|
Indian Pediatr 2016;53: 565-567 |
 |
Ready to Measure Impact? The Introduction of
Rotavirus Vaccine in India
|
* Rashmi Arora and Soumya
Swaminathan
From the Indian Council of Medical Research, Ministry
of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi, India.
Email:
[email protected]
|
I n the past few years, two live attenuated,
orally-administered rotavirus vaccines were available for Indian
children immunized by pediatricians in private practice – a monovalent
human rotavirus vaccine [RV1; Rotarix (GSK Biologicals, Rixensart,
Belgium)] and a pentavalent bovine-human reassortant vaccine [RV5;
RotaTeq (Merck and Co, Inc, Pennsylvania)] [1,2]. Initially, in 2006,
these vaccines were recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO)
for countries in regions where clinical trial data were available, but
in 2009 – following additional clinical trials in low income countries –
the WHO extended its recommendation to include rotavirus vaccines in the
routine immunization programs in all countries, and particularly in
those with high child mortality due to diarrhea [3]. However, the cost
of the vaccines was high, and with a birth cohort of 27 million, it
seemed challenging to consider the introduction of a rotavirus vaccine
for routine use in India. Yet today, a vaccination program has begun,
initially for four states, but with plans to cover the entire country
rapidly.
How did we get here? The amazing story of the Rotavac
vaccine – developed from an Indian strain by an Indian scientist,
supported by an international science community, to make and test a
vaccine in India – should serve as a paradigm for future research and
development efforts in India [4,5]. However, the policy decision to
introduce a rotavirus vaccine, also came from several other novel
features. In 2001, the Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR) and
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta, USA,
began planning a network for surveillance for rotavirus in different
parts of India. It was a slow process, but high quality data collection
began in 2005, and has been sustained for over a decade generating
information using a uniform protocol for recruitment, data collection
and testing for children hospitalized for gastroenteritis [6,7]. In over
25,000 specimens that have been collected and tested over the past ten
years, rotavirus positivity in children admitted to hospitals with
diarrhea is between 35% to 40%, indicating a very large burden of severe
disease. Additional studies also showed the devastating economic impact
of rotavirus gastroenteritis among poor families resulting in
hospitalization and catastrophic expenses [8].
At the time when these studies and the efficacy
trials of the Rotavac vaccine were being done, the two internationally
licensed vaccines became available in India following immunogenicity
bridging studies. The Indian Academy of Pediatrics reviewed the
performance of the vaccines and included them in their immunization
schedule. With this inclusion, the vaccine began to be offered and
widely used for children of parents who could use private immunization
services, but the vaccines were not available to poorer children,
because each course of vaccines cost several thousand rupees. In 2013,
the results from the phase 3 clinical trials of Rotavac became available
and demonstrated its safety and efficacy [9]. These data, along with the
very comprehensive disease burden data available through the ICMR’s
National Rotavirus Surveillance Network were presented to the National
Technical Advisory Group on Immunization [6,7,10], which made a
recommendation in 2014 for introduction of the vaccine into the national
immunization program. The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare accepted
this recommendation, procured vaccine, conducted training and begun a
early phase introduction in the states of Odisha, Andhra Pradesh,
Haryana and Himachal Pradesh, with other states to follow when feasible.
Now that India has its own rotavirus vaccine in use,
issues including performance and impact under conditions of routine use,
effectiveness against currently circulating strains, safety, and
cost-effectiveness will need to be examined. The international
experience with the two currently available oral rotavirus vaccines in
immunization programs does provide insight into the likely performance
and impact of the Rotavac vaccine in India. Since 2006, rotavirus
vaccines have been introduced in 80 countries, including several
countries in Latin America and Africa. Rotavirus vaccines have had a
large impact on mortality, hospitalizations and outpatient visits in
countries that have introduced the vaccine into their national
immunization program, including some evidence suggesting that rotavirus
vaccines may offer indirect protection to older, unvaccinated age
groups. The effect of rotavirus vaccination in reducing deaths from
childhood diarrhea in some countries in Latin America has been
remarkable, with Mexico’s introduction of vaccination in 2007 followed
by an all-cause diarrhea mortality rate decline by two-thirds compared
with the pre-vaccine baseline [11]. In other interesting findings,
researchers have seen indirect effects of rotavirus vaccines among older
children and adults, with sharp reductions in rotavirus gastroenteritis
hospitalizations in groups who did not receive vaccine [12], indicating
that young children may be the major transmitters of rotaviruses in the
community. In post-licensure efficacy studies in Africa (South Africa
and Malawi), the Rotarix vaccine at 10 and 14 weeks of age had 59%
efficacy against severe rotavirus diarrhea during the first year of life
and three doses at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age had 64% efficacy [13]. In
Malawi, efficacy was 50% for two and three dose recipients during the
first year of life, but in the second year of life, efficacy was 3% in
two dose recipients and 33% among three dose recipients. Malawi has
recently reported post-introduction effectiveness of 64% in the first
year following vaccination [14]. With Rotateq given at 6, 10, and 14
weeks of age in Africa (Ghana, Kenya, and Mali), the efficacy was 64%;
and in Asia (Bangladesh and Vietnam), the efficacy was 51% against
severe rotavirus disease during the first year of life [15,16].
Effectiveness data from Rwanda demonstrated 61-70% reduction in
rotavirus hospitalizations [17]. These post-licensure studies also
demonstrated sustained protection against a range of strains not
included in the vaccines [14,17].
An additional issue to consider is safety. Large
trials of 60,000-70,000 infants failed to detect increased risk of
intussusception following rotavirus vaccination within a month of any
dose of the two internationally licensed vaccines. However,
post-marketing surveillance has detected a small increased risk of
intussusception (1-2 excess cases per 100,000 infants vaccinated) in the
first week following the first dose of vaccine in most populations where
the vaccines have been given to several hundred-thousands of infants
with monitoring [18]. Although with the severity of rotavirus disease
and the need for management of the acute condition prevented by the
vaccine, assessments have found favorable benefit-risk ratios for
vaccination [19]; intussusception is a serious condition requiring
urgent care for which clear referral pathways must be available.
Overall, it appears likely that due to the high
rotavirus burden, the introduction of a vaccine in India will have a
significant impact on disease, protect against a wide variety of
circulating strains, and result in a decrease in the economic burden of
rotavirus in India. Studies to examine rotavirus vaccine impact and
safety using proven study designs should be conducted to help answer
many of these questions and provide support for sustained use of
rotavirus vaccine in India, and the ICMR has begun its efforts to
provide the end-to-end data for evaluation of the performance of the
vaccine in the national immunization program.
Funding: None; Competing interest: None
stated.
References
1. Ruiz-Palacios GM, Perez-Schael I, Velazquez FR,
Abate H, Breuer T, Clemens SC, et al. Safety and efficacy of an
attenuated vaccine against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis. New Engl J
Med. 2006;354:11-22.
2. Vesikari T, Matson DO, Dennehy P, Van Damme P,
Santosham M, Rodriguez Z, et al. Safety and efficacy of a
pentavalent human-bovine (WC3) reassortant rotavirus vaccine. New Engl J
Med. 2006;354:23-33.
3. No authors listed. Rotavirus vaccines. WHO
position paper – January 2013. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2013;88:49-64.
4. Bhan MK, Glass RI, Ella KM, Bhandari N, Boslego J,
Greenberg HB, et al. Team science and the creation of a novel
rotavirus vaccine in India: a new framework for vaccine development.
Lancet. 2014;383:2180-3.
5. Kang G. Rotavirus in India: forty years of
research. Indian Pediatr. 2016;53:569-73.
6. Kang G, Arora R, Chitambar SD, Deshpande J, Gupte
MD, Kulkarni M, et al. Multicenter, hospital-based surveillance
of rotavirus disease and strains among indian children aged <5 years. J
Infect Dis. 2009;20 (Suppl1):S147-53.
7. Kang G, Desai R, Arora R, Chitambar S, Naik TN,
Krishnan T, et al. Diversity of circulating rotavirus strains in
children hospitalized with diarrhea in India, 2005-2009. Vaccine
2013;31:2879-2883.
8. Sowmyanarayanan TV, Patel T, Sarkar R, Broor S,
Chitambar SD, Krishnan T, et al. Direct costs of hospitalization
for rotavirus gastroenteritis in India in different health facilities.
Indian J Med Res. 2012;136:68-73.
9. Bhandari N, Rongsen-Chandola T, Bavdekar A, John
J, Antony K, Taneja S, et al. Efficacy of a monovalent
human-bovine (116E) rotavirus vaccine in Indian infants: A randomized
double blind placebo controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;383:2136-43.
10. Mehendale S, Venkatasubramanian S, Girish Kumar
CP, Kang G, Gupte MD, Arora R. Expanded Indian National Rotavirus
Surveillance Network in the context of rotavirus vaccine introduction.
Indian Pediatr. 2016;53:575-81.
11. Richardson V, Hernandez-Pichardo J,
Quintanar-Solares M, Esparza-Aguilar M, Johnson B, Gomez-Altamirano CM,
et al. Effect of rotavirus vaccination on death from childhood
diarrhea in Mexico. New Engl J Med. 2010;362:299-305.
12. Rha B, Tate JE, Payne DC, Cortese MM, Lopman BA,
Curns AT, et al. Effectiveness and impact of rotavirus vaccines
in the United States - 2006-2012. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2014;13:365-76.
13. Madhi SA, Cunliffe NA, Steele D, Witte D, Kirsten
M, Louw C, et al. Effect of human rotavirus vaccine on severe
diarrhea in African infants. New Engl J Med. 2010;362: 289-98.
14. Bar-Zeev N, Kapanda L, Tate JE, Jere KC,
Iturriza-Gomara M, Nakagomi O, et al. Effectiveness of a
monovalent rotavirus vaccine in infants in Malawi after programmatic
roll-out: an observational and case-control study. Lancet Infect Dis.
2015;15:422-8.
15. Armah GE, Sow SO, Breiman RF, Dallas MJ, Tapia
MD, Feikin DR, et al. Efficacy of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine
against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis in infants in developing
countries in sub-Saharan Africa: A randomised, double-blind,
placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376:606-14.
16. Zaman K, Dang DA, Victor JC, Shin S, Yunus M,
Dallas MJ, et al. Efficacy of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine
against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis in infants in developing
countries in Asia: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Lancet. 2010;376:615-23.
17. Ngabo F, Tate JE, Gatera M, Rugambwa C, Donnen P,
Lepage P, et al. Effect of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine
introduction on hospital admissions for diarrhoea and rotavirus in
children in Rwanda: A time-series analysis. Lancet Glob Health.
2016;4:e129-36.
18. Shui IM, Baggs J, Patel M, Parashar UD, Rett M,
Belongia EA, et al. Risk of intussusception following
administration of a pentavalent rotavirus vaccine in US infants. J Am
Med Assoc. 2012;307:598-604.
19. Desai R, Cortese MM, Meltzer MI, Shankar M, Tate
JE, Yen C, et al. Potential intussusception risk versus benefits
of rotavirus vaccination in the United States. Pediatr Infect Dis J.
2013;32:1-7.
|
|
 |
|