|
Indian Pediatr 2014;51: 583 -584 |
|
Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Children with
Acute Myocarditis and/or Early Dilated Cardiomyopathy
|
Amarendra N Prasad and Sanjay Chaudhary
Command Hospital, Chandimandir, Panchkula (Haryana),
India.
Email: [email protected]
|
We retrospectively studied medical
records of all children with acute myocarditis and/or early DCM admitted
to the Pediatric Critical Care Unit of our hospital between January 2010
and December 2012 were reviewed. 28 patients were included in the study,
of which 12 were treated with IVIG (1 g/kg per day) for two days. The
patients who received IVIG therapy had a higher left ventricular
ejection fraction and a reduced left ventricular end diastolic diameter
six months after treatment, as compared to children who had not received
IVIG (P<0.001 and P=0.002, respectively).
Keywords: Cardiomyopathy,
Management, Myocarditis, Outcome, Steroid.
|
Acute myocarditis is defined as inflammation of the myocardium, leading
to the sudden onset of heart failure, arrhythmia, fulminant hemodynamic
collapse and sudden mortality [1]. They may lead to dilated
cardiomyopathy (DCM) and cardiac dysfunction, with serious and lethal
consequences. This retrospective study was performed to evaluate the
effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) on the cardiac function and
cardiac rhythm of children with acute myocarditis and/or early DCM.
This was a retrospective analysis of case records of
children who presented with acute myocarditis and/or early DCM and
admitted in pediatric critical care unit of our tertiary hospital
between January 2010 and December 2012. Inclusion criteria were children
(age <12 y), acute onset (duration <3 months) congestive heart failure
and impaired left ventricular function (On echocardiography, either a
left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)
£0.45,
left-ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDD) of >2 SD above the norm,
or a shortening fraction (SF) >2 SD below the mean) following a recent
viral illness. Patients with structural heart disease, Kawasaki disease
and other specific causes of acute cardiomyopathy were excluded. The
study was approved by the Ethics committee of the hospital. Data were
collected through patient chart review. Searches were screened and data
extracted independently by two reviewers. Quality was assessed by two
reviewers using the Jadad scale.
The patients were divided into IVIG therapy and non-
IVIG therapy (control) groups. Data analysis of laboratory tests
including blood levels of myocardial enzymes, troponin, and C reactive
protein; other investigations including electrocardiography, chest X-ray
and echocardiography were performed prior to and following treatment.
Gender, age, cardiac function classification, parameters of
echocardiography, blood test data and incidence of complications were
compared between the two groups. Echocardiography data was analyzed for
by standard methodology. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF),
diameter of the left atrium (LA), left ventricular end diastolic
diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular systolic diameter (LVSD), diameter of
the right atrium (RA) and diameter of the right ventricle (RV) were
analyzed. The recovery of left ventricular function was assessed in
hospital and post-treatment at 3 and 6 months. IVIG was administered at
a dose of 1 gm/kg per day for two days. Other conventional therapies
were administered as required in both groups. The primary outcome was
survival. Secondary outcomes measures were improve-ment in LVEF and
LVEDD on echocardiography; and incidence of fatal cardiac arrythmias.
All statistical analyses were performed with the Statistical Package for
Social Sciences version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
A total of 35 children were initially eligible for
the study; however, 7 were excluded due to insufficient clinical
data/non comparable factors. Twenty-eight children were ultimately
included. Of these, 12 patients, (7 males) had received treatment with
IVIG (1gm/kg per day) for two days, while the remaining 16 patients (9
males) had not received IVIG therapy. At baseline, children of the two
groups did not differ significantly with regard to the echocardiographic
data of left ventricular function i.e. LVEF and LVEDD. At both
three months and six months post-treatment, the mean LVEF and LVDD in
the IVIG group was significantly better than control group (P=0.003).
The LVEF of both groups had improved significantly at 6 months; however,
children treated with IVIG had a significantly higher LVEF than those
without IVIG. The episodes of ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation and
atrioventricular block were reduced significantly in the IVIG group.
There were two mortalities in the IVIG therapy group and seven in the
non IVIG therapy group (P=0.032).
Previous studies have indicated the therapeutic
effects of the high dose IVIG in acute myocarditis. [2-7]. High dose
IVIG is commonly used at dosage of 1gm/kg/day for 2 days [5,8]. However,
evidence from Cochrane collaboration review of 2010, based on one trial
did not support the use of IVIG for the management of adults with
presumed viral myocarditis, and observed that there are no randomized
pediatric trials [8]. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) suggested that
IVIG did not augment the improvement in LVEF for 62 patients with recent
onset dilated cardiomyopathy [9]. We observed that IVIG therapy improved
the outcome in such patients. The retrospective nature of the study, no
comparison of baseline clinical data of patients, and non-availability
of reasons for starting IVIG were the shortcoming of this study.
In conclusion, this study suggests that IVIG for the
treatment of acute myocarditis and/or early dilated cardiomyopathy is
associated with improved recovery of left ventricular function and a
reduction in the episodes of fulminant arrhythmias.
Contributors: ANP, SC: were responsible
for the clinical work; ANP: compiled the data, statistical
analysis and drafted the manuscript. He will act as guarantor.
Funding: None; Competing interests: None
stated.
References
1. Magnani JW, Dec GW. Myocarditis: current trends in
diagnosis and treatment. Circulation. 2006;113:876 90.
2. Drucker NA, Colan SD, Lewis AB, Beiser AS, Wessel
DL, Takahashi M, et al. Gamma globulin treatment of acute
myocarditis in the pediatric population. Circulation. 1994;89:252 7.
3. Gullestad L, Aass H, Fjeld JG, Wikeby L,
Andreassen AK, Ihlen H, et al. Immunomodulating therapy
with intravenous immunoglobulin in patients with chronic heart failure.
Circulation. 2001;103:220 5.
4. Yu DQ, Wang Y, Ma GZ, Xu RH, Cai ZX, Ni CM, et
al. Intravenous immunoglobulin in the therapy of adult acute
fulminant myocarditis: A retrospective study. Experim Therap Med.
2014;7:97-102.
5. McNamara DM, Rosenblum WD, Janosko KM, Trost MK, Villaneuva
FS, Demetris AJ, et al. Intravenous immune globulin in the
therapy of myocarditis and acute cardiomyopathy. Circulation.
1997;95:2476 8.
6. Tedeschi A, Airaghi L, Giannini S, Ciceri L, Massari
FM. High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of
acute myocarditis. A case report and review of the literature. J Intern
Med. 2002;251:169-73.
7. Kim HS, Sohn S, Park JY, Seo JW. Fulminant
myocarditis successfully treated with high-dose immunoglobulin. Int J
Cardiol. 2004;96:485-6.
8. Robinson J, Hartling L, Vandermeer B, Klassen TP.
Intravenous immunoglobulin for presumed viral myocarditis in children
and adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;1:CD004370.
9. McNamara DM, Holubkov R, Starling RC, Dec GW, Loh
E, Torre-Amione G, et al. Controlled trial of intravenous immune
globulin in recent onset dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation.
2001;103:2254 9.
|
|
|
|