|
Indian Pediatr 2014;51: 569-570 |
|
Iodine Deficiency Status Amongst School
Children in Pauri, Uttarakhand
|
Umesh Kapil, RM Pandey, S Prakash, N Sareen and AS Bhadoria
From Department of Human Nutrition, All India
Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Correspondence to: Dr Umesh Kapil, Department of Human
Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New
Delhi 110 029, India.
Email: [email protected]
Received: February 24, 2014;
Initial review: April 21, 2014;
Accepted: May 12, 2014.
|
Objective: To assess the iodine deficiency status amongst school
age children in district Pauri, Uttarakhand. Methods: 2067
children (age of 6-12 years) were included. Clinical examination of
thyroid gland of each child was conducted. On-the-spot urine and
salt samples were collected from children. Results: Total
Goitre Rate was found to be 16.8% and median Urinary Iodine
Concentration level was 115 µg/L. Only 40.4% of salt samples had
e 15 ppm of iodine. Conclusion: There is a mild degree of
iodine deficiency in school age children in district Pauri. There is
a need of strengthening the National Iodine Deficiency Disorder
Control Program.
Keywords: Goiter, India, Iodine
deficiency, Survey.
|
I n India, 200 million people are exposed to the
risk of Iodine Deficiency and more than 71 million suffer from goitre
and other iodine deficiency disorders (IDD) [1-3]. Iodine deficiency is
a major public health problem in Uttarakhand, India. In 1962, the
National Goitre Control Programme was launched in eight hilly districts
(Uttarkashi, Chamoli, Pithoragarh, Tehri Garhwal, Pauri Garhwal,
Dehradun, Nainital, and Almora) – and in Bijnor district – in
Uttarakhand [4]. In State of Uttarakhand – according to NFHS-3 survey –
46% households were using iodized salt with iodine content of 15 ppm or
more [5].
The present study was conducted in year 2012 to
assess the status of iodine deficiency amongst school-age children in
district Pauri, Uttarakhand.
Methods
This was a cross-sectional school-based study
including children in age group of 6-12 years. School enrolment of
primary classes was more than 90% and hence school based approach was
adopted to cover the children. All primary schools in rural and urban
area in the district were enlisted. The 30 clusters were identified
using Probability Proportional to Size (PPS) methodology [6]. In each
school, all children in the age group of 6-12 years were enlisted and 69
children were identified using random number table. The children were
briefed about the objectives of the study and informed consent was
taken. Clinical examination of the thyroid was conducted for all the
enrolled children by trained research team members. The grading of
goitre was done as per the criteria recommended by WHO/UNICEF/ICCIDD.
When in doubt, the immediate lower grade was recorded. The intra-and
inter-observer variation was controlled by repeated training and random
examinations of goitre grades by first author. The sum of grades 1 and 2
provided the Total Goitre Rate (TGR) of the study population [6]. From
each cluster, casual urine samples were collected from 19 children
selected randomly. Plastic bottles with screw caps were provided to
children for the urine samples. The samples were stored in the
refrigerator until analysis. Salt samples were also collected from 19
children selected randomly from each cluster. The urinary iodine
concentration (UIC) levels were analyzed using the wet digestion method
[7]. The iodine content of salt samples was analyzed by standard
Iodometric Titration (IT) method [8].
A pooled urine sample was prepared for internal
quality control (IQC) assessment. The IQC sample was analyzed 30 times
and mean and standard deviation (SD) of this pooled sample was
calculated. The IQC samples of known concentration of iodine content
were run with every batch of study urine samples. If the results of the
IQC samples were within the range (mean ± 2SD) then the urine sample
results of the study subjects were deemed valid. However, if the results
were outside the range of IQC sample, then the whole batch of the study
subjects was repeated [9].
The study was approved by ethical committee of All
India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.
With anticipated prevalence of 15%, absolute precision
of ± 2.0, confidence level 95% and a design effect of 1.5, we required
minimum of 1837 children for assessment of iodine deficiency amongst
school age children.
Results
A total of 2067 children (49.1% boys) were included.
The TGR was found to be 16.8%.
A total of 580 random samples of urine were
collected. The median UIC level was 115 µg/L. The percentage of children
who had UIC levels 20-49, 50-99, 100-199 and
³200 µg/L were: 25.3,
17.2, 34.0 and 23.5 percent, respectively. No child had UIC level <20
µg/L.
A total of 562 salt samples were collected. Only
40.4% of the children were consuming salt with iodine of
³15 ppm.
Discussion
It has been recommended that if more than 5% school
age children (6-12 yrs) are suffering from goiter, the area should be
classified as endemic to iodine deficiency [6]. A TGR of 16.8% signifies
that mild iodine deficiency existed in the population included in the
study. The median UIC level of 115 µg/L indicates that there was no
biochemical deficiency of iodine in the subjects studied.
We could not compare our results with earlier studies
as there is lack of scientific data on status of iodine deficiency in
district Pauri. Findings suggest that population of Pauri
district is in a transition phase from iodine deficient to iodine
sufficient. Elimination of IDD from district Pauri can be achieved by
continued and sustained supply of iodized salt with adequate quantity of
iodine to the entire population.
Contributors: UK: conception and design,
preparation and finalization of manuscript, overall scientific
management; RMP and conception and design, data analysis and
interpretation; NS and ASD: Conception and design, data collection,
preparation and finalization of manuscript.
Funding: Indian Council of Medical Research, New
Delhi; Competing interests: None stated.
References
1. Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS).
Policy Guidelines on National Iodine Deficiency Disorders Con-trol
Programme, New Delhi: DGHS, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare,
Government of India; 2006.p.1-10.
2. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW).
Annual Report 2004-2005. New Delhi: MOHFW.
3. Workshop. Health Policy Issues and Health
Programme in Uttaranchal. Mussorie 2002. Department of Health and Family
Welfare. Government of Uttaranchal, Dehradun.
4. Kapil U. National Nutrition Programmes in India.
In: Mehta MN, Kulkarni M, editors. Child Nutrition – The Indian
Scene. Bombay. Sai Creation and Advertising Co. Printing
Press,1991;p.78-107.
5. International Institute for Population Sciences
(IIPS) and Macro International, 2008. National Family Health Survey
(NFHS-3), India, 2005-06: Uttarakhand. Mumbai: IIPS.
6. Assessment of Iodine Deficiency Disorders and
Moni-toring Their Elimination. A Guide for Programme Managers.
WHO/UNICEF/ICCIDD. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2007.
7. Dunn JT, Crutchfield HE, Gutekunst R, Dunn D.
Methods for Measuring Iodine in Urine. A joint publication of
WHO/UNICEF/ICCIDD;1993;p.18-23.
8. Karmarkar MG, Pandav CS, Krishnamachari KAVR.
Principle and Procedure for Iodine Estimation- A Labo-ratory Manual.
Indian Council of Medical Research. New Delhi: ICMR Press; 1986:1-17.
9. Westgard JO, Barry PL, Hunt MR. A multi-rule
Shewhart Chart for quality control in clinical chemistry. Clin Chem.
1981;27:493-501.
|
|
|
|