Correspondence Indian Pediatrics 2007; 44:3548-549 |
|||||||||||
Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) |
|||||||||||
It is often difficult to ascribe ‘cause and effect’ in case of ADR, but it should be objectively assessed and presented based on an acceptable ‘Probability Scale’. The ‘Naranjo ADR Probability Scale’ is an internationally accepted one, by which ADR can be classified into highly probable, probable or doubtful(2). The scale is summarized in Table I. It is desirable to use an objective scale and document and report ADR in a systematic way for future reference. Table I Naranjo ADR Probability Scale–Items and Score
Interpretation; >9 = highly probable; >5 - 8 = probable; > 1 - 4 = possible; £ 0 = doubtful Elizabeth K.E., References
Dr. Elizabeth has raised a valid issue regarding criteria for assessing ADRs. The widespread use of the Naranjo ADR Probability Scale (NADRPS) by journals assessing manuscripts submitted for publication as case reports, suggest that although no perfect solution exists for clinicians seeking to assess the likelihood of ADRs, this scale does provide a somewhat structured basis for assessment in a standardized and relatively reproducible format. However, several of the questions in NADRPS are difficult to apply. In some situations the scale requires modification to improve reliability, validity, and clinical usefulness(1). And more often than not, using NADRPS, we are only able to confirm that the cause and effect is either ‘possible’ or ‘probable’(2). Another drawback of the scale is that even if none of the criteria are met, the cause and effect is categorised as ‘doubtful’ making it difficult to categorically rule out the possibility of ADR in any given case. But, because its inter-rater reproducibility is good, IP also would use this scale while reviewing articles related to ADRs. Studies employing a computerized monitoring system to analyse laboratory data using the NADRPS or other suitably modified criteria have found that the detection rate of ADRs may almost be doubled(3). Automatic generation of laboratory signals when an ADR is developing helps in early identification, reduction of morbidity, hospital stay, and treatment costs. The staff in the process get tuned to suspecting an ADR. Jeeson Unni, References
|