Zubair Kabir
From the University of Dublin (Trinity College),
CResT Directorate, St. James’s Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
Correspondence to: Dr. Zubair Kabir, CResT
Directorate, St. James’s Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland. E-Mail:
[email protected]
Manuscript received: June 6, 2002; Initial review
completed: July 15, 2002;
Revision accepted: January 7, 2003.
Abstract:
The demographic and socio-economic determinants
of post-neonatal deaths (n = 475) in a special project area of rural
northern India (Ballabgarh) were ascertained from 1991 to 1999 using
the electronic database system of the project area for data
extraction, and were compared with the eligible living children of
the same age using a matched population-based case-control study
design. Similar determinants were also ascertained in neonatal
deaths (n = 212) using the same study design. After controlling for
the potential confounders using conditional logistic regression
analyses, lower caste (a proxy measure for low socio-economic
conditions in rural India) was found to be significantly associated
with higher post-neonatal deaths (OR = 2.21). Higher maternal age
(>30 years) and fathers’ lower educational levels were significantly
associated with higher neonatal deaths, in addition to higher
post-neonatal deaths in the same area.
Key words: Case-control study, India, Neonatal
death, Post-neonatal death.
The All India Institute of Medical Sciences runs
a Comprehensive Rural Health Services Project (CRHSP) in rural
Ballabgarh of northern India. Child mortality rates in this project
area were lower than the national rural child mortality rates during
1991-1999, but post-neonatal mortality rates are similar to the
national rural average(1). The proportions of post-neonatal deaths
contributing to overall infant deaths are also higher in the project
area, because of a proportionate greater decline in neonatal
deaths(2).
The project area has a high vaccination uptake
among children aged 12-23 months (more than 90% for each of the six
antigens: BCG, DTP, OPV and measles) consistently sustained from
1990 onwards(2,3). This observation probably suggests adequate
utilization of the existing health care services in the project
area. However, it would be interesting to observe any underlying
demo-graphic and socio-economic differentials across the
populations, possibly contributing to a slower decline in
post-neonatal death rates in this project area. The present study
set out to ascertain the demographic and socio- economic
determinants of post-neonatal deaths between January 1st 1991 and
December 31st 1999, and to compare these determinants with those of
neonatal deaths during the same period in this project area.
Subjects and Methods
In 1999, there were two primary health centers (PHCs)
in CRHSP area each catering for about 37,000 people across 28
villages. Ten multipurpose health workers (male and female)
delivered health services in the community. The multipurpose health
workers registered births and deaths during routine domiciliary
visits. In addition to continuous collection of routine
socio-demographic data, the health workers conduct a census in May
and June each year. All the available socio-demographic data,
including births and deaths from the two PHCs, are entered into an
electronic database system from 1987 to date(2).
Health supervisors randomly select 20% of
households and crosscheck the information collected. In addition,
the medical officers in the two PHCs crosscheck the data for
completeness and accuracy in another 5% of households. This rigorous
nature of data verification indicates the reliability and accuracy
of the electronic database, although no objective validation of such
data was undertaken in recent past. After initial verification, the
electronic database was found to have complete information from 1991
onwards.
In April and May 2000, a population-based matched
case-control study was conducted. The study population comprised
children aged 0-365 days old from 1991 to 1999, as recorded in the
electronic database system of the project area. Cases were "all"
neonatal deaths (less than 28 days old) and "all" post-neonatal
deaths (28-365 days old) between January 1st 1991 and December 31st
1999. The controls were living children, who were randomly selected
from the CRHSP area, using a rigorous computerized matching
programme specially written for the study objective, from a cohort
of 17,500 eligible children children aged 0-365 days born between
January 1st 1991 and December 31st 1999, as recorded in the
electronic database. The controls were matched for age (date of
birth of cases with 15 days deviation), gender and village on an
individual basis, which was possible using the specialized
computerized matching programme. A total of 475 post-neonatal and
212 neonatal matched pairs were recurited for the final analysis.
The available demographic and socio-economic variables (caste, age,
literacy, occupational status of parents and the number of living
children in households), as recorded in the electronic database were
collected for each case and control.
Conditional logistic regression analysis was done
using SAS software(4). Both adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios
(OR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were calculated. Reference
categories were based on the most favourable outcome with regard to
exposure status. The Trinity College Public Health Ethics Committee,
Dublin and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
provided ethical approval for this study.
Results
Table I shows that post-neonatal deaths after
adjustment were significantly higher when these socio-economic and
demographic determinants were present: lower caste (OR = 2.21),
middle caste (OR = 1.61), maternal age of more than thirty years (OR
= 4.32), fathers’ aged less than 25 years or between 25 and 35 years
(ORs = 3.78 and 3.05, respectively). Fathers’ with schooling of less
than five years (OR = 1.72) were also significantly associated with
a higher likelihood of post-neonatal deaths. The maternal age of
less than 20 years was protective of post-neonatal deaths (OR =
0.49), as well as fathers who were involved in trading (OE = 0.57).
Table I
Socio-economic and demographic determinants of the post-neonatal deaths.
Variables
|
Cases
No (%)
|
Controls
No (%)
|
OR (95% CI)
(Unadjusted)
|
OR (95% CI)
(Adjusted)
|
Mothers’ age |
<20
|
19 (4)
|
44 (9)
|
0.57 (0.32, 1.01)
|
0.49 (0.26, 0.94)
|
20-30
|
289 (61)
|
346 (73)
|
Reference
|
Reference
|
>30
|
167 (35)
|
85 (18)
|
2.36 (1,70, 3.28)
|
4.32 (2.49, 7.49)
|
Fathers’ age |
<25
|
106 (22)
|
136 (29)
|
0.63 (0.41, 0.98)
|
3.78 (1.79, 7.99)
|
25-35
|
293 (62)
|
276 (58)
|
0.85 (0.58, 1.24)
|
3.05 (1.64, 5.65)
|
>35
|
76 (16)
|
63 (13)
|
Reference
|
Reference
|
Caste (a proxy for socio-economic status)
|
Lower
|
200 (42)
|
132 (28)
|
2.12 (1.53, 2.93)
|
2.21 (1.53, 3.18)
|
Middle
|
104 (22)
|
121 (25)
|
1.22 (0.84, 1.78)
|
1.61 (1.05, 2.45)
|
Upper
|
171 (36)
|
222 (47)
|
Reference
|
Reference
|
Mothers’ literacy skills |
No schooling
|
378 (79)
|
349 (73)
|
1.51 (1.10, 2.06)
|
0.99 (0.68, 1.46)
|
Just literate
|
97 (21)
|
126 (27)
|
Reference
|
Reference
|
Fathers’ educational levels |
No school
|
113 (24)
|
79 (17)
|
2.21 (1.51, 3.23)
|
1.53 (0.97, 2.43)
|
Schooling <5 yrs
|
209 (44)
|
179 (38)
|
1.78 (1.31, 2.41)
|
1.72 (1.20, 2.46)
|
Schooling >5 yrs
|
153 (32)
|
127 (46)
|
Reference
|
Reference
|
Mothers’ occupation |
Non working
|
436 (92)
|
429 (90)
|
1.20 (0.77, 1.88)
|
1.33 (0.76, 2.32)
|
Working
|
39 (8)
|
48 (10)
|
Reference
|
Reference
|
Fathers’ occupation |
Agriculture
|
184 (39)
|
149 (31)
|
Reference
|
Reference
|
Service
|
137 (29)
|
138 (29)
|
0.79 (0.57, 1.10)
|
0.81 (0.55, 1.19)
|
Traders
|
53 (11)
|
66 (14)
|
0.64 (0.42, 0.97)
|
0.57 (0.36, 0.91)
|
Unskilled
|
57 (12)
|
46 (10)
|
0.96 (0.61, 1.51)
|
1.03 (0.62, 1.72)
|
Others
|
44 (9)
|
74 (16)
|
0.43 (0.27, 0.69)
|
0.57 (0.34, 0.97)
|
Number of living children |
One
|
95 (20)
|
140 (29)
|
Reference
|
Reference
|
Two
|
100 (21)
|
113 (24)
|
1.36 (0.92, 2.02)
|
1.11 (0.71, 1.74)
|
Three
|
88 (18)
|
82 (17)
|
1.56 (1.05, 2.31)
|
1.23 (0.76, 1.99)
|
Four
|
68 (14)
|
58 (12)
|
1.74 (1.12, 2.70)
|
1.08 (0.61, 1.90)
|
>/=5
|
124 (27)
|
82 (18)
|
2.28 (1.53, 3.39)
|
1.10 (0.61, 1.99)
|
Table II shows that neonatal deaths after
adjustment were significantly higher in mothers’ older than 30 years
(OR = 3.83), and in fathers’ with schooling of less than five years
(OR = 2.28). Young mothers’ less than 20 years were protective of
neonatal deaths (OR = 0.39), as well as in households having two
living siblings (OR = 0.46).
Table II
Socio-economic and demographic determinants of the neonatal deaths.
Variables
|
Cases
No (%)
|
Controls
No (%)
|
OR (95% CI)
(Unadjusted)
|
OR (95% CI)
(Adjusted)
|
Mothers’ age |
<20
|
22 (10)
|
32 (15)
|
0.74 (0.40, 1.37)
|
0.39 (0.17, 0.88)
|
20-30
|
126 (59)
|
156 (33)
|
Reference
|
Reference
|
>30
|
64 (31)
|
24 (12)
|
3.34 (1.91, 5.85)
|
3.83 (1.63, 9.02)
|
Fathers’ age |
<25
|
70 (33)
|
69 (32)
|
0.34 (0.16, 0.72)
|
1.87 (0.56, 6.19)
|
25-35
|
107 (50)
|
132 (62)
|
0.26 (0.13, 0.56)
|
0.92 (0.33, 2.55)
|
>35
|
35 (17)
|
11 (6)
|
Reference
|
Reference
|
Caste (a proxy for socio-economic
status) |
Lower
|
59 (28)
|
68 (32)
|
0.71 (0.43, 1.19)
|
0.86 (0.47, 1.57)
|
Middle
|
45 (21)
|
47 (22)
|
0.77 (0.42, 1.40)
|
1.33 (0.64, 2.76)
|
Upper
|
108 (51)
|
97 (46)
|
Reference
|
Reference
|
Mothers’ literacy skills |
No schooling
|
151 (71)
|
143 (67)
|
1.41 (0.91, 2.19)
|
1.06 (0.59, 1.88)
|
Just literate
|
61 (29)
|
69 (33)
|
Reference
|
Reference
|
Fathers’ educational levels |
No school
|
47 (22)
|
21 (10)
|
3.64 (1.90, 6.94)
|
1.63 (0.94, 2.81)
|
Schooling <5 yrs
|
97 (46)
|
91 (43)
|
1.67 (1.08, 2.59)
|
2.28 (1.02, 5.10)
|
Schooling >5 yrs
|
68 (32)
|
100 (47)
|
Reference
|
Reference
|
Mothers’ occupation |
Non working
|
196 (92)
|
200 (94)
|
0.75 (0.35, 1.58)
|
0.83 (0.34, 2.02)
|
Working
|
16 (8)
|
12 (6)
|
Reference
|
Reference
|
Fathers’ occupation |
Agriculture
|
84 (40)
|
73 (34)
|
Reference
|
Reference
|
Service
|
62 (30)
|
70 (33)
|
0.75 (0.47, 1.20)
|
1.00 (0.58, 1.75)
|
Traders
|
26 (12)
|
27 (13)
|
0.80 (0.41, 1.56)
|
0.91 (0.42, 1.94)
|
Unskilled
|
20 (9)
|
9 (4)
|
1.90 (0.79, 4.54)
|
2.09 (0.78, 5.59)
|
Others
|
20 (9)
|
33 (16)
|
0.53 (0.28, 1.02)
|
0.76 (0.34, 1.73)
|
Number of living children |
One
|
60 (28)
|
59 (27)
|
Reference
|
Reference
|
Two
|
34 (16)
|
59 (27)
|
0.59 (0.34, 1.03)
|
0.46 (0.24, 0.88)
|
Three
|
37 (17)
|
41 (19)
|
0.93 (0.53, 1.65)
|
0.75 (0.37, 1.53)
|
Four
|
31 (15)
|
24 (11)
|
1.29 (0.67, 2.51)
|
0.80 (0.35, 1.82)
|
>/=5
|
50 (24)
|
29 (14)
|
1.93 (1.02, 3.64)
|
0.86 (0.37, 1.98)
|
Discussion
The findings indicate that demographic variable
(parental age), and socio-economic variables (caste and fathers’
level of education), are significant determinants of a higher
likelihood of post-neonatal deaths in the CRHSP area from 1991 to
1999. The maternal age and fathers’ educational levels are also
significant determinants of higher neonatal deaths in the project
area during the same study period. The major strength of this study
design is minimisation of selection bias in the study sample,
because of a rigorous computerized matching programme. The greatest
limitation of the study is that only those variables recorded in the
electronic database were available for analysis. Hence, the
possibility of confounding in the study findings is more likely,
because of the unmeasured factors(5).
The study included ‘all’ neonatal and ‘all’
post-neonatal deaths from 1991 to 1999, as recorded in the
electronic database, and hence no formal sample size calculation was
done. However, the power of this study is more likely to be greater
than 80%, based on an expected OR of two with an alpha level of 0.05
and an allowance of 25% for con-founding(6,7). Hence, the findings
are less likely to have occurred by chance.
The variable lower caste can be used as a proxy
measure for low socio-economic conditions in rural India(6,8).
Post-neonatal deaths are twice more likely in families belonging to
lower caste, indicating the role of underlying poverty prevalent in
this society. This observation is also reflective of the underlying
slower decline in post-neonatal deaths in the project from 1991 to
1999(1). Interestingly, post-neonatal death rate was used as an
index for general poverty in study in the United Kingdom(9).
Nonetheless, further explorations are necessary to test this
hypothesis of using post-neonatal mortality as an adequate summary
measure for population health.
Unlike other studies(10,11) mothers’ literacy
status did not influence both the neonatal and post-neontal
mortality. In contrast, the fathers’ educational levels influenced
both the outcomes.
A higher likelihood of neonatal deaths in older
mothers (more than 30 years), suggest that obstetric factors are
more likely to influence this observation. Perinatal risk
factors(12), such as pre-term birth, birth asphyxia, low birth
weight and congenital anomalies are relatively common in older
mothers, and these are the common causes for neonatal deaths in the
project area, as reported recently(2). The probable causes for
observed higher post-neonatal deaths in older mothers’ and younger
fathers’ are, however, difficult to explain.
Younger mothers in the project area have a
protective effect on both neonatal and post-neonatal deaths that may
partly be explained by strong family ties and extended parental
support to young pregnant women, consistent with findings
elsewhere(13). Parental occupational status and large family size
are not significant determinants of both neonatal and post-neonatal
deaths in this population.
In conclusion, the study findings demonstrate
that lower caste (a proxy measure for low socio-economic conditions)
is an important socio-economic determinant of post-neonatal deaths
in the project area that needs to be addressed for a possible
greater decline in post-neonatal death rates in the future. In
addition, maternal age and fathers’ educational levels influencing
signifi-cantly on both neonatal and post-neonatal deaths merit
attention for future child survival interventions in these groups of
the society.
Acknowledgements
Technical support of Mr. Guresh Kumar for the
computerized matching program; and assistance from Professors V.P.
Reddaiah, S.K. Kapoor and Dr. K. Anand for providing me with data of
Comprehensive Rural Health Services Project, All India Institute of
Medical Sciences, New Delhi, is acknowledged. I also thank Professor
John Kevany and Dr. Jean Long at the Department of Community Health
& General Practice of Trinity College (Dublin) for assistance in my
M.Sc. project design, and Dr. Kathleen Bennett at St. James’s
Hospital (Dublin) for the conditional logistic regression analyses.
Funding: Ireland Aid Program, Department of
Foreign Affairs (Ireland).
Competing interests: The author (ZK) was a Medical Officer in
the Ballabgarh Project Area prior to his joining the M.Sc. program.
This study is a re-analysis of data collected during my M.Sc.
program at the University of Dublin (1999).
Key
Messages |
• Lower caste (a proxy measure for low socio-economic conditions
in rural India) is significantly associated with higher
post-neonatal deaths.
• Higher maternal age (>30 years) and fathers’ lower
educational levels are significantly associated with both higher
neonatal and post-neonatal deaths.
|
|
1. Kabir Z, Long J. Child mortality rates in
rural India: an experience from the Ballabgarh project. J Trop
Pediatr 2002; 48: 178-180.
2. Anand K, Kant S, Kumar G, Kapoor SK.
Development is not essential to reduce infant mortality in
India: experience from the Ballabgarh project. J Epidemiol
Community Health 2000; 54: 247-253.
3. Anand K, Kant S, Kumar G, Kapoor SK.
Thirty year trend (1967-1996) in prevalence of poliomyelitis and
vaccine coverage in Ballab-garh, Haryana, India. J Epidemiol
Community Health 1998; 52: 823-825.
4. Statistical Analysis System (SAS)
Institute Inc (version 8e). Cary (USA), 1990.
5. Hirve S, Ganatra B. A prospective cohort
study on the survival experience of under five children in rural
western India. Indian Pediatr 1997; 34: 995-1001.
6. Kabir Z, Long J, Reddaiah VP, Kevany J,
Kapoor SK. Non-specific effect of measles vaccination on overall
child mortality in an area of rural India with high vaccination
coverage: a population-based case-control study. Bul World
Health Org (in press).
7. Cousens SN, Mertens TE, Kirkwood BR, Smith
PG, Feachem RGA. In: Case-control studies of common
childhood diseases: the example of diarrhea. London: Macmillan
Education Ltd; 1995; pp. 124-127.
8. Kabir Z. The relationship between primary
immunization and child mortality (1991-1999) in rural India: A
case-control study. (MSc dissertation). Dublin: University of
Dublin (Trinity College), 2000.
9. Swedlow AJ, dos Santos Silva I.
Geographical distribution of lung and stomach cancers in England
and Wales over 50 years: changing and unchanging patterns. Br J
Cancer 1991; 63: 773-781.
10. Kumar G, Anand K, Kant S, Kapoor SK.
Scale for identification of ‘at risk’ families for under-five
deaths. Indian J Pediatr 2000: 67: 411-417.
11. Rajna PN, Mishra AK, Krishnamoorthy S.
Impact of maternal education and health services on child
mortality in Uttar Pradesh, India. Asia Pac Popul J 1998; 13:
27-38.
12. National Neonatology Forum. National
neonatal-perinatal database: report for the year 1995. New
Delhi, Department of Pediatrics, AIIMS, 1996.
13. Grijibovski A, Bygren LO, Svartbo B. Socio-demographic
determinants of poor infant outcome in north-west Russia.
Pediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2002; 16: 255-262.
|