|
Indian Pediatr 2021;58:
93 |
 |
Acute Flaccid Myelitis: Are We Vigilant Enough?
|
Priyanka Madaan and Lokesh Saini*
Pediatric Neurology Division, Department of
Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatric Centre, PGIMER, Chandigarh,
India.
Email:
[email protected]
|
With the eradication of poliomyelitis from most countries, acute flaccid
myelitis (AFM) due to non-polio enteroviruses and other viruses is an
emerging disease. Besides the vaccine-associated paralytic polio, AFM
outbreaks due to other viruses are also a hazard. AFM comprises of
patients with acute flaccid paralysis (AFP), characteristically
asymmetric limb weakness, with MRI suggestive of a spinal cord lesion in
grey matter and spanning one or more vertebral segments [1]. Over the
last decade, multiple outbreaks have been reported from countries such
as USA, European countries, and Japan [1]. Two outbreaks have already
been reported from India [2,3]. However, the pathogen testing was
limited and inconclusive in both the cohorts. Even with ongoing AFP
surveillance, AFM has not been frequently reported from India. Similar
to Australia, we believe that there is misdiagnosis and
under-recognition of AFM. During the initial disease course, AFM is
frequently misdiagnosed as transverse myelitis due to an often extensive
involvement of the spinal cord, not classically limited to the grey
matter of the spinal cord [5]. Hence, there is a need for creating
awareness regarding this evolving entity.
With many viruses involved such as EVD68, EVA71, etc.
and poor yield of pathogen testing, it is often difficult to establish
causality for AFM [1-3]. Therefore, it is time that patients with AFP
should also be tested for other viruses beyond the poliovirus. This can
later help in strengthening the AFP surveillance system. Survey studies
for non-polio AFM throughout the country may be an initial step in this
aspect, in the absence of active ongoing surveillance. However, the
surveys need to be more robust to capture the epidemiological aspects of
both AFM and associated respiratory/ gastrointestinal illnesses. The key
epidemiological parameters should include the whereabouts of patients
(for source identification), age group, details of neuroimaging, and
virological studies, contact tracing, etc. for patients in both the
groups. Besides, AFM clusters and outbreaks need to be investigated
meticulously to avoid an epidemic staring at us.
REFERENCES
1. Hardy D, Hopkins S. Update on acute flaccid
myelitis: Recognition, reporting, aetiology, and outcomes. Arch Dis
Child. 2020;105:842-47.
2. Sarmast SN, Gowda VK, Ahmed M, Gv B, Saini J,
Benakappa A. Acute flaccid myelitis – Clustering of polio-like illness
in the tertiary care centre in Southern India. J Trop Pediatr.
2019;65:309-31.
3. Madaan P, Saini L. Nerve transfers in acute
flaccid myelitis: A beacon of hope. Pediatr Neurol. 2019;93:68.
4. Madaan P, Keshavan S, Saini L. Poor clinico-radiological
correlation: A hallmark of acute flaccid myelitis. Brain Dev.
2019;41:480-81.
|
|
 |
|