|
Indian Pediatr 2018;55: 25-26 |
|
Scrub Typhus Meningitis Versus Acute
Bacterial Meningitis and Tuberculous Meningitis
|
Stalin Viswanathan
Department of General Medicine, Indira Gandhi Medical
College & Research Institute, Kathirkamam, Puducherry, India.
Email:
[email protected]
|
M eningitis in the form of cerebrospinal fluid
(CSF) pleocytosis (lymphocytes predominant) in a patient with scrub
typhus diagnosed by the presence of eschar and/or immunological means
would constitute scrub typhus meningitis (STM). This comes under a broad
umbrella of diseases causing aseptic meningitis – spirochetal, viral,
rickettsial, tubercular, neoplastic, and drug-related meningitis [1].
This contrasts with acute bacterial meningitis (ABM) where neutrophils
are predominant in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and bacteria
identified by Gram stain, culture, or immunological tests.
Kakarlapudi and colleagues [2], in this issue of
Indian Pediatrics, reported a retrospective analysis of 123 children
with meningitis managed in their department over a period of 5 years.
They found that children with STM were older than children with either
bacterial or tuberculous meningitis, and had a better prognosis than the
other arms. Thrombocytopenia and splenomegaly were more often associated
with STM. Information regarding hepatorenal symptoms were not available.
Similarly, information about chest radiograph, liver function and renal
function tests would have been more illuminating to this study.
Scrub typhus is a common cause of acute febrile
illness in Asia, and complications include respiratory, neurological,
hematological, myocardial and vasculitic manifestations [3]. STM is a
spectrum ranging from aseptic meningitis to meningoencephalitis rather
than a purely meningitic illness [4]. Diagnosis of STM is often
expensive, and Weil Felix Test (WFT), the commonest test used for its
diagnosis, has poor sensitivity. It is probably the easiest meningitis
to treat as there is only one drug to be administered – doxycycline or
chloramphenicol or azithromycin or rarely rifampicin. The morbidity and
mortality of a diagnosed case of STM is generally low [4].
The comparison of STM with other meningitides as in
this study is timely, especially in the Indian context [2]. As a
physician, I think the following things should merit attention in the
assessment of the differential diagnosis for acute to subacute febrile
illness with meningeal signs. History of a mite bite is useful, but
virtually never revealed. Respiratory symptoms (cough and
breathlessness), abdominal symptoms (jaundice, abdominal pain, and
diarrhea), and musculoskeletal manifestations (myalgia and arthralgia)
should make a consideration of STM, while neurological symptoms
(seizures, limb weakness, and coma) would be commoner in tuberculous
meningitis (TBM). On examination, pulse and blood pressure (tachycardia
and hypotension being more commonly seen in STM and ABM, while
bradycardia and increased blood pressure seen more frequently in
TBM-related raised intracranial pressure), tachypnea (ARDS and
myocarditis in STM, pericardial and pulmonary tuberculosis in TBM),
anemia (more in TBM), lymphadenopathy (both in STM and TBM), rashes (purpuric
in ABM and maculopapular in STM), elevated JVP (myocarditis in STM,
pericarditis in TBM), respiratory findings (seen in STM and TBM),
hepatosplenomegaly (seen in STM and disseminated tuberculosis),
arthritis (STM and ABM-meningococcal), cranial nerve deficits (sixth
cranial nerve deficits in STM and TBM, cochlear nerve involvement in STM
and ABM, multiple cranial nerve palsies in TBM), papilledema (TBM>ABM),
vasculitic events (strokes in STM and TBM, myocardial infarction in
STM), and shock (cardiogenic in STM and TBM, and septic in ABM) makes
TBM a closer differential diagnosis to STM than ABM.
On working up such patients with acute meningitis,
hemogram may show normal to a mild increase in counts in STM and TBM
(ABM with blood leucocytosis and rarely leukopenia) and thrombocytopenia
in STM (like viral meningoencephalitis or leptospirosis), and
occasionally disseminated intravascular coagulation (ABM and STM).
Deranged liver and renal functions and creatine kinase elevation are
more common in STM. CSF lymphocytic pleocytosis is found in both STM and
TBM. CSF protein content and hypoglycorrhachia do not help much in
differentiation between the three, although TBM would have the highest
protein in CSF. Gram stain and culture would be of use only in ABM and
to a lesser extent in TBM, because of the time taken. Adenine deaminase
(TBM), polymerase chain reaction (TBM, STM, and ABM), Cartridge Based
Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (CB-NAAT for TBM) and Scrub IgM ELISA
will help clinch the diagnosis, but are not routinely available in all
institutions. Chest radiograph is useful for both STM and TBM. Fundus
examination helps in TBM (papilledema and choroidal tubercles) and STM (papilledema).
Basilar meningeal enhancement on contrast CT favors TBM [5].
Barring a few exceptions of drug resistance, one drug
is sufficient for treating STM, especially if diagnosed early (unlike
ABM where steroids and antibiotics, and TBM with steroids,
antituberculous therapy and mannitol being necessary). Rifampicin, in
even a single dose can cause clinical improvement [6]. In settings when
the treating physician is unaware of STM or the facilities are
inadequate to diagnose the same, the patient ends up in taking treatment
for months for TBM, because of improvement with rifampicin [7]. Even
though detection of serum IgM levels for scrub typhus is an affordable
test, most patients and their caregivers thronging government
institutions find the costs involved a deterrent, and need to be
convinced about the need of such a test, which would prevent such a
prolonged therapy and a label of their children having had TBM.
In conclusion, STM more closely mimics TBM in terms
of clinical features, CSF findings and therapy, but differs in
hematological features, hepatorenal and musculoskeletal dysfunction and
neuro-imaging. ABM is like STM with its short duration of illness and
can be well-differentiated with hematological, renal and liver profiles,
CSF neutrophilia and culture positivity. In this age of evidence-based
medicine, expensive tools such as PCR, CBNAAT, and IgM levels for scrub
typhus are the need of the hour, but the availability is more of an
exception rather than the rule. In localities where scrub typhus is
endemic, empirical therapy could be instituted in patients with acute
meningitis until a conclusive diagnosis is obtained. Multiorgan
involvement should always make consideration of STM.
Funding: None; Competing interests: None
stated.
References
1. Connolly KJ, Hammer SM. The acute aseptic
meningitis syndrome. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1990;4:599.
2. Kakarlapudi SR, Chacko A, Samuel P, Verghese VP,
Rose W. Comparison of scrub typhus meningitis with acute bacterial
meningitis and tuberculous meningitis. Indian Pediatr. 2018;55:35-7.
3. Charoensak A, Chawalparit O, Suttinont C,
Niwattayakul K, Losuwanaluk K, Silpasakorn S, et al. Scrub
typhus: chest radiographic and clinical findings in 130 Thai patients. J
Med Assoc Thai. 2006;89:600.
4. Misra UK, Kalita J, Mani VE. Neurological
manifestations of scrub typhus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry.
2015;86:761-6.
5. Marais S, Thwaites G, Schoeman JF, Török ME, Misra
UK, Prasad K, et al. Tuberculous meningitis: A uniform case
definition for use in clinical research. Lancet Infect Dis.
2010;10:803-12.
6. Liu Q, Panpanich R. Antibiotics for treating scrub
typhus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;3:CD002150.
7. Viswanathan S, Muthu V, Iqbal N, Remalayam B, George T. Scrub
typhus meningitis in South India – a retrospective study. PLoS One
2013;8:e66595.
|
|
|
|