|
Indian Pediatr 2015;52: 13-14 |
|
Childhood Disability – Our Responsibility
|
S Sachidananda Kamath
National President, Indian Academy of Pediatrics,
2015.
Email: [email protected]
|
T he optimal development of the child must be
ensured during the early years by avoiding – as much as possible –
perinatal, genetic, metabolic and environmental risk factors. Globally,
about 200 million children do not reach their developmental potential in
the first five years because of poverty, poor health, nutrition and lack
of early stimulation. The World Health Organization estimates that
15-20% of children, worldwide, have disabilities; 85% of which are in
developing countries [1]. As per 2011 Census of India, there are
7,862,921 children with disability in the below 19 year age group,
including 1,410,158 visual impairment, 1,594,249 hearing impairment,
683,702 speech disorder, 1,045,656 movement disorder, 595,089
intellectual disability, 678,441 multiple disability, and 1,719,845
other disabilities [2].
Most information on prevalence of childhood
disability emerges from small scale studies. In a state-wide
Aanganwadi-based systematic sample survey in partnership with IAP
Kerala, 2.5-3.4% of children had various forms of developmental problems
as diagnosed by using screening tools [3,4]. The most common forms were:
developmental delay (69.3%), speech delay (14.3%), global delay (5.7%),
gross motor delay (5.3%) and hearing impairment (3.6%). The prevalence
rate of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is estimated to be 1 in 500 and
incidence rate is approximately 1 in 91 000 people in India [4]. The
prevalence rate of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), a
condition almost always associated with poor academic performance, was
11.3% among primary school children; behavioral difficulties were found
in 36.11% of the children with ADHD [5].
Hearing and visual impairments are other disabilities
that affect quality of life of children, and require some form of
special education services. Obviously, limited opportunities exist for
these individuals to learn through communication, visual elements, and
the people around them. Vision screening of school children in
developing countries could be useful in detecting correctable causes of
poor vision, especially refractive errors, and in minimizing long term
permanent visual disability [6].
All of us would agree that data from isolated studies
in different parts of the country would not be sufficient to push for a
policy change, and we need reliable data at the national level, using
the best available research methods. Recently, International Clinical
Epidemiology Network (INCLEN) under the leadership of MKC Nair and NK
Arora conducted studies to estimate the prevalence of neurodevelopmental
Disorders (NDDs) among children aged 2-9 years, among urban, rural,
hilly areas, and tribal communities in India. Data from 4000 families
from 6 regions of India revealed that 10-18% of children aged 2-9 years
from rural/urban/hilly areas had one or more NDD. The prevalence in
tribals was lesser (5%), perhaps reflecting lower infant and child
survival [7].
With increasing focus on developmental disorders, the
Government of India has undertaken two initiatives: questions regarding
disability were included for the first time in the 2011 Census of India;
and a national program for screening, diagnosis and treatment of NDDs –
the Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram (RBSK) – was launched in
2013, with focus on district intervention centers. As comprehensive
child health care implies assurance of extensive health services for all
children from birth to 18 years of age, RBSK addresses diseases and
deficiencies in addition to defects and disability. Universal screening
should lead to early detection and timely intervention of medical
conditions, ultimately leading to a reduction in mortality, morbidity
and lifelong disability. The dividends of early intervention would be
huge, including improvement of survival, reduction of malnutrition,
enhancement of cognitive development, educational attainment, and
overall improvement of quality of life of our citizens. It is our duty
and responsibility to support and partner with the central and state
governments to implement the program in right earnest.
References
1. World Health Organization. World Report on
Disability 2011. Available from:
http://www.unicef.org/protection/World_report_on_disability_eng.pdf.
Accessed December 17, 2014.
2. Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India.
Census of India, 2011. Available from:
http://censusindia.gov.in/2011-common/censusdataonline.html.
Accessed December 17, 2014.
3. Nair MK, Nair GH, Mini AO, Indulekha S, Letha S,
Russell PS. Development and validation of language evaluation scale
Trivandrum for children aged 0-3 years—LEST (0-3). Indian Pediatr.
2013;50:463-7.
4. Nair MK, Princly P, Leena ML, Swapna S, Kumari I
L, Preethi R, et al. CDC Kerala 17: Early detection of
developmental delay /disability among children below 3 y in Kerala - A
cross sectional survey. Indian J Pediatr. 2014 Oct 9. [Epub ahead of
print].
5. Venkata JA, Panicker AS. Prevalence of Attention
Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in primary school children. Indian J
Psychiatry. 2013;55:338-42.
6. Kalikivayi V, Naduvilath TJ, Bansal AK, Dandona L.
Visual impairment in school children in Southern India. Indian J
Ophthalmol. 1997;45:129-34.
7. Silberberg D, Arora N, Bhutani V, Durkin M, Gulati
S, Nair MK, et al. Neuro-developmental disorders in India - From
epidemiology to public policy. Neurology. 2014; 82 (Suppl. I 10): 1.006
(conference abstract).
|
|
|
|