Home            Past Issues            About IP            About IAP           Author Information            Subscription            Advertisement              Search  

   
research letter

Indian Pediatr 2013;50: 151-152

The Well Baby Certificate for Puerperal Sterilization – A Critical Appraisal


G Karthikeyan and TL Ratnakumari

Neonatal Division, Department of Pediatrics, Coimbatore Medical College Hospital, Coimbatore 641 018,TN.
Email: [email protected]
   
 


From August 2004 to July 2005 at Coimbatore Medical College Hospital, Tamilnadu, the process of issuing well baby certificate to 1668 babies of 1658 mothers electing to undergo puerperal sterilization within a week of delivery was analyzed. 1553 babies (93.1%) were issued well baby certificates. Certificates were deferred in 88 babies (5.3%) and it was refused in 27 (1.6%). Reasons are analyzed and discussed.

Key words: Congenital malformation, Puerperal sterilization, Well baby certificate.


P
ediatrician’s certificate of neonatal wellbeing is an essential prerequisite before proceeding with puerperal sterilization (PS). This is to ensure that the neonates do not have an identifiable life threatening or life disabling condition that might make the mother who had underwent puerperal sterilization regret her decision and consider bearing another child by means of recanalization procedure which can have a pregnancy rate of only upto 60% even in the best hands [1,2]. Clinical examination by a qualified pediatric physician is currently the only requisite for issuing the certificate and routine laboratory or imaging procedures are not undertaken. We evaluated the process of issuing well baby certificates to babies of these mothers within the first 7 days after delivery at Coimbatore Medical College Hospital, Tamil Nadu from August 2004 to July 2005.

1668 babies (10 twins) of 1658 mothers, who elected to undergo puerperal sterilization out of 5873 mothers delivering vaginally were studied. There were 29 instances of previous sibling death in infancy among these 1658 and 6 of these deaths happened in the neonatal period. 210 of the 1668 babies weighed less than 2.5kg (low birth weight) and within them 17 (16 small for date and one preterm) weighed less than 2 kg. Overall, certificates were refused in 27 (1.6%) of 1668 babies and deferred (for less than a week) in 88 (5.3%). 1553 were issued well baby certificates on their first visit and 88 were cleared in the second examination within a week. The reasons for refusal were low birth weight (7), malformations like Down’s syndrome (1), microcephaly (1), ventricular septal defects (4), hypospadiasis (2), cleft lip and palate (1), rectovaginal fistula (1), undescended testes (3), chordee (1), dystrophic talipes equinovarus (2), icthyosis (2), and dislocated hip (2). The reasons for deferral were umbilical sepsis (14), conjunctivitis (12), pyoderma (32), jaundice (22), hypothermia (1), pyrexia (2), wide anterior fontanelle for thyroid test (2), umbilical bleeding (1) and candida rash (2). Two of the babies whose mothers had undergone PS on the strength of our well baby certificates presented to us later in the infancy with congestive cardiac failure due to ventricular septal defects.

The so called ‘regret factor’ in puerperal sterilization wherein the mothers who underwent PS later lamented (regretted) their decision to undergo PS is correlated to young age and remarriage in developed countries; whereas death of the infant is the major factor for regret and demand for reversal in less developed countries [3]. In a previous published study from India, 14 of the 1084 mothers who underwent PS over a 10 year period in a private clinic regretted their decision later-on due to infant deaths [4].

Ideally, certifying baby’s well being for maternal PS should be as rigorous as the process of issuing a pediatrician’s certificate for adoption of infants that is followed in many countries [5]. These include, apart from a detailed clinical examination, a normal inborn error of metabolism (IEM) screening report, negative serology for HIV, hepatitis B and hepatitis C as well as a normal cardiac echocardiography and abdominal ultrasound in selected cases. The prevalence of hypothyroidism in a recent Indian neonatal screening program is 1 in 1700 and many inborn error of metabolisms have a prevalence rate of less than 1:2000 [6]. Targeted IEM screening would have been in order for those babies whose mothers had previous sib deaths in infancy. This certification process can be made more foolproof if cardiac imaging is done by pediatricians trained in basic echocardiography [7]. In an increasingly litigious environment that exists in India today, it is in our interest that an informed written consent is taken explaining the above facts to the parents.

Contributors: GK: conceptualized the study, collected data, analyzed and wrote the paper; TLR: contributed to critical appraisal of the data, revised the draft paper and both authors have approved the final version of the paper submitted. GK: will be the guarantor of the paper.

Funding: None; Competing interests: None stated.

References

1. Jayakrishnan K, Baheti SN. Laparoscopic tubal sterilization reversal and fertility outcomes. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011;4:125-9.

2. Jain M, Jain P, Garg R, Triapthi FM. Microsurgical tubal recanalization: A hope for the hopeless. Indian J Plast Surg. 2003;36:66-70.

3. Chi IC, Jones DB. Incidence, risk factors and prevention of post sterilization regret in women: an updated international review from an epidemiological perspective. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1994;49:722-32.

4. Adatia MD, Adatia SM. A ten year survey of sterilization operations in women. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 1966;16:423-6.

5. Mather M. Adoption: a forgotten paediatric speciality. Arch Dis Child. 1999;81:492-5.

6. Devi AR, Naushad SM. Newborn screening in India. Indian J Pediatr. 2004;71:157-60.

7. Katumba-Lunyenya JL. Neonatal/infant echocardiography by the non-cardiologist: a personal practice, past, present, and future. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002; 86:F55-7.

 

Copyright 1999-2012 Indian Pediatrics