Objectives
Through publication of this report, WHO hopes to start
a global debate on the effectiveness of primary health care for
reorienting national health systems. The concept of primary health care
was put forward thirty years ago in all countries as a way to improve
fairness in access to health care and efficiency in resource utilization.
Unfortunately, primary health care was misconstrued as poor care for poor
people and was dismissed by some as utopian, or a threat to the medical
establishment(1). This report is an earnest attempt by WHO to reinterpret
and refocus on the virtues of primary health care, which in the words of
WHO Director-General "looks more and more like a smart way to get health
development back on track"(2).
Key Issues
The report focuses on problems such as inequities in
health access and outcomes, a disproportionate focus on specialist
hospital care, fragmentation of health systems, and the proliferation of
unregulated commercial care.
Striking inequities
In a wide-ranging review, the report found striking
inequities in health outcomes, in access to care, and in what people have
to pay for care. Differences in life expectancy between the richest and
poorest countries now exceed 40 years. Of the estimated 136 million
pregnant women in world this year, around 58 million will receive no
medical assistance whatsoever during childbirth and the postpartum period,
endangering their lives and that of their infants. Globally, annual
government expenditure on health varies from as little as US$ 20 per
person to well over US$ 6000. For 5.6 billion people in low and
middle-income countries, more than half of health care expenditure is
through out-of-pocket payments. With the rising costs of health care,
these personal expenditures on health push more than 100 million people
below the poverty line each year. Vast differences in health exist within
countries and sometimes within individual cities. In Nairobi, for example,
the under-five mortality rate is below 15 per 1000 in the high-income area
and 254 per 1000 in a slum(2).
Health systems lose focus
Data set out in the report indicate that health systems
have lost their focus on fair access to care, their ability to invest
resources wisely, and their capacity to meet the needs and expectations of
people, especially in impoverished and marginalized groups(2). Health care
is often delivered according to a model that concentrates on diseases,
high technology, and specialist care, with health viewed as a product of
biomedical interventions and the power of prevention largely ignored.
Specialists may perform tasks that are better managed by general
practitioners, family doctors, or nurses. This contributes to
inefficiency, restricts access, and deprives patients of opportunities for
comprehensive care. WHO estimates that better use of existing preventive
measures could reduce the global burden of disease by as much as 70%(2).
Fragmented health care
In rural parts of the developing world, care tends to
be fragmented into discrete initiatives focused on individual diseases or
projects, with little attention to coherence and little investment in
basic infrastructures, services, and staff. As the report observes, such
situations reduce people to "program targets." Above all, health care is
failing to respond to rising social expectations for health care that is
people-centered, fair, affordable and efficient(2).
Shortcomings
Still, the report is weak in certain aspects:
• It accepts pre-payment schemes that can exclude
poor people (although it does support massive state subsidy of these,
and notes that tax revenue funded systems are a type of pre-payment
pooled financing scheme).
• It stops short of calling for publicly provided
services, saying that the critical issue is not the type of provider but
the regulation of these providers. However, experience suggests that
state provision itself, not just regulation, is a vital component of
universal access. In fact, the evidence shows that further private
sector growth in health care delivery can come at a direct cost to
progress towards achieving universal access.
• The dichotomy of WHO on criticizing individual
health projects in the report, and at the same time promoting ‘vertical’
programs that may have negative impact on many ongoing effective
‘horizontal’ health programs by competing for scarce resources and
funding, especially in the countries having poorly built public health
delivery systems, is quite evident.
Need of the hour
There are opportunities to start channelizing the
health systems towards primary health care in all countries. There is more
money being spent on health than ever before and more knowledge to address
global health challenges, including better medical technology. The core
strategy for tackling inequalities is to move towards universal coverage
in a spirit of equity, social justice, and solidarity. Primary health care
also offers the best way of coping with the ills of life in the 21st
century; the globalization of unhealthy lifestyles and rapid unplanned
urbanization. These trends contribute to a rise in chronic diseases like
heart disease, stroke, cancer, diabetes and asthma A multisectoral
approach is central to prevention as the main risk factors for these
diseases lie outside the health sector.