M. Kanitkar
From the Pediatric Nephrology Unit, Department of
Pediatrics, Command Hospital, Pune 411 040, India.
Correspondence to: Lt. Col. Madhuri Kanitkar,
Associate Professor of Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Command
Hospital, Pune 411 040. E-mail:
[email protected]
.
Renovascular hypertension results from a lesion that impairs
blood flow to a part or all, of one or both kidneys. 3-10% of
children referred for the evaluation of severe hypertension are
subsequently found to have clinically significant renovascular
lesions Renovascular hypertension is the second most common
cause of correctable hypertension in children second only to
coarctation of the aorta. Specific therapeutic options now
available, justify the often-invasive investigations required to
confirm the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension. A systematic
evaluation of the child with hypertension will help the
pediatrician select correctly, the child most likely to have
renovascular hypertension, thus reducing the number of children
exposed to the risks involved with diagnostic but invasive
investigations like renal arteriography which remains the gold
standard Other non-invasive newer modalities like doppler
ultrasonography, computed duplex sonography, ACE inhibited
radionuclide imaging, and MR/CT/spiral CT angiography may be
used depending on the availability of the facilities. Definite
therapeutic options for renal artery stenosis include
angioplasty, stenting and surgical re-vascularization using a
bypass graft.
Hypertension in children is defined as blood
pressure >95th percentile for age, gender and height on repeated
measurements(1). A recording below the 90th percentile is
considered normal. Children with blood pressure between the 90th
and 95th percentiles should remain under observation and evaluated
for other risk factors for hypertension.
Renovascular hypertension is defined as
hypertension resulting from a lesion that impairs blood flow to a
part or all, of one or both kidneys. Three to ten percent of
children referred for evaluation of severe hypertension are found
to have clinically significant renovascular lesions(2); 5.7% of
such children, evaluated at a tertiary referral centre in India,
had renovascular hypertension(3). Renovascular hypertension is the
second most common cause of correctable hypertension in children
second only to coarctation of the aorta. In view of currently
available therapeutic options, a detailed evaluation for
hypertension leading to a diagnosis of renovascular hypertension
can be rewarding.
Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System (RAAS)
An understanding of the RAAS is vital to the
understanding and evaluation of renovascular hypertension. The
RAAS is a hormonal system with additional paracrine and autocrine
functions. Renin causes the cleavage of angiotensinogen to form
angiotensin I, which is further broken down to angiotensin II by
the angiotensin converting enzyme. Renin appears to be the
rate-limiting enzyme in the RAAS cascade. Angiotensin II is a
potent vasoconstrictor that stimulates the synthesis and secretion
of aldosterone and regulates renin secretion via a negative
feedback mechanism. It promotes sodium reabsorption at the
proximal tubule, stimulates prostaglandin release and modulates
angiotensin receptor density in the vascular bed. It promotes
neovascularization and cellular growth. Centrally, it stimulates
thirst and release of the antidiuretic hormone.
The measurable components of the RAAS are
plasma renin activity (PRA) and aldo-sterone. The PRA is dependent
on age, posture, sodium intake and prior treatment with diuretics
or antihypertensive medications. It also shows a diurnal
variation. It is important to have the child in a supine position
for at least two hours prior to collecting a blood sample for PRA
assay and is ideally collected early morning. Severe hypertension
in childhood is most commonly due to some form of renal disease
and the RAAS plays an important role in perpetuating it. PRA is
raised in a majority of cases with significant hypertension
secondary to renovascular disease or pyelonephritic scarring.
However, 15% of children with unilateral and 40% with bilateral
renal artery stenosis may have normal PRA(4). Angiotensin
converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI’s) stimulate PRA selectively in
patients with renovascular hypertension and an ACEI stimulated
PRA, the ‘post captopril test’, has been suggested to have a
sensitivity similar to captopril renography(5). Renal vein renin
measurement is an important diagnostic procedure and helps in
identifying surgically curable forms of renal hypertension. It is
important to keep in mind the association of renovascular disease
and pheochromocytoma. The tumor can cause renal artery compression
and also directly stimulates renin release, resulting in raised
PRA. On the other hand, renovascular hypertension with raised PRA
can cause a rise in levels of urinary and plasma catecholamines.
A low PRA in a hypertensive child on the other
hand suggests mineralocorticoid excess or a salt and water
overload for other reasons.
Etiology
The commonest cause for renovascular
hypertension in children reported in western literature is
fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) and the midaortic syndrome(4).
However, in India Takayasu disease (idiopathic aortoarteritis) is
the most important cause(3) accounting for upto 87% of children
with renovascular hypertension(6). Renal artery stenosis may also
occur in association with neurofibromatosis, Williams syndrome,
Marfan syndrome, rubella syndrome, Klippel Trenaunay Weber
syndrome, linear sebaceous nevus syndrome, Kawasaki disease and
Crohn disease. Bilateral renal artery disease is more common than
unilateral, with or without intra-renal arterial involvement. In a
review of 54 children with renovascular hypertension, 38 had
bilateral and 16 unilateral disease; 20% had coarctation of
abdominal aorta with resultant middle aortic syndrome(7).
Clinical Features
The presentation of renovascular hyper-tension
is generally non-specific. Children with a blood pressure >140/100
mm Hg at any age are more likely to have secondary hypertension.
However the level of blood pressure may not delineate children
with renal artery disease. Younger children may present with
irritability, behavioral changes or failure to thrive. Older
children may complain of headache and lethargy. Complications
arising from severe hypertension e.g., left ventricular
failure, neurological complications like Bell’s palsy, seizures or
intracranial bleeds may be seen at presentation. Metabolic
problems may include hypokalemic alkalosis, or renal
insufficiency; ESRD at presentation is rare(4).
A meticulous history and clinical examination
may raise a high index of suspicion for renovascular hypertension.
Just as a history of urinary tract infections suggests renal
parenchymal disease, a history of umbilical catheterization in the
neonatal period, abdominal irradiation and a renal transplant may
point to a possible reno-vascular problem. Systemic symptoms like
fever, weight loss, diffuse myalgias, features of vascular
insufficiency, preceeded by pain over involved arteries and absent
pulses suggest aortoarteritis. Café-au-lait spots and other
features of neuro-ectodermal syndromes need to be looked for along
with a bruit over the abdomen or other larger vessels. Though the
presence of a renal bruit is highly suggestive of renal artery
stenosis, 13% of children with a renal bruit may be normal on an
arteriography and conversely only 30% of children with renal
artery stenosis may have a bruit(4).
Evaluation
Investigating a child with hypertension aims at
determining a possible renovascular cause and then confirming it
with more specific tests. It also necessitates the evaluation of
end organ damage resulting from the severe hypertension with echo-cardiography
and opthalmological examina-tion, as well as the possible
underlying etiology for renal artery stenosis. Clinical criteria
to diagnose aortoarteritis have been described(8) and include one
obligatory criterion (age less than or equal to 40 years), two
major criteria (left and right mid-subclavian artery lesions) and
nine minor criteria (high erythrocyte sedimentation rate, common
carotid artery tenderness, hyper-tension, aortic regurgitation or
annuloaortic ectasia and lesions of the pulmonary artery, left mid
common carotid artery, distal brachiocephalic trunk, thoracic
aorta and abdominal aorta). In addition to the obligatory
criterion, the presence of two major criteria, or one major plus
two or more minor criteria, or of four or more minor criteria
suggests a high probability of the presence of Takayasu disease.
In Asians the disease may present at a later age and involvement
of the abdominal aorta causing renovascular hypertension is seen
more frequently(9). Reports have linked aortoarteritis with a
variety of infectious agents including spirochetes, bacteria,
mycobacteria and viruses. However, there is no convincing evidence
that any of these play a pathogenic role(10). Efforts to rule out
tuberculosis through circumstantial evidence, in the form of chest
radiography, Mantoux test and lymph node biopsy, are required.
Disease activity index is determined using ESR, and C-reactive
proteins along with clinical and angiographic criteria(11)
Renal arteriography is the gold standard for
confirming the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis, but is an
invasive procedure. The diagnostic risk-benefit issues relating to
the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension raise the question of
whether a pediatrician can select correctly the child likely to
have renovascular disease prior to planning arteriography. Rapid
sequence intravenous urography (IVU) is not a reliable
investigation. The most reliable abnormality on IVU predicting
stenosis is a size difference between the kidneys, for which
ultra-sonography is a better tool.
Clinical features and baseline investigations
warranting further evaluation for renovascular hypertension are
shown in Table I. Children with sustained hypertension and
no evidence of renal scarring, glomerular disease, catecholamine
excess or any other identifiable cause should also be evaluated
further for a possible renovascular cause.
Table I
Indications for Evaluation for Renovascular Disease
|
|
Specific Tests
These include doppler ultrasonography, computed
duplex sonography, captopril renography, radionuclide imaging, and
magnetic resonance (MRA) or computerized tomographic (CT)
angiography depending on the availability of the facilities. These
tests are relatively non-invasive and can help decide which
patients need conventional arteriography for confirmation of the
diagnosis of renovascular disease. Their sensitivity and
specificity are shown in Table II. Renal vein renin assays
have an important role in helping make therapeutic plans for a
child with renovascular hypertension. A systematic evaluation of
the child with hypertension (Fig. 1) will help the
pediatrician select correctly, the child most likely to have
renovascular hypertension, thus reducing the number of children
requiring invasive investigations like renal arteriography.
Table II
Utility of Investigation for Diagnosing Renovascular
Hypertension
|
|
Doppler Ultrasonography
This test in expert hands can demonstrate the
changes in the flow within the renal arteries and computed duplex
sonography can measure blood flow volumes. Doppler studies can
detect stenotic lesions only when they are severe. A peak systolic
velocity greater than 180 or 200 cm/s and renal aortic ratio
greater than 3.0 is suggestive of renovascular hypertension(12).
Radionuclide Scans
The standard 99mtechnetium diethylene triamine
penta acetic acid (DTPA) scan and 131I-orthoiodohippurate scan are
useful investigations to detect renal artery stenosis. A repeat
DTPA scan after captopril (captopril renogram) allows
identification of over 90% children with unilateral renal artery
stenosis(13). In children with renovascular hypertension captopril
induces changes in the scintigraphic images of the kidney distal
to the stenosis by revealing a reduced uptake or delayed excretion
with cortical retention. Cortical retention is however difficult
to interpret in the presence of suspected pelvic retention and
there may be marked inter-observer variability. In a recent
multicentric trial, looking for inter-observer variability in the
interpretation of 1205 DTPA scans, the sensitivity of the
captopril renogram ranged from 70-100% and specificity
60-100%(14). The utility of the captopril primed 99mTc
dimercaptosuccinic acid scan (99mTc-DMSA) in identifying renal
abnormalities especially scarring is valuable, as it may identify
etiologies of renovascular hyper-tension other than renal artery
stenosis.
MRA/CT/Spiral CT Angiography
MRA is a time efficient and safe test when
compared with conventional arteriography. Gadolinium enhanced MRA
has proven to have a high sensitivity for detecting stenosis in
the main and accessory renal arteries. A 3-D phase contrast MRA
can improve the specificity of the test(15). CT/spiral CT
angiographies have the advantage of being less invasive and fairly
useful in the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension(16), though
with a higher radiation and contrast burden. Their role in the
evaluation of children with renovascular hypertension is
controversial, as they may not demonstrate stenosis of intrarenal
vessels in all cases.
Digital Subtraction Angiography
(DSA)
Intravenous digital subtraction angiography has
the potential for direct detection of renal artery stenosis with
intravenous injection of contrast. It may not be good enough for
intrarenal abnormalities. Intra-arterial DSA though as invasive as
the renal arteriography, requires half the volume of diluted
contrast medium for good visualisa-tion of renal vessels and
therefore causes less radiation exposure than with the standard
angiography. A 3-D DSA has an advantage over conventional 2-D DSA
especially in the diagnosis of aneurysms.
Renal Angiography
Renal arteriography remains the gold standard,
but is an invasive procedure and should be undertaken when the
index of suspicion for renal artery stenosis is high. Direct
intra-arterial contrast injection with computer aided digital
subtraction appears to be the definitive procedure for the
evaluation of children with renovascular hypertension.
Renal Vein Renin Assays
In children, measurement of selective renal
vein renin is useful to confirm the hemodynamic significance of
confirmed renal artery stenosis. Renal vein renin ratios of >1.5:1
between the affected and the contralateral kidney are considered
significant and predict a satisfactory response to surgery. This
prediction is reinforced by a PRA ratio <1.3 of contralateral
renal vein renin to inferior vena cava renin assay(17). Segmental
renal vein sampling allows demonstration of lateralization when
arterial disease is segmental. When these differences are not
obvious, bilateral disease is suspected. Facilities for these
tests are not readily available.
Treatment
Relieving the stenosis and restoring renal
blood flow would seem the obvious solution to curing renovascular
hypertension. But in a large number of children this may not be
easily achieved due to the disease being extensive and bilateral.
These children and also those awaiting surgical intervention need
medications to control the blood pressure. It is advisable to
avoid diuretics like frusemide, as they worsen salt and water
depletion, which can aggravate the release of renin. ACEI are
effective; however need close monitoring of renal functions in
view of the ability to cause a drop in the glomerular filtration
rate. They are probably best avoided until angiographic data and
results of captopril primed scans are available. When used in
unilateral renal artery stenosis it has a significantly favorable
outcome with a reduction in proteinuria as well, but can cause a
decrease in function of the kidney.
In Takayasu disease (idiopathic aortoarteritis),
treatment is based on the use of glucocorticoids alone or in
association with a variety of cytotoxic medications, the one most
commonly used being methotrexate. The dose is titrated in relation
to the ESR, to remain below 20 mm per hour. Therapy with
corticosteroids needs to be continued for 2-3 years followed by
gradual tapering and eventually withdrawn if and when no clinical
signs of flare up are evident and the ESR is persistently <10 mm
per hour(11). The disease is likely to flare up on withdrawing
corticosteroids and may then require more aggressive
immunosuppression. A positive tuberculin sensitivity test or a
diagnosis of accompanying active tuberculosis necessitates
antituberculous therapy. In a series of thirty children from South
Africa with Takayasu arteritis, 90% had a strongly positive
Mantoux test and were treated with antituberculous therapy(18).
Surgery
The choice of either surgery or percutaneous
angioplasty depends on the age and size of the child, technical
feasibility, extent of the disease process and the underlying
etiology. The options most commonly used are percutaneous
transluminal angioplasty (PTA), PTA with stenting and surgical
revascularization. The widespread nature of the disease in
children means that the majority will not benefit from surgical
intervention. In a series of 54 children treated for renovascular
hypertension only 20 (37%) were considered likely to benefit with
a surgical intervention, 10 (18%) children underwent surgical
reconstruction due to the extensive nature of their disease and 6
(10%) underwent PTA(13). PTA and PTA with stenting are relatively
simple procedures. Ballooning followed by stenting often improves
blood flow. Surgical revascular-ization is undertaken using grafts
to bypass the site of obstruction. Long term studies for children
with PTA/stenting have not been reported, however with a bypass
graft in a series of 53 children followed up for up to 16 years
the hypertension was cured in 70% and improved in another 26%(19).
When the outcome and cost were compared in 130 patients treated
with PTA, renal artery stenting or renal artery bypass grafting,
the success rates were comparable at 91%, 98% and 92% with a
complication rate of 13%, 16% and 38% respectively. All three were
equally effective in controlling hypertension but the cost of
surgery was ten times that of PTA and six times that of
stenting(20). Some children undergo a combination of treatments,
with success often difficult to link to one or other of the
procedures. There is also a benefit in improving blood supply to
the kidney thus reducing the antihypertensive medications, yet not
curing the hypertension.
Other options available are autotrans-plantation
of the functioning but severely stenosed kidney or a partial/total
nephrectomy for a non-functioning kidney that is causing severe
hypertension.
Following PTA/surgery, the blood pressure often
takes some time to reduce. This may be because of postoperative
edema or vasospasm of the renal artery. At times there may be an
embolic episode during the PTA. Follow up with DMSA scan and
doppler study carried out after the procedure can help detect
these complications.
Acknowledgements
Prof. M.J. Dillon (Emeritus Professor of
Pediatric Nephrology) Institute of Child Health, London gave
expert advice in drafting the manuscript. Ms Vanita Shah (Senior
Research Scientist), Institute of Child Health, London, guided
regarding renal vein rennin assay studies.
Contributors: MK did the literature review,
drafted the manuscript and will act as the guarantor.
Funding: None.
Competing interests: None.