Home            Past Issues            About IP            About IAP           Author Information            Subscription            Advertisement              Search  

   
research letter

Indian Pediatr 2021;58: 176-177

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Adolescents From Southern India – A Single Center Experience


Umamaheswari Gurunathan, Hemchand Krishna Prasad,* Sherlin White, Thangavelu Sangalalingam and Nedunchelian Krishnamoorthy

Department of Pediatrics, Mehta Multispeciality Hospitals India Pvt Ltd, Chennai, India.
Email: [email protected]

 


This 1-year follow-up study was conducted on 21 subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. We found reduction in glycosylated hemoglobin from 10.5% to 8.1%, and maintenance of BMI z-scores from 3.9 to 3.8. Majority of the patients could be weaned-off from insulin. Heterogeneous presentation, frequent co-morbidities and complications, and familial clustering were observed.

Keywords: Diabetic nephropathy, HbA1C, Outcome.

 


Pediatric data on T2DM from various Indian centers been described [1-3], but there is paucity of studies on response to therapy. We, herein, describe the profile of children and adolescents with T2DM and response to one year of therapy from a single center in Southern India. With the increasing prevalence of obesity [4,5], type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in young is also increasing [1,2].

With institutional review board approval, we recruited newly diagnosed children with T2DM: Fasting blood sugar ³125mg/dL, 2 hour post 75 gram glucose challenge ³200 mg/dL (screening in asymptomatic obese adolescents), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) ³6.5%, C-peptide >4 ng/mL and negative anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody titre (<10 mIU/mL) [6]. Data on demography, history, clinical presentation, anthropometry and Tanner staging collected. T2DM complications assessed: urine albumin creatinine ratio (ACR) (normal, <30 mg/g creatinine) [6], fundus evaluation by indirect ophthalmoscopy, lipid profile after 12 hours of fasting and hypertension (³95th percentile more than three occasions). Genetic testing for monogenic diabetes (first degree relative with diabetes onset <40 years, autosomal dominant family history, negative antibody, no diabetic ketoacidosis and insulin resistance) performed using targeted next generation gene sequencing for thirteen MODY genes [7]. Comorbidities like obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, fatty liver, polycystic ovaries diagnosed as per standard criteria and Homeostatic model for assessment of insulin resistance calculated as (fasting glucose (in mg/dL) x fasting insulin (in µU/mL)/405.

Children were managed with fluid therapy, intravenous insulin, lifestyle measures, oral metformin, subcutaneous glargine and multiple daily injection (MDI) regimen using glargine and aspart insulin, as appropriate [6]. Self-monitoring of blood glucose and log book maintenance advised. Subjects were followed up 3-monthly for one year with assessment of adherence of lifestyle measures, medications, anthropometry, hypoglycemic episodes and HbA1C. Management was escalated or deescalated as indicated [6]. Data were entered in excel sheet, and summarized as mean (SD), or numbers (percentages).

We recruited 21 subjects with mean (SD) age of 14.5 (2.1) years (10 boys) and all with Tanner stage ³2), out of 265(7.9%) registered in the diabetic clinic (Table I). Monogenic diabetes testing was performed in five subjects: all were negative. Of these, 9 (42.8%), 12 (57.1%) and none had a parent, relative or sibling with T2DM, respectively; 6 (28.5%) had history of gestational diabetes mellitus in the mother. Co-morbidities in our subjects included fatty liver and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in 5 (23.8%) and 2 (9.5%), respectively. 19.0% had systolic hypertension [mean (SD) systolic blood pressure Z-score 0.9 (0.3)], 14.2% had diastolic hypertension [mean (SD) diastolic blood pressure z-score 0.7 (0.2)] and 47.6% subjects had dyslipidemia as complications. Echocardiographic evaluation was performed in these four children, and two had left ventricular hypertrophy (initiated on enalapril). On screening for microvascular complications, two had diabetic nephropathy (persistent elevation of urine albumin-creatinine ratio) and none had diabetic retinopathy.

Table I Clinical and Laboratory Profile of Adolescents With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (N=21)
Study parameters Value
Clinical presentation, n (%)
Asymptomatic 6 (28.5)
Classical symptomsb 12 (57)
Atypical featuresc 3 (14.2)
Ketosis without acidosis 6 (28.5)
Hyperosmolar non-ketotic syndrome 2 (9.5)
Diabetic ketoacidosis 1 (4.7)
Anthropometry
Height SD scorea 0.6 (0.5-0.7)
BMI SD scorea 3.9 (3.1-4.2)
Waist circumference z-scorea  2.8 (2.5-3.2)
Biochemical assessment
C-Peptide (ng/mL)a 4.9 (4-5.2)
HbA1C (%) 10.5 (1.1)
HOMA-IRa 9.4 (8.1-10.3)
LDL cholesterol (mg/dL) 152.5 (12.3)
HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) 35.5 (8.6)
Triglyceride level (mg/dL) 178 (21.4)
Values in mean (SD) or amedian (IQR); bpolydipsia, polyuria and polyphagia; cfoot ulcer, delayed menarche, pruritus vulvae.
 

Subjects who had life threatening complications were initiated on metformin and MDI regimen (14.2%). Those with ketosis started on metformin with basal insulin (28.5%) and remaining 57.1% of subjects were on metformin monotherapy. On follow-up at 6 months, one, one and 13 subjects were on metformin with MDI, metformin with basal insulin and metformin monotherapy. None, one and 13, of the 14 subjects who were followed up at 12 months were on metformin with MDI, metformin with basal insulin and metformin mono-therapy, respectively.

During the one year follow-up, the HbA1c was 10.5% (at baseline), 8.5% (at 6 months) and 8.1% (at 1 year). Correspondingly, the BMI z-scores were +3.9 (at baseline), +3.7 (at 6 months) +3.8 (at 12 months). Two episodes of hypoglycemia observed during the study period. Both episodes occurred early morning with autonomic symptoms and both subjects were on insulin therapy). On follow-up, two children with hypertension had normal blood pressure, two adolescents had reduction in LDL levels, and one child with diabetic nephropathy had control of microalbuminuria and no adverse reactions to therapy.

In our series, 28.5% were asymptomatic and 14.2% presented as emergencies. It is very important that pediatricians recognize existence of hyperosmolar non-ketotic coma [8] as a diabetic emergency in obese adolescents requiring aggressive fluid therapy vs DKA where over-hydration results in cerebral edema. We observed significant complications at diagnosis, endorsing ISPAD guidelines which recommend early screening of vascular complications in T2DM [3]. Asymptomatic phase results in prolonged exposure to hyperglycemia and early complications. On follow-up, safety of metformin, good improvement in HBA1C, static BMI z-scores observed. Similar safety profile, reduction in BMI z-score of -0.045 and a reduction of HbA1C of -1.3 has been reported [9,10]. Strengths of our study include management as per ISPAD guidelines and one year follow-up period. Inability to quantify adherence of lifestyle measures and 33.3% drop-out at 12 months are limitations in our study.

Adolescents with T2DM have heterogeneous presentation, significant comorbidities and complications; familial clustering and good biochemical response to metformin therapy observed.

Contributors: The study was conceptualized by HKP, SW and ST; study design was framed by HKP and KN. UG: data collection; HKP, SW, UG: analysis; HKP, KN, SW, ST: clinical management of cases. All authors approve the final manuscript.

Ethics clearance: Mehta Multispeciality Hospitals IEC; No. IRB-MCH/34/2015, dated: July 22, 2015.

Funding: None; Competing interests: None stated.

REFERENCES

1. Bhatia V, Arya V, Dabadghao P, Balasubramanian K, Sharma K. Etiology and outcome of childhood and adolescent diabetes melli-tus is North India. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2004;17:993-9

2. Jevalikar G, Kohli C, Bansal B, et al. Childhood and youth onset diabetes: A single center experience. Indian J Pediatr. 2016;83:792-8

3. Amutha A, Pradeepa R, Chella KS, et al. Lipid profile in childhood-and youth-onset type 2 diabetes and their association with microvascular complications. J Assoc Physicians India. 2017;65 :42-47.

4. Khadilkar V, Yadav S, Agrawal KK, et al. Revised IAP Growth Charts for Height, Weight and Body Mass Index for 5- to 18-Year-Old Indian Children. Indian Pediatr. 2015; 52; 47-55.

5. Singh P, Gandhi S, Malhotra R, Seth A. Impact of using different growth references on interpretation of anthropometric parameters of children aged 8-15 years. Indian Pediatr. 2020; 57:124-8.

6. Zeitler P, Arslanian S, Fu J, et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Youth. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018; 19:28-46.

7. Hattersley AT, Greeley SAW, Polak M, et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: The Diagnosis and Management of Monogenic Diabetes in Children and Adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018; 19:47-63.

8. Wolfsdorf JI, Glaser N, Agus M, et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Guidelines 2018: Diabetic Ketoacidosis and Hyperglycemic Hyperosmolar State. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018;19:155-77.

9. Laffel L, Chang N, Grey M, et al. Metformin monotherapy in youth with recent onset type 2 diabetes: Experience from the prerandomization run-in phase of the TODAY study. Pediatr Diabetes. 2012; 13: 369-75.

10. TODAY Study Group. Safety and tolerability of the treatment of youth-onset type 2 diabetes: The TODAY experience. Diabetes Care. 2013; 36: 1765-71.1


 

Copyright © 1999-2021 Indian Pediatrics