The recent article titled "Teaching and Assessing Clinical Reasoning
Skills" is the need of the hour, and is in the best interest of medical
training [1]. Though the authors have extensively described about the
Dual processing theory to improve the clinical reasoning of clinicians,
teaching the same from the initial years of medical training may fetch
the goal more effectively; the following discussion will further
strengthen the above concepts [2].
Though many factors discussed pertain to poor
clinical reasoning and lack of clinical skills, one important concern is
the inadequate knowledge and understanding of the basic anatomy and
physiology of an organ with relevance to a case scenario by the student.
Since the medical subject is vast unless the basics are repeatedly
taught in a similar style it will not get registered in the minds of the
young doctors (e.g. instead of human heart being depicted with
various illustrations over the years, a simple typical diagram can be
followed from the beginning). If basics are forgotten, effective
clinical problem solving is too difficult to practice in later years.
Since there is a gross mismatch between the
perspectives of the educator and the student, didactic lectures can be
curtailed, and each student may be exposed to the variety of clinical
cases during the training. The clinical training should include both
common and rare cases. Clinical examinations based on "Long case" alone
may not improve the clinical reasoning skills. Clinical problem solving
exercises serve as a good model to improve the clinical skills of the
student. The analytical approach and the interactive discussion will
enhance the skills of both the faculty and the student if both of them
are unaware of the diagnosis. The interactive discussions between the
educator, postgraduates and undergraduates during the grand rounds will
improve the clinical skills of the students since the cases are
presented randomly without prior exercise. Such grand rounds should be
encouraged in all the medical institutions, so that a student can be
given an opportunity to improve the reasoning skills from the early
years of medical training [3].
The authors have mentioned multiple methods to
evaluate the student during the final examination but all these should
be practiced in a programmed manner from the early years of medical
training to enhance clinical reasoning skills [4].
References
1. Modi JN, Anshu, Gupta P, Singh T. Teaching and
Assessing clinical reasoning skills. Indian Pediatr. 2015;52:787-94.
2. Croskerry P. The theory and practice of clinical
decision making. Can J Anesth. 2005;52:R1-8.
3. Kassirer JP. Teaching clinical reasoning:
case-based and coached. Acad Med. 2010;85:1118-24.
4. See KC, Tan KL, Lim TK. The script concordance test for clinical
reasoning: Re-examining its utility and potential weakness. Med Educ.
2014;48:1069-77.