|
Indian Pediatr 2015;52: 107-108 |
|
Fetal Growth Restriction and Cardiovascular
Health Among Adolescents
|
Anuradha V Khadilkar and LS Parthasarathy
From Hirabai Cowasji Jehangir Medical Research
Institute, Jehangir Hospital, Pune, India.
Email:
[email protected]
|
I n developing countries, low birth weight (LBW) is
a major public health problem. Seventy-two percent
of low birth weight infants in developing countries are born in Asia,
with 40 per cent being born in India [1]. Fetal growth restriction or
intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is a condition where the fetus
fails to achieve its intrinsic growth potential, due to anatomical or
functional disorders and diseases in the feto-placental-maternal unit.
More than 50% of LBW infants born in India are IUGR; thus, the burden of
IUGR is high in India [2]. IUGR is associated not only with significant
perinatal morbidity and mortality, but also with long-term complications
throughout life [3]. Thus, addressing IUGR and related problems is
critical in developing countries.
Being born IUGR is associated with increased risk of
degenerative diseases in adulthood, including diabetes, hypertension,
and cardiovascular diseases [4]. The association between IUGR and
cardiovascular diseases was first described by ‘developmental origins of
adult disease’ hypothesis, often called The Barker hypothesis, which
proposes that these diseases originate through adaptations of the fetus
when it is undernourished. These adaptations may be cardiovascular,
metabolic, or endocrine, and they may permanently program the structure
and function of the body, increasing coronary heart disease risk factors
such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance and
hyperlipidemia.
Although the association between IUGR and adult
disease has been extensively studied, reports also suggest that rather
than merely IUGR, postnatal weight gain is in itself a risk factor for
diseases in later life. Cole, using a life-course plot, has emphasized
the substantial impact of later weight on high blood pressure in
adolescence [5]. Further, Barker, et al. [6] also reported that
the risk of coronary events was more strongly related to the tempo of
childhood gain in body mass index (BMI) than to the BMI attained at any
particular age. They also report that small size at birth, low BMI at 2
years of age, and high BMI at 11 years of age were each associated with
later coronary events in both men and women [6]. Thus, it seems that
apart from being IUGR, the change in trajectory of growth in infants
born IUGR contributes to adult-onset diseases. These observations
demonstrate that coronary events are independently associated with not
only prenatal but postnatal growth as well. In line with these
observations, a study conducted in India reported that thinness at 2
years of age, followed by a rapid increase in BMI, is associated with
the development of impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes at
approximately 30 years of age [7].
In the current issue of Indian Pediatrics,
Alves, et al. [8] from Brazil reiterate the importance of
studying fetal growth restricted babies and the associated
complications. Though the authors could not demonstrate an association
between fetal growth restriction and changes in cardiovascular risk
factors in adolescents at this stage, they bring to our notice that the
growth restricted group was similar to the non growth restricted group
in the parameters studied. Their results possibly indicate that these
adolescents had changed trajectory to equal the control group. Though
the current paper is interesting, we think that the results would have
been on more firm grounds if, given the age range and gender,
comparisons between groups in anthropometric parameters would have been
made after calculating Z scores. Assessing the change in trajectory, or
lack of it, would have strengthened the authors’ observations. As the
authors have also discussed, one of the limitations of their study is
that the tempo of the anthropometric characteristics is of greater
importance than a single reading in adolescent years, and further
follow-up of these children may possibly replicate the results, as
previously reported. Additional longitudinal cohort studies are required
to elucidate long-term impact of IUGR on cardiovascular disease in
developing countries.
Funding: None; Competing interests: None
stated.
References
1. WHO. UNICEF. Low Birthweight: Country, Regional
and Global Estimates. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2004.
2. Pinheiro A, David A, Joseph B. Pregnancy weight
gain and its correlation to birth weight. Indian J Med Sci 2001;
55:266-70.
3. Cosmi E, Fanelli T, Visentin S, Trevisanuto D,
Zanardo V. Consequences in infants that were intrauterine growth
restricted. J Pregnancy. 2011;2011:364381. doi: 10.1155/2011/364381.
4. Alexe DM, Syridou G, Petridou ET. Determinants of
early life leptin levels and later life degenerative outcomes. Clin Med
Res. 2006;4:326-35.
5. Cole TJ. Modeling postnatal exposures and their
interactions with birth size. J Nutr. 2004;134:201-4.
6. Barker DJ, Osmond C, Forsén TJ, Kajantie E,
Eriksson JG. Trajectories of growth among children who have coronary
events as adults. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1802-9.
7. Bhargava SK, Sachdev HS, Fall CHD, Osmond C,
Lakshmy R, Barker DJ, et al. Relation of serial changes in
childhood body-mass index to impaired glucose tolerance in young
adulthood. N Engl J Med 2004;350:865-75.
8. Alves PJS, Henriques ACPT, Silva KF, Leite AJM,
Feitosa FEL, Alencar CHM, et al. The influence of fetal growth
restriction on cardiovascular health among adolescents in Brazil: A
retrospective cohort study. Indian Pediatr. 2015;52:109-14.
|
|
|
|