Every year the editors of Science have an intense
discussion to identify the top scientific breakthrough of the year. This
year the winner is cancer immunotherapy. This nascent field is just
taking baby steps but it is a paradigm shift in the way cancers are
treated. The target here is the body’s immune system and not the tumour.
The story begins in the late 1980’s when French researchers discovered a
new protein receptor on the surface of T cells, called cytotoxic
T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4). Then an American scientist, James
Allison found that these receptors actually inhibit T cell activity. He
wondered whether blocking the blocker — the CTLA-4 molecule — would set
the immune system free to destroy cancer. In 1996, he demonstrated that
antibodies against CTLA-4 destroyed tumours in rats. Pharma companies
initially were wary of this new approach, so a tiny company Medarex in
Princeton developed the drug. Finally it was bought over by Bristol-Meyes-Squibs
for more than $ 2 billion. For the first time, they demonstrated that
any treatment had extended life in advanced melanoma in a randomized
trial. Nearly a quarter of participants receiving these antibodies
survived at least 2 years.
Meanwhile, a biologist in Japan discovered a molecule
expressed in dying T cells, which he called programmed death 1 (PD-1),
and which he recognized as another brake on T cells. An oncologist in
John Hopkins urged Medarex to develop anti PD-1 antibodies. The results
of anti PD-1 antibodies in patients with drug refractory cancers were
astounding. However oncologists are still trying to understand how they
work and what they do. Some tumours actually grow before shrinking and
some tumours continue to shrink even when antibodies have been stopped.
Another therapy is called chimeric antigen receptor therapy, or CAR
therapy — a personalized treatment that involves genetically modifying a
patient’s T cells to make them target tumor cells. For physicians
accustomed to losing every patient with advanced disease, these
therapies bring a hope they couldn’t have dreamed of a few years ago.
(Science 20 December 2013)
Clarity
Another of the top breakthrough’s listed in science
is a new imaging technique called CLARITY. It stands for Clear,
Lipid-exchanged, Anatomically Rigid, Imaging/immunostaining
compatible, Tissue hYdrogel. It is used on biopsies or
post-mortem samples to study highly detailed pictures of the protein and
nucleic acid structure of organs, especially the brain. First a series
of chemical treatments are applied so that the lipid content of the
sample is removed, while all of the original proteins and nucleic acids
are left in place.The aim is to make the tissue transparent so that a
detailed microscopic analysis of the protein scaffolding may be done.
The imaging is done using immunostaining with fluorescent tags. An
example of a discovery made through CLARITY imaging is a peculiar
‘ladder’ pattern where neurons connected back to themselves and their
neighbors, which has been observed in animals to be connected to
autism-like behaviors. Scientists predict CLARITY will be a powerful
tool to study neurological disorders with a 3 dimensional perspective. (Science
20 December 2013)
Hypothyroidism Still Rampant
A nation-wide study to evaluate the prevalence of
hypothyroidism has revealed that hypothyroidism affects 11% of Indians
as compared to less than 2% in UK and less than 5% in USA. Ever since
India adopted the universal salt iodization program in 1983, there has
been a decline in goiter prevalence in several parts of the country,
which were previously endemic. In 2004, a WHO assessment of global
iodine status classified India as having ‘optimal’ iodine nutrition,
with a majority of households (83.2% urban and 66.1% rural) now
consuming adequate iodized salt. India is supposedly undergoing a
transition from iodine deficiency to sufficiency state. This study was a
cross-sectional, multi-centered epidemiology study conducted at eight
sites in India: Bangalore, Chennai, Delhi, Goa, Ahmedabad, Hyderabad,
Kolkata and Mumbai. The prevalence of previously undetected
hypothyroidism was 3.47%. Those who self-reported to be hypothyroid, a
significant proportion (28%) still had a high TSH indicating inadequate
treatment. The emergence of Kolkata as the worst affected city was
unanticipated, particularly as the city was established to be iodine
replete over a decade back. It appears that thyroid disorders in India
are not confined to the conventional iodine-deficient sub-Himalayan zone
but also extend to the plain fertile lands. A possible etiological role
of cyanogenic foods acting as goitrogens which interfere with iodine
nutrition has been previously suggested as well as increasing exposure
to thyroid disruptors including industrial and agricultural
contaminants. However this study was done only in adults and limited to
urban areas. More studies in children are warranted. (Indian J Endocr
Metab. 2013;17:647-52)