|
Indian Pediatr 2013;50: 193 |
 |
Cytomegalovirus in Hematological Malignancies
|
Sameer Bakhshi and Bivas Biswas
Department of Medical Oncology, Dr BRA Institute
Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences,
New Delhi 110 029, India.
Email: [email protected]
|
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection
frequently causes cytopenia in hematopoietic stem cell transplant
setting where there are clear cut recommendations for prophylaxis,
screening and pre-emptive treatment of CMV infection [1]. However,
evidence of CMV infection in hematological malignancies other than stem
cell transplant setting is lacking. A retrospective, single centre study
of autopsied patients of acute leukemia, chronic leukemia or
myelodysplastic syndrome (without stem cell transplant), reported a low,
but rising prevalence of CMV pneumonitis over a 5-year period, with a
case fatality rate of 57% [2].
Kanvinde, et al. [3] describe 13 episodes of
CMV in 11 cases of hematological malignancy, which were treated with
intravenous gancyclovir. These cases were diagnosed based on detection
of antigen or DNA, of which, nearly half were diagnosed by a qualitative
PCR which is not the standard method for diagnosing CMV infection.
Further, none of these cases had demonstration of virus by culture or
histopathology. Few of these episodes were associated with other
documented viral or bacterial infections which by themselves are known
to cause prolonged cytopenias. Further, two of these patients had
resolution of their symptoms even before initiation of gancyclovir. It
would be reasonable to state that these patients may have had evidence
of CMV infection but certainly CMV disease was not demonstrated in any
case, and thus none of these patients can be attributed to have
CMV-related cytopenia.
Even the term "CMV syndrome" should be avoided.
Although it is recognized that CMV can cause the combination of fever
and bone marrow suppression that is usually used to define the disease
entity, the same symptoms can have several other different viral
etiologies such as human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6), possibly human
herpesvirus 7, and adenovirus infections. Antiviral drugs might have
some effect against these viruses, making the interpretation of
causality difficult. Thus, if the term "CMV syndrome" is to be used, it
must be used only after testing has been done for HHV-6, at the very
least [4].
Intravenous gancyclovir remains the standard of care
for symptomatic CMV infection and/or CMV disease. But there are
limitation of gancyclovir treatment as it causes myelosupression which
may lead to superadded bacterial or fungal infection. It is important
not to treat every episode of asymptomatic CMV infection to avoid
undesired toxicity. This argument is supported by Ng, et al. [5],
who described 35 patients with CMV DNAemia, with six having CMV disease;
in this series, none of the untreated 20 patients developed CMV
infection or disease on follow-up.
In countries with population congestion like India,
where CMV seropositivity is as high as 90%, CMV reactivation may be more
common than in the Western world. It is possible that many of our
patients have undiagnosed asymptomatic CMV infection, as they are not
routinely screened for CMV. But at the same time, they may also be
recovering from CMV infection without any antiviral therapy as described
by Ng, et al. [5]. If CMV infection or disease has to be
evaluated in hematological malignancies, then perhaps these patients
should be serially tested from diagnosis for change in viral load, if
any, from diagnosis and to attempt diagnostic biopsies in suspected
cases of CMV disease. A previous study showed that on serial monitoring,
15.3% patients of acute lymphoblastic leukemia showed evidence of CMV
reactivation but none of these patients at reactivation or thereafter
showed evidence of CMV disease [6]. Thus, in the absence of strong
evidence of CMV disease, it may not be appropriate to initiate
gancyclovir therapy for patients with hematological malignancies who
have either a positive pp65 antigen or PCR positivity, as toxicity of
intravenous gancyclovir outweighs the effectiveness.
Competing interests: None stated; Funding:
Nil
References
1. Ljungman P, Reusser P, de la Camara R, Einsele H,
Engelhard D, Ribaudi P, et al. Management of CMV infections:
recommendations from the infectious diseases working party of the EBMT.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2004;33:1075-81.
2. Nguyen Q, Estey E, Raad I, Rolston K, Kantarjian
H, Jacobson K, et al. Cytomegalovirus pneumonia in adults with
leukemia: an emerging problem. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:539-45.
3. Kanvinde S, Bhargava P, Patwardhan S.
Cytomegalovirus is an important cause of cytopenia after chemotherapy in
haematological malignancies. Indian Pediatr. 2013;50:197-201.
4. Ljungman P, Griffiths P, Paya C. Definitions of
cytomegalovirus infection and disease in transplant recipients. Clin
Infect Dis. 2002;34:1094-7.
5. Ng AP, Worth L, Chen L, Seymour JF, Prince HM,
Slavin M, et al. Cytomegalovirus DNAemia and disease: incidence,
natural history and management in settings other than allogenic stem
cell transplantation. Haematologica. 2005;90:1672-9
6. Lunghi M, Riccomagno P, De Paoli L, Vendramin C,
Conconi A, Gaidano G, et al. Monitoring of cytomegalovirus
reactivation during induction and nontransplant consolidation of acute
leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2009;84:697-8.
|
|
 |
|