Dr Sanklecha has raised some valid points in his
communication [1]; nevertheless, I would like to put these
in their right perspective.
First of all, 17.5% to 70% of patients in
the various studies included in the review [2] were
post-operative/surgical. In the only prospective randomised
controlled study of tight glycemic control in children by
Vlasselaers, et al. [3], 600 out of 700 (85.7%)
patients were post-operative cardiac surgical, high risk
surgical or those with trauma. Further, in a retrospective
study in 177 post-operative (cardiac surgery) children
admitted to a PICU, non-survivors had higher peak glucose
levels (389.3 ± 162 mg/dL vs 162± 106.3 mg/dL) and
longer duration of hyperglycemia (3.06 ± 1.67 vs 2.11
± 0.92 days) during the first 5 post operative days,
compared to survivors [4].
In the absence of any scientific studies,
it would be difficult to substantiate the author’s
observation that post-operative hyperglycemia is not
necessarily indicative of a poor outcome. Though
hyperglycemia may not directly be associated with mortality,
significant increase in morbidity such as, increase in
duration of ventilation, higher wound infection rates and
increase in length of ICU/hospital stay is possible.
However, it is pertinent to mention here that some studies
have shown that early post-operative hyperglycemia (within
first 24-48 hours) is not associated with a worse outcome
[4,5]. To conclusively determine whether post-operative
hyperglycemia is indeed asso-ciated with a worse outcome, we
await the results of an ongoing trial in post-operative
cardiac surgical children [6].
Secondly, the evidence is now moving in
favour of a modest glucose target of 110-150 mg% rather than
strict normoglycemia [2]. There is no doubt that targeting
strict normoglycemia definitely increases the risk of
hypoglycemia. The same has been emphasized in other studies
too [4].
Finally, I have no doubt that insulin
infusion to correct hyperglycemia, especially in our
children where malnutrition is rampant, cannot be taken
lightly. This can only be embarked upon once the nursing
personnel are trained, adequate nutrition is provided and
locally feasible protocols are devised.
References
1. Sanklecha M. Hyperglycemia in the
PICU: Tread with caution. Indian Pediatr. 2011;48:824.
2. Poddar B. Treating hyperglycemia in
the critically ill child: Is there enough evidence? Indian
Pediatr. 2011;48:531-6.
3. Vlasselaers D, Milants I, Desmet L,
Wouters PJ, Vanhorebeek I, van den Heuvel I, et al.
Intensive insulin therapy for patients in paediatric
intensive care: a prospective, randomized controlled study.
Lancet. 2009;373:547-56.
4. Ulate KP, Falcao GCL, Bielefeld MR,
Morales JM, Rotta AT. Strict glycemic targets need not be so
strict: A more permissive glycemic range for critically ill
children. Pediatrics. 2008;e898-904.
5. Yung M, Wilkins B, Norton L, Slater A.
Glucose control, organ failure, and mortality in pediatric
intensive care. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008;9:147-52.
6. Maintaining normal blood sugar levels in children
undergoing heart surgery to reduce the risk of infections
and improve recovery (The SPECS study).
http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00443599. Accessed on
October 10, 2010.