Home            Past Issues            About IP            About IAP           Author Information            Subscription            Advertisement              Search  

   
correspondence

Indian Pediatr 2010;47: 199

Cross System Practice and Prescription

Yash Paul

A-D-7, Devi Marg, Bani Park, Jaipur 302 016, India.
Email: [email protected] 
 

Bonnisan liquid and Liv-52 preparations are being prescribed by some doctors. Can practitioners of modern medicine i.e. allopathic practitioners prescribe ayurvedic medicines? I seek clarification from the medico legal cell of IAP on this issue.

Reply

Satish Tiwari and Jayant Navrange,

Medico-Legal Group, IAP.
Email: [email protected]
 

Bonnisan liquid and Liv-52 preparations are being prescribed by some doctors. Can practitioners of modern medicine i.e. allopathic practitioners prescribe ayurvedic medicines? I seek clarification from the medico legal cell of IAP on this issue.

The National Law School Banglore, has interpreted the two judgments of Supreme Court of India on this issue two judgments and came to the conclusion that there is no bar on cross system practice. The apex court has only laid down that every practitioner must discharge "a duty of care" to every patient he accepts to treat and "the practitioner must bring to his task reasonable degree of skill and knowledge, and must exercise a reasonable degree of care." The onus is on practitioner to demonstrate that he has the requisite knowledge and skill to prescribe that medicine and to treat the patient in a particular system.

We know that the modern medicine is usually a peer-reviewed, research oriented and evidence based practice. The same may not be applicable to the other system of traditional Indian medicine or Homeopathy. According to essentials or prerequisites for negligence there must be damage to the patient which should be as a direct result of deficiency in duty or care(1). The Apex Court, in the Poonam Varma v. Ashwin Patel case has ruled that if you are practicing any other system it is Negligence per se. The other side of this issue is that in many developing countries where rural health is important and qualified practitioners are not available the authorities are appointing community health workers (CHW)(2). These CHW are provided with some of the common medicines which can be used for domiciliary management of common illnesses. Do they have the deep and complete knowledge of these illnesses or medicines? If an unqualified CHW can prescribe or dispense medicines why a graduate in medical curriculum (traditional or homeopathic) cannot do so? This issue also needs a countrywide medical and legal debate.

Many recent editions of modern medicine books are coming with chapters and some references on traditional medicines(3). This indicates that some studies have been conducted or are in progress at different centers. We feel that there is no harm in using such drugs/medicines which have been scientifically evaluated.

References

1. Tiwari S. Baldwa M. What is medical negligence; In: Baldwa M, Tiwari S, Shah N editors; Legal problems in day-to-day pediatrics practice: 1st edition, Hyderabad Paras Publishing 2005; 16-49.

2. Park K. Park’s Text Book of Preventive and Social Medicine. 20th edition. Jabalpur: Banarsidas Bhanot; 2009. p. 791-815.

3. Kemper KJ, Gardiner P. Herbal medicines. In: Behrman RE, Kliegman RM, Jenson HB, editors Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics, 18th edition. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2007. p. 357-360.
 

 

Copyright© 1999 by the Indian Pediatrics (Disclaimer)