1.gif (1892 bytes)

Short Communications

Indian Pediatrics 2008; 45:135-139

Profile and Outcome of Neuroblastoma with Conventional Chemotherapy in
Children Older than One year: A 15-years Experience

 

Deepak Bansal, R K Marwaha, Amita Trehan, *K L N Rao and Vishal Gupta

From the Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Unit, Department of Pediatrics and Department of *Pediatric Surgery, Advanced Pediatrics Center, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research,
Chandigarh, India.

Correspondence to: Dr R K Marwaha, Professor of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatric Center, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research,
Chandigarh 160 012, India. Email: [email protected]

Manuscript received: March 28, 2006; Initial review completed: May 22, 2006;
Revision accepted: October 4, 2007.

Abstract

The clinical profile and outcome of neuroblastoma in 103 children, older than one-year is presented. 74 had Stage IV, 27 Stage III and one patient each had Stage I or II disease. Treatment included chemotherapy followed by surgical resection/debulking. Radiotherapy was administered to those with residual tumor. Chemotherapy consisted of ‘OPEC’ (vincristine, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin and etoposide). The caretakers of 54 (52.4%) children either did not opt for or defaulted therapy, whilst 3 patients died before chemotherapy could be initiated. Of the remaining 46 patients, the tumor progressed during therapy in 19 (41.3%). Relapse of disease was documented in 22 (47.8%) cases. Merely 4 (8.7%) children are disease free for a period of 16.5±6.7 months. Majority of children presented with advanced disease and the outcome was dismal with conventional non-myloablative chemotherapy.

Key Words: India, Neuroblastoma, Survival, Treatment.

Introduction

Neuroblastoma (NBL) is the most common extracranial solid tumor in children(1). The outcome is usually favorable in infants, in whom the tumor may regress spontaneously(2). In contrast, the tumor has inconsistent response to chemotherapy in older children, often with progression or relapse after apparent remission. Recent advances in molecular genetics, megatherapy with stem cell rescue and targeted therapy have improved survival in developed nations(3-5). Reports on the outcome of children with NBL from developing countries are limited, even though pediatric oncologists manage a significant number of children with NBL(6-8). We describe patient characteristics and treatment outcome in children beyond the age of one-year with NBL. As the biological behavior of neuroblastoma in infancy is different, it is being analyzed separately.

Methods

Previously untreated children, between the ages of 1-13 years, with an established diagnosis of NBL, were included. Case files were retrieved from the records of pediatric oncology clinic. The relevant data pertaining to diagnosis, treatment and outcome was recorded on a pre-designed proforma. Meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scanning and MYCN amplification was not performed because of non-availability. Urinary catecholamine estimation was done in limited cases. Diagnosis of NBL was established by (a) fine needle aspiration cytology with or without immunocytochemistry, or, (b) bone marrow examination, revealing unequivocal tumor cells in conjunction with a suprarenal mass. Staging was done according to the International Neuroblastoma Staging System(9).

The treatment included chemotherapy followed by surgical resection/debulking of the primary tumor. Children with stage I/II disease, were taken for primary surgery. Patients were administered courses of "OPEC" therapy, namely, vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 on day 1, cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 2 and etoposide 120 mg/m2 on day 4. Hematopoietic growth factors were not administered. Response to treatment at primary/metastatic sites was reassessed after 3-5 courses. If there was no evidence of metastatic disease, resection/debulking of the primary tumor was attempted, depending on the extent and adherence of the tumor to adjoining structures. Treatment was declared unsuccessful if there was evidence of metastatic disease subsequent to 4 courses of chemotherapy. Patients with stage III or stage IV disease with residual tumor mass following surgery were administered radiotherapy to tumor bed, provided that the metastatic disease had resolved. An additional two courses of ‘OPEC’ were administered subsequent to local therapy.

Results

In the period between January 1990 to December 2004, there were 103 children (>1 year old) with NBL. The mean age was 41.5±24.8 months (range: 12.5 months to 12.5 years). 54 (52.4%) and 41 (39.8%) children were in the age range of 1-3 and 3-6 years, respectively. Only 2 (1.9%) children were older than 9 years. The male:female ratio was 2.8:1. The salient manifestations and site of origin of primary tumor are outlined in Tables I and II, respectively.

TABLE I  

Clinical Manifestations at Presentation (N=103)
Symptoms No. (%) Signs No. (%)
Fever 67 (65.0) Hepatomegaly 31 (30.0)
Abdomen lump/distension 56 (54.4) Bone lesions 26 (25.2)
Bone pains 32 (31.0) Splenomegaly 15 (14.6)
Proptosis 28 (27.2) Lymphadenopathy 14 (13.6)
Lower limb paresis 2 Central nervous system metastasis 7  (6.8)
Urinary incontinence 2 Bilateral pleural effusion 4
Jaundice 3 Superior vena cava syndrome 1
Chronic diarrhea, hematuria and   Opsomyoclonus and ataxia 1
  abnormal gait and eye movements 1 each    
          The total exceeds 103, as symptoms coexisted in a single patient
TABLE II

Site of Primary Tumor (N=103)
Site No (%)
Abdominal 87 (84.5)
   Adrenal 66  
   Retroperitoneal/paravertebral 13  
   Too large to identify site of origin 7  
   Pelvis 1  
Occult 11 (10.7)
Thorax 5 (4.8)

Bone marrow examination could be performed in 86 children. It was infiltrated with tumor cells in 54 (62.8%). Urinary vanillylmandelic acid (VMA) levels were estimated in 10 children and were elevated in 3. Advanced Stage III or IV disease was documented in 27 and 74 cases, respectively. Localized Stage I or II disease was observed in one case each.

TABLE III

Treatment Rendered Following Initial Evaluation and Outcome
Treatment details No. (%)
No treatment administered 44 (42.7)
Treatment default during various stages of therapy, with no meaningful assessment 10 (9.7)
Death before start of treatment due to progressive primary disease 3 (2.9)
Remaining patients available for outcome analysis 46 (44.7)
Disease progression/incomplete control during treatment 19 (41.3)
Relapse after complete treatment 22 (47.8)
Death due to sepsis 1 (2.2)
Off treatment, disease free 4 (8.7)

The treatment rendered, and outcome is described in Table III. 17 (63%) patients with Stage III and 27 (36.5%) with Stage IV disease received therapy. 17 patients received radiotherapy. Radiation dose ranged from 10-30 Gy (mean: 17.8±5.6 Gy). Tumor was found to be adherent/inoperable at the operating table in 4; all had received 4 courses of ‘OPEC’ prior to surgery. Treatment was declared unsuccessful in the remaining 7, as the marrow had persistent infiltration following chemotherapy.

Recurrence of tumor occurred at the metastatic and primary sites in 12 and 8 children, respectively. Relapsed disease in both primary and metastatic site was evident in 2 patients. Mean duration of interval between treatment completion and relapse was 3.9±3.2 months. All relapsed within one year and merely 3 relapsed later than 6 months. No patient received salvage chemotherapy or an autologous transplant.

Three patients died prior to treatment initiation. One had superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS), secondary to tumor located in the posterior mediastinum and died of respiratory failure. Another had disseminated disease with bilateral pleural effusion; the third had raised intracranial pressure secondary to metastatic brain disease. Four patients, who completed therapy, are disease free for 16.5±6.7 months. These include one child each with Stage I, II, III and IV.

Discussion

More than half the patients did not receive specific treatment or defaulted therapy. Low socioeconomic background, coupled with the unfavorable outcome associated with advanced stage disease contributed to a large drop out. In addition, the assistance from non-governmental cancer support groups was restricted, and directed preferentially towards ‘cancers with favorable outcomes’. The age distribution of patients has been typical(1). The male preponderance of 2.8:1, on the other hand, has been higher than figure of 1.1:1 in most large series(1). Gender bias favoring males is common in Indian society due to preferential care of male children(7,10).

The primary site could not be defined in 11 (10.7%) cases, which is higher than the textbook quoted figure of 1%(1). In 99 patients with stage IV NBL from France(11), none had an occult primary, whilst 6 (6.6%) of 91 patients reported by Kusumakumari, et al.(6) had an undetected primary. Greater number of patients with occult disease in our study probably reflects an insufficient investigative workup. MIBG scan was not available. CT-scan of chest/abdomen was not performed in cases with normal ultrasonography of the abdomen and X-ray of the chest. The decision was influenced primarily by non-inclination of the family towards treatment. Urinary catecholamine levels are reported to be elevated in the large majority. Merely 3 (30%) patients in the index study, on the other hand, had elevated urinary VMA levels. A lack of sensitive technique and faulty collection of sample could presumably be contributory. A non-contributory result with urinary VMA has been the experience of other centers from India as well(8,10). Of 16 infants reported from Mumbai, urinary VMA levels were elevated in 8(8).

The majority (98%), had either Stage III or IV disease. In 7 patients, the massive size of abdominal disease precluded the assessment of the organ of origin. 88% patients from Malaysia, as well as Turkey, and 82% from Hong Kong had advanced Stage NBL(12-14). Delayed visit to the health care facility is presumably a factor contributing towards high proportion of patients with advanced disease. In addition, patients with localized disease are likely to be managed in surgical units, without referral to Pediatric-oncology-unit; the ‘difficult’ cases thus tend to get clustered.

Paraneoplastic syndrome was observed in two. One had intractable diarrhea and another had opsomyoclonus syndrome and ataxia. Patient with neurological paraneoplastic syndrome is the sole patient with Stage I disease. The lower Stage is characteristic; majority of children with this syndrome have favorable outcome with respect to their tumor(15,16). The tumor was resected completely and patient is disease free for 10-months. A single patient presented with SVCS. NBL is a rare cause of SVCS(17). Administration of ‘OPEC’ was uneventful and uncomplicated in the majority. Febrile neutropenia was not a limiting issue. One child died of septicemia, which was not associated with neutropenia.

The survival of patients with stage III/IV disease has been dismal. Merely 2 patients with advanced stage disease are disease free. Of the 25 patients whose bone marrow was infiltrated and followed the treatment without default, 7 (28%) had persistent infiltration following 4 courses of OPEC. Nearly, similar number of patients had disease progression/incomplete control during therapy and relapsed after completing therapy. Majority of the relapses were observed soon after completing the therapy, indicating that the disease was suppressed temporarily by chemotherapy. The evidence is overwhelming that conventional chemotherapy was unsuccessful in controlling the disease.

Historically, the long-term survival of high-risk NBL, with non-myeloablative chemotherapy has been less than 15%(18). Kusumakumari, et al.(7) reported a 2-year survival of 11.7%. In a study from Turkey(13), five-year overall and event-free survival rates were 63 and 30% in Stage III, and 6 and 5%, in Stage IV patients, respectively. A 2 year disease free survival of 39% was reported in 78 patients from Malaysia (12). Myeloablative therapy with stem cell rescue and targeted therapy has improved survival in recent times(1,4,19,20). In the European Neuro-blastoma Study Group, 5-year event-free survival was 38% in the melphalan-treated group and 27% in the "non-melphalan" group(4). French Society of Pediatric Oncology reported higher survival rates (83%) with high-dose chemotherapy, stem cell rescue and radiotherapy, when compared with standard treatment alone (25%), in Stage II/III disease(3). The current survival rates however remain unacceptable and have come at the expense of significant immediate and long-term morbidity(21). Information regarding MYCN status and the pathological classification for favorable/unfavorable disease is lacking in the index study. It is thus unfeasible to comment if unfavorable features were responsible for the adverse outcome.

Contributors: DB and VG collected the data. DB performed literature search, analyzed the data and prepared the initial draft. RKM guided the study, critically evaluated the manuscript, and will be the guarantor. KLNR contributed to surgical management. RKM, AT and DB participated in the clinic.

Funding: Nil.

Competing interest: None stated.

 


What This Study Adds?

• Majority of children with neuroblastoma in India present with advanced stage disease and the outcome is dismal with conventional non-myloablative chemotherapy.
 


 

References

 

1. Brodeur GM, Maris JM. Neuroblastoma. In: Pizzo PA, Poplack DG (eds): Principles and Practice of Pediatric Oncology, 5th edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: 2006 p. 933- 970.

2. Nickerson HJ, Matthay KK, Seeger RC, Brodeur GM, Shimada H, Perez C, et al. Favorable biology and outcome of stage IV-S neuroblastoma with supportive care or minimal therapy: A Children’s Cancer Group Study. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 477-486.

3. Laprie A, Michon J, Hartmann O, Munzer C, Leclair MD, Coze C, et al. Neuroblastoma Study Group of the French Society of Pediatric Oncology. High-dose chemotherapy followed by locoregional irradiation improves the outcome of patients with international neuroblastoma staging system Stage II and III neuroblastoma with MYCN amplification. Cancer 2004; 101: 1081-1089.

4. Pritchard J, Cotterill SJ, Germond SM, Imeson J, de Kraker J, Jones DR. High dose melphalan in the treatment of advanced neuroblastoma: results of a randomised trial (ENSG-1) by the European Neuroblastoma Study Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2005; 44: 348-357.

5. Tsuchida Y, Shitara T, Kuroiwa M, Ikeda H. Current treatment and future directions in neuroblastoma. Indian J Pediatr 2003; 70: 809-812.

6. Kusumakumari P, Ajithkumar TV, Ratheesan K, Chellam VG, Nair MK. Pattern and outcome of neuroblastoma. A 10 year study. Indian Pediatr 1998; 35: 223-229.

7. Kusumakumari P, Ajithkumar TV, Hariharan S, Varma RR, Chellam VG, Nair R, et al. Intensive chemotherapy in children with stage IV neuroblastoma. Indian J Pediatr 1999; 66: 867-872.

8. Rao SR, Iyer RS, Nair CN, Kurkure PA, Pai SK, Advani SH. Infantile neuroblastoma: 10 year TMH experience. Indian J Cancer 1993; 30: 85- 87.

9. Brodeur GM, Seeger RC, Barrett A, Berthold F, Castleberry RP, D’Angio G, et al. International criteria for diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment in patients with neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol 1988; 6: 1874-1881.

10. Marwaha RK, Choudhry VP. Neuroblastoma in Indian Children. Indian J Pediatr 1982; 49: 811-813.

11. Frappaz D, Michon J, Coze C, Berger C, Plouvier E, Lasset C, et al. LMCE3 treatment strategy: Results in 99 consecutively diagnosed stage 4 neuroblastomas in children older than 1 year at diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 468-476.

12. Ng SM, Abdullah WA, Lin HP, Chan LL. Presenting features and treatment outcome of 78 Malaysian children with neuroblastoma. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 1999; 30: 149-153.

13. Olgun N, Kansoy S, Aksoylar S, Cetingul N, Vergin C, Oniz H, et al. Experience of the Izmir Pediatric Oncology Group on Neuroblastoma: IPOG-NBL-92 Protocol. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2003; 20: 211-218.

14. Leung CK. Fifteen years’ review of advanced child-hood neuroblastoma from a single institution in Hong Kong. Chin Med J (Engl) 1998; 111: 466-469.

15. Posner JB. Paraneoplastic syndromes in neuro-blastoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2004; 26: 553-554.

16. Altman AJ, Baehner RL. Favorable prognosis for survival in children with coincident opsomyoclonus and neuroblastoma. Cancer 1976; 37: 846-852.

17. Ingram L, River G, Shapiro DDN. Superior vena cava syndrome associated with childhood malignancy. Analysis of 24 cases. Med Pediatr Oncol 1990; 18: 476.

18. Shah S, Ravindranath Y. Neuroblastoma. Indian J Pediatr 1998; 65: 691-705.

19. Castel V, Canete A. A comparison of current neuroblastoma chemotherapeutics. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2004; 5: 71-80.

20. Matthay KK, Tan JC, Villablanca JG, Yanik GA, Veatch J, Franc B, et al. Phase I dose escalation of iodine-131-metaiodobenzylguanidine with myelo-ablative chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation in refractory neuroblastoma: a new approach to Neuroblastoma Therapy Consortium Study. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 500-506.

21. Nathan PC, Furlong W, De Pauw S, Horsman J, Van Schaik C, Rolland M, et al. Health status of young children during therapy for advanced neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2004; 43: 659-667.

Home

Past Issue

About IP

About IAP

Feedback

Links

 Author Info.

  Subscription