1.gif (1892 bytes)

Review Article

Indian Pediatrics 2006; 43:141-147

Epidemiology of Childhood Hodgkin's Disease: Is it Different in Developing Countries

 

Veronique Dinand
Laxman S. Arya

From the Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110 029, India.

Correspondence to: L..S. Arya, Senior Consultant, Pediatric Oncology & Hematology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi 110 076. E-mail: [email protected]


 

Abstract:

Childhood Hodgkin’s Disease (HD) is a lymphoma that displays characteristic epidemiological, clinical and pathological features according to various geographic areas, particularly according to the socio-economic level of a given country. India presents a similar sex, age and subtype distribution as other emerging countries: high male-to-female ratio, younger age at presentation, high proportion of advanced stages and presence of constitutional symptoms, predominance of mixed cellularity type of HD. The etiology of HD is still the subject of controversy and investigation, but it may occur as a sequel of a viral infection during early childhood, such as Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). Most cases of Indian childhood HD are associated to EBV, while genetic predisposition is seen in very rare cases.

Key words: Epidemiology, Epstein-Barr virus, Hodgkin’s disease.

Introduction

In 1990, countries with limited resources accounted for 86% of the world’s children (<15 years), a figure projected to increase to more than 90% by 2030(1). These countries bear most of the global burden of childhood cancer(2). First recognised by Thomas Hodgkin(3) in 1832, the etiology of HD is still subject to numerous speculations. Epidemiological findings suggest that it might have a different etiology in different age groups.

Definition

HD is a lymphoreticular malignancy characterised by a progressive painless enlargement of lymph nodes and defined by specific histopathological features. These include a partial or total replacement of nodal architecture by an inflammatory cellular background containing Reed-Sternberg (RS) cells or their variants. Characteristic RS cells are binucleate or multinucleate giant cells, with prominent nucleoli and abundant cytoplasm. The Rye morphologic classification has been modified with the addition of immunological markers in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification(3).

Clinical presentation

Probably originating in a single lymph node, HD spreads by extension to contiguous nodes. The most common presentation of HD in children is a painless cervical lymph-adenopathy, usually unilateral. Primary disease in a subdiaphragmatic site occurs in only about 3% of cases. Ann-Arbor staging classification(4) distinguishes four stages according to the extension of the disease at the moment of diagnosis. In western countries, 75% of newly diagnosed patients have early disease at presentation (stage I-II)(5-7). In less economically developed countries, however, more than half of the patients have advanced disease (stage III-IV)(8-11), perhaps because of delayed diagnosis and referral.

Constitutional "B" symptoms (un-explained fever, night sweats and weight loss) occur in 25-30% of cases reported in Western literature. Reports from developing countries show a greater incidence of B symptoms, in about 50% of cases.

Incidence and age distribution

With an annual incidence of about 0.5 cases per 100,000 children in the U.S. and in the European Union (EU)(12), HD accounts for 5 to 6% of childhood cancers and is the sixth most frequent childhood malignancy, after leukemias, brain tumors, neuroblastomas, nephroblastomas and rabdomyosarcomas. Incidence of childhood HD is maximal in Latin-American countries, between 1 and 1.5 per 100,000 children(13). In developing countries, lymphomas are relatively common and HD is the fourth more common malignancy, after leukemias, brain tumors and non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (NHL)(13). Age standardised incidence rate of HD in Indian children (both sexes) was reported 0.42 per 100,000 (Mumbai), equal to the incidence of NHL, HD being the fourth more common after acute lymphoblastic leukemia, brain cancer and retinoblastoma(14).

HD presents a bimodal distribution with regard to age, with a rise in incidence in young adults (20-34 years) and in the elderly (55-74 years)(15). In contrast, in developing countries the first peak occurs in children and teenagers; there is an inverse relationship between the incidence of the HD in children and young adults within countries according to their economic development(16). Such patterns of occurrence being similar to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), tuberculosis and poliomyelitis infections, the role of an environmental exposure was suggested as a possible etiology of HD.

Reports from various countries with limited resources show that childhood HD occurs at a younger age than in western countries: as many as 20 to 30 % of childhood HD cases in developing countries occur before 5 years of age(10,17) against some 5% in industrialised countries (Table I).

Table I

Sex, Age, Stage and Subtype Distribution of Childhood Hodgkin’s Disease 
in Various Countries
Author Country N M:F Mean age
(Range)
<5 yrs
(%)
III-IV
(%)
MC
(%)
Hunger, et al. (5), 1994
 
USA (Stanford)
57
1.7:1
12 (4-17)
5
60
17
Shanker, et al.(6), 1997
UK
331
2.5:1
n.a.(2-15)
32.3
22
Schellong, et al.(7), 1999
Germany/ Austria
578
1.2:1
Median 13
(2.7-17.9)
5.5
31
24.2
Olweny, et al.(8), 1978
Uganda
48
2.4:1
77.1
41.7
Baez, et al. (10), 1994
Nicaragua
48
7.9 (3-15)
58.3
52.1
Kapoor G., et al.(19), 1995
India (Bombay)
147
     6:1
37
65
Sackmann, et al.(17), 1997
Argentina
114
1.7:1
9 (2-17)
20.2
51.7
Çavdar, et al.(10), 1999 
Turkey
175
3.1:1
7.8 (2.5-15)
29.7
65.3
60.6
Arya, et al.(11), 2005
India (Delhi)
218
9.6:1
Median 8
(2.7-14)
14.9
45.3
86.0
Abbreviations: N: number of cases. M:F male to female ratio. MC: mixed cellularity subtype.

Sex distribution

Pediatric HD presents a slight male pre-dominance in Western countries (M : F ratio close to 1.5:1). However, there is a large male excess in less economically developed countries, with a M : F ratio between 2.5:1 and 5:1. These countries have a higher proportion of cases occurring under the age of 10 years, and male predominance is universally higher in that age group, with a M:F ratio of approximately 4:1.

India presents a significant male pre-dominance in HD that much higher than in any other types of childhood cancers. For instance, a seven-year study of 617 cases of childhood cancers registered in Bangalore showed a M : F ratio of 1.8:1, whereas the 54 cases of childhood HD had a M : F ratio of 7.8:1(18). Likewise, the analysis of childhood cancers registered in All India Institute of Medical Sciences during a 5-year period showed a M : F ratio of 7.4:1 in HD, against M:F ratios in other cancers between 2:1 (neuroblastoma and retinoblastoma) and 4.0:1 (acute myeloid leukemia) (unpublished data). Similarly, childhood HD in Mumbai presents a M : F ratio of 6:1(19). The sex distribution discrepancy in HD between countries is not yet fully understood. It could be partly explained by the association existing between decreasing national economic status and increasing sex ratio in childhood cancers(20). In the case of India, it could also be due to poor heath care access for females, reflecting the cultural disinterest in the female child. However, this hypothesis fails to explain why HD presents a much higher male predominance than any Indian childhood cancers.

Etiology of HD

Viral infection

In the west, features indicating high standard of living in early childhood are significant risk factors associated with the development of HD in young adulthood: single family housing, small family size and a high level of maternal education(21). HD in this age group might arise as a result of delayed exposure to a common infectious agent. Young adults (16-24 years) with a prior history of infectious mononucleosis have an increased risk of HD, whereas early exposure to chicken pox, measles, mumps, pertussis and rubella plays a protective role, possibly because it stimulates immunity(22). HD could be caused by a genetically determined abnormal immune response to a childhood infection. This hypothesis is supported by the increased incidence of HD among patients with immune deficiency states, such as ataxia-telangectasia(23) or HIV infection(24). Host factors may also explain the male excess in childhood HD, via a different response to that infectious agent.

Attention was drawn on several lymphotropic viruses, particularly EBV, because of its clearly established association with malignant and non-malignant lymphoid proliferations. EBV’s association with HD was shown by various epidemiological(25), serological(26) and pathological studies(27, 28). In industrialised countries, EBV-associated HD represents 30 to 40% of all ages HD, while the proportion is significantly higher (70% to 100%) in patients with lower socio-economic status and in developing countries from Latin-America, Africa and Asia. China, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Japan have an intermediary association (60 to 65%). In India, EBV was found in 78% of all ages HD cases, and in 91 to 98% of children(29, 30). EBV-associated HD is more frequent in children below 10 years of age, in males, in less-developed regions and in mixed cellularity (MC) subtype(31). However, geographic variation of EBV-associated HD could be due to the higher proportion of patients less than 10 years at diagnosis in series from developing countries(32).

Primary EBV infection occurs within a few months to years after birth in developing countries and only during the second and third decade of life in industrialised countries. Early exposure to EBV infection may play an etiological role in the pathogenesis of HD, especially in less economically developed countries where EBV seroconversion is almost universal by the age of 4 years. The detection of EBV genome in tumor tissues does not necessarily imply EBV’s direct involvement in the pathogenesis of HD, though the presence of EBV in a monoclonal episomal form(27) indicates that EBV infection precedes the expansion of the neoplastic clone, thus strengthening its causal role. However, the presence of EBV-negative HD cases suggests other possible pathogenic etiologies.

Armstrong et al have built a three-disease model for HD, on the basis of age at diagnosis and EBV status(33). The first entity is largely a disease of childhood, EBV-associated disease, with higher incidence in developing countries and usually of MC subtype. Development of HD is probably associated with early exposure to EBV infection, which occurs at a particularly young age in less economically developed countries. The second entity, predominantly affecting older adults, is also EBV associated, usually of MC subtype, and likely to be related to EBV reactivation events. The third entity predominantly affects young adults. It is more prevalent in developed countries, usually of nodular sclerosis (NS) subtype, and not EBV-associated. Since this age group has the maximum epidemiological evidence for an infectious etiology, it may be associated with the delayed exposure to another infectious agent.

Other lymphotropic herpesviruses have been studied, such as cytomegalovirus, human herpes virus 6 (HHV-6), HHV-7, HHV-8 (34-36). Molecular studies showed no evidence for their presence within H-RS cells. However, HHV-6 antibody titres are elevated in HD(37). TT virus has recently been found in more than 30% of nodular sclerosis HL tumor cells, often with co-infection with EBV(38).

Familial HD

Rare cases of familial HD have been reported. Most cases concern adults, and less than 7% of familial cases are seen in children(39). Familial HD might be caused by environmental factors, but EBV serological and in situ hybridisation studies suggest that EBV does not play an important role in familial HD(40). However, some cases may be due to a genetic predisposition to HD, with a possible recessive mode of inheritance(41). Both HLA-linked and HLA-unlinked factors are responsible for familial HD, and only a subset of cases is determined by specific HLA antigens: HLA-A1, B5, B8, B18 and W35(41). Immunodeficiency might play an etiological role in very rare cases of familial HD, as suggested by the report of decreased induced lymphocyte DNA synthesis and decreased CD4+/CD8+ ratio in HD cases and family members of patients with HD(42).

There is a threefold to sevenfold increased risk of HD for the siblings of young adults with HD, and siblings of the same sex as the affected person have a risk double than that of siblings of the opposite sex(43). The risk for identical twins of HD patients to develop HD themselves is 99-fold(44). A long time interval between cases in the same family is very uncommon. There is an increased concordance of histological subtypes between affected relatives(41). Genetic susceptibility might be involved in the male predominance, which is particularly marked before 10 years of age, but no study has suggested this hypothesis so far.

Our team reported the first case of familial HD in Indian children(45). Two siblings aged 14 and 7 years presented on the same day with a history of cervical lymphadenopathy for 4 years and 12 months respectively and were diagnosed as MC-HD. Both tumors showed positive immuno-histochemical staining for EBV latent membrane protein-1.

Conclusion

Epidemiological features of childhood HD vary greatly among countries with different socio-economic level. Both the development of HD at a younger age and the male predominance in underprivileged populations could be at least partly explained by the hypothesis of an etiologic role of EBV in the genesis of HD, as there is an increased male susceptibility to viral and bacterial infection in childhood, which is more marked in the first five years of life. In India, as in other developing countries where EBV primary infection occurs at an early age, EBV genome is almost universally found in HD tumor cells. Low socio-economic status may generate malnutrition, which could lead to impaired immunity after initial exposure, and so to EBV-associated HD.

Genetic predisposition to HD rarely occurs, and etiological factors other than EBV are responsible for the development of EBV-negative tumors. Much is still to be proven in order to understand the various mechanisms leading to HD. The current challenge in child-hood HD remains to improve patients’ survival at the cost of minimal late complications.

 

 References

 

1. World Development Report, 1993. Published for the World Bank. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.

2. Hodgkin T. On some morbid appearances of the absorbent glands and spleen. Med Chir Trans 1832; 17: 62-114.

3. Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Diebold J, Flandrin G, Muller-Hermelink HK, Vardiman J, et al. The World Health Organization classification of neoplasms of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: Report of the Clinical Advisory Committee meeting – Airlie House, Virginia, November, 1997. Hematol J 2000; 1: 53-66.

4. Carbone PP, Kaplan HS, Musshoff K, Smithers DW, Tubiana M. Report of the committee on Hodgkin’s disease staging. Cancer Res 1971; 31: 1860-1861.

5. Hunger SP, Link MP, Donaldson SS. ABVD/MOPP and low-dose involved-field radiotherapy in pediatric Hodgkin’s disease: the Stanford experience. J Clin Oncol 1994;12: 2160-2166.

6. Shankar AG, Ashley S, Radford M, Barrett A, Wright D, Pinkerton CR, et al. Does histology influence outcome in childhood Hodgkin’s disease? Results from the United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 2622-2630.

7. Schellong G, Pötter R, Brämswig J, Wagner W, Prott FJ, Dorffel W, et al. High cure rates and reduced long-term toxicity in pediatric Hodgkin’s disease: the German-Austrian multicenter trial DAL-HD-90. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 3736-3744.

8. Olweny CLM, Katongole-Mbidde E, Kiire C, Lwanga SK, Magrath I, Ziegler JL. Childhood Hodgkin’s disease in Uganda. Cancer 1978; 42: 787-792.

9. Baez F, Ovampo E, Conter V, Flores A, Gutierrez T, Malta A, et al. Treatment of childhood Hodgkin’s disease with COPP or COPP/ABV (hybrid) without radiotherapy in Nicaragua. Ann Oncol 1997; 8: 247-250.

10. Çavdar AO, Pamir A, Gözdasoglu S, Babacan E, Yavuz G, Umal E, et al. Hodgkin’s disease in children: clinicoepidemiologic and viral (Epstein-Barr virus) analyses. Med Pediatr Oncol 1999; 32: 18-24.

11. Arya LS, Dinand V, Thavaraj V, Bhakhshi S, Dawar R, Rath GK, et al. Hodgkin’s disease in Indian children: outcome with chemo- therapy alone. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2005; Sept 13.

12. Macfarlane GJ, Evstifeeva T, Boyle P, Grufferman S. International patterns in the occurrence of Hodgkin’s disease in children and young adult males. Int J Cancer 1995; 61: 165-169.

13. Stiller CA, Parkin DM. Geographic and ethnic variations in the incidence of childhood cancer. Br Med Bull 1996; 52: 682-703.

14. Parkin DM, Stiller CA, Draper GJ, Bieber CA. International indidence of childhood cancer. Int J Cancer 1988; 42: 511-520.

15. Grufferman SL, Delzell E. Epidemiology of Hodgkin’s disease. Epidem Rev 1984; 6: 76-106.

16. Correa P, O’Conor GT. Epidemiologic patterns of Hodgkin’s disease. Int J Cancer 1971; 8: 192-201.

17. Sackmann-Muriel F, Zubizarreta P, Gallo G, Scopinaro M, Alderete D, Alfaro E, et al. Hodgkin’s disease in children: results of a prospective randomized trial in a single institution in Argentina. Med Pediatr Oncol 1997; 29: 544-552.

18. Nandakumar A, Anantha N, Appaji L, Swamy K, Mukherjee G, Venugopal T, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of childhood cancers in Bangalore, India. Cancer Causes Control 1996; 7: 405-410.

19. Kapoor G, Advani SH, Dinshaw KA, Muckaden MA, Soman CS, Saikia TK, et al. Treatment results of Hodgkin’s disease in Indian children. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1995; 12: 559-569.

20. Pearce MS, Parker L. Childhood cancer registrations in the developing world: still more boys than girls. Int J Cancer 2001; 91: 402-406.

21. Alexander FE, McKinney PA, Williams J, Ricketts TJ, Cartwright RA. Epidemiological evidence for the "two-disease hypothesis" in Hodgkin’s disease. Int J Epidemiol 1991; 20: 354-261.

22. Alexander FE, Jarrett RF, Lawrence D, Armstrong AA, Freeland J, Gokhale DA, et al. Risk factors for Hodgkin’s disease by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status: prior infection by EBV and other agents. Brit J Cancer 2000; 82: 1117-1121.

23. Sandoval C, Swift M. Hodgkin’s disease in ataxia-telangectasia patients with poor outcome. Med Pediatr Oncol 2003; 40: 162-166.

24. Rabkin CS. Association of non-acquired immunodeficiency-defining cancers with human immunodeficiency virus infection. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1998; 23: 23-25.

25. Miller RW, Beebe GW. Infectious mononucleosis and the empirical risk of cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1973; 50: 315-321.

26. Levine PH, Ablashi DV, Berard CW, Carbone PP, Waggoner DE, Malan L. Elevated antibody titers to Epstein-Barr virus in Hodgkin’s disease. Cancer 1971; 27: 416-421.

27. Weiss LM, Strickler JG, Warnke RA, Purtillo DT, Sklar J. Epstein-Barr viral DNA in tissues of Hodgkin’s disease. Am J Pathol 1987; 129: 86-91.

28. Masih A, Wickert R, Mitchell D, Duggan M. The detection of EBV genome in Hodgkin’s disease by dot-blot analysis and the polymerase chain reaction. Lab invest 1990; 62: 64A.

29. Naresh KN, Johnson J, Srinivas V, Soman CS, Saikia T, Advani SH, et al. Epstein-Barr virus association in classical Hodgkin’s disease provides survival advantage to patients and correlates with higher expression of proliferation markers in Reed-Sternberg cells. Ann Oncol 2000; 11: 91-96.

30. Dinand V, Arya LS, Dawar R. Hodgkin’s disease in North Indian children: prevalence and significance of Epstein-Barr virus Latent Membrane Protein-1 detection in Hodgkin’s and Reed Sternberg cells. Indian J Medical Res 2005; 121:157 (abstract).

31. Glaser SL, Lin RJ, Stewart SL, Ambinder RF, Jarrett RF, Brousset P, et al. Epstein-Barr virus-associated Hodgkin’s disease: epidemiologic characteristics in international data. Int J Cancer 1997; 70: 375-382.

32. Razzouk BI, Gan YJ, Jenkins JJ, Liu Q, Hudson M, Sixbey JW, et al. Epstein-Barr virus in pediatric Hodgkin’s disease: age and histiotype are more predictive than geographic region. Med Pediatr Oncol 1997; 28: 248-254.

33. Armstrong AA, Alexander FE, Cartwright R, Angus B, Krajewski AS, Wright DH, et al. Epstein-Barr virus and Hodgkin’s disease: further evidence for the three disease hypothesis. Leukemia. 1998; 12: 1272-1276.

34. Torelli G, Marasca R, Luppi M, Selleri L, Ferrari S, Narni F, et al. Human herpesvirus-6 in human lymphomas: identification of specific sequences in Hodgkin’s lymphomas by polymerase chain reaction. Blood 1991; 77: 2251-2258.

35. Secchiero P, Bonino LD, Lussi P, Abele MC, Reato G, Kerim S, et al. Human herpesvirus type 7 in Hodgkin’s disease. Br J Haematol 1998; 101: 492-499.

36. Armstrong AA, Shield L, Gallagher A, Jarrett RF. Lack of involvement of known oncogenic DNA viruses in Epstein-Barr virus-negative Hodgkin’s disease. Br J Cancer 1998; 77: 1045-1047.

37. Jarrett RF, MacKensie J. Epstein-Barr virus and other candidate viruses in the pathogenesis of Hodgkin’s disease. Seminar Hematol 1999; 36: 260-269.

38. Garbuglia AR, Iezzi T, Capobianchi MR, Pignoloni P, Pulsoni A, Sourdis J, et al. Detection of TT virus in lymph node biopsies of B-cell lymphoma and Hodgkin’s disease, and its association with EBV infection. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2003; 16: 109-118.

39. Ferraris AM, Rancchi O, Rapezzi D, Gaetani GF, Boffetta P. Familial Hodgkin’s disease: A disease of young adulthood? Ann Hematol 1997; 74: 131-134.

40. Lin AY, Kingma DW, Lennette ET, Fears TR, Whitehouse JM, Ambinder RF, et al. Epstein-Barr virus and familial Hodgkin’s disease. Blood 1996; 88: 3160-3165.

41. Chakravarti A, Halloran S, Bale SJ, Tucker MA. Etiological heterogeneity in Hodgkin’s disease: HLA linked and unlinked determinants of susceptibility independent of histological concordance. Genet Epidemiol 1986; 3: 407-415.

42. Merk K, Bjorkholm M, Tullgren O, Mellstedt H, Holm G. Immune deficiency in family members of patients with Hodgkin’s disease. Cancer 1990; 66: 1938-1943.

43. Grufferman S, Cole P, Smith PG, Lukes RJ. Hodgkin’s disease in siblings. N Engl J Med 1977; 296: 248-250.

44. Mack TM, Cozen W, Shibata DK, Weiss LM, Nathwani BN, Hernandez AM, et al. Concordance for Hodgkin’s disease in identical twins suggesting genetic susceptibility to the young-adult form of the disease. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 413-418.

45. Thavaraj V, Kumar R, Arya LS. Familial Hodgkin’s disease in two siblings. Indian Pediatr 2002; 39: 79-83.

Home

Past Issue

About IP

About IAP

Feedback

Links

 Author Info.

  Subscription