Letters to the Editor Indian Pediatrics 2005; 42:185-186 |
Diabetes Mellitus in Neurofibromatosis I: An Unusual Presentation |
The diagnosis of NF type I is based largely on clinical criteria set up by National Institute of Health, 1987(1). The condition is associated with protean manifestations as well as some serious complications. In 1983 a syndrome of multiple endocrine neoplasia was described as MEN type III which included duodenal carcinoid (often producing somatostatin) and NF type I or pheo-chromocytoma(2). Unlike other endocrinal abnormalities, diabetes mellitus is rarely seen in association with NF I. It is attributed to occurance of somatostatinomas in pancreas and duodenum. These are rare gut-pancreatic endocrinomas that secrete somatostatin. Inhibition of insulin release produces the diabetic state which is easy to control because of concomitant suppression of glucagon release. Most somatostatinomas in NF I are duodenal in location(3). Duodenal somatostatinomas are rare neuroendocrine generally non- functioning well differentiated tumors with a low grade of malignancy and are less frequently metastatic(4). These rare neoplasms have been reported only in adults and old patients. In contrast to pancreatic tumors, duodenal tumors are seldom associated with ‘somatostatin syndrome’ (diabetes mellitus, diarrhea, and chole-lithiasis). They are smaller in size, and give rise to symptoms like abdominal pain or lump, gastrointestinal hemorrhage and obstructive jaundice(3). A case has, however, been reported where partial somatostatinoma syndrome was found along with duodenal carcinoid(5). In yet another case all the 3 features of somatostatin syndrome were present in association with the same tumor. Most tumors located in the head of pancreas are malignant with metastasis to liver. Pancreatic tumors and metastasis are equally well detected by CT and MRI. They are echo poor and can sometimes be missed on USG (especially those located in the tail). Endoscopic evaluation is often required for detection of duodenal carcinoids as they can be missed on MRI or other radiographic techniques. Clinical and hormonal features of somatostatinoma syndrome are not requisite for diagnosis, analysis of plasma somatostatin immunoreactivity might lead to a higher detection rate of the tumor. Hyper-somatostatinemia demonstrated by Calcium-pentagastrin test or tolbutamide test is very useful for diagnosis. Tumor is further confirmed by immunohistochemical studies. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and octreotide therapy is a newer modality for diagnosis and treatment. Zeeba Zaka-ur-Rab,
|
References |
|