|
Indian Pediatr 2019;56: 1037-1040 |
|
Predictors of Mortality among Neonates with
Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Experience from an Inborn
Unselected Cohort in India
|
Tanushree Sahoo, Sindhu Sivanandan, Deena Thomas,
Ankit Verma, Anu Thukral, M Jeeva Sankar, Ramesh Agarwal and Ashok K
Deorari
From Division of Neonatology, Newborn Health
Knowledge Centre (NHKC), WHO Collaborating Centre for Training and
Research in Newborn Care, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute
of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Correspondence to: Dr Anu Thukral, Assistant
Professor, Department of Paediatrics, WHO Collaborating Centre for
Education & Research in Newborn Care, All India Institute of Medical
Sciences, Ansari Nagar,
New Delhi 110 029.
Email: [email protected]
Received: November 11, 2018;
Initial review: April 15, 2019;
Accepted: October 04, 2019 .
|
Objective: To evaluate the
clinical profile and predictors of mortality in neonates with congenital
diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). Method: Demographic and clinical
parameters of neonates with congenital diaphragmatic heria (n=37)
between January 2014 and October, 2017 were reviewed, and compared among
those who survived or expired in hospital. Result: Median (range)
gestation and birthweight were 38 (37-39) weeks and 2496 (2044-2889) g,
respectively. Persistent pulmonary hypertension (PPHN) was documented in
19 (51%) neonates and 10 (27%) had associated malformations. Surgery
could be performed in 18 (49%), overall mortality was 60%. On univariate
analysis, low Apgar scores, presence of malformations, PPHN, need for
higher initial peak inspiratory pressure/high frequency ventilation, and
requirement of a patch for closure were associated with increased
mortality. On multivariate analysis, PPHN remained the only significant
risk factor [adjusted RR 3.74 (95% CI 1.45-9.68)]. Conclusion:
The survival of infants with CDH is low, and PPHN is an important
predictor of mortality.
Keywords: Congenital malformation, Management,
Outcome, Pulmonary hypertension.
|
C ongenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) affects 1 in
2500-3000 live births [1].The management of a neonate with CDH is
challenging. Despite improvement of health care, mortality still exceeds
30% and morbidity among survivors is high. Overall survival is highly
variable; varying from 70-80% in developed countries [1-4] and 38-72% in
low- and middle-income countries [5-10].
Many neonates with CDH are not diagnosed in the
antenatal period, and may die soon after birth and thus may not come to
medical attention. These cases contribute to a significant "hidden"
mortality. The clinical profile and outcome reported from out-born units
and surgical units may under-estimate the actual mortality among CDH
cases. The neonates who finally reach referral centers have lesser
severity with relatively better prognosis. The actual burden is of the
"hidden mortality" of the disease [2,11]. Hence this study was planned
to describe the clinical profile and evaluate the outcome of neonates
with CDH in an inborn neonatal unit.
Methods
Data from 37 consecutive neonates with CDH delivered
at the All India Institute of Medical science, New Delhi between
January, 2014 and October, 2017 was retrieved and analyzed from the
hospital database. Neonates delivered elsewhere and transferred to the
neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) or pediatric surgical unit were
excluded. Data on demographic variables, treatment, and perioperative
and postoperative outcomes of enrolled cases were collected using
standard predesigned proforma.
Antenatally diagnosed cases of CDH were booked in
obstetrics unit and underwent comprehensive prenatal evaluation which
included ultrasonography and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for
confirmation of diagnosis, assessment of severity and associated
malformations. However, such an extensive evaluation was not possible
amongst late referrals.
Delivery room management included involvement of at
least two skilled personnel, elective intubation, and the use of T-piece
resuscitator for positive pressure venti-lation. Postnatal ventilatory
management in the NICU utilized lung-protective strategy with
conventional venti-lation with time-cycled, pressure-limited ventilation
(Web Fig. 1). Inspired oxygen concentration (FiO 2)
was adjusted to target pre-ductal oxygen saturation of >85%. Permissive
hypercapnia (PaCO2 55-65
mmHg) was tolerated as long as pH was
³7.25. If hypercapnia
persisted on conventional ventilation or when PIP required to target the
desired PaCO2 levels
exceeded 20-25 cm H20,
neonates were switched to high frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFO).
Persistent pulmonary hypertension was clinically suspected when there
was labile oxygen saturation (SaO2),
pre-ductal SaO2 <85% despite
high FiO2 or pre-post ductal
difference in oxygen saturation of >10%. Echocardiography was performed
in all cases to confirm PPHN, evaluate myocardial function and to rule
out cardiac malformation. We used inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in a few
cases as a bridge to surgery or prior to considering the use of
extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). ECMO was used in two cases
due to the presence of significant hypoxia (oxygenation index >40)
and/or persistent hypotension/acidosis despite optimal ventilation and
management of pulmonary hypertension. The management protocol, including
supportive therapy, have been outlined in Web Fig.1.
Surgical repair was done when the neonate was
clinically stable for at least 24 hours. Clinical stability was defined
as ventilatory parameters of FiO 2
requirement of <60%, MAP <12, PaO2
>50 mm Hg, normal blood pressures with minimum inotropic support
(dopamine and/or dobutamine of £10
µg/kg/min) and urine output >0.5 mL/kg/hr). Repair was either primary or
patch repair based on the size of the defect.
Statistical analysis: Patient demographics and
hospital course were summarized and compared among those survived and
died, in hospital. We used Fisher-exact test for categorical variables
and Student t-test for continuous variables. Statistical analysis was
done using Stata v 13.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX). For
multivariate analysis, generalized linear model equation was used.
Results
Of the 9,712 live births during the study period, 37
neonates (62% males) with diagnosis of CDH were included in the
analyses. The median (IQR) gestational age and birthweight of the cases
were 38 (37-39) week and 2496 (2044-2889) grams, respectively. Ultrasono-graphically,
lung-head ratio (LHR) was documented only in 13 (35%) cases. Majority of
(34, 92%) hernias were left sided and one baby had bilateral
abnormality. Associated congenital malformations were noted in 10 (27%)
cases, viz hypoplastic left heart with bilateral hydronephrosis,
hemivertebrae, pulmonary sequestration, Dandy Walker malformation,
bilateral corneal opacity, single kidney, polydactyly and cardiac
anomalies. The other perinatal characteristics and resuscitation details
are provided in Table I.
TABLE I Demographic Characteristics, Resuscitation Details and Postnatal Course (N=37)
Characteristics |
N (%) |
Antenatal diagnosis |
33 (89) |
Vaginal delivery |
31 (83) |
#GA at diagnosis (wk)
|
25 (23-29.8) |
Respiratory distress requiring intubation in delivery room
|
36 (97.3) |
Chest compression during delivery room resuscitation
|
4 (10.8) |
Fluid bolus during resuscitation
|
8 (21.6) |
#Apgar score (1 min)
|
4 (2-6) |
#Apgar score (5 min) |
7 (5-8) |
Primary repair
|
18 (48.6) |
Age of repair (d) |
4.8 (2.9-4.8) |
Incidence of PPHN |
19 (51.3) |
HFO
|
20 (54) |
#Maximum MAP
|
14 (11-17) |
Need for ECMO
|
2 (5.4) |
HFO: High frequency oscillation ventilation, MAP: mean
airway pressure, PPHN: persistent primary pulmonary
hypertension, ECMO: extra corporeal membrane oxygenation;
#Median (IQR). |
All cases requiring ventilatory support were
initiated on conventional ventilation and about a half (n=14)
were put on high frequency mode (HFO) subsequently. The median (IQR)
initial and maximum peak inspiratory pressures in conventional mode were
17 (15-20) and 19 (15-21) cm H 2O,
respectively. Median oxygenation index (OI) when HFO was initiated was
21 (14-45.75). Pneumothorax was noted in 11 (30%: 6 cases before and
rest secondary to surgery) cases and PPHN in 19 (51%) cases: out of
which 7 were stabilised and operated. In 13 neonates (35%) with
refractory PPHN, inhaled nitric oxide was used at a median age of 2
(0.25-7) days. Pulmonary vasodilator medications like sildenafil and
milrinone were used in approximately one-third. The median duration of
ventilation among survivors was 12 (5.8-15) days.
Surgical repair could be performed only in 18
neonates: in 14 cases at median age of 2 days (IQR 1-5.7), while in rest
at or beyond 2 nd week.
Closure of diaphragmatic defect was primary in 14 (78%) neonates while a
patch was used in the rest (n=4). Extracorporeal membrane
oxygenation (ECMO) support was used in two cases on day 14 and 17,
respectively during primary repair: both cases succumbed due to
multi-organ dysfunction. One case of left sided CDH, with persistent
ventilatory requirement and repeated extubation failure after surgical
repair improved after repair of a diaphragmatic hernia on the
contralateral side, detected later.
TABLE II Significant Predictors of Mortality Among Babies with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia (N=37)
Characteristics |
Survived |
Deaths |
P value |
|
N= 15 |
N= 22 |
|
Malformation
|
1 (6.7) |
9 (40.9) |
0.03 |
#Apgar score at 1 min
|
6 (4-7) |
2.5 (2-5.25) |
0.01 |
#Apgar score at 5 min
|
8 (7-8) |
6 (4-7.25) |
<0.01 |
Initial PIP*
|
15.5 (14-16.25) |
19.5(17-22) |
<0.01 |
Need for HFO
|
5 (33.3) |
15 (68.2) |
0.04 |
Day of surgery
|
2(1-4) |
14 (4-21) |
0.03 |
Hospital stay (d)
|
20 (14-26) |
4(2-14) |
0.001 |
PPHN
|
1 (6.7) |
18 (81.8) |
<0.01 |
Sildenafil use
|
1 (6.7) |
10 (45.5) |
<0.01 |
Milrinone use
|
1 (6.7) |
12 (54.5) |
<0.01 |
Inhaled nitric oxide initiation
|
0 |
13 (59.1) |
<0.01 |
Antibiotics
|
14 (93.3) |
12 (54.5) |
0.01 |
Patch for diaphragm closure (n=18) |
1 (6.6) |
3 (100) |
0.01 |
HFO: high frequency oscillatory ventilation, PIP: Peak
inspiratory pressure, PPHN: persistent pulmonary hyppertension
of newborn; *in conventional mode; #median (IQR). |
In our cohort overall mortality was 59.5%; 51%
(19/37) died before surgical correction and 8% (3/37) died
post-operatively. Univariate analysis was carried out for sex,
laterality of lesion, co-morbid malformations intubation in delivery
room, chest compression in delivery room, fluid bolus, APGAR scores,
cord pH, initial PIP, need for HFO, age at surgery, duration of hospital
stay, PPHN, shock, sildenafil use, milrinone use, inhaled NO use, use of
antibiotics, sepsis, and use of patch for closure (Table II).
The following factors were associated with increased mortality: low 1
and 5 minute Apgar scores, higher initial PIP requirement on
conventional ventilation, associated congenital malformations and PPHN.
Requirement of a patch repair was associated with an increased risk for
mortality relative to primary repair (100% vs. 6.67%, P =
0.005). On multivariate analysis using generalized linear model with
mortality as dependent variable and factors that were considered to be
clinically important (gestation, birth weight, malformation, Apgar score
at 5 min and PPHN) as independent variables; only PPHN was associated
with a higher mortality with adjusted risk ratio of 3.74 (95% CI
1.45-9.68) (Table III).
TABLE III Multivariate Analysis for Predictors of Mortality (N=37)
Factor |
Adjusted Risk Ratio (95% CI) |
P Value |
Gestation |
0.96 (0.49-1.87) |
0.91 |
Birthweight |
0.99 (0.99-1.00) |
0.86 |
Malformation |
0.37 (0.06-2.15) |
0.27 |
Apgar at 5min |
0.78 (0.46-1.30) |
0.34 |
PPHN* |
3.74 (1.45-9.68) |
< 0.01 |
*PPHN: persistent pulmonary hypertension of newborn. |
Discussion
The overall mortality among CDH cases born in our
centre was 59% and the presence of PPHN was a significant predictor. We
followed a protocol based management with lung protective ventilation,
permissive hypercapnia, and elective surgical repair. There is paucity
of reports from the LMICs regarding the outcomes of CDH patients [5-10].
The differences in survival when compared to the
developed world can be attributed to factors like lack of a dedicated
CDH team, absence of any hidden mortality in current cohort (ours was an
unselected population of all inborn neonates). In general,
population-based studies have reported lower survival than studies from
single institution; this difference being due to the presence of a
‘hidden’ mortality [12,13]. Skari, et al. [14] noted that
prenatal diagnosis of CDH, associated major malformations, side of
hernia and study population had a major influence on mortality.
Therefore, these factors should be taken into consideration while
interpreting survival outcomes from various studies. Ours was an
unselected population which included all in-born neonates irrespective
of associated malformation and laterality.
Only few studies have reported postnatal risk factors
for poor outcomes in CDH neonates in LMICs [5–8,10]; most of them are
from outborn and from referral units, thus leading to a selection bias.
The poor prognostic factors include established antenatal diagnosis,
intramural birth, and presence of an associated malformation, PPHN and
absence of a hernia sac in intraoperative findings. PPHN was the most
important determinant of survival in our study similar to previous
studies [6,15,16].
We used ECMO in two cases as a bridge to surgical
repair. Low utilisation of ECMO has been reported even from large
surgical centres in Europe [17]. The centres following preoperative
medical stabilization with selective use of ECMO followed by surgical
repair have reported higher survival [3,13,18], when compared with
facilities not using ECMO [19,20].
In this cohort, we screened for associated
malformations using echocardiography, ultrasonography, karyotyping (in
neonates with suspected syndrome on clinical evaluation) and autopsy
(whenever parents consented). However, the outcomes reported from a
limited study population and from a single center are limitations of
this study. We did not have antenatal data pertaining to severity of CDH
in many cases, due to late referral. Ours being a tertiary care centre,
there could be a referral bias due to referral of complicated or severe
cases diagnosed antenatally.
Management of CDH in developing world is still
challenging. Our centre had a high mortality rate despite good neonatal
intensive care and surgical management. PPHN was an important predictor
of mortality.
Contributors: TS: developed study proforma,
collected data and wrote the first draft of the paper; SS: collection of
data and contributed in writing the manuscript; DT: collection of data
and analysis of results; AV: give important inputs in conduction of
study and writing of the manuscript; AT: supervised implementation of
the study and corrected the final manuscript ad reviewed; JS: data
analysis and compilation, writing up the final manuscript; RA,AD:
supervised the study as well as gave critical inputs in writing up the
manuscript.
Funding: None; Competing
interest: None stated.
What This Study Adds?
• Presence of persistent pulmonary
arterial hypertension is an important risk factor for
mortality among CDH infants in developing countries.
|
References
1. Long A-M, Bunch KJ, Knight M, Kurinczuk JJ, Losty
PD. Early population-based outcomes of infants born with congenital
diaphragmatic hernia. Arch Dis Child-Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018;0:F1-6.
2. Mah VK, Zamakhshary M, Mah DY, Cameron B, Bass J,
Bohn D, et al. Absolute vs relative improvements in congenital
diaphragmatic hernia survival: what happened to "hidden mortality." J
Pediatr Surg. 2009;44:877-82.
3. Harting MT, Lally KP. The congenital diaphragmatic
hernia study group registry update. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med.
2014;19:370-5.
4. McGivern MR, Best KE, Rankin J, Wellesley D,
Greenlees R, Addor M-C, et al. Epidemiology of congenital
diaphragmatic hernia in Europe: a register-based study. Arch Dis Child -
Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100:F137-44.
5. Grizelj R, Bojanic K, Vukovic J, Novak M, Rodin U,
Coric T, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of congenital
diaphragmatic hernia in Croatia: A Population-based study. Paediatr
Perinat Epidemiol. 2016;30:336-45.
6. Chandrasekaran A, Rathnavelu E, Mulage L, Ninan B,
Balakrishnan U, Amboiram P, et al. Postnatal predictors for
outcome in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: A singlecenter retrospective
cohort study from India. Indian J Child Health. 2015;3:324-9.
7. Jain A, Singh V, Sharma M. Congenital
diaphragmatic hernia:our experience-a brief review. month. 2002;6:426-9.
8. Panda SS, Bajpai M, Srinivas M. Presence of hernia
sac in prediction of postoperative outcome in congenital diaphragmatic
hernia. Indian Pediatr. 2013;50:1041-3.
9. Khan SE, Siddiq A, Nessa M. Congenital
Diaphragmatic Hernia in Neonate: Experience in a Teaching Hospital. J
Armed Forces Med Coll Bangladesh. 2011;7:28-30.
10. Bhat YR, Kumar V, Rao A. Congenital diaphragmatic
hernia in a developing country. Singapore Med J. 2008;49:715.
11. Harrison MR, Bjordal RI, Langmark F, Knutrud O.
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: the hidden mortality. J Pediatr Surg.
1978;13:227-30.
12. Colvin J. Outcomes of congenital diaphragmatic
hernia: A Population-based study in Western Australia. Pediatrics.
2005;116:e356–63.
13. Downard CD, Jaksic T, Garza JJ, Dzakovic A, Nemes
L, Jennings RW, et al. Analysis of an improved survival rate for
congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38:729-32.
14. Skari H, Bjornland K, Haugen G, Egeland T, Emblem
R. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a meta-analysis of mortality
factors. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35:1187-97.
15. Morais CG, Rocha G, Flor-de-Lima F, Éden P,
Fragoso AC, Guimarães H. Predictors of prognosis in neonates with
congenital diaphragmatic hernia: experience of 12 years. J Pediatr
Neonatal Individ Med. 2017;6: e060126.
16. Brindle ME, Cook EF, Tibboel D, Lally PA, Lally
KP, on behalf of the Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group. A
Clinical prediction rule for the severity of congenital diaphragmatic
hernias in newborns. Pediatrics. 2014;134:e413-9.
17. Long A-M, Bunch KJ, Knight M, Kurinczuk JJ, Losty
PD, BAPS-CASS. Early population-based outcomes of infants born with
congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed.
2018;103:F517-22.
18. Diagnosis and management of congenital
diaphragmatic hernia: A clinical practice guideline. Can Med Assoc J.
2018;190: E103-12.
19. Ssemakula N, Stewart DL, Goldsmith LJ, Cook LN,
Bond SJ. Survival of patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia
during the ECMO era: An 11-year experience. J Pediatr Surg.
1997;32:1683-9.
20. Weber TR, Kountzman B, Dillon PA, Silen ML.
Improved survival in congenital diaphragmatic hernia with evolving
therapeutic strategies. Arch Surg. 1998;133:498-502.
|
|
|