|
Indian Pediatr 2018;55: 1091-1092 |
|
A Single
Center Experience of Pediatric Tracheostomy
|
Pradeep Kumar Sharma *
and Nikhil Vinayak
Pediatric Critical Care and Pulmonology, Sri Balaji
Action Medical Institute, New Delhi, India.
Email: [email protected]
|
The feasibility and safety of pediatric tracheostomy
care at home by parents is challenging. Many physicians are not
confident of sending tracheostomized children home. We describe our
experience with 12 children who underwent tracheostomy and were sent
home. Nine children were successfully decannulated. With proper training
of parents, the outcome of home tracheostomy seems good.
Keywords: Domiciliary care, Outcome, Tracheo-bronchomalacia.
|
W ith the availability of
quality pediatric critical care across India, many children require
elective tracheostomies. However, most pediatricians have concerns
regarding safety, feasibility and outcome of home tracheostomy care. We
aimed to share our experience with tracheostomy care.
Hospital records of tracheostomized children from
September 2014 to January 2018 were analyzed retrospectively, and
information collected with respect to age, gender, parent’s education,
indication for tracheostomy, duration, complications, and follow-up.
In the study duration, twelve patients (10 boys)
underwent tracheostomy. The median (range) age was 2 years (1 month to
15 years). Four out of 11 (36%) parents had not completed their higher
secondary education. Indications of tracheostomy and outcome are
presented in Table I. Only tracheobronchomalacia cases
required home ventilation and respective duration of home ventilation in
each case was 3 months, 4 months and 1 year. The median (range) hospital
stay post-tracheostomy was 15.5 (5-55) days and home tracheostomy were
88 (35-850) days. Eight events of non- elective hospitalization were
required in four patients; five were infective (pneumonia) and three
were due to accidental tube displacement yielding an incidence of 2.14
and 1.28 events per 1000 home tracheostomy days, respectively. All tube
displacements occurred in children below one year of age and within two
months of home care. No complications were observed during tube change
apart from minor bleeding. Nine (82%) children were successfully
decannulated, one child was lost to follow-up and one child died at home
after 38 days. One child (still on tracheostomy) was awaiting surgical
reconstruction for tracheal stenosis by the time of submission of this
manuscript. No major problems were encountered post-decannulation.
TABLE I Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients Discharged With Tracheostomy
Case No |
Age/Gender |
Indication of tracheostomy |
Post tracheostomy |
Home tracheo- |
Outcome
|
|
|
|
hospital stay (days) |
stomy days |
|
1 |
8mo/M |
Tracheobronchomalacia |
55 |
850 |
Decannulated |
2 |
1mo/M |
Tracheobronchomalacia |
30 |
178 |
Decannulated |
3 |
3mo/M |
Tracheobronchomalacia |
39 |
790 |
Tracheal stenosis*
|
4 |
7y/M |
Tracheobronchitis
|
15 |
60 |
Decannulated |
5 |
5y/M |
CP and Severe pneumonia |
9 |
82 |
Decannulated |
6 |
2y/M |
Meningoencephalitis |
7 |
94 |
Decannulated |
7 |
2y/F |
Severe TBI |
21 |
148 |
Decannulated |
8 |
3y/M |
Severe TBI |
16 |
- |
Lost to follow up |
9 |
15y/M |
Bilateral abductor palsy |
5 |
35 |
Decannulated#
|
10 |
2y/F |
Posterior fossa tumor |
10 |
38 |
Expired |
11 |
1y/M |
Severe TBI |
7 |
62 |
Decannulated |
12 |
3y/M |
Tetanus |
35 |
0 |
Decannulated |
CP: Cerebral Palsy; TBI: traumatic brain injury; *child
still on tracheostomy and awaiting surgical correction for
tracheal stenosis; #Decannulated after surgical correction. |
This study suggests that home tracheostomy care by
parents seems feasible in similar settings. Other studies on pediatric
tracheostomy have shown successful decannu-lation rate from 15% to 77%
[1-3]. Physicians concerns regarding safety and tracheostomy care of
child at home are major hurdles for sending these children home.
However, in our experience, the parents managed home tracheostomy well,
and there were few complications.
In conclusion, if parents are properly educated and
trained in tracheostomy care, it may be feasible and safe to send these
children on home tracheostomy care with good outcomes.
Contributors: PKS: conceptualized the study,
collected data, written, critically edited and finally approved the
manuscript; NV: collected data and finally approved the manuscript.
Funding: None; Competing interest: None
stated.
References
1. Alladi A, Rao S, Das K, Charles AR, D’Cruz AJ.
Pediatric tracheostomy: A 13-year experience. Pediatr Surg Int.
2004;20:695-8.
2. Challapudi, G, Natarajan G, Aggarwal S.
Single-center experience of outcomes of tracheostomy in children with
congenital heart disease. Congenit Heart Dis. 2013;8:556-60.
3. Almeida JC, Esteves SS, Rosa F, Coutinho M, José GS, Sousa AS.
Pediatric tracheostomy: The experience from a tertiary center in
Portugal. Acta Otorrinolaringol Gallega. 2017;10:144-51.
|
|
|
|