|
Indian Pediatr 2018;55:1050-1055 |
|
Safety and
Immunogenicity of Two Doses of a Quadrivalent Meningococcal
Polysaccharide Diphtheria Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine in Indian and
Russian Children Aged 9 to 17 Months
|
Bakul Javadekar 1,
Apurba Ghosh2,
Rajeev Zachariah Kompithra3,
Shally Awasthi4,
Olga Perminova5,
Viktor Romanenko6,
Vera Rodnikova7,
Susanna Kharit8,
Yael Thollot9,
Valerie Bosch-Castells10,
Alexander Goldstein11
and Himanshu Dubey12
From 1Department of Pediatrics, Medical
College and SSG Hospital, Baroda, SSG Hospital Campus, Raopura, Vadodara,
Gujarat. India; 2Institute of Child Health, Kolkata, West
Bengal, India; 3Well Baby Clinic, Department of Child Health,
Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamilnadu, India; 4Department
of Pediatrics, Shahuji Maharaj Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar
Pradesh, India; 5City Children’s Policlinic No 5, Perm,
Russia; 6Municipal City Children Hospital # 11, Ekaterinburg,
Russia; 7Murmansk Children’s City Hospital, Murmansk, Russia;
8Research Institute for Pediatric Infectious Diseases, St.
Petersburg, Russia; 9Sanofi Pasteur, Lyon, France; 10Sanofi
Pasteur, Marcy l’Etoile, France; 11Sanofi Pasteur, Moscow,
Russia; and 12Medical Affairs, Sanofi Pasteur, Mumbai, India.
Correspondence to: Dr Himanshu Dubey, Sanofi House,
CTS No. 117-B, L&T Business Park, Saki Vihar Road, Powai, Mumbai 400
072, India.
Email:
[email protected]
Received: November 23, 2017;
Initial review: March 05, 2018;
Accepted: August 27, 2018.
Clinical Trial Registration: CTRI/2014/12/005272
and NCT01890759.
|
Objective: Evaluation of tolerability, safety and
immunogenicity of a two-dose series of a quadrivalent meningococcal
polysaccharide diptheria toxoid conjugate (ACYW-D) vaccine in Indian and
Russian infants/toddlers.
Design: Open-label, single-arm, phase III
multi-national trial.
Study participants: 300 children aged 9-17
months, previously unvaccinated against meningococcal disease from four
sites each in India (n=200) and the Russian Federation (n=100).
Intervention: Two 0.5 mL doses of ACYW-D by
intramuscular injection, 3-6 months apart.
Main outcome measures: Meningococcal antibody
titers to serogroups A, C, W-135 and Y, determined using a serum
bactericidal assay in the presence of human complement before
vaccination and 28 days after the second vaccination. Titers
³1:8
against either/all of the A, C, W-135 or Y were considered sero-protective.
Results: After dose 2, 95.7–99.5% and 92.9–99.0%
of infants/toddlers achieved seroprotection across the four serogroups
in India and the Russian Federation, respectively. No immediate adverse
events were reported after any dose of ACYW-D. Solicited reactions were
reported in 49.2% of participants, and were mainly of Grade 1 severity,
and resolved within three days. Unsolicited adverse events were reported
in 19.1% of infants: one event (Grade 3 diarrhea, resolving within one
day) was considered related to study vaccine. No non-serious adverse
events led to premature withdrawal from the study. Four serious adverse
events were reported; none were considered related to study vaccine. No
deaths occurred during the study.
Conclusions: A two-dose series of ACYW-D vaccine
in Indian and Russian children (9-17 month) was well-tolerated with no
safety concerns, and induced robust bactericidal antibody responses
against the meningococcal serogroups contained in the vaccine.
Keywords: Bactericidal assay, Immunization, Meningococcus,
Prevention.
|
R ates of meningococcal disease
vary from <1-3/100,000 in developed countries to 10-25/100,000 in less developed countries [1].
Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is estimated to cause death in
10-15% of cases [2]. The majority of IMD cases in the Russian Federation
occur in children aged up to 2 years, with an incidence of approximately
14/100,000 [3, 4]. In the Russian Federation, the incidence of
meningococcal infection in 2007 was reported to have declined from 5.0
per 100,000 population in 1989 through to 1.9 cases per 100,000
population in 2007, but was 8-11/100,000 in children aged <14 years [3].
In India, meningococcal disease surveillance is not enforced [5-7] and
several epidemics have been reported. Six meningococcus serogroups,(A,
B, C, W, X and Y) cause most cases of IMD [8, 9]. Strain A was
associated with all major epidemics in India, with small numbers of
serogroup C isolated in one epidemic [5]. In the Russian Federation,
serogroups A, B and C are responsible for most IMD cases with serogroup
A mainly responsible [10], and Y and W isolated in some cases.
The meningococcal (Groups A, C, Y and W-135)
polysaccharide diphtheria toxoid conjugate vaccine (Men-ACYW-D;
Menactra, Sanofi Pasteur) is approved for active immunization against
IMD in >60 countries [11]. ACYW-D was licensed in the USA in 2005, and
is approved for primary vaccination in children aged 9-23 months as a
two-dose series, and in individuals aged 2-55 years as a single dose
[12, 13]. A rabbit complement serum bactericidal antibody titer of
³1:8 was
validated to be seroprotective against serogroup C IMD [14].
When the present study started, no quadrivalent
meningococcal conjugated vaccine was licensed
for broad-based protection against IMD
from early childhood (<2 years) in India or in the Russian Federation,
but ACYW-D was licensed for those aged 2-55 years. Previous phase I/II
studies showed this vaccine was immunogenic with a good safety profile
in infants, toddlers and children [15, 16]. A phase III study was
therefore performed to determine the proportion of Indian and Russian
infants and toddlers achieving sero-protective titers after immunization
with Men-ACYW-D vaccine, and assess any adverse events following
immunization.
Methods
This was an open-label, single-arm, international
phase III trial undertaken at four sites in the Russian Federation
(between 25 June, 2013 and 9 April, 2014) and four sites in India
(between 24 March, 2015 and 12 April, 2016). The trial was conducted in
accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki
and the International Conference on the Harmonization – Good Clinical
Practice, and was approved by the relevant Institutional Review Board
and Independent Ethics Committee of each of the eight participating
centers. Parents/legal guardians of all infants and toddlers
participating in the study gave written informed consent for their child
to participate, and were present at each study visit. There were four
study visits on Day 0, Day 28-35, Day 90-180, and 28-35 days after the
third visit.
Infants and toddlers from India and the Russian
Federation aged 9-17 months at entry were eligible. Key exclusion
criteria included a history (confirmed clinically, serologically, or
microbiologically) or high risk (investigators opinion) of meningococcal
disease, acute disease/infection (any severity at Russian sites or
moderate to severe at Indian sites) according to the investigator or
fever (axillary temperature ³37.0°C
at Russian sites, and temperature ³38.0°C
at Indian sites) on the day of vaccination, bleeding disorders or
receipt of anticoagulants in the preceding three weeks, history of known
thrombocytopenia, or immunodeficiency conditions. Those receiving
immunosuppressive medication, or another vaccine (other than influenza
or measles, mumps, rubella [MMR] vaccines, or oral poliomyelitis vaccine
[OPV] at the Indian sites) in the four weeks before or after the study
vaccination, or those previously vaccinated against meningococcal
disease were also excluded.
Participants received two 0.5 mL doses of Men-ACYW-D
by intramuscular injection (anterolateral thigh or optionally, deltoid
muscle for toddlers aged ³12
months). Dose 2 was given 3-6 months after Dose 1. Each 0.5 mL dose was
formulated in sodium phosphate buffered isotonic sodium chloride
solution to contain meningococcal capsular polysaccharides (A, C, Y, and
W: 4 µg each) conjugated to approximately 48 µg of diphtheria toxoid
protein.
Serum samples were collected immediately before Dose
1 and 28 days (+7 days) after Dose 2, frozen and maintained at –20 °C
until immunogenicity analysis at a central laboratory (Global Clinical
Immunology, Sanofi Pasteur, Swiftwater, USA). Meningococcal antibody
titers to serogroups A, C, W and Y were determined using the serum
bactericidal assay in the presence of human complement (SBA-HC),
expressed as SBA-HC geometric mean titers (GMTs) as previously described
[12]. Antibody titers ³1:8
were considered seroprotective for each serogroup; although a titer of
1:4 could be considered protective, the higher titer was chosen as a
conservative assumption [17]. The number and percentage of participants
who achieved a four-fold increase in titers 28 days after the second
dose compared with pre-vaccination were calculated.
Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse reactions
(ARs) or events (AEs). Participants were monitored for 30 minutes after
each injection for any immediate ARs or AEs. In addition, solicited
systemic (fever, vomiting, abnormal crying, drowsiness, loss of appetite
and irritability) and local (pain, erythema, and swelling) ARs were
recorded for the first seven days after either dose, and unsolicited AEs
and ARs were recorded for the first 28 days after either dose. Diary
cards were provided to parents or guardians on Visit 1, 2, and 3 to
maintain a written record of AEs. Parents or guardians were contacted by
telephone 8 days after each vaccination. Serious adverse events (SAEs)
were recorded during the entire study period.
A sample size of 300 participants (India, 200;
Russian Federation, 100) was arbitrarily chosen to ensure 180 evaluable
participants from India and 90 from the Russian Federation, assuming an
attrition rate of 10%.
Statistical analyses: Statistical analyses were
performed using SAS Version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina,
USA). All planned analyses were descriptive with no hypothesis testing.
The full analysis set (FAS) consisted of all participants who received
³1 dose of
study vaccine; the safety analysis set consisted of all participants in
the FAS with safety data available. To calculate the four-fold rises in
titers 28 days after the second dose compared with pre-dose, any
pre-dose 1 titer reported as <lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was
converted to a value equal to LLOQ, and any post-dose 2 titer reported
as <LLOQ was converted to a value of 0.5 LLOQ. Any value >ULOQ was
converted to the ULOQ to calculate the four-fold increases. Safety and
reactogenicity were assessed on the safety analysis set; the incidences
of AEs/ARs were calculated individually, by country, and overall.
Results
In total, 200 participants were enrolled at the sites
in India and 100 in the Russian Federation. At baseline, 41.0% and 65.8%
of participants were male, and the mean (standard deviation) age at
entry was 13.5 (2.7) and 12.9 (3.0) months in the Russian Federation and
Indian study, respectively. Of the Indian participants, 199 received
Dose 1 and 191 received both doses. In total, 188 children completed the
study; of the withdrawals, eight were by parental request, and four were
by investigator decision. Of these four, two babies were excluded due to
protocol deviations (one received Hepatitis B + OPV 27 days prior to
inclusion; the other did not attend Visit 3), and two were lost to
follow-up. All Russian participants received the first dose of
Men-ACYW-D, and 98 received both doses of Men-ACYW-D and completed the
study. Two children were withdrawn from the study before receiving Dose
2 due to parental request.
At baseline, in the full analysis set, seroprotection
(SBA-HC titer of ³8
[1/dil]) rates against meningococcus serogroup A (55.8% in India and 40%
in Russia) were higher than for the other serogroups (range 4-7% in both
countries; Fig. 1). After Dose 2, 92.9-99.0% and
95.7-99.5% of children achieved seroprotection across the four
serogroups in the Russian Federation and India, respectively. In
addition, 86.5-97.3% and 80.6-90.8% of participants in India and Russia,
respectively, had a ³4-fold
increase from baseline to post-Dose 2 in SBA-HC titers across the four
serogroups.
|
Fig. 1 Seroprotection (percentage of
participants with SBA-HC titer
³8 (1/dil)
[95% confidence intervals]) at baseline and after Dose 2 (Full
Analysis Set).
|
Rates of seroprotection and geometric mean SBA-HC
titers by serogroup in India and the Russian Federation are given in
Table I. SBA-HC GMTs post-Dose 2 were markedly higher than at
baseline for all serogroups.
TABLE I Rates of Seroprotection and Geometric Mean SBA-HC Titers by Serogroup in India
and the Russian Federation (Full Analysis set)
|
India |
Russian Federation |
|
Proportion (%) of participants |
GM (95% CI) |
Proportion (%) of participants |
GM (95% CI) |
|
with seroprotection (95% CI) |
|
with seroprotection (95% CI) |
|
Serogroup A |
Pre-Dose 1 (baseline) |
55.8 (48.6-62.8) |
6.77 (6.00-7.63) |
40.0 (30.3-50.3) |
5.43 (4.76-6.18) |
Post-Dose 2 |
97.8 (94.6-99.4) |
101 (83.1-122) |
99.0 (94.4-100) |
142 (108-188) |
Post-Dose 2 response vs pre-Dose 1 |
86.5 (80.7-91.1) |
14.8 (11.7-18.9) |
90.8 (83.3-95.7) |
25.9 (19.1-35.1) |
Serogroup C |
Pre-Dose 1(baseline) |
5.0 (2.44-9.05) |
2.46 (2.19-2.77) |
5.0 (1.64-11.3) |
2.39 (2.19-2.62) |
Post-Dose 2 |
95.7 (91.8-98.1) |
138 (111-171) |
92.9 (85.8-97.1) |
59.6 (42.7-83.2) |
Post-Dose 2 response vs pre-Dose 1 |
92.6 (87.8-95.9) |
55.4 (43.2-71.1) |
80.6 (71.4-87.9) |
24.8 (17.6-34.9) |
Serogroup Y |
Pre-Dose 1(baseline) |
6.0 (3.15-10.3) |
2.44 (2.17-2.75) |
4.0 (1.10-9.93) |
2.30 (2.05-2.57) |
Post-Dose 2 |
98.4 (95.4-99.7) |
106 (86.8-129) |
93.9 (87.1-97.7) |
55.6 (42.7-72.3) |
Post-Dose 2 response vs pre-Dose 1 |
93.1 (88.5-96.3) |
43.3 (34.4-54.5) |
89.8 (82.0-95.0) |
24.1 (17.9-32.5) |
Serogroup W-135 |
Pre-Dose 1(baseline) |
5.0 (2.44-9.05) |
2.43 (2.15-2.75) |
7.0 (2.86-13.9) |
2.46 (2.14-2.83) |
Post-Dose 2 |
99.5 (97.1-100) |
202 (169-242) |
98.0 (92.8-99.8) |
99.9 (79.9-125) |
Post-Dose 2 response vs |
97.3 (93.9-99.1) |
82.5 (66.6-102) |
89.8 (82.0-95.0) |
40.4 (30.7-53.3) |
pre-Dose 1 |
|
|
|
|
Seroprotection, an antibody titer ≥1:8
dilution against each serogroup; CI, confidence interval, GM,
geometric mean; SBA-HC, serum bactericidal assay with human
complement. |
No immediate ARs or AEs were reported after any dose
of Men-ACYW-D. Solicited reactions occurred in 49.2% of children (Table
II). Most solicited injection site reactions and solicited systemic
reactions occurred during the three days after injection, were of Grade
1 severity, and resolved within three days. Unsolicited ARs after any
study injection were very infrequent (Table II).
Unsolicited AEs were reported in approximately 20% of all children (Table
II). The most common unsolicited AEs reported occurred at a rate
£5% (Table
III). One unsolicited non-serious AE (Grade 3 diarrhea at a
Russian site, which resolved within one day) was considered by the
investigator to be related to the study vaccine. Two other cases of
unsolicited non-serious AEs (rhinitis at a Russian site and fever at an
Indian site) were of Grade 3 severity. No non-serious AEs led to
premature withdrawal from the study.
TABLE II Safety Overview after any Study Vaccine Injection (Percentage of Participants Experiencing ≥1 Event)
in the Indian and Russian Federation studies: Safety Analysis Sets
|
India (n=199) |
Russian Federation (n=100) |
Overall (n=299) |
Immediate unsolicited AE/AR, n (%) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Solicited reaction, n (%) |
86 (43.2) |
61 (61.0) |
147 (49.2) |
Injection site reaction, n (%) |
43 (21.6) |
45 (45.0) |
88 (29.4) |
Systemic reaction, n (%) |
72 (36.2) |
40 (40.0) |
112 (37.5) |
Unsolicited AE, n (%) |
47 (23.6) |
10 (10.0) |
57 (19.1) |
Non-serious systemic AE, n (%) |
46 (23.1) |
9 (9.0) |
55 (18.4) |
Unsolicited AR, n (%) |
0 |
1 (1.0) |
1 (0.3) |
Non-serious injection site AR, n (%) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Non-serious systemic AR, n (%) |
0 |
1 (1.0) |
1 (0.3) |
SAEs, n (%) |
3 (1.5) |
1 (1.0) |
4 (1.3) |
Death, n (%) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
AE: adverse event; AR: adverse reaction; SAE: serious
adverse event. |
TABLE III Percentages of Participants Experiencing ≥1 Unsolicited AE After any Study Vaccine Injection
(Most Common AEs, ≥1% in Overall Population) in the India and Russian Federation studies: Safety Analysis Sets
|
India (n=199) |
Russian Federation (n=100) |
Overall (n=299) |
Diarrhea, n (%) |
9(4.5) |
1(1.0) |
10(3.3) |
Vomiting, n (%) |
2(1.0) |
1(1.0) |
3(1.0) |
Pyrexia, n (%) |
7(3.5) |
1(1.0) |
8(2.7) |
Nasopharyngitis, n (%) |
3(1.5) |
4(4.0) |
7(2.3) |
Respiratory tract infection, n (%) |
7(3.5) |
2(2.0) |
9(3.0) |
Upper respiratory tract infection, n (%) |
10(5.0) |
0 |
10(3.3) |
Viral respiratory tract infection, n (%) |
3(1.5) |
0 |
3(1.0) |
Cough, n (%) |
9(4.5) |
1(1.0) |
10(3.3) |
AE, adverse event. |
Four SAEs were reported; one at a Russian site and
three at Indian sites: nasopharyngitis, acute respiratory tract
infection, lower respiratory tract infection, and forearm abscess
(mosquito bite complication at a site unrelated to vaccine injection),
which all required hospitalization. None was considered related to study
vaccine by the investigators. No deaths occurred during the study.
Discussion
These studies show that a two-dose series of
Men-ACYW-D vaccine administered 3-6 months apart is well
tolerated with no safety concerns, and induces seroprotective
titers against each of the four meningococcal serogroups in
³93% of Russian and
Indian children aged 9-17 months. These results are consistent with
other studies of Men-ACYW-D in the similar age groups [12,18,19], and in
older age groups [11, 20].
The baseline GMTs for group A were high compared with
Groups C, Y, and W. This may have been due to the serum bactericidal
assay utilized and not due to the higher baseline seroprevalence of
Group A.
A two-dose series of Men-ACYW-D in infants and
toddlers would benefit management of IMD in the Russian Federation and
India, as the highest incidence rates registered or cases reported in
these areas are among children aged up to two years of age and <5 years,
respectively [1,3-5]. It has been previously shown that Men-ACYW-D
induces a robust protective immune response and is generally well
tolerated when administered with other routine pediatric vaccines;
concomitant use does not adversely affect the immunogenicity of either
vaccine or their relative safety profiles [17,19]. Limitations of the
study include the unblinded, non-comparative design of the trial and
lack of appropriate controls. As this was a descriptive study and there
were no statistically powered hypotheses, the number of participants was
arbitrarily chosen. In addition, the study was not designed or powered
to compare differences in immunogenicity data between the two countries
and no clinical efficacy data were obtained; as such, it is not
meaningful to directly compare the respective data presented. This study
was intended as confirmatory only, on the basis of existing supportive
evidence and approval in many countries.
In conclusion, our results with Men-ACYW-D are
consistent with previous studies in young children, and support efficacy
and safety in infants and toddlers in India and the Russian Federation.
Contributors: AG, RZK, YT, VB-C: involved
in designing the study; BJ, AG, RZK, SA, OP, VR, VR, SK: were involved
in data acquisition; all authors were involved in data analysis and/or
interpretation, contributed to the drafting and critical review of the
manuscript, approved the final for submission, and are accountable for
the accuracy and integrity of the work.
Funding: This study and the Editorial
support to develop the manuscript were funded by Sanofi Pasteur.
Competing interest: None stated.
What is Already Known?
•
The Men-ACYW-D vaccine has a good safety and immunogenicity
profile.
What This Study Adds?
•
A high proportion of
infants and toddlers in India and the Russian Federation achieve
seroprotective titers following Men-ACYW-D in a 2-dose schedule
3–6 months apart.
|
References
1. Manchanda V, Gupta S, Bhalla P. Meningococcal
disease: History, epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations,
diagnosis, antimicrobial susceptibility and prevention. Indian J Med
Microbiol. 2006;24:7-19.
2. Pace D, Pollard AJ. Meningococcal disease:
Clinical presentation and sequelae. Vaccine. 2012;30:062.
3. Titova L, Samodova O, Buzinov R, Gordienko T.
Epidemiology of meningococcal infection in arkhangelsk- oblast.
Available from: http://wwwepinorthorg/eway/defaultaspx?pid=230&trg=Area_5268&MainArea_5
260=5263:0:15,2946:1:0:0:::0:0&Area_5263=5268:44984::1: 5264:
1:::0:0&Area_5268=5273:47185::1:5266:3:::0:0. Accessed June 19,
2017.
4. Koroleva IS, Maxina TA, Zakroeva M, Beloshitsky
GV, Lytkina IN, Pyaeva AP. Epidemiology of invasive meningococcal
disease in Moscow, 2005-2010. Available from:
www.meningitis.org/assets/x/53942. Accessed June 19, 2017.
5. Sinclair D, Preziosi MP, Jacob John T, Greenwood
B. The epidemiology of meningococcal disease in India. Trop Med Int
Health. 2010;15:1421-35.
6. John TJ, Gupta S, Chitkara AJ, Dutta AK, Borrow R.
An overview of meningococcal disease in India: knowledge gaps and
potential solutions. Vaccine. 2013;31:2731-7.
7. Borrow R, Lee JS, Vazquez JA, Enwere G, Taha MK, Kamiya
H, et al. Meningococcal disease in the Asia-Pacific region:
Findings and recommendations from the Global Meningococcal Initiative.
Vaccine. 2016;34: 5855-62.
8. Jafri RZ, Ali A, Messonnier NE, Tevi-Benissan C, Durrheim
D, Eskola J, et al. Global epidemiology of invasive meningococcal
disease. Popul Health Metr. 2013;11:17.
9. Borrow R, Alarcon P, Carlos J, Caugant
DA, Christensen H, Debbag R, et al. The Global Meningococcal
Initiative: global epidemiology, the impact of vaccines on meningococcal
disease and the importance of herd protection. Expert Rev Vaccines.
2017;16:313-28.
10. Koroleva I, Beloshitskij G, Zakroeva I, Melnikova
A, Koroleva M, Shipulin G, et al. Invasive meningococcal disease
in Russian Federation. In: European Meningococcal Disease Society. 20
years EMGM. Bad Loipersdorf, Austria. 17-19 September 2013. p71. Available
from: http://emgm.eu/meetings/emgm2013/Abstract_Book_EMGM_ 2013.pdf.
Accessed April 13, 2017.
11. Robertson CA, Greenberg DP, Hedrick J, Pichichero
M, Decker MD, Saunders M. Safety and immunogenicity of a booster dose of
meningococcal (groups A, C, W, and Y) polysaccharide diphtheria toxoid
conjugate vaccine. Vaccine. 2016;34:5273-8.
12. Pina LM, Bassily E, Machmer A, Hou V, Reinhardt
A. Safety and immunogenicity of a quadrivalent meningococcal
polysaccharide diphtheria toxoid conjugate vaccine in infants and
toddlers: three multicenter phase III studies. Pediatr Infect Dis J.
2012; 31:1173-83.
13. Pelton SI, Gilmet GP. Expanding prevention of
invasive meningococcal disease. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2009;8: 717-27.
14. Borrow R, Balmer P, Miller E. Meningococcal
surrogates of protection – serum bactericidal antibody activity.
Vaccine. 2005;23:2222-7.
15. Choudhuri D, Huda T, Theodoratou E, Nair H,
Zgaga L, Falconer R, et al. An evaluation of emerging vaccines
for childhood meningococcal disease. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:S29.
16. Halperin SA, Diaz-Mitoma F, Dull P, Anemona A,
Ceddia F. Safety and immunogenicity of an investigational quadrivalent
meningococcal conjugate vaccine after one or two doses given to infants
and toddlers. European J Clin Microb Infect Dis. 2010;29:259-67.
17. Santos GF, Deck RR, Donnelly J, Blackwelder W,
Granoff DM. Importance of complement source in measuring meningococcal
bactericidal titers. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2001;8:616-23.
18. Hansen J, Zhang L, Eaton A, Baxter R, Robertson
CA, Decker MD, et al. Post-licensure safety surveillance study of
routine use of quadrivalent meningococcal diphtheria toxoid conjugate
vaccine (MenACWY-D) in infants and children. Vaccine. 2018;36:2133-8.
19. Noya F, McCormack D, Reynolds DL, Neame D, Oster
P. Safety and immunogenicity of two doses of quadrivalent meningococcal
conjugate vaccine or one dose of meningococcal group C conjugate
vaccine, both administered concomitantly with routine immunization to
12- to 18-month-old children. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol.
2014;25:211-6.
20. Yadav S, Manglani MV, Narayan DA, Sharma
S, Ravish HS, Arora R, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a
quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MenACYW-DT): a
multicenter, open-label, non-randomized, phase III clinical trial.
Indian Pediatr. 2014; 51:451-6.
|
|
|
|