|
Indian Pediatr 2013;50:
1155-1156 |
 |
Inborn Errors of Metabolism in a Tertiary Care
Hospital of Eastern India
|
Moushumi Lodh and Anand Kerketta
Department of Biochemistry and *Pediatrics and
Neonatology, The Mission Hospital, Immon Kalyan Sarani,
Sector 2C, Bidhannagar, Durgapur, West Bengal, India.
Email:
[email protected]
|
Inborn errors of metabolism are a
challenge on a diagnostic and therapeutic level. All newborn babies in
our hospital were screened over 4 years. 91 (15%) neonates were screen
positive for IEM, G6PD being the most common. Early detection and
treatment can improve outcomes.
Keywords: Diagnosis, Newborn screening, Metabolic
disorders.
|
In India, the prevalence of Inborn errors of
metabolism (IEM) is one in 2497 newborns [1]; congenital hypothyroidism
incidence is 2.1 per 1000 [2] and G6PD deficiency is 2-7.8% [3].
Worldwide, the incidence of IEM is more than 1/1000 [4]. All newborn
babies were screened for congenital hypothyroidism (CH), congenital
adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), cystic fibrosis (CF), G6PD deficiency
(G6PDD), phenyketonuria, galactosemia and biotinidase deficiency by
Delfia technology (Perkin Elmer), over a period of 4 years from February
2008 through January 2012. The organic acidemias were picked up by doing
a gas chromatography in the urine and Tandem mass spectrometry performed
on dried blood spots for detection of aminoacidurias.
TABLE I Age and Sex Distribution of Newborns Detected with IEM [n=91]
Disorder |
No. of patients |
Age
|
Sex |
|
|
0-30 days |
31-60 days |
61-90 days |
91-120 days |
Male |
Female |
G6PD
|
22 |
19 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
11 |
11 |
Phenylalanine
|
6 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
Biotinidase deficiency |
39 |
37 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
24 |
15 |
Galactosemia
|
11 |
9 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
8 |
3 |
TSH abnormality |
7 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
Cystic fibrosis
|
6 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
91 (15%) newborn babies (50 males) had a screen
positive of IEM. Clinical presentation was quite varied. 29 cases were
born to consanguineously married couples. History of neonatal deaths,
still births or sibling deaths with similar illness was not found in any
of the cases. Majority of abnormalities were seen within 30 days of life
(Table I). No baby was positive for 17 OHP deficiency. We
found more male babies to be suffering from biotinidase deficiency, more
females suffering from TSH abnormalities, while the G6PD deficiency was
equally distributed. Eight babies were found to have abnormalities in
aminoacid metabolism, detected by tandem mass spectrometry (Table
II).
TABLE II Findings on Tandem Mass Spectrometry (n=8)
Tests |
No. of patients |
Glycine |
1
|
Acetylcarnitine (C2) |
1 |
Hexanoylcarnitine (C6) |
1 |
Myristoylcarnitine (C14) |
1 |
Octadecanoylcarnitine (C18) |
3 |
Glutamic acid |
1 |
The Indian population being 1220 million, and birth
rate of 20.6, the estimated number of neonates who would have CH alone
would be about 17000 births each year [5]. In our study, out of 600
newborn 90 had a metabolic defect. Biotinidase deficiency [n=39],
was the commonest finding followed by G6PD deficiency. Aminoacidopathies
as a group constituted the next most common disorder. Interestingly, a
very high prevalence of inborn errors of metabolism to the extent of 1
in every thousand newborns has been observed [6].
Incidence of G6PD deficiency has been quoted as 22%
[7] with incidence in males being 28.3% and in females 1.05% [8]. Rao,
et al. [9] reviewed a total of 869 cases of which 40.2% were less
than 1 year, 19.9% were 1-3 years, 13.5% between 3-5 years, 18.4% more
than 5years of age and 8.0% were adults , received within a duration of
two years with presenting symptoms of IEMs. Our data shows 2 children
with suspected CAH who were lost on follow up.
Our study has certain limitations. The diagnosis of
IEM was based on results of tests like blood TMS and urine GC/MS which
only suggest the diagnosis and final confirmation needs either enzymatic
analysis or genetic studies many of which are found in select centres in
India. The disadvantages of MS/MS are those found with any new
technology [10]. The initial cost of a system is high. A level of
expertise is needed for preparing samples, operate the system and to
interpret the data produced by the MS/MS. Many of the metabolic
intermediates detected by this methodology are elevated in multiple
different disorders, and so proficiency in interpretation is necessary.
Lack of indigenous External Quality Assurance programs is a cause of
worry.
Pre-symptomatic diagnosis of these disorders can
minimize the irreversible complications and significantly improve the
long-term prognosis, by early treatment. This will prevent a lot of
anxiety, wastage of time and money for parents and suffering for
affected children. Our study highlights many facts of the demographics
of IEM in this region. Many such studies are required from other centers
to know the actual prevalence, types and burden of IEM.
References
1. Latheef SA. A database for inborn errors of
metabolism in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh. Bioinformation.
2010;4:276-7.
2. Sanghvi U, Diwarkar KK. Universal screening
programme for congenital hypothyroidism. Indian Pediatr. 2008; 45:331-2.
3. Padilla CD, Therrrel BL. Newborn screening in Asia
pacific region. Inherit. Metab Dis. 2007;30:490-506.
4. Alfadhel M, Al-Thihli K, Moubayed H, Eyaid W, Al-Jeraisy
M. Drug treatment of inborn errors of metabolism: a systematic review.
Arch Dis Child. 2013;98:454–461.
5. Kapoor S, Gupta N, Kabra M. National Newborn
Screening Program – Still a Hype or a Hope Now? Indian Pediatr.
2013;50:639-43.
6. Devi AR, Naushad SM. Newborn screening in India.
Indian J Pediatr. 2004;71:157-60.
7. Gupte SC, Patel PU, Ranat JM. G6PD deficiency in
Vataliya Prajapati community settled in Surat. Indian J Med Sci.
2005;59:51-6.
8. Pao M, Kulkarni A, Gupta V, Kaul S, Balan S.
Neonatal screening for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency.
Indian J Pediatr. 2005;72:835-7.
9. Rao AN, J Kavitha, Koch M, Suresh Kumar V. Inborn
errors of metabolism: review and data from a tertiary care center;
Indian J Clinic Biochemistry. 2009; 24:215-22.
10. Grebe SKG, Singh RJ. LC-MS/MS in the clinical laboratory – Where
to from here? Clin Biochem Rev. 2011;32:5-31.
|
|
 |
|