Compared to cancers that occur in adults, cancers in children are
rare. In developed countries, these comprise only 2% of all cancers
while it is 3.0% in developing countries(1). The proportion of
child-hood cancers relative to all cancers reported by Indian cancer
registries varied from 2.1% to 6.2%. Studies of incidence pattern or
cumulative risk provide a useful measure of health burden. No study on
trends in incidence or risk in childhood cancer was so far reported
from India. Some studies from cancer registries of Mumbai and
Bangalore and some other studies(2-4) in India reported descriptive
epidemiology of some childhood cancers. The present communication
attempts report some highlights of temporal trends in childhood cancer
cumulative risk from an ongoing study entitled "Exploration of
National Cancer Registry Program (NCRP) data and its statistical
modeling" of Institute of Cytology and Preventive Oncology, Indian
Council of Medical Research (ICMR).
Age-specific cancer incidence rates of childhood
period up to the age of 15 years are collected for the years 1982 to
2000 from NCRP reports(5) of ICMR. Cumulative risks are computed by
using the formula: Cumulative risk = 100 × [1-exp (–cumulative
rate/100)] where cumulative rate = [5 × å(ASpR)
× 100]/100,000 and AspR is age specific incidence rate. The results
obtained are as follows.
The cumulative risk ranges and significant linear
trends in risks of childhood cancers during 1982-2000 for various
cancer sites are depicted in Table I. The risks, in terms of
one in number of children develop cancer, in different registries for
male children are observed to be highest in Delhi with risk of one in
486 to lowest in Barshi with one in 1740. The risk for female children
is highest in Chennai with one in 852 to lowest in Barshi with one in
3175. The risk for Luekemias of different types are found to be
increasing during the study period in Mumbai and Bhopal while Luekemia
unspecified observed a significant decline in Delhi among female
children. Non Hodgkins Lymphoma risk is found to have increasing
trends in Mumbai and Bhopal among males. There is a declining trend
for risk of carcinomas of eye and Leukemia unspecified among male
children of Mumbai and Delhi. Bone, Brain and Nervous system and Non
Hodgkins Lymphoma risks are found to have increasing trends among
females in different registries (Table I). The male to female
ratio for magnitude of childhood cancers ranges from 1.1 to 2.5 in
different registries. Childhood cancer risk among males is also higher
as compared to females.
TABLE I
Significant Trends in Cumulative Risks of Childhood Cancers in India during 1982-2000
Childhood cancer site
(ICD-10) |
Increase/decline trend in cumulative risk
(Risk range for 100,000 children)* |
|
Female |
Male |
Bone (C-40-41) |
Increase; P = 0.005, R2 = 60.4
(Bangalore)
[3.0, 8.0] |
- |
Eye (C-69) |
– |
Decline; P = 0.026, R2 = 43.9
(Mumbai)
[6.0, 2.0] |
Brain and nervous system |
Increase, P = 0.033, R2 =
41.3 |
– |
(C-70-72) |
(Mumbai) |
|
|
[6.0, 175] |
|
Non Hodgkin’s lymphoma |
Increase P = 0.041, R2 =
68.8 |
Increase P = 0.011, R2 =
53.1 |
(C-82-83, 96) |
(Delhi) |
(Mumbai) |
|
[4.0, 10] |
[10.0, 15.0] |
|
|
Increase, P = 0.039, R2 =
69.5 |
|
|
(Bhopal) |
|
|
[0.0, 20.0] |
Lymphoid leukemia |
Increase P = 0.006, R2 =
59.3 |
– |
( C-91) |
(Chennai) |
|
|
[14, 33] |
|
Myeloid leukemia |
Increase P = 0.037, R2 =
79.6 |
– |
C=92-94 |
(Bhopal) |
|
|
[0.0, 6.0] |
|
Leukemia unspecified |
Increase P = 0.047, R2 =
36.9 |
Decline P = 0.001,R2 =
96.8 |
( C-95) |
(Chennai) |
(Delhi) |
|
[0.0, 5.0] |
[20.0, 6.0] |
|
Decline P = 0.033, R2 =
72.1 |
|
|
(Delhi) |
|
|
[8.0, 1.0] |
|
All childhood cancers |
Increase P = 0.001, R2 =
70.0 |
Increase P = 0.009,R2 =
54.6 |
|
(Chennai) |
(Mumbai) |
|
[79.0, 117.0] |
[139, 155] |
*Range for the years 1982 to 2000 for Bangalore, Mumbai and Chennai; 1988 to 2000 for the Barshi, Delhi and Bhopal.
Positive and negative trends are indicated by “Increase” and “decline” respectively.
Blank cell (-) indicate no statistical significance observed in any registry for this childhood cancer site.
ICD: International Classification of Disease (Version no. 10)
Delhi reports highest magnitude of risks for males
and Chennai for females in all cancers combined during childhood
period. Significant increase in trends of childhood cancer risk
detected for all sites combined in Chennai for males and in Mumbai for
females. The trends observed may likely to give an insight into
further understanding of childhood cancer etiology.
L Satyanarayana,
Smita Asthana,
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics,
Institute of Cytology and Preventive Oncology,
I-7, Sector-39, NOIDA, UP,
India.
E-mail: [email protected]
1. Parkin DM, Kramarova E, Draper GJ, Masuyer E,
Michaelis J, Neglia J, et al. International incidence of childhood
cancers, Vol 2. Oxford, UK: IARC Scientific Publications No.144,
1999.
2. Nandakumar A, Anantha N, Appaji L, Swamy K,
Mukherjee G, Venugopal T, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of
childhood cancers in Bangalore, India. Cancer Causes Control. 1996;
7: 405-410.
3. Yeole BB, Advani SH, Sunny L. Epidemiological
features of childhood cancers in Greater Mumbai. Indian Pediatr
2001; 38: 1270-1277.
4. Dinand V, Arya LS. Epidemiology of childhood
Hodgkins disease: is it different in developing countries? Indian
Pediatr. 2006; 43: 141-147.
5. Annual Reports. 1982-2000. National Cancer Registry, Indian
Council of Medical Research, New Delhi: 1985-2005.
|