1.gif (1892 bytes)

Letters to the Editor

Indian Pediatrics 2001; 38: 1432  

Reply


We would like to clarify some of the issues raised.

1. The patient presented to us at the age of 9½ years but already had menarche at the age of 7½ years of age. Historically and as per physician records available to us from the time she presented with menarche, there was no evidence to suggest breast development at that time. Hence, the title refers to isolated menarche and not precious puberty.

2. GnRH (LHRH) stimulation test was done to decide whether precocity was due to a central or peripheral mechanism. As the patient was actively menstruating, it can be safely assumed that her estradiol levels would be in the pubertal range. Detailed GnRH test was done (Table I), but due to the limit of the number of words permitted in a letter to the Editor, we could publish the entire results. TeBG was not done both because we did not feel it was essential and because we did not have the facility to perform the test.

Table I__ FSH and LH Level (Basal and After GnRH Stimulation)
Time (Min) FSH (IU/L) LH (IU/L)
0 5.9 0.02
15 6.6 0.07
30 5.9 0.63
45 5.6 0.45
60 6.1 0.42
90 6.2 0.38
120 6.7 0.35
GnRH 100 µg iv, Response is prepubertal. 
Normal values: FSH (IU/L) = 0.5-3.3 
LH (IU/L) = 0.3-1.0

3. We were aware of the two more possible mechanisms for precocity in hypothy-roidism, but due to space constraints restricted ourselves to mentioning the more important mechanisms.

Nikhil Tandon,
Dinesh Dhanwal,

Department of Endocrinology,
All India Institute of Medical Sciences,
New Delhi 110 029, India
. 

Home

Past Issue

About IP

About IAP

Feedback

Links

 Author Info.

  Subscription