|
Indian Pediatr 2018;55: 661-664 |
|
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for
Primary Immunodeficiency Disorders: Experience from a Referral
Center in India
|
Ramya Uppuluri 1,
Dhaarani Jayaraman1, Meena
Sivasankaran1, Shivani Patel1,
Venkateswaran Vellaichamy Swaminathan1,
Lakshman Vaidhyanathan2,
Sathishkumar Kandath3 and
Revathi Raj1
From Departments of 1Pediatric Haematology, Oncology,
Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2Haematology and Stem Cell Pheresis,and
3Pediatric Critical Care; Apollo Cancer Institutes,
Chennai, India.
Correspondence to: Dr Ramya Uppuluri, Department of
Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Apollo
Cancer Institutes, 320, Padma Complex, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai
600 035, India.
Email:
[email protected]
Received: November 18, 2017;
Initial review: March 08, 2018;
Accepted: May 23, 2018.
|
Objective: To share experience of over 15 years in hematopoietic
stem cell transplantation in children with primary immunodeficiency
disorders.
Design: Medical record review.
Setting: A referral center for
pediatric hemato-oncological disorders.
Participants: Children (<18 y)
diagnosed to have primary immune deficiencies who underwent
hematopoietic stem cell transplantation between 2002 and August 2017.
Main outcome measures:
Disease-free survival, morbidity and mortality.
Results: 85 primary
immunodeficiency disorder transplants were performed with engraftment
noted in 80 (94%) transplants and an overall survival of 67%. The
conditioning regimen was individualized based on the underlying immune
defect. Mixed chimerism was noted in 20% children with 56% (9/16)
remaining disease-free. Graft versus host disease was noted in 33
(39.2%) children with most seen in children with chronic granulomatous
disease. Severe combined immune deficiency transplants were mainly
complicated by infections. Immune cytopenias complicated Wiskott Aldrich
syndrome and Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis transplants. 29.4%
(25/85) children underwent haploidentical transplant in our cohort with
a survival of 70% in this group. Infectious complications were the most
common cause of death.
Conclusion: Primary
immunodeficiency disorders are curable in India when transplanted in
centers with experienced and trained pediatric transplant physicians and
intensivists.
Keywords: Immunity, Management, Outcome,
Prognosis, Stem cell therapy.
|
P rimary immunodeficiency disorders (PID) are
inherited disorders with impaired and dysregulated immunity
characterised by recurrent infections, failure to thrive and a
propensity for malignancy, especially lymphoma. Hematopoietic stem cell
transplantation (HSCT) is a curative option available with intact
survival post- HSCT. HSCT in PID can be challenging due to associated
co-morbidities and underlying immune dysregulation.
PID are common in India due to a high incidence of
consanguineous marriages. There is a paucity of data from India with
recent studies reporting an incidence of more than one per million
[1,2]. The lack of early diagnosis, awareness and late referral for HSCT
are likely contributory factors to the hitherto poor outcome in these
children [3].
We present the spectrum of PIDs including those
undergoing HSCT at our centre over 15 years and the factors that
influence morbidity and mortality.
Methods
In this retrospective study in the Department of
pediatric haematology, oncology and blood and marrow transplantation
unit, we reviewed records of children less than 18 years of age
diagnosed to have PIDs and who underwent HSCT from 2002 to August 2017.
PID was confirmed by gene mutation analysis or laboratory studies,
including T and B markers by flow cytometry, Immunoglobulin profile
including IgG, IgA, IgM and IgE, nitroblue tetrazolium chloride test or
dihydrorhodamine assay, flow cytometry for CD11b/18 and CD107a/Perforin
levels. The ten warning signs for PID as proposed by the Jeffry Modell
foundation were applied as a screening tool for initiating workup.
We analyzed the number of children within each
disorder, graft characteristics including the source of stem cells and
donor, conditioning regimen, rates of engraftment, post-transplant
complications noted in general and those unique to each of the
disorders, graft versus host disease, mortality and overall
survival. Written informed consent was obtained from all parents for the
procedure, and they were educated regarding the process of HSCT. The
study was approved by the Institutional ethics review board.
In the matched related donor (MRD) transplants,
peripheral blood stem cells were used as the source of stem cells in 21
(25%) and bone marrow in 17 (20%) children. In the matched unrelated
donor (MUD) cohort, peripheral blood stem cells were used in 8 (9.5%)
and umbilical cord blood units in 14 (16%) children. Haploidentical stem
cell grafts were used in 25 (29%) children.
Among the children undergoing haploidentical stem
cell transplants, techniques of T cell depletion included CD34 selection
and Campath in the bag in 1 child each (4% each), CD 3/19 selection in 2
transplants (8%), TCR alpha/beta depletion in 6 transplants (24%) and
post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in 15 (60%) children.
The conditioning regimen was myeloablative in
children with Wiskott Aldrich Syndrome (WAS), Hyper IgM syndrome and
Chronic Granulomatous Disease (CGD) with fludarabine with busulphan or
melphalan. Anti-thymocyte globulin was added to all MUD transplants. All
children with Severe Combined Immune Deficiency (SCID), Hemophagocytic
Lympho-histio-cytosis (HLH), Common Variable Immune Deficiency (CVID),
and Leucocyte Adhesion Defect (LAD) were treated with a reduced
intensity conditioning using fludarabine and treosulfan [5,6]. Busulphan
and cyclophosphamide were used only in the initial three patients before
fludarabine became available. Among the children with SCID, 20% (6/29)
were transplanted without conditioning.
In transplants where TCR alpha/beta depletion was
used, conditioning included fludarabine/treosulfan/thiotepa/anti-thymocyte
globulin. Conditioning in transplants with PTCy included fludarabine/treosulphan
with or without single dose 2 gray total body irradiation (TBI) in
conditions with a robust underlying immune system to facilitate enhanced
myeloablation and immunosuppression. Fludarabine/melphalan was an
alternative in children less than three years of age where radiotherapy
cannot be used.
Results
A total of 85 PID transplants were performed at our
centre during the study period (Table I). Engraftment was
noted in 80 (94%) children by 16-21 days post-HSCT, with primary graft
failure seen in 5 (5.8%) children. All five children underwent a
haploidentical transplant, each with Hyper IgM syndrome, CGD, MSMD and
WAS. Two children with WAS died of sepsis, while the other three
children had autologous reconstitution and are awaiting second HSCT.
TABLE I Primary Immunodeficiency Disorders in the Study Population (N=85)
Disorder |
*Number (%) |
Severe combined immunedeficiency
|
29 (34) |
Wiskott Aldrich syndrome |
15 (17) |
Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis
|
14 (16) |
Chronic granulomatous disease
|
10 (11) |
Hyper-IgM syndrome |
5 (5.8) |
Leucocyte adhesion defect
|
2 (2.3) |
Common variable immunedeficiency
|
2 (2.3) |
Mendelian susceptibility to mycobacterial diseases |
2 (2.3) |
IL10R deficiency |
2 (2.3) |
*One patient each with Hyper-IgE syndrome, IPEX syndrome, IKZF
mutation, and X-linked agammaglobulinemia. |
Among the 80 children who achieved engraftment,
complete chimerism with a durable graft was noted in 64 (80%) children;
mixed chimerism was seen in 20%. SCID was the underlying diagnosis in 8
out of 16 children, of which three underwent a second transplant; four
are doing well with mixed chimerism and remain infection free, and one
child died of refractory cytomegalovirus reactivation. One child each
with LAD and IL10 R deficiency died with loss of graft while one child
with WAS underwent a second HSCT. The other children with mixed
chimerism including two with WAS and one each with IPEX syndrome, HLH,
CGD and Hyper-IgE syndrome are clinically well with no infections.
Therefore, 56% (9/16) children with mixed chimerism remained
disease-free with a chimerism of 70% to 85%. Donor lymphocyte infusion
was performed in seven children which resulted in stabilization of
chimerism.
Graft versus host disease (GvHD) was noted in
33 out of 85 children (39.2%) with maximum GvHD rates in CGD (7/10,
70%). Children with HLH had GvHD rates of 57% (8/14) while WAS had rates
42% (6/14). GvHD rates were 16% (5/30) in SCID. Each of the children
with Hyper IgM syndrome, Hyper IgE syndrome and IKZF mutation had grade
2-3 skin and gut GvHD.
GvHD was the cause of death in 12% children (4/33);
one child each with SCID and WAS and two children with CGD. GvHD was
managed with steroids including methylprednisolone and prednisolone.
Second line immunosuppressants namely Etanercept, Tocilizumab, and
Rituximab were required in 15/33 (45%) children.
The overall survival rate in our cohort was 67%
(57/85) with mortality rates of 32% (Table II). Seven
children died before engraftment, of which four children with SCID died
due to sepsis. Among children with SCID, five died of sepsis, four of
whom died before engraftment, two children who underwent haplo SCT died
of unexplained encephalopathy, two died of refractory cytomegalovirus
(CMV) disease, and one died of GvHD. One child who received busulphan as
conditioning died due to fibroelastosis of the lung four years
post-HSCT. One child with bare lymphocyte syndrome died of disseminated
invasive aspergillosis. Among children with WAS, causes of death
included GvHD, refractory CMV, acute respiratory distress syndrome
(ARDS) and pulmonary haemorrhage.
TABLE II Disease-specific Overall Survival Rates
Disorder
|
Survival
|
Severe combined immunodeficiency
|
16/29 (55%) |
Wiskott Aldrich syndrome
|
9/16 (60%) |
Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis
|
9/14 (64%) |
Chronic granulomatous disease
|
8/10 (80%) |
Hyper-IgM syndrome |
5/5 (100%) |
Leucocyte adhesion defect
|
1/2 (50%) |
Common variable immunedeficiency
|
2/2 (100%) |
Mendelian susceptibility to mycobacterial diseases
|
2/2 (100%) |
IL10R deficiency |
1/2 (50%) |
Hyper-IgE syndrome |
1/1 (100%) |
IPEX syndrome |
1/1 (100%) |
IKZF mutation |
1/1 (100%) |
X-linked agammaglobulinemia
|
1/1 (100%) |
The cause of death among children with HLH is varied.
Two children who were less than six months of age died of diffuse
alveolar haemorrhage and ARDS. One child died of immune hemolysis. Two
children died of relapse of central nervous system disease.
Both deaths among those with CGD were due to GvHD.
Late graft rejection with a resultant recurrence of disease was the
cause of death in the baby with IL10R deficiency. The child with LAD
died due to loss of graft with refractory CMV.
Discussion
In this series from India about HSCT in PIDs,
survival rate was 67%. The Australian and New Zealand Children’s
Haematology Oncology group had published an overall survival of 72% in
their cohort in 2013 [4]. Recent data on HSCT in adults with PIDs
reported an overall survival at 3 years of 85.2% [5]. Conditioning
regimens need to be chosen based on the genotype of an individual child.
The pre-engraftment phase is critical in babies with SCID due to maximum
mortality risk secondary to bacterial sepsis. Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome
poses unique challenges due to immune dysregulation and these children
need to be monitored for late immune cytopenias. GvHD is a predominant
problem in children with CGD. In children with primary HLH and less
than six months of age, acute pulmonary haemorrhage is a risk factor
affecting mortality. In all these children, CMV viral load needs to be
monitored and treated early. Whole exome sequencing further aids with
treatment modifications and adds to the spectrum of PIDs being
transplanted including IL10R deficiency, IKZF mutation, and MSMD. Haploidentical
SCT in PID present a ray of hope for a cure in children with no
compatible matched family or unrelated donor with the advantage of ease
of donor availability and cost [6]. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide is
cost effective and well tolerated. Supportive care with trained
pediatric intensivists is a major determinant of outcome. Advances in
conditioning chemotherapy with increasing use of reduced intensity
conditioning and treosulfan based protocols have decreased
regimen-related toxicity and improved overall survival [7,8]. Stable
mixed chimerism is found to be acceptable in PIDs [4,9].
The concept ‘one size fits all’ does not apply to PID
transplants. Each one of the PIDs has a unique underlying
pathophysiology involving immune dysregulation and treatment needs to be
tailored accordingly [10,11]. SCID has a varied spectrum of phenotypic
and genotypic characteristics. Based on the gene mutation and the
percentage of T cells, B cells and NK cells, conditioning is modified.
T- B+ NK- SCID can be transplanted before six months of age without
conditioning [12]. The presence of NK cells requires reduced-intensity
conditioning given the increased risk of rejection and chemotoxicity
[13].
Early diagnosis and referral for HSCT is the most
important determinant of outcome. Referral may not be delayed for
complete stabilisation of these children as it may be difficult with
resultant loss of optimal time for HSCT. The use of the Jeffry Modell
chart with the ten warning signs of PIDs in all pediatric clinics could
help raise awareness and aid in early recognition. The use of simple
newborn screening (NBS) techniques will aid in early diagnosis. The
absence of thymus on chest X-ray and an absolute lymphocyte count
of less than 2000 are indications for further workup. SCID has been
included in NBS through an assay to detect T cell receptor excision
circles (TRECs) which are biomarkers for T cell development [14].
Gene therapy is evolving into an alternative for cure
for children with PIDs with no potential donor for HSCT. In particular,
trials have been conducted with encouraging results in X-linked SCID,
adenosine deaminase deficiency, chronic granulomatous disease and
Wiskott Aldrich syndrome. Further research is aimed at improving viral
vectors so as to achieve transgene transfer with reduced mutagenesis
[15].
The future of PID in India lies on the pillar of
shared care between pediatricians and hematologists and transplant
physicians. The first step towards improving outcome in these children
in India lies with pediatricians who are the key to early recognition
and institution of appropriate care including parent counselling for a
curative option.
Acknowledgements: Pediatric Critical Care Group,
Stem Cell Pheresis Team and Infectious Disease Specialists of our center
for their immense support and expertise in managing these children.
Contributors: RU: conception and design of the
work; DJ, MS: acquisition of data; VVS, SP: analysis of data, LV:
analyzing stem cell pheresis data; SK: analysis of PICU data; RR:
revising critically for important intellectual content.
Funding: None; Competing Interest: None
stated.
What is Already Known?
• Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
(HSCT) is a curative option available for primary
immunodeficiency disorders.
What This Study Add?
• Expierience of HSCT, including
haploidentical stem cell transplantation, from a tertiary-call
center with 67% overall survival rate.
|
References
1. Madkaikar M, Aluri J, Gupta S. Guidelines for
Screening, Early Diagnosis, and Management of Severe Combined
Immunodeficiency (SCID) in India. Indian J Pediatr. 2016;5:455-62.
2. Gupta S, Madkaikar M, Singh S, Sehgal S. Primary
immunodeficiencies in India: A perspective. Ann N Y Acad Sci.
2012;1250:73-9.
3. Jindal AK, Pilania RK, Rawat A, Singh S. Primary
immunodeficiency disorders in India – A situational review. Front
Immunol. 2017;8:714.
4. Mitchell R, Nivison-Smith I, Anazodo A, Tiedemann
K, Shaw P, Teague L, et al. Outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell
transplantation in primary immunodeficiency: a report from the
Australian and New Zealand Children’s Haematology Oncology Group and the
Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Recipient Registry. Biol Blood
Marrow Transplant. 2013;19:338-43.
5. Fox TA, Chakraverty R, Burns S, Carpenter B,
Thomson K, Lowe D, et al. Successful outcome following allogeneic
hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adults with primary
immunodeficiency. Blood. 2018;131:917-31.
6. Shah RM, Elfeky R, Nademi Z, Qasim W, Amrolia P,
Chiesa R, et al. T-cell receptor
ab+ and CD19+ cell
depleted haploidentical and mismatched hematopoietic stem cell
transplantation in primary immune deficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol.
2018;141:1417-26-e1.
7. Fischer A, Landais P, Friedrich W, Gerritsen B,
Fasth A, Porta F, et al. Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in
Europe for primary immunodeficiencies other than severe combined
immunodeficiency: A report from the European Group for BMT and the
European Group for Immunodeficiency. Blood. 1994;83:1149-54.
8. Slatter MA, Rao K, Amrolia P, Flood T, Abinun M,
Hambleton S, et al. Treosulfan-based conditioning regimens for
hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with primary
immunodeficiency: United Kingdom experience. Blood. 2011;117:4367-75.
9. Buckley RH, Schiff SE, Schiff RI, Markert ML,
Williams LW, Roberts JL, et al. Hematopoietic stem-cell
transplantation for the treatment of severe combined immunodeficiency. N
Engl J Med. 1999;340:508-16.
10. Gennery AR, Slatter MA, Grandin L, Taupin P, Cant
AJ, Veys P, et al. Transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells
and long-term survival for primary immunodeficiencies in Europe:
Entering a new century, do we do better? J Allergy Clin Immunol.
2010;126:602-10.e1-11.
11. Kapoor N, Raj R. Hematopoietic stem cell
transplantation for primary immune deficiency disorders. Indian J
Pediatr. 2016;83:450-4.
12. Slatter MA, Boztug H, Pötschger U, Sykora KW,
Lankester A, Yaniv I, et al. Treosulfan-based conditioning
regimens for allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in
children with non-malignant diseases. Bone Marrow Transplant.
2015;50:1536-41.
13. Hassan A, Lee P, Maggina P, Xu JH, Moreira D,
Slatter M, et al. Host natural killer immunity is a key indicator
of permissiveness for donor cell engraftment in patients with severe
combined immunodeficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133:1660-6.
14. Borte S, von Döbeln U, Hammarström L. Guidelines
for newborn screening of primary immunodeficiency diseases. Curr Opin
Hematol. 2013;20:48-54.
15. Ghosh S, Gaspar HB. Gene therapy approaches to
immunodeficiency. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2017; 31:823-34.
|
|
|
|