|
Indian Pediatr 2018;55: 657-658 |
|
Bone Marrow Transplantation for Primary
Immune Deficiency Disorders in India: Past, Present and Future
|
Satya Prakash Yadav
From the Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology
and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Cancer Institute,
Medanta the Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
Email: [email protected]
|
P rimary immune deficiency disorders (PID) are a
group of under-diagnosed and under-treated entities [1,2] with high
morbidity and mortality. A review of 386 patients of PID from India
reported the most common forms to be disorders of immune regulation
followed by phagocytic disorders and predominant antibody deficiencies
[2]. Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is a curative option for many
PID. Barriers to cure include lack of early diagnosis and referral, lack
of diagnostic facilities especially genetic tests, lack of centers
specializing in transplant for PID, and high cost of BMT [1].
The number of patients seeking BMT in India has
increased over the last five years. Nearly 2000 BMTs,with more than 1000
allogeneic, are being performed annually across 75 centers as per Indian
Stem Cell Transplant Registry (ISCTR) 2017 report (personal
communication). Pediatric BMT outcomes are also improving. A recent
retrospective analysis from eight centers has reported 76% overall
survival in 717 children after BMT. Thalassemia (33%) was the commonest
indication for BMT whilst PID (2.1%) was the rarest [3]. However,
outcome data for BMT in PID is lacking. In this issue of Indian
Pediatrics, Uppuluri, et al. [4] describe largest experience
from India – 85 children with PID undergoing BMT with 67% overall
survival. This is the right time to describe the journey from a
difficult past to a happening present and an exciting future.
Past: BMT for PID in India has made a slow
progress. The first case reported was of a child suffering from Wiskott-Aldrich
syndrome (WAS) who underwent a successful matched sibling donor (MSD)
BMT [5]. A total of 150 children with PID have undergone BMT in last 5
years as per the ISCTR 2017 report. In last decade, alternative donor
BMT has been performed for various PIDs. Few landmarks have been – first
unrelated cord blood transplant (UCBT) performed for a child with
familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis [6], first haploidentical
with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for severe combined immune
deficiency (SCID) [7], matched unrelated donor (MUD) BMT and
haploidentical BMT with TCR alpha-beta/CD19 depletion for WAS [8].
Present: BMT centers in India have grown from
just 10 in 2005 to 75 in 2017. Now alternative donor transplants are
being performed for children, especially from half-matched (haploidentical)
family donors (mother, father, uncles and aunts) solving problem of
donor scarcity [9]. The main highlight of the paper by Uppuruli, et
al. [4] is the alternative donor transplant, which was performed in
47 out of 85 transplants (MUD-8, UCBT-14 and haploidentical-25). Newer
reduced toxicity conditioning regimens using agents like Treosulfan and
Fludarabine or Busulfan and Fludarabine with or without Thiotepa and
Graft versus host disease (GVHD) regimens like PTCy or TCR
alpha-beta/CD19 depletion from the donor graft have made BMT for PID
safer [4,8,10]. Another heartening aspect is the spectrum of PID
undergoing BMT in India – SCID, WAS and HLH were nearly 67% of total BMT
in the present study but many other children with rare PID have also
been transplanted [4]. Multi-speciality care, especially good pediatric
intensive care support, is needed to improve outcomes as highlighted in
the present paper [4]. Mixed chimerism was seen in 20% children in the
present study; however, another study from India [10] has shown fully
donor chimerism in a series of 8 patients undergoing reduced toxicity
BMT with PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis. TCR alpha-beta/CD19 depletion is
another new technique that can reduce GVHD rates tremendously with
haploidentical donors. In present study, six such transplants were
performed and another such BMT has been reported for WAS [8].
Future: Transplant-related mortality remains the
major challenge in children with PID undergoing BMT as shown in present
study [4]. Another challenge is to reduce long-term sequelae of
chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy in these very young children. Chronic
GVHD is another unwanted complication that affects quality of life. In
future, transplants would be with minimal or no chemotherapy as it would
be replaced by monoclonal antibodies targeting host bone marrow. Another
possibility is availability of gene therapy in the near future. After
correcting genetic defect (either by lentivirus or by gene editing) in
the host bone marrow, it would be re-infused in patient after
administering some chemotherapy, and this would be a GVHD-free
autologous BMT. In-utero stem cell transplantation would be
another new possibility. Better supportive care like cytotoxic T-cells
specific for viruses and fungi would reduce mortality. Monitoring of
drug levels such as busulfan or treosufan can reduce toxicity.
Post-transplant donor lymphocyte infusions can help convert mixed
chimersim to fully donor. Better drugs for acute and chronic GVHD (e.g.,
ruxotilinib and ibrutinib) might help save lives. Setting up of
long-term follow-up clinics would help improve outcomes further.
In conclusion, India is making fast strides in BMT
for PID, and in future we should be able to diagnose early and
transplant early, and save many more lives with better quality of life.
Funding: None; Competing interests: None
stated.
References
1. Chinnabhandar V, Yadav SP, Kaul D, Verma IC,
Sachdeva A. Primary immunodeficiency disorders in the developing world:
data from a hospital-based registry in India. Pediatr Hematol Oncol.
2013;31:207-11.
2. Chopra YR, Yadav SP. Status of primary immuno-deficiency
disorders in India. Indian Pediatr. 2013;50:974.
3. Bhat S, Joshi R, Katewa S, Kharya G, Sen S, Misra
R, et al. Pediatric hematopoetic stem cell transplantation in
India: A report by Indian Pediatric Hematology Oncology Group
(Conference Abstract P759). Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018;53 (In Press).
4. Uppuluri R, Jayaraman D, Sivasankaran M, Patel S,
Swaminathan VV, Vaidhyanathan L, et al. Hematopoetic stem cell
transplantation for primary immunodeficiency disorders: Experience from
a tertiary referral center in India. Indian Pediatr. 2018;55:661-4.
5. Mathew LG, Chandy M, Dennison D, Srivastav A,
Ganapathy K, Cherian T. Successful bone marrow transplantation in an
infant with Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome. Indian Pediatr. 1999;36:707-10.
6. Ramzan M, Yadav SP, Kharya G, Chinnabhandar V,
Enteserian M, Henter JI, et al. Hemophagocytic
lymphohistiocytosis in infants: a single center experience from India. Pediatr
Hematol Oncol.2014;31:285-92.
7. Dhingra N, Yadav SP, de Villartay JP, Picard C,
Sabharwal RK, Dinand V, et al. Severe combined immunodeficiency
caused by a new homozygous RAG1 mutation with progressive
encephalopathy. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2014;7:44-9.
8. Thakkar D, Katewa S, Rastogi N, Kohli S, Nivargi
S, Yadav SP. Successful reduced intensity conditioning alternate donor
stem cell transplant for Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome. J Pediatr Hematol
Oncol. 2017;39:e493-6.
9. Yadav SP, Rastogi N, Thakkar D, Kohli S, Nivargi
S, Misra R, et al. Outcome of alternate donor stem cell
transplantation in children: An Indian experience (Conference abstract
P482). Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017;52:S372.
10. Rastogi N, Katewa S, Thakkar D, Kohli S, Nivargi
S, Yadav SP. Reduced-toxicity alternate-donor stem cell transplantation
with posttransplant cyclophosphamide for primary immunodeficiency
disorders. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018;65:doi: 10.1002/pbc.26783.
|
|
|
|