|
Indian Pediatr 2016;53:
685-688 |
 |
Outcome of Gaucher Disease in India: Lessons
from Prevalent Diagnostic and Therapeutic Practices
|
Mamta Muranjan and Smita Patil
From Genetic Clinic, Department of Pediatrics, Seth
GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, India.
Correspondence: Dr Mamta Muranjan, Flat 301, 3rd
floor, Suman Apartments, 16 – B, Naushir Bharucha Road, Tardeo, Mumbai
400 007, India.
Email:
[email protected]
Received: April 14, 2015;
Initial review: July 08, 2015;
Accepted: May 13, 2016.
|
Objectives: To study disease severity and response to enzyme
replacement therapy in Gaucher disease.
Methods: Updated data was
captured from records of 37 patients (35 reported previously) with
confirmed diagnosis of Gaucher disease from January 1995 through
December 2011 (31, 83.8 %) and prospectively from January 2012 through
June 2013 (6, 16.2 %). Severity of manifestations was determined by
Gaucher disease Severity Score Index. Response to enzyme replacement
therapy was assessed in terms of attainment of therapeutic goals.
Results: Moderate to severe
manifestations (domain score of > 2) were observed in treated patients
at baseline (83%, 58%, 66% and 25% for anemia, thrombocytopenia,
hepatomegaly and leucopenia, respectively and 100% for splenomegaly and
elevated plasma chitotriosidase). None of the 11 patients treated with
synthetic enzyme (average annual dose 23 to 53 units/kg) attained all
therapeutic goals in the recommended time frame, particularly the
visceral, skeletal and growth domains.
Conclusions: Early onset of
moderate to severe disease in Indian patients mandates early therapy
with optimum doses to ensure attainment of all recommended therapeutic
goals.
Keywords: Glucocerebrosidase deficiency, GBA 1
gene, lysosomal storage disease.
|
Gaucher disease in populations of Asian ancestry
is a severe, rapidly progressive phenotype with younger age at onset,
severe hematological, visceral and bone involvement, higher frequency of
neuronopathic disease and p. Leu483Pro as the most frequent GBA 1
gene allele [1]. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) is not widely
available in India. Multicentric data is available on the phenotypic
spectrum and response to enzyme replacement therapy in 25 individuals
with Gaucher disease in India [2]. However, data on disease severity,
dosing, bone disease and genotype was incomplete. This study was
therefore performed to analyze disease severity and response to ERT at a
single center in Western India.
Methods
The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics
Committee of our institute. Records of patients with confirmed diagnosis
of Gaucher disease (by estimation of
b-glucocerebrosidase
activity and/or identification of pathogenic mutations and/or
histopathological evidence of Gaucher cells) were retrospectively
reviewed from January 1995 through December 2011 (n = 31, 83.8 %)
and six patients (16.2%) were prospectively enrolled from January 2012
through June 2013. Of these, 35 cases constituted a subset of lysosomal
storage disorders analyzed previously for diagnostic time frame and
genotype [3].
Parameters analyzed were age at diagnosis and
initiation of ERT. Severity of manifestations were graded by Gaucher
disease Severity Score Index (GauSSI) [4]. In those receiving ERT, dose
and duration was determined for each case. Therapeutic response was
analyzed according to published therapeutic goals [5].
Results
Of the 37 confirmed cases (22 males), phenotypic
classification was possible in 22 cases: 45.4% had type 1 disease and
41% had type 3 disease. The most frequent GBA 1 gene allele was
p. Leu483Pro in 10 (62.5%) cases
(8 homozygous, 2 heterozygous).
The average age (range) at onset of symptoms,
presentation to our center and diagnosis was 28 (1- 150), 56 (3.5-228)
and 56 (4-229) months, respectively. The average delay in diagnosis from
the initial symptoms was 30 months (range 1-154). The severity of
manifestations, are described in Table I. Only hematologic
and biomarker (plasma chitotriosidase) domains could be scored as due to
financial constraints, very few patients had imaging for bone disease
and organ volume ascertainment and evaluation of lung domain.
TABLE I Clinical Characteristics and Severity Score with GauSSI for Hematologic and Biomarker
Domains in Study Subjects (N=37)
Manifestations |
On ERT |
Untreated |
Total |
|
(n = 12) |
(n = 25) |
(%) |
Anemia |
11 |
20 |
31 (83.7) |
0 (>12) |
1 |
5 |
6 (16) |
1 (10-12) |
1 |
2 |
3 (8) |
2 (8-9.9) |
3 |
8 |
11 (30) |
3 (< 8) |
7 |
10 |
17 (46) |
Thrombocytopenia |
9 |
12 |
21 (56.7) |
0 (>150) |
3 |
13 |
16 (44) |
1 (101-150) |
2 |
3 |
5 (13) |
2 (60-100) |
2 |
3 |
5 (13) |
3 (<60) |
5 |
6 |
11 (30) |
Leucopenia |
5 |
7 |
12 (32.4) |
0 (>4) |
7 |
18 |
25 (67.5) |
1 (2.5-4) |
2 |
1 |
3 (8) |
2 (<2.5) |
2 |
2 |
4 (11) |
3 (<1.9) |
1 |
4 |
5 (13.5) |
Blood transfusion |
7 |
5 |
12 (32.4) |
Bleeding/bruises/petechiae |
6 |
0 |
6 (16.2) |
High plasma chitotriosidase* |
11 |
7 |
18 (85.7) |
0 (<600) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 (600-4000) |
0 |
1 |
1 (5.5) |
2 (4001-15000) |
4 |
4 |
8 (44.4) |
3 (>15000) |
7 |
2 |
9 (50) |
*Total 21, with 9 untreated. |
ERT was initiated in 12 cases. Before commencing ERT,
all 12 cases had splenomegaly and hepatomegaly whereas stunting (height
<3 rd centile, NCHS chart)
was noted in 10 (83.3 %) and osteopenia (DEXA Z score -1 to -2.5) in 9
(75%). Three (25%) had undergone splenectomy. Baseline liver volume in
one patient was <1.25 times normal, four each had moderate hepatomegaly
(1.25-2.5 times normal) and severe hepatomegaly (>2.5 times normal) and
in three individuals baseline liver volume was not available. The
average liver volume was 2.27 times normal (range of 1.06-4). Nine
individuals with an intact spleen had severe splenomegaly (volume > 15
times normal, average 40.2 times normal, range: 20.7-67). The average
(range) age at initiation and duration of ERT was 85 (17-140) months and
55 (1-144) months, respectively. Average annual dose ranged from
23-53Units/kg and varied every year. Response to enzyme replacement was
prospectively analyzed in 11 out of 12 cases (7 males; 7 with type 1
disease and 4 with type 3). One 10 year old with advanced disease died
due to intracranial hemorrhage after the first infusion of ERT. The
response to ERT is presented in Table II.
TABLE II Response to Enzyme Replacement Therapy in Terms of Achievement of Therapeutic Goals
within the recommended Time-frame
Therapeutic goal |
Time to achieve goal |
Before ERT, no(%) |
After ERT, no(%) |
Hemoglobin |
|
|
|
•Increase to >11 g/dL |
1 to 2 years |
2(18.1)* |
7/10(70)# |
•Received transfusions |
|
7 (63.6) |
0 |
Platelet count |
•Increase to prevent bleeding |
1st year |
6 (54.5) |
10 (100) |
•Avoid splenectomy: Splenectomy |
|
2 (18.1) |
0 |
•Splenectomized patients: Normalization |
1st year |
2/2 (100) |
2/2 (100) |
•Intact spleen, moderate thrombocytopenia:$
|
|
4/9 (44.4%) |
|
- Increase by 1.5 to 2.0 fold |
1st year |
|
4/4 (100) |
- Approach low normal (Normal> 150000) |
2nd year |
|
3/4 (75) |
Intact spleen, severe thrombocytopenia‡:
|
|
3/9 (33.3) |
|
- Increase by 1.5 fold |
1st year |
|
2/2# |
- Continue to increase |
Years 2-5, doubling by year 2 |
|
2/2# |
Liver volume reduction^ |
•By 20% to 30% 1st year |
|
|
5/10 (50)# |
•By 30-40% Year 3 – 5 |
|
|
4/7 (57.1) |
Spleen volume reduction^ |
•By 30% to 50% |
1st year |
|
2/8 (25)# |
•By 50% to 60% |
Year 2-5 |
|
3/6 (50) |
Bone |
•Lessen or eliminate bone pains |
1- 2 years |
2 |
0 |
•Prevent bone crisis |
|
2 |
0 |
•Prevent osteonecrosis and subchondral joint collapse |
2 years |
2 |
0 |
•Improve BMD; increase cortical and trabecular BMD |
|
3** |
2/9 (22)## |
Growth |
•Normal height |
3 years |
1(9) |
3/10 (30)# |
*Splenectomy prior to commencing ERT; #Duration
of ERT was <1 year in one patient; $platelet
count 60000-120000, platelet count‡: 60000, ^n=9;
**Baseline DEXA spine Z score < -1; ##Follow-up
DEXA spine Z score >-1. |
Discussion
The broad phenotypic spectrum of Gaucher disease and
wide variation in severity makes treatment with ERT a challenge.
Acknowledging these aspects has resulted in adoption of individualized
dose regimen [6,7].
A key determinant of the initial treatment dose is
disease severity, rate of progress, nature of organ involvement and
impact of disease manifestation on quality of life [6,7]. This
stratifies patients to high or low risk groups [7]. Children are
categorized as high-risk on the basis of various clinical and laboratory
parameters [6,7]. A dose of 60 Units/kg every two weeks has been
recommended to treat high-risk children and as a minimum dose for
children with type 3 phenotype [7,8].
We found that Indian children have severe disease
based on the following observations: early age of onset (average of 28
months), objectively graded moderate to severe manifestations of
splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, anemia and thrombocytopenia corroborated by
extremely elevated plasma chitotriosidase levels (indicating a high
disease burden) [9], and high proportion of the severe genotype
(p.Leu483Pro) (representing severe manifestations and neuronopathic
disease) [8]. The severe manifestations could partly be attributed to
the diagnostic lag (average of 30 months) in our study.
Thus majority of our cohort would be candidates for
receiving a dose of 60 Units/kg every two weeks as they have multiple
high risk criteria. Due to supply constraints, our children received low
doses that varied every year. Despite receiving dose of <60 Units/kg,
early response with hematological reconstitution by the first year of
therapy was adequate. However, the visceral and skeletal response
digressed from the recommended targets. Only 50% and 25% of ERT
recipients achieved the target reduction in liver and spleen volume,
respectively by the first year of therapy. Skeletal response was
likewise suboptimal with only 22% showing improvement in BMD and 30%
achieving normal height by 3 years. As visceral and skeletal response is
dose-dependent and determined by age at initiation of ERT; late
initiation, high disease burden and low doses was the most likely cause
for sub-optimum visceral and skeletal response [10-12].
A publication describing collective results of five
Indian centers has shown significant hematological and visceral response
and improved weight and height [2]. However, parameters that were not
addressed in this early publication were dose of ERT, objective severity
of disease and response in terms of prescribed therapeutic goals.
Additionally, as skeletal and growth response are only observed after
the third year of treatment [5,8], the relatively shorter duration of
therapy (average of 2.5 years in eight out of 22 patients completing
more than one year therapy) did not permit effective conclusions. Thus
our study contributes to the experience of treating Gaucher disease in
India by documenting long-term data against established therapeutic
goals.
A limitation of our study was reliance on
retrospective data due to which clinical information was incompletely
captured, evaluations were partial and patients were lost to follow-up.
The other limitation was lack of complete systemic assessment of solid
organs, lungs, heart and skeleton by imaging due to financial
constraints as all expenses were out-of-pocket. In conclusion, severe
disease phenotype and higher proportion of type 3 disease in Indian
children necessitates ERT in higher doses along with cautious dose
tapering for long term management if optimum response in all disease
domains is to be a reality. As ethnic/geographic background of a Gaucher
disease population may be a consideration for optimum dosing [7], our
study has important therapeutic ramifications. Such phenotype and risk
categorization of Indian children along with comprehensive pre-treatment
evaluation of organ involvement and disease burden would determine
whether the therapeutic promise of ERT in India is realized in its
entirety.
Acknowledgements: The authors are grateful to
Genzyme, a Sanofi group of Companies, for providing Imiglucerase through
the charitable access program [INCAP] and to members of Genzyme’s Indian
Medical Advisory Board for their inputs. The authors are indebted to Dr.
Priya Kishnani, Division Chief, Medical Genetics, Duke University
Medical Center, USA and Dr. Ashok Vellodi, Consultant Metabolic
Pediatrician, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK, for
guidance and invaluable contributions in evaluation and monitoring
therapy of our patients. We also acknowledge Dr. Meenakshi Bhat and Dr.
Swathi Shetty, Center for Human Genetics, Bangalore; Dr. Pramod Mistry,
Director, Metabolic Liver and Lysosomal Disease Program, Department of
Internal Medicine (Digestive Diseases), Yale University School of
Medicine, USA; Dr. Jayesh Sheth, Institute of Human Genetics, Ahmedabad
and Dr. Parag Tamhankar, ICMR Genetic Research Center, Mumbai for
performing molecular testing. The authors thank Dr. Avinash Supe, Dean
of Seth GS Medical College & KEM Hospital for granting permission to
publish the study.
Contributors: MM: conceptualized the
study, designed the protocol, supervised data collection and analysis
and wrote the manuscript; SP: collected and analyzed the data; MM: will
act as guarantor.
Funding: None; Competing interests:
MM is member of Genzyme’s Indian medical advisory board and does not
receive any compensation for serving on the board.
What This Study Adds?
• Severe phenotype of Gaucher disease in
Indian children stratifies them to the high-risk category.
|
References
1. Zimran A. How I treat Gaucher disease? Blood.
2011; 118:1463-71.
2. Nagral A, Mewawalla P, Jagadeesh S, Kabra M,
Phadke SR, Verma IC, et al. Recombinant macrophage targeted
enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher disease in India. Indian Pediatr.
2011;48:779-84.
3. Agarwal S, Lahiri K, Muranjan M, Solanki N. The
face of lysosomal storage disorders in India: a need for early
diagnosis. Indian J Pediatr. 2015;82:525-9.
4. Di Rocco M, Giona F, Carubbi F, Linari S,
Minichilli F, Brady RO, et al. A new severity score index for
phenotypic classification and evaluation of responses to treatment in
type I Gaucher disease. Haematologica. 2008;93:1211-8.
5. Pastores GM, Weinreb NJ, Aerts H, Andria G, Cox
TM, Giralt M, et al. Therapeutic goals in the treatment of
Gaucher disease. Sem Hematol. 2004;41:4-14.
6. Andersson HC, Charrow J, Kaplan P, Mistry P,
Pastores GM, Prakash-Cheng A, et al. Individualization of
long-tern enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher disease. Genet Med.
2005;7:105-10.
7. Martins AM, Valadares ER, Porta G, Coelho J,
SemionatoFilho J, Pianovski MA, et al. Recommendations on
diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring for Gaucher disease. J Pediatr.
2009;155:S10-S18.
8. Kaplan P, Baris H, De Meirleir L, Di Rocco M, El
Beshlawy A, Huemer M, et al. Revised recommendations for the
management of Gaucher disease in children. Eur J Pediatr.
2013;172:447-58.
9. van Dussen L, Hendriks EJ, Groener JE, Boot RG, Hollak
CE, Aerts JM. Value of plasma chitotriosidase to assess non-neuronopathic Gaucher
disease severity and progression in the era of enzyme replacement
therapy.J Inherit Metab Dis. 2014;37:991-1001.
10. Grabowski GA, Kacena K, Cole JA, Hollak CE, Zhang
L, Yee J, et al. Dose-response relationships for enzyme
replacement therapy with Imiglucerase/alglucerase in patients with
Gaucher disease type 1. Genet Med. 2009;11:92-100.
11. Andersson H, Kaplan P, Kacena K, Yee J.
Eight-year clinical outcomes of long-term enzyme replacement therapy for
884 children with Gaucher disease type 1. Pediatrics. 2008;122:1182-90.
12. Niederau C. Dose finging. In: Niederau C,
editor. Gaucher disease. 2nded.Bremen: Uni-Med Verlag AG; 2009. p. 58-
60.
|
|
 |
|