Home            Past Issues            About IP            About IAP           Author Information            Subscription            Advertisement              Search  


Indian Pediatr 2010;47: 709-718

Efficacy and Safety of Therapeutic Nutrition Products for Home Based Therapeutic Nutrition for Severe Acute Malnutrition: A Systematic Review

Tarun Gera

From the Department of Pediatrics, Fortis Hospital, Shalimar Bagh, New Delhi, India.

Correspondence to: Dr Tarun Gera, B-256, Derawala Nagar, Delhi 110 009, India.
Email: tarun256@yahoo.com


Context: Severe acute malnutrition (SAM) in children is a significant public health problem in India with associated increased morbidity and mortality. The current WHO recommendations on management of SAM are based on facility based treatment. Given the large number of children with SAM in India and the involved costs to the care-provider as well as the care-seeker, incorporation of alternative strategies like home based management of uncomplicated SAM is important. The present review assesses (a) the efficacy and safety of home based management of SAM using ‘therapeutic nutrition products’ or ready to use therapeutic foods (RUTF); and (b) efficacy of these products in comparison with F-100 and home-based diet.

Evidence Acquisition: Electronic database (Pubmed and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register) were scanned using keywords ‘severe malnutrition’, ‘therapy’, ‘diet’, ‘ready to use foods’ and ‘RUTF’. Bibliographics of identified articles, reviews and books were scanned. The information was extracted from the identified papers and graded according to the CEBM guidelines.

Results: Eighteen published papers (2 systematic reviews, 7 controlled trials, 7 observational trials and 2 consensus statements) were identified. Systematic reviews and RCTs showed RUTF to be at least as efficacious as F-100 in increasing weight (WMD=3.0 g/kg/day; 95% CI -1.70, 7.70) and more effective in comparison to home based dietary therapies. Locally made RUTFs were as effective as imported RUTFs (WMD=0.07 g/kg/d; 95% CI=-0.15, 0.29). Data from observational studies showed the energy intake with RUTF to be comparable to F-100. The pooled recovery rate, mortality and default in treatment with RUTF was 88.3%, 0.7% and 3.6%, respectively with a mean weight gain of 3.2 g/kg/day. The two consensus statements supported the use of RUTF for home based management of uncomplicated SAM.

Conclusions: The use of therapeutic nutrition products like RUTF for home based management of uncomplicated SAM appears to be safe and efficacious. However, most of the evidence on this promising strategy has emerged from observational studies conducted in emergency settings in Africa. There is need to generate more robust evidence, design similar products locally and establish their efficacy and cost-effectiveness in a ‘non-emergency’ setting, particularly in the Indian context.

Key words: Efficacy, Management, Severe acute malnutrition, Therapeutic nutrition product.

Despite praiseworthy advances in economic prosperity and in the field of medical therapeutics, malnutrition continues to be a significant public health problem in India. Approximately 8.1 million children under the age of 5 years (6.4%) suffer from severe acute malnutrition (SAM) and it is one of the important co-morbidities leading to hospital admissions in our country(1). The mortality associated with severe acute malnutrition is also high, ranging from 73 to 187 per 1000(2). Needless to say, control and prevention of severe acute malnutrition should be one of the important priorities of the health planners. The current recommendations on the management of SAM by WHO involve initial management at a referral centre for initial stabilization followed by home therapy(3). Given the number of severely malnourished children in India and the state of health infrastructure in the country, particularly in the peripheries, these strategies do not seem to be logistically feasible. Also, given the complex interplay between social exclusion, poverty and SAM, inpatient treatment is associated with un-acceptable costs to the family. In such a situation, uncomplicated malnutrition is not considered a health problem by the family leading to delayed institution of appropriate management. This leads to seeking of health care when the problem is associated with other co-morbidities, leading to increased mortality.

Given the grimness of the current situation, there is clearly a need to improve and improvise the current standard guidelines for the management of SAM in children. One of the suggested methods has been the use of ‘therapeutic nutrition products’ administered at home to children with uncomplicated SAM(4). A review was planned to study the efficacy and safety of various therapeutic nutrition products for home based management of SAM in children and to critically review the extendibility of this strategy to India with the following objectives:

(a) to study the efficacy and safety of home based management of SAM using ‘therapeutic nutrition products’ in children; and

(b) to compare the efficacy of these products with F-100 formaulation or home based dietary therapy.

Trials: Systematic Reviews; before and after observational studies; Individual, cluster, and quasi randomized and non-randomized controlled trials; consensus statements.

Participants: Children with severe acute malnutrition.

Intervention: Therapeutic nutrition product, basically derived from F-100 formulation, which is an integral part of the WHO Management Protocol for SAM but should have these additional properties: (i) does not need to be prepared in any form before consumption; (ii) resists microbial contamination; and (iii) can be stored at ambient temperature.

Control: No intervention or alternative intervention such as home based dietary management or facility based standard treatment.

Outcome Measures: For efficacy: (a)Recovery rate (as defined by the authors); (b)Weight gain (g/kg/day); and (c) Relapse.

For Safety: (a) Morbidities like diarrhea, malaria and respiratory infections; and (b) Mortality.

Identification of studies: An exhaustive literature search was done in the Cochrane Library and Pubmed using the search terms ‘severe malnutrition’, ‘therapy’, ‘diet’, ‘ready to use foods’ and ‘RUTF’ on April 20, 2010.

Review of Evidence

A total of 4073 citations were scanned to identify relevant studies. The bibliography of identified articles was also scanned and lateral search strategy in Pubmed was utilised to identify any additional trials. A total of 18 published studies(4-21) were identified and the information extracted was graded according to the CEBM guidelines(22) and is presented in Table I. Wherever possible and where the data from the published studies was extractable, the data was pooled statistically to get a precise quantitative estimate. The pooled estimates of the weighed mean difference (WMD) of the weight gain between the control and intervention group and the mean pooled weight gain in observational studies were calculated by meta-analyses using random effects model assumptions with the "metan" command in STATA software.

Table I

Role of Therapeutic Nutrition Products in Home Based Management of Severe Acute Malnutrition 

in Children: Summary of Evidence
Author, Year of Publication, Country, Type of Study, Age, Inclusion Criteria Intervention, Sample Size, Duration of Study Salient Findings Conclusion, Grade of Evidence
Systematic Reviews
Bhutta, et al., 2008(4), Pediatric age group Intervention to reduce mother and child undernutrition and survival; Analyzed data from 21 studies on management of SAM The overall case-fatality rate in 23, 511  unselected severely malnourished children treated in 21 programs of community-based therapeutic care in Malawi, Ethiopia, and Sudan, between 2001 and 2005,was 4·1%, with a recovery rate of 79·4% and default of 11·0%. This compares favourably with case-fatality rates that are typically achieved with facility-based management. Use of preprepared balanced foods such as spreads and ready-to-use supplementary foods is feasible in community settings.
Grade: 2a
Ashworth, et al., 2006(5), Systematic Review, Malnourished children in non-emergency situations Community based rehabilitation for treatment of severe malnutrition,  Analyzed data from 33 studies of community based rehabilitation Eleven (33%) programs were considered effective. Of the subsample of programs reported since 1995, 8 of 13 (62%) were effective. None of the programs operating within routine health systems without external assistance was effective. When done well, rehabilitation at home with family foods is more cost-effective than inpatient care, but the cost effectiveness of ready-to-use therapeutic foods (RUTF) versus family foods has not been studied. Where children have access to a functioning primary health-care system and can be monitored, the rehabilitation phase of treatment of severe malnutrition should take place in the community. Grade: 2a
Controlled Trials RUTF versus Standard Practice
Gaboulaud, et al., 2007; Niger(6), 6-59 mo; Inclusion: a)  WHZ < -3 z or bilateral pitting edema
b) MUAC < 11cm
Management at therapeutic feeding centre (TFC) versus TFC and home based care versus home based care alone using RUTF; Total: 1937 TFC: 660; TFC and home: 937; Home based: 340 (Order: TFC, TFC plus home, home) Recovery: 52.7, 83.2 and 92.7; Mortality: 18.9, 0.0, 1.7; Default: 28.1, 16.8, 5.6 Transferred: 0.3, 0, 0; Wt gain: 20.8, 10.1, 9.7 g/kg/d Satisfactory treatment of SAM can be achieved using a combination of home and hospital strategies. Children without complications and preserved appetite may be directly managed at home. Grade: 2b
Ciliberto, et al. 2005; Malawi(7); Quasi-randomized controlled trial; 10-60 mo; Inclusion
a) Moderate and Severe wasting and/or kwashiorkor
b) Absence of severe edema, evidence of systemic infection, or anorexia
RUTF versus standard practice (WHO guidelines) at NRU;Total = 1178; RUTF:992; Standard Therapy: follow up till 6 mo. Recovery (WFH z > -2): 79% versus 46%; Mean wt. gain:3.5 g/kg/d versus 2.0 g/kg/d; Mortality and relapse: 8.7% versus 16.7%; Lower morbidity in RUTF group Home-based therapy with RUTF is associated with better outcomes for childhood malnutrition than is standard therapy Grade: 1b
Diop, et al., 2003; Senegal(8); Randomized controlled trial; 6-36 months; Inclusion: WFH < -2z without edema or after edema had resolved RUTF versus F-100 (received F-75 for 1-4 days prior to enrolment); Total: 70, RUTF: 35, F-100: 35 Wt gain: 10.1 g/kg/d in F-100 versus 15.6 g/kg/d in RUTF group, Mean duration to recovery: 17.3 days in F-100 versus 13.4 days in RTUF RTUF can be used efficiently for the rehabilitation of severely  malnourished children. Grade: 1b
Commercial or Indigenous Medical Nutrition Products versus Home based Foods
Manary, et al., 2004; Malawi(9);>12 months; Inclusion: a) Children discharged from NRU after initial treatment of infectious and metabolic problems,
b) HIV negative c) Tolerated test dose of RUTF 
RUTF versus RUTF supplement versus maize-soy flour; Total: 282, RUTF: 69 RUTF supplement: 96 Maize soy: 117
Duration: Till recovery/death/ infection
Recovery: 95% in RUTF versus 78% in others: Wt Gain: 7.0 versus 4.9 g/kg/d Morbidity: 3.8% diarrhea in RUTF versus 5.6% in others Home based therapy of malnutrition with RUTF is successful. Grade: 1b
Simpore, et al., 2006; Burkina Faso (10); Randomized controlled trial; 6-60 months; Inclusion: Undernourished children after initial stabilization using NG feeds Spirulina, Misola (made of Millet, soya, peanut kernel, sugar, salt) versus traditional foods; Total: 550 Spirulina: 170, Misola: 170 Spirulina+Misola: 170, Control: 40 All groups showed significant wt gain; maximum in spirulina and Misola group Rehabilitation by Spirulina plus Misola seems synergically favour the nutrition rehabilitation better than the simple addition of protein and energy intake. Grade: 1b
Local versus Imported Therapeutic Nutrition Products
Sandige, et al., 2004; Malawi(11); Quasi-randomized controlled trials: 1-5 years; Inclusion: a) Initial stabilization at NRU; b) WHZ < -2z for non-hospitalized subjects Imported RUTF (Plumpy nut) versus locally produced RUTF; Total: 260, Local RUTF: 135; Imported RUTF: 125; Duration: 14 weeks Recovery: 78%, Recovery (Local): 80%, Recovery (imported): 75%, Wt gain: 5.2 versus 4.8 g/kg/d, Default: 5% Failure, mortality and relapse: 11% Home-based therapy with RUTF was successful. Locally produced and imported RUTF have similar efficacy. Grade: 1b
Diop, et al., 2004; Senegal(12); Randomized controlled trial; 6-59 months; Inclusion: a) Severe malnutrition (WFH <70% and/or edema); b) Initial stabilization for 7 days at facility  Local RUTF versus Imported RUTF; Total: 61, Individual sample sizes not mentioned Mean energy intake comparable:  3434.2 vs 3181.2 kJ; Mean wt gain: 7.9 vs 8.1 g/kg/d; Mean  duration of rehabilitation: 35 vs 33 days Home-based rehabilitation with locally made RUTF was successful in promoting catch-up growth. Locally produced  RTUF was, at least as well accepted as the imported version  and lead to similar weight gain. Grade: 1b
Cohort Studies
Amthor, et al., 2009; Malawi(13); Prospective cohort study; Inclusion: a) WFH< 70% or Kwashiorkor b) Good appetite RUTF to provide 175 kcal/kg/d and protein 5.3g/kg/d; N = 826 Duration: 8 weeks Recovery (WFH 100%): 93.7% Mean wt gain: 2.7 g/kg/d Default: 3.6% Relapse: Not Mentioned Home-based therapy with RUTF administered by village health aides is effective in treating mal-nutrition during food crises in areas lacking  health services Grade: 2b
Jilcott, et al., 2010; Uganda(14); Evaluation study of a feeding program; 6-59 months; Inclusion: a) WFA <3rd percentile; b) MUAC < 12 cm Locally produced RUTF; N=20 Duration: 5 weeks Energy intake: 684 kcal/day Mean wt gain: 2.5 g/kg/day Locally-produced RUF is a promising strategy for community-based care of malnourished children.
Linemann, et al., 2007; Malawi(15);Prospective cohort study; 6-60 months; Inclusion: a) Moderate and severe malnutrition b) Good appetite Locally produced RUTF; treatment by medical professionals versus community health aides; Duration: 8 weeks Recovery: 89%; Mean wt gain: 3.5g/kg/d Default: 7%; Mortality: 1.4%; No differences in recovery rate based on training of the staff Home-based therapy with RUTF yields acceptable results without requiring formally medically trained personnel. Grade: 2b
Ciliberto, et al., 2006; Malawi(16); Prospective cohort study;1-5 years;Inclusion: a) Edematous malnutrition, b) Good appetite, c) No complications Administration of RUTF at home; Total: 219; Duration: 8 weeks Recovery: 83%, Mortality: 5%, Mean wt gain: 2.8g/kg/d Children with edematous malnutrition and good appetite may besuccessfully treated with home-based therapy. Grade: 2b
Chaiken, et al., 2006; Ethiopia(17); Prospective cohort study; Age not mentioned; Inclusion: a) WFH < 70% or bilateral edemaor MUAC<11 cm RUTF; N=5799 Followed up till recovery Recovery (WFH 80%) : 66% Default: 2.3%,Transferred: 8.8% Mortality 0.2% Recovery rates comparable with international standards, coverage far exceeded that of traditional center-based care. Grade: 2b
Collins, et al., 2002; Ethiopia(18); Retrospective Cohort Study;6-120 months; Inclusion: a) WFH< 70% or bilateral pitting edema RUTF Oral antibioticVitamin A, FA Education; N=170 Followed up till recovery Recovery: 85%, Mean wt gain: 3.2 g/kg/d Mortality: 4%; Default: 5%, Relapse: 6%; Mean time to recovery: 42 days Outpatient treatment exceeded internationally accepted minimum standards for recovery, default, and mortality rates. Time spent in the program and rates of weight gain were not satisfactory. Outpatient care could provide a complementary treatment strategy to therapeutic  feeding centres. Grade: 2b
Briend, et al., 1999; Chad(19); Prospective Cohort study; >12 mo Inclusion: a) WFH < 70% b) Gaining wt for 3 days Alternative F100 feeds were replaced by RUTF; 203 meals Energy intake 40·2 (SD 20·9) kcal/kg per feed for RUTF versus 20·2 (11·5) kcal/kg per feed for F100 (p<0·001); Total mean energy intake for the day was same RUTF might be useful in contaminated environments or where residential management is not possible. Grade: 2b
Consensus Statements
WHO, UNICEF, SCN informal consultation on community based management of SAM, 2006 (20)
  1. It is highly desirable to manage the treatment of severely malnourished children with no complications at home without an inpatient phase.

  2. RUTFs are useful to treat severe malnutrition without complications in communities with limited access to appropriate local diets for nutritional rehabilitation.

  3. When families have access to nutrient-dense foods, severe malnutrition without complications can be managed in the community without RUTF by carefully designed diets using low-cost family foods, provided appropriate minerals and vitamins are given.

  4. Treatment of young children should include support for breastfeeding and messages on appropriate feeding practices for infants and young children. Children under 6 months of age should not receive RUTF or solid family foods. These children need milk-based diets, and their mothers need support to reestablish breastfeeding. They should not be treated at home.

Grade of Evidence: 5

National Workshop on Development of Guidelines for Home Based Care and Standard Treatment of Children suffering from  Severe Acute Malnutrition, 2006(21)
  1. Home based management could be feasible, acceptable, and cost effective option for those children categorized as “uncomplicated”.

  2. Experience indicates that home management of SAMN is likely to be successful in closely monitored conditions with protocols, motivated staff and parents. An effective home based care and treatment program should be comprehensive and simultaneously address nutritional, medical, social, and economical aspects.

  3. Energy dense therapeutic diets with low bulk are essential in the initial phase of management. However, these should be economical, available, and acceptable. These diets could be (i) home based (prepared/modified from the family pot) or  (ii) ready to use therapeutic food (RUTF). Feeding should be frequent (6 to 8 times per 24 hours), active, and hygienic.

  4. Commercially available international RUTF may not be suitable (acceptable, cost effective and sustainable) for Indian settings.

  5. Multiple micronutrient and mineral supplementation should be provided orally as per the WHO guidelines for inpatient management of SAMN children.

Grade of Evidence: 5

Systematic Reviews

A 2008 systematic review(4) on severe malnutrition identified 276 articles on management of SAM, of which 21 were eventually included in the final analyses. Of these, nine studies evaluated the efficacy of WHO guidelines for facility based management of severe acute malnutrition; pooled data from these trials showed a reduction in mortality (Risk Ratio 0.45; 95% CI 0.32, 0.62). The authors could not identify any randomized controlled trials studying the effect of RUTF on mortality. However, obtaining the observational data collected from 21 field programs on 23,511 children on community based management of SAM, the authors showed the case fatality rate to be 4.1%, recovery rate was 79.4% and default was 11%; figures which were noted to be comparable to data from facility based trials. The authors also conducted two meta-analyses of RCTs conducted in children recovering from SAM as part of this review. The first one compared the use of RUTF with F-100, and revealed an advantage of weight gain of 3.0 g/kg/day (WMD = 3.0; 95% CI= –1.70, 7.70) in favour of RUTF; however, the results were not statistically significant (P=0.21). Meta-analyses comparing RUTF with maize/soy flour included only one study(9) and found significantly increased weight gain (WMD= 2.10 g/kg/day; 95% CI= 1.97, 2.23; P<0.001).

Another review, conducted by Ashworth, et al.(5), studied the effectiveness of rehabilitating severely malnourished children in community settings. Effectiveness was defined as mortality of less than 5% or weight gain of more than 5 g/kg/day. 16 trials of home based management of SAM children were identified; of these, seven were considered to be effective. Amongst these, two programs were home based programs where no food was distributed, while 5 trials utilised RUTF. The authors noted that all successful programs aimed at providing the child with high protein, high energy diet at frequent intervals. None of the programs within the existing health systems was effective without external assistance. Home based treatment with nutrition education was shown to be effective in Bangladesh, even without the provision of RUTF or any other food. However, this involved considerable effort in educating the mothers.

Controlled Trials

A total of seven controlled trials were identified. Three trials compared home based management of RUTF with the standard practise using F-100 formula at therapeutic centres. Of these, two studies started home therapy after initial stabilization at a facility(6-8). A previously conducted meta-analysis showed an advantage of weight gain of 3.0 g/kg/day (WMD = 3.0; 95% CI= –1.70, 7.70) in favour of RUTF against F-100; however, the results were statistically not significant(4). The third study(8) in this group followed a purposive selection method, where more sick patients and those with complications were referred to a facility; subjects without complications and with good appetite were selected for home based management using RUTF. Expectedly, the mortality in the F-100 group was much higher (18.9% versus 92.7%) because of the unequal baseline status between the two groups.

Two studies were identified that compared the efficacy of therapeutic nutrition products with traditionally available foods at home. Manary, et al.(9) compared RUTF with maize soy flour and observed higher weight gain and recovery, and lower morbidity in RUTF group, in comparison to home based foods. The study had been included in the systematic review mentioned above and details are given in that section. The second study(10) used Misola (a local product made from millet, soya, peanut kernal, sugar and salt) that supplies energy almost equivalent to conventional RUTFs. The authors found that Misola fortified with Spirulina led to higher weight gain, in comparison to use of traditional foods.

Two trials(11,12) compared the efficacy of a locally made RUTF with imported RUTF. A meta-analysis was done from the data derived from the two studies doing a comparative assessment of the impact of locally made RUTF and imported RUTF. The pooled data from the two studies done amongst 321 subjects, of whom 165 received locally made RUTF and 156 received imported RUTF, showed no difference in the weight gain between the two groups (WMD = 0.07 g/kg/d; 95% CI = -0.15, 0.29, 1.244, P=0.15) (Fig 1).

Fig. 1 Forest Plot showing the effectiveness of imported RUTF in comparison with local RUTF in weight gain of severe malnourished children.

Observational Trials

A total of 7 observational trials(13-19) were identified. Of these, one trial(19) estimated the adequacy of energy intake with ready to use foods in comparison to F-100 and found them to be comparable. Most of the trials (4 out of 5) reported a recovery rate (recovery variably defined by the authors) of more than 80%.

A pooled analysis of data from 5 studies (giving information on 9145 severely malnourished children) reveals a recovery rate of 88.3%, mortality of 0.7%, default rate of 3.6% and 6.7% babies had failure of treatment or needed referral to a facility. Using meta-analytic methods the pooled mean weight gain with the use of RUTF was 3.2 g/kg/day (95% CI 3.06, 3.34 g/kg/d) (Fig 2). Of these trials, one(14) used a locally designed RUTF and found weight gain comparable, as with the use of commercially available RUTFs in other trials.

Fig. 2 Forest Plot showing the pooled estimates for weight gain in severe malnourished children using RUTF.

Consensus Statements

Two consensus statements(20,21) were identified from published literature. Both the statements emphasized the need to treat uncomplicated severely malnourished children at home, and on the efficacy of therapeutic nutrition products like RUTF for this purpose. They also stated the need for micronutrient supplementation as per WHO guidelines, exclusive breastfeeding in the first 6 months of life, monitoring of the children to ensure compliance and adequate response to treatment and need to develop local products to increase acceptability and decrease cost.


Review of presently available published peer reviewed literature shows that the use of ‘therapeutic nutrition products’ like RUTF are efficacious in treating children with severe acute malnutrition, who do not have any associated complications, and during the rehabilitation phase when prolonged hospitalization may not be desirable. Systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials on the topic show that this modality of treatment may be as efficacious as standard (WHO) treatment using F-100. Furthermore, these products are more effective than home based foods with lower energy density in treating SAM. Locally designed ready to use foods are as effective as the commercially available products. The overall recovery rate with the use of RUTF is more than 85% with a mortality of less than 1%.

However, the currently available level of evidence does have some drawbacks that preclude the direct incorporation of such a strategy into a program or a policy, and even its extendibility to India. First is the fact that there is paucity of data, that too of robust quality, available on the topic. Most of the information is available from observational studies conducted in disaster situations, where no other alternative strategy was feasible. The other noteworthy issue is the fact that all the studies available so far were conducted in Africa. The results of extending it to countries like India, in non-emergency situations, with unknown efficacy and acceptability, are at present unpredictable.

A number of studies, especially the controlled trials which constitute a higher level of evidence are conducted in controlled situations, under the supervision and monitoring of health care workers. No doubt, this enables early identification of complications and institution of early treatment, wherever indicated but digresses from the basic rationale of using this strategy in areas where the health infrastructure is poor or non-existent. Such supervised management also increases the cost of management of SAM children. Based on the cost of RUTF alone, Ashworth, et al.(5) estimated the cost to rehabilitate a SAM child to be $55; for a HIV positive child it would double to $110. To put it in perspective, in 2006, the per capita health care cost spent by India was $39(23). These are substantial costs for the health system of any developing country to absorb and emphasize the need for product innovation at a local level.

The use of home treatment, using medical nutrition products, as a public health strategy, therefore, should be treated as a possibility in infancy, with its need to study its feasibility and cost effectiveness in the Indian setting in an operational research format, before suggesting its integration into the current health programs. The effectiveness of cheaper locally designed ready to use foods is encouraging, and should stimulate the scientific community to design appropriate food(s) which are culturally acceptable in various parts of our large country, as well as cost-effective.

Most important is the need to communicate to the policy planners the urgency to address the problem of severe acute malnutrition. Despite the fact that severe malnutrition is often a co-morbidity in large proportion of avoidable child mortality, it does not get the attention it deserves. It should be emphasized that the treatment of SAM is cost effective – in fact, even hospital based management of SAM is more cost effective in reducing mortality than many other child survival intervention programs including the extremely visible vitamin A supplementation program(24,25). The availability of alternative strategies like home based management using locally made therapeutic nutrition products is likely to add to the cost effectiveness. India needs multi-pronged strategies to address the problem of severe malnutrition, given the geo-graphic, cultural and financial barriers that exist across this large country; home based management is likely to be one of them.

Funding: None.

Competing Interests: None stated.

EURECA Conclusion in the Indian Context

The presently available evidence, drawn from limited number of studies, all conducted in Africa, on home based management of severe acute malnutrition using therapeutic nutrition products suggests that it is safe and efficacious.

There is need for further research, particularly in product innovation and operational issues to establish its efficacy and cost effectiveness in the Indian context.


1. International Institute for Population Sciences. National Family Health Survey 3, 2005-2006. Mumbai, India: IIPS; 2006.

2. Pelletier DL. The relationship between child anthropometry and mortality in developing countries: implications for policy, programs and future research. J Nutr 1994; 124 (suppl): 2047S–2081S.

3. Collins S, Dent N, Binns P, Bahwere P, Sadler K, and Hallam A. Management of severe acute malnutrition in children. Lancet 2006; 368: 1992-2000.

4. Bhutta ZA, Ahmed T, Black RE, Cousens S, Dewey K, et al. What works? Interventions for maternal and child undernutrition and survival. Lancet 2008; 371: 417-440.

5. Ashworth A. Efficacy and effectiveness of community-based treatment of severe malnutrition. Food Nutr Bull 2006 Sep; 27(3 Suppl): S24-48.

6. Gaboulaud V, Dan-Bouzoua N, Brasher C, Fedida G, Gergonne B, Brown V. Could nutritional rehabilitation at home complement or replace centre-based therapeutic feeding programmes for severe malnutrition?J Trop Pediatr 2007; 53: 49-51.

7. Ciliberto MA, Sandige H, Ndekha MJ, Ashorn P,Briend A, et al. Comparison of home-based therapy with ready-to-use therapeutic food with standard therapy in the treatment of malnourished Malawian children: a controlled, clinical effectiveness trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2005; 81: 864 -870.

8. Diop EHI, Dossou NI, Ndour MM, Briend A, Wade S. Comparison of the efficacy of a solid ready-to-use food and a liquid, milk-based diet for the rehabilitation of severely malnourished children: a randomized trial. Am. J. Clin, Nutr. 78: 302-307.

9. Manary MJ, Ndkeha MJ, Ashorn P, Maleta K, Briend A. Home based therapy for severe malnutrition with ready to use food. Arch. Dis. Child. 2004;89;557-561.

10. Simpore J, Kabore F, Zongo F, Dansou D, Bere A, Pignatelli S, et al. Nutrition rehabilitation of undernourished children utilizing Spiruline and Misola. Nutr J. 2006 Jan 23; 5: 3.

11. Sandige H, Ndekha MJ, Briend A, Ashorn P, Manary MJ. Home-based treatment of malnourished malawian children with locally produced or imported ready-to-use food. JPGN 2004; 39: 141–146.

12. Diop EI, Dossou N, Briend A, Yaya NA, Ndour MM, Wade S. Home-based rehabilitation for severely malnourished children using locally made ready-to-use therapeutic food (RTUF). Pediatr Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition: Second World Congress, Paris, France, 2004.

13. Amthor RE, Cole SM, Manary MJ. The use of home based therapy with ready to use therapeutic food to treat malnutrition in a rural area during a food crisis. J Am Diet Assoc 2009; 109: 464-467.

14. Jilcott SB, Ickes SB, Ammerman AS, Myhre JA. Iterative design, implementation and evaluation of a supplemental feeding program for underweight children ages 6-59 months in Western Uganda. Matern Child Health J. 2010; 14: 299-306.

15. Linemann Z, Matilsky D, Ndekha M, Manary M, Maleta K, Manary MJ. A large scale operational of home based therapy with ready to use therapeutic food in childhood malnutrition in Malawi. Mat Child Nutr 2007; 3: 206-215.

16. Ciliberto MA, Manary MJ, Ndekha MJ, Briend A, Ashorn P. Home-based therapy for oedematous malnutrition with ready-to-use therapeutic food. Acta Paediatr. 2006; 95: 1012-1015.

17. Chaiken MS, Deconinck H, Degefie T. The promise of a community-based approach to managing severe malnutrition: A case study from Ethiopia. Food Nutr Bull 2006 Jun; 27: 95-104.

18. Collins S, Sadler K. Outpatient care for severely malnourished children in emergency relief programmes: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2002; 360 : 1824-1830.

19. Briend A, Lacsala R, Prudhon C, Mounier B, Grellety Y, Golden MHN. Ready-to-use therapeutic food for treatment of marasmus. Lancet 1999; 353: 1767-1768.

20. Prudhon C, Prinzo ZW, Briend A, Daelmans BMEG, Mason JB. Proceedings of the WHO, UNICEF, and SCN Informal Consultation on Community-Based Management of Severe Malnutrition in Children. Food Nutr Bull 2006; 27(Suppl 3): S99-S108.

21. National Workshop on "Development of Guidelines for Effective Home Based Care and Treatment of Children Suffering from Severe Acute Malnutrition" Indian Pediatr 2006; 43: 131-139.

22. CEBM Centre for Evidence Based Medicine. Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine – Levels of Medicine (March 2009). Available at: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025. Accessed on May 15, 2010.

23. WHO Statistical Information System. Available at: http://apps.who.int/whosis/data/Search.jsp. Accessed on May 18th, 2010.

24. Jha P, Bangoura O, Ranson K. The cost-eff ectiveness of forty health interventions in Guinea. Health Policy Plan 1998; 13: 249-262.

25. Tectonidis M. Crisis in Niger-outpatient care for severe acute malnutrition. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 224-227.


Copyright© 1999 by the Indian Pediatrics (Disclaimer)