|
Indian Pediatr 2009;46: 717-719 |
 |
Endoscopic Laser for Severe Laryngomalacia |
Rajan Joshi, Farzana Shaikh, *Sachin Gandhi and *Pallavi Thekedar
From Department of Pediatrics and *ENT, Deenanath
Mangeshkar Hospital, Erandwane, Pune, India.
Correspondence to: Dr Rajan Joshi, Deenanath Mangeshkar
Hospital, Erandwane, Pune, India.
Email: [email protected]
Manuscript received: January 2, 2008;
Initial review :February 4, 2008;
Accepted: August 7, 2008.
Published online 2009. Jan 1. PII: S001960610800007-2
|
Abstract
Stridor in the pediatric age group needs detailed
evaluation. Laryngomalacia, the commonest cause of stridor is mostly
benign, but in about 10% patients can be an important cause of morbidity
and mortality. Laser surgical correction in patients with severe
laryngomalacia gives good results. We evaluated 32 patients of stridor.
All were screened with fibreoptic laryngoscopy and whenever indicated,
direct endoscopy was carried out. 13 (40%) of the patients had
laryngomalacia. Of these, 8 had severe laryngomalacia and underwent
treatment with diode laser. All of them showed definite post procedure
improvement.
Keywords: Endoscopy, Laryngomalacia, Laser, Stridor.
|
S tridor
is a symptom that should be thoroughly evaluated. Persistent stridor is
generally due to anatomical abnormalities of airway, the commonest cause
being laryngomalacia(1-3). Almost 90% patients with laryngomalacia can be
managed by periodic observation only and 10% with severe condition require
hospitalization, intense monitoring and maybe, a surgical intervention.
Gastroesophageal reflux should always be ruled out(4). We conducted this
study to assess the usefulness of fibreoptic laryngoscopy and direct
endoscopy in evaluation of stridor, and efficacy of laser surgical
correction in children with severe laryngomalacia.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 32 pediatric cases of
persistent stridor referred to our institute for further evaluation,
diagnosis and management over a period of two years between August 2005 to
August 2007. After a thorough history, all children were examined with a
fibreoptic laryngoscope (Fusinon flexible nasopharyngoscope) in the
outpatient clinic.
Patients with severe stridor were admitted. Proper
hydration, oxygenation and supportive care was provided. Nebulization was
carried out with adrenaline (5mL of 1:1000) and budenoside (2mg) in all.
Systemic steroids (dexamethasone 0.15 mg/kg 8 hrly for three days) and
bronchodilators (terbutaline 0.01 mg/kg s/c) were administered in patients
with severe stridor. ABG was done in all children at admission and
repeated only if initial ABG was abnormal. CT neck was done in 25/32
patients of patients to look for accompanying anomalies/ extraluminal
cause of stridor. Direct laryngoscopy with 30º sinus endoscope (Storz
endoscope) under anesthesia without any muscle relaxant was carried out in
all. Subglottis and tracheal lumen were examined after giving 10%
xylocaine spray over the vocal cords. Children with laryngomalacia were
classified as mild, moderate, and severe as per the classification of
European Laryngological Society(5).
Patients with severe laryngomalacia underwent surgical
diode laser. Neonates were electively ventilated for 24-48 hrs post
procedure, and monitored in an ICU setting. Nebulisation with adrenaline
and budesonide was continued in all. Parenteral dexamethasone (0.15 mg/kg
8 hrly) for three days was also given. All patients were administered
antireflux medication post surgery for three months. Once stable, patients
were discharged and called for follow-up after a week. Subsequently
monthly follow-up was advised for next six months. Patients were also
advised to report in case of any stridor, respiratory distress, feeding
difficulty and noisy breathing.
Results
Laryngomalacia was ascertained as the most common cause
of stridor, seen in 13 cases (40%). The other causes included subglottic
stenosis (9/32), bilateral vocal cord palsy (5/32), laryngeal web (4/32),
and interarytenoid cleft (1/32).Table I provides the details
of 13 cases with Laryngomalacia.
TABLE I
Data of patients with laryngomalacia
S.No |
Age at Presentation |
Age at onset |
Sex |
Severity |
Treatment |
Follow-up
duration |
Condition at
last follow – up |
1 |
1½ yr |
2 m |
M |
severe |
diode laser |
6 m |
weight gain good, no stridor |
2 |
2½ yr |
1½ yr |
F |
moderate |
medical |
on regular follow up |
mild stridor during URTIs |
3 |
3yr 2 m |
2m |
M |
severe |
diode laser |
2yr |
doing well, no complaints, good weight gain |
4 |
4 m |
birth |
M |
severe |
diode laser |
1yr |
no feeding problems, mild stridor during URTI |
5 |
5 m |
1m |
F |
severe |
diode laser |
8 m |
doing well |
6 |
2 m |
birth |
F |
severe |
diode laser |
9 m |
good weight gain, feeding problems, no stridor, good weight gain |
7 |
1 d |
birth |
F |
severe |
diode laser |
8 m |
mild stridor during URTI |
8 |
1d |
birth |
M |
severe |
diode laser |
6 m |
weight gain good, no stridor |
9 |
3 wk |
birth |
M |
severe |
diode laser |
3 m |
weight gain good, no stridor |
10 |
2½ m |
birth |
F |
moderate |
medical |
on regular follow up |
mild stridor during URTI |
11 |
1½ m |
birth |
F |
moderate |
medical |
on regular follow up |
mild stridor during URTI |
12 |
2½ m |
birth |
M |
mild |
medical |
on regular follow up |
weight gain good, no stridor |
13 |
5 m |
birth |
M |
moderate |
medical |
on regular follow up |
no feeding problems,no stridor |
Laser indicates laser aryepiglottoplasty; Medical management includes
nebulisation and steroids; wt: weight; URTI: upper |
Improvement was seen in all within 24 hrs and at
discharge three to four days post surgery. Follow up done for a maximum of
two years showed improvement in terms of feeding, weight gain and did not
show any complications in terms of airway compromise even during future
episodes of respiratory tract infection.
Discussion
Awake flexible fibre-optic laryngoscopy is used as a
screening procedure to examine the interior of the aerodigestive tract. It
gives the definitive diagnosis of the cause of stridor in most
patients(6-8). If in doubt, imaging studies are done. Direct laryngoscopy
under a general anesthetic is the gold standard investigation that is
required in a few patients to confirm initial findings and rule out
lesions elsewhere in the respiratory tract.
Conventional treatment of the laryngomalacia with
tracheostomy carries significant risk of morbi-dity and mortality(9).
Endoscopic laser correction provides immediate improvement, avoids the
need for tracheostomy and improves the quality of life(9). Many studies
have found fibreoptic laryngoscopy to be safe and cost effective method as
screening procedure in stridor evaluation, and have recommended the
endoscopic evaluation for a group of patients in whom a diagnosis cannot
be made in outpatient clinic(6,8). Earlier studies have reported
successful endoscopic correction of severe laryngo-malacia(10,11).
Our study had certain limitations. Some cases were
referred after tracheostomy was performed. Also patients with central
nervous system causes of stridor were not evaluated separately. Better
awareness regarding the available treatment options and early referrals
for laser endoscopic correction can avoid episodes of severe airway
compromise. A larger study for a longer duration is needed in the Indian
scenario to further prove the efficacy of laser correction in severe
laryngomalacia.
Contributors: RJ and SG were involved in designing
the study, drafting the article, critically revising it and final approval
of the revised version. FS did collection and analysis of data, manuscript
writing, drafting the article, and revising it. PT has helped in
manuscript writing, data collection and analysis. RJ will act as guarantor
of the study.
Funding: None.
Competing interest: None stated.
What This Study Adds?
• Endoscopic laser surgery in severe
laryngomalacia is safe and provides immediate improvement in
symptoms.
|
References
1. Rupa V, Raman R. Aetiological profile of pediatric
laryngeal stridor in an Indian hospital. Ann Trop Peditr 1991; 11;
137-141.
2. Altman KW, Wetmore RF, Marsh RR. Congenital airway
abnormality in patients requiring hospitalization. Arch Otolaryngol Head
Neck Surg 1999; 125: 525-528.
3. Holinger LD. Etiology of stridor in neonates,
infants and child. Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1980; 89: 397-400.
4. Haim B, Ekaterina K, David S, Melly O, David BD,
Daniel L, et al. The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in
children with tracheomalacia and laryngomalacia. Chest 2001; 119: 409-413.
5. Remacle M, Bodart E, Lawson G, Minet M, Mayne A. Use
of CO 2 laser micropoint
micromanipulator for the treatment of laryngomalacia. Eur Arch Otolarynol
1996: 253: 401-404.
6. Moumouldis I, Gray RF, Wilson T. Outpatient fibre-
optic laryngoscopy for stridor in children and infants. Eur Arch
Otorhinolaryngol 2005; 262: 204-207.
7. Midulla F, de Blic J, Barbato A, Bush A, Eber E,
Kotecha, S, et al. ERS Task Force 1. Flexible endoscopy of
pediatric airways. Eur Respir J 2003; 22: 698-708.
8. Botma M, Kishore A, Kubba H, Geddes N. The role of
fibre optic laryngoscopy in infants with stridor. Int J Pediatr
Otorhinolaryngol 2000; 55: 17-20.
9. Sichel JY, Dangoor E, Eliashar R, Halperin D.
Management of congenital laryngeal malfor-mations. Am J Otolaryngol 2000;
21: 22-30.
10. Whymark AD. Laser epiglottopexy for laryngo-malacia
since 10 yr exp in west of Scotland. Otol laryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;
32: 978-982.
11. Venkatakarthikeyan C, Thakar A, Lodha R. Endoscopic correction of
severe laryngomalacia. Indian J Pediatr 2005; 72: 165-168.
|
|
 |
|