Letters to the Editor Indian Pediatrics 2002; 39:793 |
Consensus Statement on the Management of UTI |
Secondly, in the area of antimicrobials used for prophylaxis, cefadroxil can easily replace cephalexin with an easy twice a day dosing and dosing unrelated to meals with no loss of efficacy. We find hardly any mention about cefadroxil in the Western literature since the molecule is prohibitively expensive in the west as compared to cephalexin. However since cefadroxil is affordable in our country, there is no reason to use cephalexin in any indication and needs to be replaced by cefadroxil everywhere. Thirdly, if the orignal organism causing the UTI is resistant to the common list of prophylactic agents such as cotrimoxazole, nitrofurantoin or cephalexin as is commonly the case, can these medications still be used for prophylaxis or should we use antibiotics as dictated by the original sensitivity report and include medications such as norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin and cefixime in our prophylactic regimens? Should we continue for prophylaxis the antibiotic used to treat the original UTI? Mukesh Sanklecha, 9c, 1st Floor, Sindh Chambers, Colaba, Mumbai 400 005, India. E-mail: [email protected] .
|
References |
|