|
Indian Pediatr 2009;46: 346-348 |
|
Antenatal Detection of Renal Malformations |
Abhijeet Saha, Prerna Batra, Pushpa Chaturvedi, Bhupinder Mehera* and Atul
Tayade†
From Pediatric Renal Unit, Department of Pediatrics,
*Department of Surgery and †Department of Radiodiagnosis,
Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram, Wardha,
Maharashtra 442 102, India.
Corresponence to: Dr Abhijeet Saha, Assistant Professor
(Pediatrics), Lady Hardinge Medical College,
Delhi 110 001.
E-mail: [email protected]
Manuscript received: April 12, 2007;
Initial review completed: June 14, 2007;
Revision accepted: June 11, 2008.
|
Abstract
Our aim was to study the incidence and outcome of
antenatally detected renal malformations in rural Maharashtra. Among
7365 deliveries conducted during the study period, antenatal screening
for renal malformations was done in 6682 (90.7 %) deliveries. Renal
malformations were detected in 35 fetuses on antenatal screening.
Postnatal investigations confirmed renal malformations in 27 babies
(77.1%), giving an incidence of 0.4% among liveborn babies. Seven babies
were operated and 2 were awaiting surgery (33.3%). Two patients expired
and another two were lost to follow-up. The outcome was satisfactory in
other patients. Antenatal screening was a useful tool in diagnosing
renal malformations.
Keywords: Antenatal Renal malformations, Ultrasonography.
|
R outine antenatal
ultrasonography is being used increasingly to detect malformations of the
fetal urinary tract(1,2). Abnormalities of the urinary tract have been
reported to occur in 0.1% to 0.92% of pregnancies(3). Detection rates
increase when ultrasound is performed at midtrimester compared to earlier
scanning(4). If these anomalies are not detected by prenatal ultrasound
and subsequently managed, many of these urologic abnormalities would
manifest later in life as pyelonephritis, hypertension or end stage renal
disease(5). There is a paucity of studies on antenatally detected renal
malformations and its outcome from India. Hence we conducted this study to
ascertain the incidence of antenatally detected renal malformation and its
short term outcome among live born babies in this region.
Methods
The study was conducted at Mahatma Gandhi Institute of
Medical Sciences, Sevagram, Wardha between January 2005 and December 2006.
Over 90% of the mothers who delivered in the hospital were from rural
areas of Maharashtra. All antenatal women were screened for renal
anomalies by a skilled sonologist in the hospital between 20 to 37 weeks
of gestation. All structural abnormalities of the renal tract were
reported and anteroposterior pelvic diameter of renal pelvis was noted in
cases with hydronephrosis. Senior pediatric staff was available to discuss
the implications of suspected abnormalities with the parents. Babies, in
whom an abnormality had been detected antenatally, underwent repeat
ultrasonography at the end of first week of life. When this confirmed an
abnormality, urine examination, renal function tests, micturating
cystourethrography (MCU) and isotope DTPA scanning were done as indicated.
Babies with hydronephrosis were managed according to the recommendations
of Indian Pediatric Nephrology Group(6). Babies needing surgical
intervention were managed in the Department of Surgery or referred to
tertiary care pediatric surgery centers. All the babies, including those
operated outside were followed in our pediatric renal clinic.
Results
Of 7365 deliveries, antenatal screening was possible in
6682 deliveries (90.7%). Renal malformations on antenatal ultrasonography
were reported in 35 cases. The mean gestational age at diagnosis was 32.5
weeks. 77.1% (27 babies) of those with abnormal antenatal scan had renal
tract malformation confirmed postnatally, giving an incidence of 0.40%
among live born babies. Seven babies had bilateral disease, rest were
unilateral. The antenatal scan correctly predicted whether the lesion was
unilateral or bilateral in all except one baby. Of 27 babies, there were
16 boys and 10 girls; one had ambiguous genitalia and assigned female
after karyotyping. Sixteen babies were born by lower segment cesarean
section and 11 by normal vaginal delivery. None had birth asphyxia.
Table I
Diagnosis and Outcome for 27 Babies with Renal Abnormality Confirmed postnatally
|
No. |
Bilateral |
Operative |
|
|
disease |
inter- |
|
|
|
vention |
Antenatally detected hydronephrosis (13) |
|
|
|
PUJ obstruction |
6 |
2 |
1 |
VUR (grade II/III) |
3 |
– |
|
Posterior urethral valve |
3 |
3 |
3 |
Ureterocoele |
1 |
– |
1 |
Unilateral empty renal fossa (8) |
|
|
|
Pelvic kidney |
5 |
– |
– |
Dysplastic kidney |
2 |
– |
– |
Renal agenesis |
1 |
– |
– |
Multicystic dysplastic kidney |
3 |
1* |
– |
Exstrophy of bladder |
2 |
– |
2 |
Bilateral Polycystic Disease |
1 |
1 |
– |
*Contralateral hydronephrosis, PUJ: pelviureteric junction
|
Table I gives the diagnosis and the
outcome for these 27 babies. At last follow up, 7 babies were operated and
2 were awaiting surgery. Of the 27 babies in whom an abnormality was
detected, 9 (33.3%) had or were soon going to have a surgical
intervention. The three babies with vesicoureteric reflux grade II or III
disease were on chemoprophylaxis; none had urinary tract infection. Of the
eight cases reported as empty renal fossa, five had pelvic kidney on same
side, one of which was dysplastic. Two were dysplastic but normal in
position and one had unilateral renal agenesis. Two babies with pelvic
kidney had additional mal-formations; one had Pierre Robin sequence and
another penile hypospadias. All three babies with posterior urethral
valves underwent operation, one had deranged renal functions. There were
two deaths and two patients were lost to follow-up. One patient with
exstrophy of bladder expired post operatively due to sepsis, another wish
multicystic dysplastic kidney with contralateral pelviureteric junction
obstruction died at 2 months of life. One baby each of exstrophy of
bladder and bilateral polycystic kidney disease were lost to follow-up.
Discussion
The incidence of renal malformation among live born
babies (0.40%) is high as compared to the study by Sanghavi, et al.
(0.20%), which also included still births(7). This could be because the
mean gestational age at diagnosis was 32.5 weeks as compared to 28.4 weeks
in the previous study. During a screening program for fetal malformation
in Sweden, only 9% of renal abnormalities were detected by 17 weeks
gestation, but 91% were detected by 33 weeks(8). This is because,
ultrasound performed at 30 to 36 weeks of gestation is likely to detect
more cases of hydronephrosis.
We assessed the importance of antenatal diagnosis in
terms of definite or probable benefit. We assumed that all babies
requiring intervention i.e., an operation or chemoprophylaxis
benefited, then 37% (10/27) benefited from early diagnosis. This is a
higher proportion than the previous study from India(7). Probable benefit
is difficult to assess because the natural course and implications of PUJ
obstruction and unilateral dysplastic kidney are uncertain. Antenatal
diagnosis would probably allow early identification of complications like
urinary tract infection and hypertension. Therefore 10 additional patients
probably benefited (37%).
Fetal urinary sampling or vesicoamniotic shunt
insertion was not done in any case. Only in one of the 7 cases, surgical
intervention was performed at our center, rest all were done at tertiary
care pediatric surgery centers. Any potential abnormality detected during
pregnancy is a source of enormous distress to parents and is often
compounded by communication difficulties between relevant specialties,
more when postnatal surgery is performed at a distant center. Counseling
is difficult due to our limited understanding of the natural history of
many problems.
Contributors: AS and PB planned the study, managed
the cases, analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. PC critically
reviewed the manuscript. BM was the consultant surgeon in-charge. AT did
the radiological interpretation.
Funding: None.
Competing interest: None stated.
What This Study Adds?
• The incidence of antenatally detected renal
malformations among liveborn babies in rural Maharashtra was 0.4%.
|
References
1. Fefer S, Ellsworth P. Prenatal hydronephrosis.
Pediatr Clin North Am 2006; 53:429-447.
2. Elder JS. Antenatal hydronephrosis: fetal and
neonatal management. Pediatr Clin North Am 1997; 44: 1299-1321.
3. Dudley JA, Haworth JM, McGraw ME, Frank JD, Tizard
EJ. Clinical relevance and implications of antenatal hydronephrosis. Arch
Dis Childhood 1997; 76: 31-34.
4. D’Ottavio G, Mandruzzato G, Meir YJ, Rustico MA,
Fischer-Tamaro L, Conocenti G. Comparisons of first and second trimester
screening for fetal anomalies. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998; 847: 200-209.
5. Corteville JE, Gray DL, Crane JP. Congenital
hydronephrosis: Correlation of fetal ultrasonographic findings with infant
outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 384-388.
6. Hari P, Bagga A, Srivastava RN. Consensus statement
on management of antenatally detected hydronephrosis. Indian Pediatr 2001;
38: 1244-1251.
7. Sanghavi KP, Merchant RH, Gondhalekar A, Lulla CP,
Mehta AA, Mehta KP. Antenatal diagnosis of congenital renal malformations
using ultrasound. J Trop Pediatr 1998; 44: 235-240.
8. Helin I, Persson PH. Prenatal diagnosis of urinary tract
abnormalities by ultrasound. Pediatrics 1986; 78: 879-883.
|
|
|
|