Letters to the Editor Indian Pediatrics 2004; 41:404-406 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blood Lead Levels Among Children Aged 0-15 Years in Hangzhou, China |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stratified-cluster-random-sampling survey for the population was performed from March 2000 to March 2002. A total of 636 children (414 males and 222 females) participated in the survey, corresponding to approximately 0.5% of the total number of children aged 0-15 years in Hangzhou. The geometric mean of PbB levels was 75.94 µg/L (ranged from 11.0 µg/L to 380.0 µg/L) with a positive skewness distribution. The overall prevalence rate of lead poisoning was 31.3% (199/636) with the PbB levels of 200 µg/L or higher in 3.9%(25/636), indicating that lead exposure is a very serious problem in these children. Studies have revealed a direct link between consumption of leaded gasoline and lead levels in childhood(4). The prevalence rate of lead poisoning in our study was 24.7% in children aged 0-6 years, which is significantly lower than the previously survey (39.16%) in Hangzhou in 1997(5). This may be due to, at least partly, the using of lead free gasoline from 1998 in Hangzhou. The difference of PbB levels (as geometric mean) between female (71.52 µg/L) and male (78.26 µg/L) was not significant (P = 0.064). The prevalence rate was 28.8% (64/636) in female and 32.6% (135/636) in male and the difference was not significant too (P = 0.327). These implied that the female and male could absorb the same lead when they are in the same environments. TABLE I The Geometric Mean and Prevalence Rate of Blood Lead Levels in Different Ages
F = 17.910, P = 0.000; x2 = 33.727, P <0.001. * LSD multiple comparison of geometric mean among subgroups. In the United States and Australia, the PbB levels are highest in 1- to 2-year-old children and decline at later ages. In this study, we found the PbB levels were increased with age in children younger than 3 years with the highest level in children aged 3-11 years, and then declined at later ages. The differences of PbB levels among different ages were significant (P <0.001) (Table I). The pre valence rates also increased with ages in children younger than 3 years and then decrease in children older than 6 years, with statistically significant difference (P = 0.000). One possible explanation for this discrepancy in age trends is that factors that make younger children more susceptible to lead exposure (i.e., hand-to-mouth behavior, lead absorption physiology) may be superseded by other risk behaviors such as increased outdoor activities or exposure of other sources of lead (i.e., lead in food, toys, pencils and so on). Zou Chaochun,
|