1.gif (1892 bytes)

Original Articles

Indian Pediatrics 2003; 40:303-309 

Follow Up of Survival and Quality of Life in Children After Intensive Care

 

M. Jayashree, S. C. Singhi, P. Malhi

From the Division of Pediatric Intensive Care, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatric Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Correspondence to: Dr. Sunit Singhi, Professor and Incharge, Pediatric Emergency and Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatrics, PGIMER, Chandigarh 160 012, India.
E-mail: [email protected]

Manuscript received:March 13, 2002, Initial review completed: April 30, 2002,
Revision accepted: February 3, 2003.

Objective:To evaluate the health related quality of life of children after intensive care and to assess their long term survival. Design: Prospective. Setting: Tertiary Care Hospital Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Subjects and Methods: All patients admitted to ICU were enrolled prospectively over a period of 1 year. Children with ICU stay of less than 24 hrs, infants, readmission to ICU were however excluded. Survival was determined at the time of ICU discharge and 1 year later. Health status assessment was done with the help of the multiattribute health status classification (MAHSC), which has 6 domains; sensation, mobility, emotion, cognition, self care and pain. Assessment was done at two points of time - within 48 hours of admission to the ICU and 1 year after discharge. Results: 150 children (mean age 5.68 ± 3.6 years) with a mean duration of ICU stay (5.7 ± 5.5 days) were included in the study. The cumulative ICU mortality was 12.9%. Fifty-five (36.7%) had no overall health impairment (no affected domains) preceding the present illness. There was overall health impairment (³1 affected domain) preceding the present illness in 95 of the 150 patients (63.3%). In the domain specific health status mobility was affected in 74 (49%) followed by pain 61 (41.2%), self care 56 (38.8%), sensation 29 (20%), cognition 21 (14.8%) and emotion 14(9.5%). After 1 year, overall state of health had improved or was equal to the premorbid state in 87 (75%). In domain specific health, the proportion improving or remaining unchanged varied from 75% (emotional) to 80% (cognition), 85.3% (pain) and 88.7% (mobility). The overall state of health had worsened as compared to the premorbid state in 29 (25%) – majority with neurological illnesses. Conclusion: Quality of life in three-quarters of the patients was preserved and one year survival was favorable. Worsening was noted primarily in-patients with neurological illnesses.

Key words: Health related quality of life, Multi-attribute health status classification, Outcome, Pediatric intensive care.


INTEREST in measuring quality of life in relation to health care has increased in recent years(1). Intensive care medicine has increased the survival of critically ill patients, but at the same time requires expensive equipment and a large staff(2). The high costs of care are compelling Intensive Care Units in different set-ups to objectively evaluate and document their results. Success and utility of intensive care is generally presented as mortality rate adjusted for severity of illness, disregarding long term survival and functional outcome(3). Longitudinal assessment of morbidity change and health related quality of life (HRQOL) have become important supplementary outcome measures of mortality rates(4-6). Most of the instruments used for evaluation of HRQOL are questionnaires designed for adult use(7). Few studies addressing the issue in pediatric population have used a generic multi-attribute health status classification for children which includes both type and severity of sequelae(8).

Most of the available literature describes QOL of adult patients with few focussing on pediatric population. These few studies denote a favorable long-term survival of children admitted to ICU and a good functional outcome in terms of preservation of health(6,9,10). Similar studies are lacking in Indian set-up. We conducted this study with the aim of evaluating the health-related quality of life in children after intensive care and to assess their long-term survival.

Subjects and Methods

All patients admitted over a period of one year (May 1999-May 2000) to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) of Advanced Pediatric Centre, PGIMER, Chandigarh were prospectively enrolled in the study. Pediatric ICU has 8 beds and had admitted 347 patients during the study period. On admission to PICU, the demographic details were recorded with specific emphasis on primary diagnosis and indications for PICU referral. PRISM (III) scoring was done on Day 1 of admission to ascertain the severity of illness. Survival was determined at the time of ICU discharge; hospital discharge and one year after ICU discharge.

Health Status Assessment

The multi-attribute health status classification (MAHSC) was developed as a comprehensive generic health status measure for children. This classification has been used in pediatric patients in previous studies, originally in evaluating survivors of child-hood cancer(8). The MAHSC has been divided into 6 domains: sensation, mobility, emotion, cognition, self care and pain (Table I).

Table I__The Multi-attribute Health Status Classification System (MAHSC).
Attribute	Level	Description
Sensation	1	Able to see, hear and speak normally for age.
	2	Requires equipment to see or hear or speak.
	3	Sees, hears or speaks with limitations even with equipment.
	4	Blind, deaf, or mute.
Mobility	1	Able to walk, bend, lift, jump and run normally for age.
	2	Walks, bends, lift, jump or run with some limitations but do not require help.
	3	Requires mechanical equipment (such as canes, crutches, braces, or 
		wheelchair) to walk or get around independently.
	4	Requires the help of another person to walk or get around the required 
		mechanical equipment as well.
	5	Unable to control or use arms and legs.
Emotion	1	Generally happy and free from worry.
	2	Occasionally fretful, angry, irritable, anxious, depressd, or suffering night terrors.
	3	Often fretful, angry, irritable, anxious, depressed or suffering night terrors.
	4	Almost always fretful, angry, irritable, anxious, depressed.
	5	Extremely fretful, angry, irritable or depressed usually requiring hospitalization or 
		psychiatric institutional care.
Cognition	1	Learns and remembers school work normally for age.
	2	Learns and remembers schoolwork more slowly than classmates as judged by 
		parents and/or teachers.
	3	Learns and remembers very slowly and usually requires special educational 
		assistance.
	4	Unable to learn and remember.
Self-care	1	Eats, bathes, dresses and uses the toilet normally for age.
	2	Eats, bathes, dresses, or uses the toilet independently with difficulty.
	3	Requires mechanical equipment to eat, bathe, dress or use the toilet 
		independently.
	4	Requires the help of another person to eat, bathe, dress, or use the toilet.
Pain	1	Free of pain and discomfort.
	2	Occasional pain, discomfort relieved by nonprescription drugs or self-control
	                activity without disruption of normal activities.
	3	Frequent pain, Discomfort relieved by oral medicines with occasional disruption 
		of normal activities.
	4	Frequent pain. Frequent disruption of normal activities. Discomfort requires 
		prescription narcotics for relief.
	5	Severe pain. Pain not relieved by drugs and constantly disrupts normal activities.
Adopted from Feeny et al. (1992)(8).

 

Functioning within each attribute is represented by four or five levels, varying from healthy to poor depending on absence or level of impairment. The state of health of a particular subject is described as a profile by a six element vector (X1X2X3X4X5X6) where X denotes the level (1-5) for domain 1. The level of each domain are meant to be interpreted as developmentally appropriate for the age. This system has not been validated for children less than 12 months of age.

We recorded health status within 48 hours of ICU admission and 1 year after discharge from the ICU. The health status recorded within 48 hours of ICU admission, reflected the premorbid health status (i.e. before the present illness) and averaged over three months preceding the present illness. This was assessed by a questionnaire completed during a structured parental interview. Excluded from the analysis were children less than one year of age, survivors who stayed for less than 24 hrs in ICU, readmission and death within 24 hr of ICU stay. One year after discharge health status was re-assessed by an identical questionnaire completed during a structured interview at follow-up.

Outcome Parameters

1. Overall health status: It was expressed as number of affected domains regardless of the degree of dysfunction.

2. Domain specific health status: Degree of functional level within each of the domain.

3. Change in overall health status was obtained by comparing the number of affected domains before admission with that one year after discharge.

4. Change in domain specific health status: This was defined as the difference from preadmission to one year after discharge corresponding to each domain.

A positive change was defined as an improved level and a negative change as a deteriorated level.

Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as mean values ± standard deviation. Comparison of two groups in different areas was performed by using Student ‘t’ test. Significance was accepted as P <0.05 level. Correlation between PRISM and overall health status was done with the help of Chi square and Spearmann correlation.

Results

Overall 347 patients were seen during the study period. Forty five patients died in ICU (12.9%) and none during their subsequent hospital stay or in the first year following discharge. The cumulative ICU mortality was thus 12.9%.

The following patients were excluded from the study: Patients younger than 1 year (n = 159), survivors who stayed less than 24 hrs in the ICU (n = 16) non survivors (n = 18), and ICU readmission (n = 4). There were 150 patients at the beginning of the study who were eligible for enrollment. The mean age of the study population was 5.7 ± 3.6 yr (range 1-12 yr) with a M:F ratio of 2.4:1. The mean duration of ICU stay was 5.7 ± 5.5 days (range 2-42 days). Twenty-two (14.7%) patients died in the study group.

Fifty five (36.7%) had no overall health impairment (i.e., no affected domains) preceding the present illness. Ten of these died in the ICU. Thirty three survivors were in perfect health at the end of 1 year and in 12 of the 45 survivors with uncompromized health, a decline in overall health status was found.

Overall health impairment (³1 affected domain) preceding the present illness was found in 95 (63.3%) patients. Twelve of these died in the ICU and 7 did not return for follow-up. Of the 76 patients available for follow-up at the end of one year, 32 patients (42%) improved to normal health, 20(26.3%) showed an improvement to better level as compared to admission and 17(22.3%) showed a decline in the health status. Table II and Fig. 1 show the one year outcome (overall health status) in relation to premorbid health status.

Table II

One Year Outcome in Relation to Premorbid Health Status.
Health status 
at 1 yr

No health impairment at 
admission (n = 55)

Health impaired 
at admission (n = 95)

Died
10
12
Lost to follow up
–
12
Remained normal
33 (82%)
-
Worsened
12 (30%)
17 (22.3%)
Unchanged or equal
–
2
Improved
 
52(68%)
  – to normal
–
32 
  – to better level
–
20

 

Fig. 1. Health Status - Premorbid Admission vs one year

In summary the overall health status had improved or remained unchanged in 87 (75%) at 1 year after discharge from PICU.

In the domain specific health status, mobility was affected in 74(49%) followed by pain 61 (41.2%), self care 56 (38.8%), sensation 29 (20%) cognition 21 (14.8%) and emotion 14 (9.5%). One year post discharge, the domain specific health status is as shown in Fig. 2, comparing it to the premorbid health status. It had remained unchanged or improved in 75% with respect to emotional functions, 88.7% in mobility, 85.3% with respect to pain and 80% in cognition. Emotional domain was the worst affected in 28 (24.4%).

Fig. 2 Changes in Domains at one year

The relation between overall health status and acute severity of illness on admission to PICU is shown in Table III. Seven (32%) of the non-survivors had an uncompromized health status at admission, 9 (40%) had one or two domains affected and 6 (27.2%) had more than two domains affected. In all the groups, majority of the patients who died were in the moderate to high risk mortality group as per the PRISM scoring. There was no definite correlation that could be drawn from the premorbid health status and mortality risk in the non-survivors.

Table III
 Relation Between PRISM Score and Overall Health Status
PRISM
score
No. of patients with no affected domains No. of patients with >=1  affected domains
 0-5(n = 79)
24
55
 6-10(n = 55)
26
29
11-15(n = 12)
4
8
>16(n =  4)
1
3
Total
55
95
	No correlation could be found between the two (Chi square and  Spearmann correlation).

 

Discussion

Quality of life (QOL) is a multi-dimensional entity. It includes, but is not limited to, the social, physical and emotional functioning of the child and when indicated his/her family and it must be sensitive to the changes that occur throughout development. In the majority of circumstances, the impact of disease on QOL is measured and hence the term health related quality of life has often been used(11).

The multi-attribute health status classi-fication system (MAHSC) was first evaluated and applied to study QOL in survivors of cancer(8,12). A major advantage of this system is that it provides a comprehensive assessment and hence identifies the sequelae which impair long term outcome. It helps in identifying the type and severity of sequelae. It can be used for multiple assessments in long term follow up studies. Thus, the system focuses attention on the full array of the dimensions of health status. There are however some disadvantages associated with this sytem. The data lacks way to report organ toxicity; it also does not include a separate component for prognosis. It has not been validated for infants, who represent a major portion of ICU admissions. Including this group would hence be particularly relevant for long term outcome.

There was no difference between data collection on admission and one year later, as on both occasions, the parents responded to identical questionnaire in a structured inter-view. We found that overall health impair-ment before the present illness was present in nearly two third of the patients and one third were normal (i.e., no affected attributes). Eighty percent of those who were normal continued to remain so after one year and 20% had shown a decline. On the other hand 80% of those who showed health impairment at one year, majority were health impaired at admission. These findings emphasize that pre-morbid health status has an important bearing on the long term outcome. The domain specific health status also reflects a similar trend.

Major deterioration both in overall and domain specific health status was observed in 29 (25%) patients. It is interesting to note that the group which deteriorated belonged to the neurological illnesses, which left behind sequelae. Emotional domain was the most commonly affected followed by cognition, self care, pain, mobility and sensation. The affection of cognition, mobility and self care as a part of neurological sequelae is well accepted. The emotional attribute needs to be looked into more carefully.

There is a dearth of studies addressing this issue in pediatric care, but a few that are available have indicated a favourable outcome(6,10). Butt et al.(9) found a cummulative mortality of 14.3% and overall health impairment on follow up in 58%. Health status remained unchanged in 68.7%, deteriorated in 8.3% and improved in 8.7% compared to preadmission. This was a retrospective study and had not used any health measuring instrument. In a prospective study Gemke et al.(6) found that overall pre-admission health status was impaired in 68.5% and after one year, it had improved or equalled the pre-admission state in 72.6%(6). In another prospective study by Morrison et al.(10), it was found that 59.3% of children had scores indicating a normal QOL and 32.4% had a fair QOL requiring some intervention. In adults cumulative one to two year mortality varied from 23-69% with 10-68% survivors regaining their previous state of health(5,13).

Another study found that only 31% to 77% of adults who are admitted to ICU survive and of this only 62% to 70% regain their previous state of health(14). In contrast to these there are some studies, the results of which suggest that intensive care is most cost effective for children than adults(15,16).

We did not find a definite correlation between the premorbid health status and the mortality risk in our study. A similar pros-pective study in pediatric patients, however has demonstrated high mortality risk in-patients with un-compromised health status as compared to patients with impaired health status where mortality risk was low(6).

We conclude that overall health status at one year after ICU discharge is significantly affected by the premorbid health status. In spite of large number of health impairment preceding the present illness, two thirds of the patients had improved at one year. Worsening was noted in relation to the neurological illness and their sequelae. The domain of emotion and pain needs more attention as a part of ICU care.

Contributors: All the three authors were involved in the planning and designing of the study protocol. PM guided the data collection, JM drafted the manuscript and SS critically reviewed the manuscript and finalized the draft and shall act as guarantor for the paper.

Funding: Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh.

Competing interests: None stated.

Key Messages

• Overall health status at one year after ICU discharge is significantly affected by the premorbid health status.

• In spite of large number of health impairment preceding the present illness, two third of the patients had improved at one year.

• Worsening was noted in relation to the neurological illness and their sequelae.

• The domain of emotion and pain needs more attention as a part of ICU care.

 

 References


1. Fitzpatrick R, Fletcher A, Gore S, Jones D, Spiegelhalter D, Cox D. Quality of life measures in health care. BMJ 1992; 305: 1074-1077.

2. Gemke RJBJ, Bonsel GJ, Mc Donnell J, Van Vught AJ. Patient characteristics and resource utilization in pediatric intensive care. Arch Dis Child 1994; 71: 291-296.

3. Beaufils F, Roze JC, Azema D, Francois HG, Bloc D, Floret D et al. Evaluation of pediatric intensive care in Europe. A colloborative study by the European Club of pediatric intensive care. Intensive Care Med 1987; 13: 65-70.

4. Yinnon A, Zimran A, Hershko C. Quality of life and survival following intensive care medicine. Quart J Med 1989; 264: 347-357.

5. Vaszuez Mata G, Fernandez RR, Carmona AG, Delgado-Rodriguez M, Ruiz JMT, Pugnaire AE et al. Factors related to quality of life 12 months after discharge from an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1992; 20: 1257-1262.

6. Gemke RJBJ, Bonsel GJ, Vught AJ. Long term survival and state of health after pediatric intensive care. Arch Dis Child 1995; 73: 196-201.

7. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright I. Short form 36(SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. BMJ 1984; 306: 1437-1444.

8. Feeny D, Leiper A, Barr RD, Torrance GW, Rosembaum P, Weitzman S. A comprehensive multiattribute system for classifying the Health status of survivors of childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10: 923-928.

9. Butt W, Shann F, Tibballs J, Williams J, Guddihy L, Blewett L, et al. Long term outcome of children after intensive care. Crit Care Med 1990; 18: 961-965.

10. Morrison AL, Cert PIC, Gillis J, O’Connell J A, Schell DN, Dossetor DR, et al. Quality of life of survivors of pediatric intensive care - Pediatric Crit Care Med 2002; 3: 1-5.

11. Jenney MEM, Campbell S. Measuring quality of life. Arch Dis Child 1997; 77: 347-354.

12. Feeny D, Leiper A, Barr RD, Furlong W, Torrance GW, Rosenbaum P, et al. The comprehensive assessment of health status in survivors of childhood cancer: application to high risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Br J Cancer 1993; 67: 1047-1052.

13. Parno JR, Teres D, Lemeshow S, Brown RB, Avrunium JS. Two year outcome of adult intensive care patients. Med Care 1984; 22: 167-176.

14. Potgieter PD, Rosenthal E, Benatar SR. Immediate and long term survival in patients admitted to a respiratory ICU. Crit Care Med 1985; 13: 798-802.

15. Cullen DJ, Keene R, Waternaux C, Kunsman JM, Caldera DL, Peterson H. Results, changes and benefits of intensive care for critically ill patients: update 1983. Crit Care Med 1984; 12: 102-106.

16. Parno JR, Teres D, Lemeshow S, Brown RB. Hospital charges and long term survival of ICU versus non ICU patients. Crit Care Med 1982; 10: 569-574.

Home

Past Issue

About IP

About IAP

Feedback

Links

 Author Info.

  Subscription