Lactating mothers transfer SARS-CoV-2 antibodies to
infants after vaccination
With COVID-19 cases skyrocketing, people have
realized the importance of vaccines and are overcoming vaccine
hesitancy. The Government of India has reduced the minimum age for
vaccine eligibility to 18 years from May 1, 2021. A common query now is
whether lactating mothers are candidates for the vaccine.
A study published recently in JAMA found robust
secretion of SARS-CoV-2 specific IgA and IgG antibodies in breast milk
for 6 weeks after vaccination. It was conducted on 84 lactating women,
with 2 doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine adminis-tered 3 weeks apart.
IgA secretion was evident as early as 2 weeks after vaccination and
peaked at 4 weeks. A spike in IgG occurred at 4 weeks. These antibodies
showed strong neutralizing effects, suggesting a potential protective
effect in infants. No mother or infant had any serious adverse effect.
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends use of
Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Janssen vaccines in
breastfeeding women. The Federation of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
Society of India (FOGSI) has also suggested use of these vaccines in
breastfeeding women, as their benefits seem to far outweigh any
theoretical and remote risks. Although, no data are available on the use
of Indian vaccines in lactating women, the Ministry of Health and Family
Welfare (MOHFW) has recently included this subgroup for vacination.
With COVID cases soaring and an impending third wave,
this inclusion of lactating women for vaccination seems reasonable.
Studies should be done to assess the protective effect imparted by the
Indian vaccines in lactating women.
(JAMA, 12 April, 2021)
Does the double mutant B.1.617 SARS-CoV-2 variant
evade vaccine-induced immunity?
The B.1.617 variant is termed the ‘double mutant’ as
it simultaneously carries two important mutations in the receptor
binding domain – L452R and E484Q. The L452R mutation was found in the
Californian variant, which was highly transmissible. The E484Q mutation
is similar to the E484K mutation found in the rapidly spreading South
African (B.1.351) and the Brazilian (P.1) variants. The combination of
these mutations created an apprehension that it could increase
transmission and surpass immune defenses. It has recently been
classified by the WHO as a ‘variant of concern’.
Researchers screened 146 COVID-19 cases in
Maharashtra using next generation sequencing and found the double mutant
variant in 15 of them. The neutralization capacity against the prototype
B1 (D614G) variant was compared with the B.1.617 variant using sera of
Covaxin recipients. Although a drop in neutralization was detected with
the B.1.617 variant, it was limited to 2-fold (GMT ratio1.95). When sera
from COVID-19 recovered people (infected with other variants) were
compared with sera from Covaxin recipients, the neutralizing capacity
against B.1.617 was similar. Early results of another study have shown
that both convalescent sera and Covishield-vaccinated sera offer
protection against the B.1.617 variant.
Although further studies would be needed to confirm
these findings, results of these studies assuring neutralization of
B.1.617 variant with sera of Covaxin and Covishield vaccine recipients
would provide the much-needed boost to the COVID-19 vaccination program
in India.
(BioRxiv preprint, 23 April 2021)
Myopia in children post COVID-19 home confinement
Apart from the damage caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus
itself, there have been ill-effects due to public health measures taken
to combat the virus. One among them is the impairment of visual health
in school-aged children post COVID home confinement.
To prevent COVID-19 spread, nations across the world
have closed their schools and begun online classes. This has reduced the
time spent by children in outdoor activities and increased the screen
time. A Chinese study found a significant myopic shift (approximately
–0.3 diopters) in the 2020 school-based screen-ings compared with
previous years (2015-2019) for children aged 6-8 years. The change was
not significant in older children.
This suggests that younger children are in a critical
period for the development of myopia and their eyes are more sensitive
to environmental changes. While myopic children can see well through
glasses or contact lenses, myopia increases the risk of high myopia
later in life, which in turn can cause retinal detach-ment/tears,
macular degeneration, glaucoma, and blindness.
With the pandemic far from over, public health
authorities should take this into consideration and plan an intelligent
lockdown. Parents should plan an appropriate indoor life for younger
children and restrict their screen times.
(JAMA Ophthalmology, 14 January 2021)