Home            Past Issues            About IP            About IAP           Author Information            Subscription            Advertisement              Search  

   
Editorial

Indian Pediatr 2014;51: 776-778

Zinc for Prevention of Acute Respiratory Infections in Infants – Research Needs

Indian Perspective

 

Archana Patel

Program Director, Lata Medical Research Foundation & Professor of Pediatrics, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, Nagpur, India.
Email: [email protected]

 

 


Pneumonia is responsible for 18% of under-five mortality as a result of an estimated 151 million new episodes each year occuring mostly in the marginialized and malnourished children in the developing countries who are often zinc-deficient [1].
In fact, the extent of zinc deficiency in a population is often estimated by the prevalence of stunting among these settings [2]. Zinc affects both non-specific and specific immune function at a variety of levels. In terms of nonspecific immunity, zinc affects the integrity of epithelial barrier, and function of neutrophils, natural killer cells, monocytes and macrophages [3,4]. Therefore, zinc conceptually promises to offer a beneficial impact on prevention, control and treatment of infections. Based on evidence from several randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Children’s Fund recommended zinc supplementation for up to 2 weeks for management of acute diarrhea [5]. Similarly, several studies evaluated the effect of zinc supplementation in reducing the frequency and severity of respiratory infections children. Variable results have been reported from a series of meta-analyses that evaluated the role of zinc in prevention of pneumonia. Two meta-analyses in 1999 and 2007 reported a beneficial effect in preventing pneumonia in children [6,7]. Subsequently, in 2008, Roth, et al. [8] evaluated the burden of ALRI attributed to zinc deficiency and concluded that zinc supplementation to young children prevented about one-quarter of ALRI cases, which could translate into reduction in infant mortality. Another meta-analysis of ten trials [9] concluded a reduction in incidence of ALRI defined by a specific definition but no effect on ALRI based on caregiver report. This finding was supported by a Cochrane review of 6 studies in 2010 [10] but mitigated in the same year by another review which included eleven studies with robust methodology and consistent definition of pneumonia [11].

In this issue, Malik, et al. [12], reported a double blind randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether zinc prophylaxis for a short duration had any role in reducing the morbidity due to ARIs in 272 apparently healthy infants of 6-11 months of age from two urban resettlement communities in Delhi, India. Nearly 40% of the population were wasted or stunted, more so in the placebo group. They reported an overall absence of effect on the incidence of acute respiratory infections (ARIs). There was a differential impact on acute upper respiratory infections (AURTI) and acute lower respiratory tract infection (ALRTI). A slight but insignificant increase in incidence of AURTI but a reduction in incidence of ALRTI by 62% was observed. These results need to be interpreted with caution. The sample size was powered to observe a 20% reduction in an overall estimated ARIs episodes of 5.5 episodes per child-year. The observed AURI and ALRTI episodes in the study were a mean of 7.2 and 1 per child-year respectively. So this study is largely underpowered to observe a difference in ALRTI. A significant decrease of 15% in days of ARI and 12% in duration of an episode of ARI were perhaps contributed largely by upper respiratory tract episodes which were 7 times more frequent than ALRTI.

The reported efficacy of zinc therapy for pneumonia, although encouraging, needs to be considered in the light of several caveats. Previously conducted meta-analyses report significant heterogeneity of estimated benefit across studies. This may occur due to differences in host factors such as age, nutritional status, urban or rural residency, and environmental exposures. The responses of supplementation may also differ with viral, bacterial or allergic etiology. Variability in zinc salts used, the dose, the frequency, duration of supplementation and how the outcome of pneumonia is defined or monitored can also contribute largely to the heterogeneous impact. Whether and to what extent these factors might modify and tailor the beneficial effect of zinc is still unclear. Finally the most recent meta-analysis by Mayo-Wilson, et al. [13] of 80 randomized trials with 205 401 participants found no effect of zinc supplementation despite a possibly synergistic co-intervention of vitamin A on incidence or prevalence of respiratory infections and a small but non-significant effect on all-cause mortality. In conclusion, despite convincing biological rationale exists for the role of zinc in reducing incidence of infections – especially in malnourished children – the prophylactic role of zinc to prevent pneumonia in children is unresolved. It is of foremost importance to understand the predictors of zinc efficacy to identify the populations most likely to benefit from supplementation. It appears both intuitive and scientific that even if found to be prophylactically efficacious, programmatic decisions on the prophylactic use of zinc supplementation will need to address additional issues like safety, acceptability, adherence, cost and effectiveness.

Funding: None; Competing interests: None stated.

References

1. Liu L, Johnson HL, Cousens S, Perin J, Scott S, Lawn JE, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: An updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. Lancet. 2012;379:2151-61.

2. de Benoist B, Darnton-Hill I, Davidsson L, Fontaine O, Hotz C. Conclusions of the joint WHO/UNICEF/IAEA/IZiNCG interagency meeting on zinc status indicators. Food Nutr Bull. 2007;28:S480-9.

3. Shankar AH, Prasad AS. Zinc and immune function: The biological basis of altered resistance to infection. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;68(2 Suppl):447S-63S.

4. Fraker PJ, King LE, Laakko T, Vollmer TL. The dynamic link between the integrity of the immune system and zinc status. J Nutr. 2000;130(5 suppl):1399S-406S.

5. WHO/UNICEF. Clinical Management of Acute Diarrhea. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2004.

6. Bhutta ZA, Black RE, Brown KH, Gardner JM, Gore S, Hidayat A, et al. Prevention of diarrhea and pneumonia by zinc supplementation in children in developing countries: Pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Pediatr. 1999;135:689-97.

7. Aggarwal R, Sentz J, Miller MA. Role of zinc administration in prevention of childhood diarrhea and respiratory illnesses: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2007;119:1120-30.

8. Roth DE, Caulfield LE, Ezzati M, Black RE. Acute lower respiratory infections in childhood: Opportunities for reducing the global burden through nutritional interventions. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86:356-64.

9. Roth DE, Richard SA, Black RE. Zinc supplementation for the prevention of acute lower respiratory infection in children in developing countries: meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized trials. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39:795-808.

10. Lassi ZS, Haider BA, Bhutta ZA. Zinc supplementation for the prevention of pneumonia in children aged 2 months to 59 months. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;12:CD005978.

11. Mathew JL Zinc supplementation for prevention or treatment of childhood pneumonia: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Indian Pediatr. 2010;47:61-6.

12. Malik A, Taneja DK, Devasenapathy N, Rajeshwari K. Zinc supplementation for prevention of acute respiratory infections in infants:  A randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr. 2014;51:780-4.

13. Mayo-Wilson E, Imdad A, Junior J, Dean S, Bhutta ZA. Preventive zinc supplementation for children, and the effect of additional iron: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e004647.

 

Copyright © 1999-2014  Indian Pediatrics