|
Indian Pediatr 2013;50: 954-956 |
|
Aggressive Parenteral Nutrition in Sick Very
Low Birth Weight Babies:
A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
Amit Tagare, *Meenal Walawalkar and Umesh Vaidya
From Division of Neonatology, Department of
Pediatrics, KEM Hospital, Rasta Peth, Pune 411011 and *Department of
Health Sciences, University of Pune, Pune 411007, India.
Correspondence to: Dr Amit Tagare, Neonatologist,
Department of Pediatrics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Medical
College and Hospital, Sangli Miraj Road, Sangli 416 414, Pune,
Maharasthra, India.
Email: [email protected]
Received: March 26, 2012;
Initial review: June 11, 2012;
Accepted: March 23, 2013.
|
Survival of preterm neonates in developing world has improved.
Developing countries lag behind in nutritional management in NICU
especially parenteral nutrition (PN). This randomized controlled
trial was done to evaluate the effect of aggressive parenteral
nutrition on nitrogen retention of sick VLBW and extremely low birth
weight (ELBW) babies. From September 2009 to February 2010, total 34
babies were randomized to receive aggressive parenteral nutrition
(APN) (n=17) or standard parenteral nutrition (SPN) (n=17).
The average daily total and PN calory intake of babies in APN group
was significantly higher during first week. APN was well-tolerated;
however, nitrogen retention was not significantly higher in APN
group. Aggressive parenteral nutrition in sick VLBW babies is
feasible in developing world, though it did not improve nitrogen
retention in first week of life.
Keywords: Aggressive; Nitrogen retention;
Parenteral nutrition; Preterm.
|
O wing to advances in perinatal medicine, more very
preterm infants are surviving. These babies have unique nutritional
requirements for growth due to their low energy stores, high protein
accretion rate and high metabolic rate. Compared to advances in other
aspects of neonatal care, developing countries lag behind in nutritional
management, especially parenteral nutrition [1]. Delay in initiating
nutritional support results in postnatal malnutrition that produces
measurable growth failure [2,3]. Effects of malnutrition in early life
of preterm neonates are long-lasting [4].
Because of immaturity of the gastrointestinal tract,
most prematurely born infants must initially be given parenteral
nutrition (PN). PN can be given safely shortly after birth (aggressive
PN). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and
safety of aggressive PN in VLBW infants during the first week of life in
comparison with standard PN. We hypothesized that, in comparison to
standard PN, aggressive PN would improve nitrogen balance, be well
tolerated metabolically, shorten time to regain birth weight and shorten
length of hospitalization.
Methods
This randomized controlled trial was conducted in a
40 bed level III referral neonatal unit. All babies admitted from
October 2009 to March 2010 were screened for eligibility. Eligibility
criteria were: (i) Prematurity (<37 weeks), (ii)
chronological age <24 hours, (iii) birth weight <1500 grams and (iv)
need for respiratory support (mechanical ventilation or nasal CPAP).
Babies with any one of the following were excluded: (i) major
congenital defects, (ii) chromosomal abnormalities, (iii)
antenatal suspicion of liver and or kidney diseases, (iv)
enrolment to other trial. If informed consent was obtained from one or
both parents within the first 24 hours of life, infants were enrolled.
The study protocol was approved by institutional ethics committee.
Babies were randomly allocated to either aggressive
PN or standard PN using computer generated random numbers contained in
consecutively numbered sealed envelopes with labels wrapped in opaque
aluminum foil. The clinical team and statistician were unaware of the
assignments. Babies in the standard PN limb received PN as per the
unit’s existing protocol. It called for intravenous amino acids (Aminoven
Infant 10%, Fresenius Kabi,
India Ltd) to be started in the first 24 hrs of life in a dose of 1
g/kg. The dose was increased to 2 g/kg the following day and remained
the same thereafter. Intravenous lipids (Intralipid
20%, Fresenius Kabi, India Ltd) were introduced on
day 3 at a dose of 1 g/kg which remained the same thereafter. The babies
assigned to the aggressive PN limb received 3 g/kg of amino acids and 2
g/kg of lipids beginning in the first 24 hrs of life. Unless intolerance
developed, infants received the assigned PN until enteral intake reached
80% of total intake. Criteria for intolerance to PN and to terminate PN
(if attending physician demands) was predefined. Fluid intake was not
dictated by the experimental protocol. Enteral nutrition (20 mL/kg/day)
was initiated once babies achieved hemodynamic stability. Human milk was
preferred when available, otherwise preterm formula was fed. Feedings
were increased by 25 mL/kg/day as tolerated.
Body weight was determined daily on an electronic
scale accurate to 2 g (ATCO, Electric Balance, Model LL6MM 06/12-W).
Fluid intake and urine volume was recorded daily. Urine was collected
from an attached bag with any leakage collected on preweighed diaper.
Nitrogen retention was determined on days 4 and 7
using the standard formula (5). Nitrogen intake was calculated as Amino
acids (g) ÷ 6.25 = mg of nitrogen. To monitor tolerance of PN, blood
glucose was determined twice daily and serum electrolytes, urea,
creatinine, bilirubin, triglycerides, arterial blood gas and full blood
count were obtained on days 4 and 7. Determinations were performed in
the hospital laboratory using standard methods. The attending
neonatologist could order additional tests as needed depending on the
clinical condition of baby. Time (in days) to regain birth weight and
length of hospitalization were determined from medical records.
Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version
11.5, Inc. Chicago, USA) for MS windows was used for statistical
analysis. Nitrogen retention on day 7 with standard PN, estimated before
the start of the trial, was 150 (+/- 80) mg/kg/day. It was hypothesized
that aggressive PN would increase this to 300 mg/kg/day on day 7. Sample
size of 16 in each group was necessary to detect this difference in the
mean nitrogen retention with a power of 80% and a P value < 0.05.
Results
During study period 34 babies met the eligibility
criteria and were enrolled with 17 babies in each group. Mean birth
weight was 1161.5 (SD 223.8) in the aggressive PN group and 1263.8 (SD
194.4) in the standard PN group. Mean gestational age was 30.5 (2.6)
weeks and 32.1 (2.8) weeks, respectively. In both groups 41% babies
received antenatal steroids.
Table I shows nutritional intakes and
outcomes of both groups. Biochemical parameters were comparable in both
groups (Table II). Clinical outcomes like intraventricular
hemorrhage, hemodynamically significant PDA, late onset sepsis, need
for exchange transfusion and bronchopulmonary dysplasia were comparable
in both groups. Two babies in the aggressive group and one baby in the
standard group died before discharge (P=0.9).
TABLE I Nutritional Outcomes In The Two Groups
Outcome
|
Aggressive PN group(n=17) |
Standard PN group(n=17) |
P value |
Calories received in first week
(kcal/kg/d) |
63.5 (8.1) |
50.1 (11.1) |
0.001 |
PN calories received in first week
(kcal/kg/d) |
45.8 (9.1) |
38.7 (8.6) |
0.04 |
Nitrogen retention on day 4 (mg/kg/d) |
411.9 (107.9)
|
328.7 (197.5) |
0.17 |
Nitrogen retention on day 7 (mg/kg/d) |
370.7 (233.6) |
278.7 (151.1) |
0.69 |
Time to regain birth weight (d) |
9.5 (6.7) |
11.5 (6.7) |
0.394 |
Time to reach full enteral nutrition (d) |
8.4 (6.9) |
11.1 (6.6) |
0.23 |
Duration of NICU stay (d) |
19.5 (13.3) |
20.2 (12.9) |
0.92 |
All values in ____ (SD); PN: Parenteral
Nutrition. |
TABLE II Biochemical Parameters on Day 7 in The Two Groups
Parameter
|
Aggressive |
Standard PN
|
|
PN group (n=17) |
group (n=17)
|
pH
|
7.4 (0.08) |
7.4 (0.10)
|
Bicarbonate (mmol/L) |
16.7 (2.4) |
18.7 (2.5)
|
S. urea (mg/dL) |
36.2 (25.4) |
24.7 (12.9)
|
Urine urea (mg/dL) |
483.0 (400.0) |
346.0 (411.2)
|
S. triglycerides (mg/dL) |
153.9 (70.2) |
94.8 (60.2)
|
S. bilirubin (mg/dL) |
6.7 (3.1) |
7.2 (2.5)
|
S: Serum; Mean (SD), P; *: P=0.05. |
Discussion
Though the average daily calorie intake was
significantly higher in the aggressive PN group, nitrogen retention in
the first week was not significantly increased. Trends were seen toward
shorter time to reach full feeds and to regain birth weight and toward
shorter duration of stay in NICU. Most importantly, aggressive PN was
well tolerated and no adverse clinical and biochemical outcomes were
noted.
Early amino acid administration has previously been
shown to be safe [6-8]. Early amino acid administration increases
protein synthesis, resulting in an anabolic state [9]. Early lipid
administration has not been associated with adverse effects in preterm
neonates [10,11]. Ibrahim, et al. [5] showed that early
administration of both amino acids and lipids is well tolerated. Their
aggressive approach improved nitrogen balance of preterm babies compared
to babies who received late PN. We compared our aggressive approach with
the existing PN regimen, where infants received amino acids from day one
but at a lower dose than with the aggressive regimen. Nitrogen excretion
increases in babies when nitrogen intake increases [8]. We noted a
similar finding. There was also nitrogen coming from enteral feedings
which probably increased urinary nitrogen excretion and explains why
apparent nitrogen retention was less. This may be one of the reasons why
we could not show significant improvement in nitrogen retention.
Recent studies have demonstrated better growth in
VLBW babies receiving aggressive nutrition [7,12-14]. We could not find
an effect of aggressive PN on time to regain birth weight. Most babies
in the aggressive PN group were on full enteral feeds by the ninth day.
But as per unit policy, most babies did not receive fortified milk till
the end of second week. There are other factors influencing weight in
the first week of life. These may be the reason why we did not find an
effect on time to regain birth weight. Valentine, et al. [7]
observed that babies receiving early amino acids achieved full enteral
feedings earlier despite being smaller and younger at birth. We noticed
a similar trend, though it was not significant. In developing countries
like India, social and economic reasons affect the time of discharge. So
we could not show any effect on duration of NICU stay.
One important observation was that babies tolerated
aggressive PN well. Neonatologists in developing countries like India,
are still concerned about the safety of PN, as there is lack of data
from the developing world. We can say that aggressive and early PN is
feasible and safe in India. This may be taken as a positive step. Larger
multicentric trials are needed before reaching conclusions about
efficacy. Our study suggests that aggressive PN is safe in India.
Acknowledgement: Prof Ekhard Ziegler, Fomon
Infant Nutrition Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Carver College of
Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Contributors: AT: conceived the study, helped in
statistical analysis and wrote the manuscript; MW: collected data and
helped in statistical analysis; UV: supervised data collection. The
final manuscript was approved by all authors.
Funding: None; Competing interest: None
stated.
References
1. Tagare A, Vaidya U. Reasearch issues in parenteral
nutrition. J Neonatol. 2009;23:294-8.
2. Ziegler EE. Malnutrition in the premature infant.
Acta Pediatr Scand Suppl. 1991;374:58-66.
3. Ehrenkranz R, Younes N, Lemons J, Fanaroff A,
Donovan E, Wright L, et al. Longitudinal growth of hospitalized
very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 1999;104:280-9
4. Stephens B, Walden R, Gargus R, Tucker R, McKinley
L, Mance M, et al. First week protein and energy intakes are
associated with 18 month developmental outcomes in extremely low birth
weight infants. Pediatrics. 2009;123:1337-43.
5. Ibrahim HM, Jeroudi MA, Baier RJ, Dhanireddy R,
Krouskop RW. Aggressive Early Total Parental Nutrition in
Low-Birth-Weight Infants. J Perinatol. 2004;24:482-6.
6. Thureen PJ, Melara D, Fennessey PV, Hay Jr WW.
Effect of low versus high intravenous amino acid intake on very low
birth weight infants in the early neonatal period. Pediatr Res.
2003;53:24-32.
7. Valentine CJ, Fernandez S, Rogers LK, Gulati P,
Hayes J, Lore P, et al. Early amino acid administration improves
preterm infant weight. J Perinatol. 2009;29:428-32.
8. Te Braake FWJ, Van Den Akker CHP, Wattimena DJL,
Huijmans JGM, Van Goudoever JB. Amino acid administration to premature
infants directly after birth. J Pediatr. 2005;147:457-61.
9. Van Den Akker CHP, Te Braake FWJ, Wattimena DJL,
Voortman G, Schierbeek H, Vermes A, et al. Effects of early amino
acid administration on leucine and glucose kinetics in premature
infants. Pediatr Res. 2006;59:732-5.
10. Drenckpohl D, McConnel C, Gaffiney S, Niehaus M,
Macwan KS. Randomized trial of very low birth weight infants receiving
higher rates of infusion of intravenous fat emulsions during the first
week of life. Pediatrics. 2008;122:743-51.
11. Simmer K, Rao SC. Early introduction of lipids to
parenterally-fed preterm infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic
Reviews 2005, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD005256.
12. Dinerstein A, Nieto RM, Solana CL, Perez GP,
Otheguy LE, Larguia AM. Early and aggressive nutritional strategy (parenteral
and enteral) decreases postnatal growth failure in very low birth weight
infants. J Perinatol. 2006;26:436-42.
13. Wilson DC, Cairns P, Halliday HL, Reid M, McClure
G, Dodge JA. Randomised controlled trial of an aggressive nutritional
regimen in sick very low birth weight infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal
Neonatal. 1997;77:F4-F11.
14. Maggio L, Cota F, Gallini F, Lauriola V, Zecca C,
Romagnoli C. Effects of high versus standard early protein intake on
growth of extremely low birth weight infants. J Pediatr Gastroenterol
Nutr. 2007;44:124-9.
|
|
|
|