1.gif (1892 bytes)

Brief Reports

   Indian Pediatrics 2004;41:1025-1030

Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux: Progress of Disease, Somatic Growth and Renal Parameters

 

Prema Menon, K.L.N. Rao, Arpita Bhattacharya, J.K. Mahajan and R. Samujh

From the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Correspondence to: Dr. K.L.N. Rao, Professor and Head, Department of Pediatric Surgery, P.G.I.M.E.R., Chandigarh 160012, India. E-mail: [email protected]

Manuscript received: June 13, 2003, Initial review completed: August 14, 2003;
Revision accepted: February 4, 2004.

Abstract:

Thirty children (45 units) in the age group 1 day-12 yrs with primary vesicoureteral reflux were studied prospectively and periodically assessed for renal function, scarring, grade of reflux and somatic growth parameters. Four children (6 units) with grade IV reflux underwent ureteric reimplantation. Complete resolution with medical management was seen in all 12 units of grade I-III reflux and in 5 of the remaining 27 units of grade IV-V reflux over 6 months-6 yrs. This group showed highly significant improvement in height (p <0.001). The weight gain of the above 2 groups was statistically significant compared to those with persistent reflux. Focal defects were seen initially in 62% refluxing units. None of the patients showed deterioration in renal function or formation of new scars over the next 1-7 years. Three children on conservative management showed persistent growth retardation with associated breakthrough infection, hypertension, multiple renal scars and poor renal functional volume.

Key words: Primary vesicoureteral reflux, Renal scarring, Somatic growth parameters, Urinary tract infection .

Management of primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a controversial subject(1). Only a few studies have assessed the effect of the type of management on growth parameters (2,3). There is no controlled study on Indian children and we therefore prospectively observed the long-term effects of surgical and conservative treatment on renal status and somatic growth, especially in patients with severe VUR.

Subjects and Methods

All children with primary VUR attending our outpatient department between 1996-2003 were enrolled in the study. The baseline investigations included urine for culture and sensitivity, blood pressure, micturating cystourethrogram (MCUG), ultrasonography (USG) of urinary tract and diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) and dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) renal scans. Renal function was assessed by urine protein, levels of blood urea and creatinine, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). VUR was graded according to the International Classification(4). All patients were started on low-dose antibiotic prophylaxis. Follow-up included 3-monthly urine cultures and yearly blood creatinine, urine protein and blood pressure measurement. DMSA scan was initially done 6 months after the first scan and then yearly to assess renal scarring. DTPA scan was performed yearly to assess differential function of kidneys and GFR(5). Status of VUR and renal growth were monitored with yearly direct isotope cysto-urethrography (DRCG) and USG. In children with perceptible reduction of reflux on DRCG, a MCUG was also done for the purpose of grading. Renal growth was assessed by calculation of renal parenchymal volume(6) and by comparison of kidney length with bipolar parenchymal thickness. All episodes of febrile and culture positive urinary tract infection (UTI) were recorded. Age at presentation, grade of reflux, renal function tests, renal scars, time for resolution of reflux and necessity for surgical intervention were studied. The indications for surgery were single functioning kidney and recurrent breakthrough UTI (more than 2 UTI during 6 months) while on prophylaxis in children with grade IV-V reflux. The children who were operated continued to be followed up; weight and height were recorded at regular intervals.

Statistical analysis

Children were placed into 3 groups; group 1: complete resolution of reflux, group 2: persistent/improving reflux, and group 3: operated. Height and weight standard deviation (z) scores were calculated at the time of entry into the study (HZ 1, WZ 1) and at last follow-up (HZ 2, WZ 2) using data from US National Center for Health Statistics, 1977 as the standard (Table I). Paired ‘t’ test was used to compare HZ 1 with HZ 2, and WZ 1 with WZ 2 within each group. Unpaired ‘t’ test was used to compare height and weight changes between the various groups; p <0.05 was considered significant. Probability of persistence of reflux was studied by life table analysis (Fig.1).

Table I

Comparison of z scores at entry and last followup(mean + SD)
Groups
Refluxing units
HZ 1
HZ 2
WZ 1
WZ 2
Complete 
IV-V: 5
–0.813 ± 1.37*
0.783 ± 1.22*
–0.78 ± 1.06
–0.177 ± 1.23
resolution I-III : 12        
Persistent reflux
IV-V: 22
–1.302 ± 1.62
–1.594 ± 1.41
–1.336 ± 1.23
–1.54 ± 1.06
Operated
IV: 6
0.226 ± 1.38
0.128 ± 0.89
–1.013 ± 1.18
–0.446 ± 0.8
HZ 1,WZ 1: Height and weight z scores at entry; HZ 2,WZ 2: Height and weight z scores 
at last follow-up * P < 0.001

Fig. 1. Life table analysis showing probability of persistence of VUR among all cases and in the completely resolved (CR) group.

Results

Thirty children (23 boys and 7 girls) were studied over 1-7 yrs with a total of 45 refluxing units. Two children had solitary kidneys. Two patients were seen on day 1 of life following antenatal diagnosis of hydronephrosis. The rest of the patients presented with UTI between 2 months - 12 yrs age (median 2 yrs). The age at inclusion in the study ranged from 1 day-12 yrs (median 3 yrs 3 months). Clinical features at the time of diagnosis included fever (25 subjects), loin pain (13), pyuria (4) and hypertension (4). Two patients, one with left grade III reflux and another with bilateral grade IV reflux had blood level of creatinine at 1.4 and 1.8 mg/dL respectively.

Complete resolution with medical management was seen in 3 units with grade V reflux over a period of 5 yr, 2 with grade IV reflux over 2-3 yr and in all 12 units with grade I-III reflux over 6 months-6 yrs. Ureteric reimplantation was performed in 4 patients with grade IV reflux (6 units); 2 with bilateral pyonephrosis and 2 with single functioning kidney. One child with grade V reflux underwent pyeloplasty for associated pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction. Another with grade III reflux underwent nephroureterec-tomy of the nonfunctioning, opposite kidney to control hypertension (240/150 mm Hg).

Breakthrough UTI were seen in 12 patients, of whom 3 were surgically managed. In the medically managed group, 2 patients with grade IV-V reflux had recurrent infections. In one, this stopped following resolution of reflux along with improvement in growth parameters. In the other, surgery was not planned since reflux was seen to be regressing. In the operated group, two developed UTI in the first year after surgery with no effect on growth parameters.

The refluxing and nonrefluxing sides showed focal defects on DMSA scan in 62.2% and 14.3% respectively; global reduction (20-40% of relative uptake) in 11% and 0% and shrunken kidney (relative uptake <20%) in 15.5% and 14.2% respectively, the majority occurring in grade IV-V reflux. Out of 13 children with bilateral grade IV-V reflux, significantly reduced function on one side was seen in 4 cases. No new scars or deterioration in renal function on renal scans developed during the period of study. Measurement of renal parenchymal volume at entry and last followup showed growth parameters within ± 2SD of normal values in 90% of the patients. GFR was maintained in all patients.

The mean height gain in group 1 was highly significant (P <0.001). There was no significant difference between HZ 1 and HZ 2, and WZ 1 and WZ 2 in the remaining groups. Statistically significant improvement in height (P < 0.001) and weight (P <0.05) was seen in group 1 compared to group 2, and improve-ment in height in group 1 compared to group 3 (P <0.011) (Fig. 2). Comparison between group 2 and 3 showed significant improvement in weight in favour of group 3 (P <0.05).

Fig.2 Scatter graph showing the 3 groups of patients with average heights at entry/time of operation and last follow-up plotted against the age in years with reference to the 50th percentile curve (NCHS standard). Each group is depicted by a separate symbol.

‘z’ scores below –2 SD for height and weight were seen in 3 patients in group 2 (Table I); all had history of breakthrough UTI. Two patients had raised blood pressure of 120-160/110 mm Hg and multiple scars with one kidney smaller and poorly functioning with low GFR on DTPA scan; blood urea and creatinine levels were within normal limits. The third patient had a blood pressure of 140/90, 24hr urine protein 1.2 g and blood creatinine of 1.8 mg/dL; USG showed bilateral small kidneys. USG showed significantly less parenchymal thickness in these children compared to the remaining in their group at the time of entry as well as last followup (P <0.05).

Discussion

Primary VUR often improves with age(7,8). In our study, 15% of grade IV-V and all the cases of grade I-III reflux resolved completely over 6 months to 6 yrs. The statistically expected time of disappearance of reflux (Fig. 1) is in confirmity with previous studies(9). In contrast to most international series(9), our series had a male-female ratio of 3: 1.

Our study has shown a higher incidence of initial renal damage compared to previous studies(10,11). Most of our patients were not on uroprophylaxis before entering the study with previous episodes of symptomatic bacteriuria. Pre-existing congenital abnormalities can also produce renal defects and may account for the damage seen on the contralateral nonrefluxing units(10,12). Inspite of persistent severe reflux, no patient showed new scar formation or deterioration in renal function, probably because of constant medical supervision(13).

Although recurrent breakthrough infection is one of the most common indications for surgical intervention(14), UTI per se is independent of VUR, 2 of our 4 operated cases having UTI within a year of reimplantation(15). Socioeconomic status, breakthrough UTI and renal function play a role in somatic growth. The Hawthorne effect, i.e., "a distortion of results caused by the response of the subjects to the special attention they receive from the researchers" should be kept in mind while interpreting data. No difference in growth was found in the first controlled trial comparing surgery vs conservative management in children below 11 yrs(2). Growth is not influenced by UTI or renal scars at entry (2,17,18). In our study, statistically significant improvement in height and weight was noted in the completely resolved group compared to the persistent refluxers, as noted by others(18). It remains to be seen whether the overall poor growth is also in some way affecting the maturation of the vesicoureteral junction, delaying resolution of reflux. Better weight gain was seen in the operated children compared to those with persistent reflux. This is significant as this group was already biased towards poorer outcome.

In severe reflux, while surgical intervention is preferable with single functioning kidney, recurrent breakthrough infections and where regular follow-up appears unlikely, when the reflux is improving or the kidney is badly scarred, it is unlikely to be of much benefit. Renal scarring with associated hypertension, overall less functioning renal tissue and poor renal growth appear to have contributed to persistent growth retardation in three children with continuing reflux. The aim should therefore be to detect VUR early and maintain constant vigilance to prevent acquired renal scarring.

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the help of S.K. Chowdhary in patient management and A.K. Bhalla in statistical analysis.

Contributiors: PM did drafting of manuscript, literature search, analysis of data and contributed to patient management. AB contributed to collection of data and literature search. JKM, RS revised the article critically and contributed to patient management. KLNR, Consultant operating surgeon, gave the final approval of manuscript version and will act as guarantor for the manuscript.

Funding: None.

Competing interests: None.

Key Messages


• Susceptibility to urinary tract infection continues even after successful surgery.

• Children with multiple renal scars, hypertension and poor renal functional volume show persistent growth retardation inspite of compliance with treatment protocols.
 

 

 References


1. Elder JS, Peters CA, Arant BS Jr., Ewalt DH, Hawtrey CE, Hurwitz RS, et al. Pediatric vesicoureteral reflux guidelines panel summary report on the management of primary vesicoureteral reflux in children. J Urol 1997; 157: 1846-1851.

2. Wingen AM, Koskimies O, Olbing H, Seppanen J, Tamminen-Mobius T. Growth and weight gain in children with vesicoureteral reflux receiving medical versus surgical treatment: 10-year results of a prospective, randomized study. International Reflux Study in Children (European Branch). Acta Paediatr 1999; 88: 56-61.

3. Sutton R, Atwell JD. Physical growth velocity during conservative treatment and following subsequent surgical treatment for primary vesicoureteric reflux. Br J Urol 1989; 63:245-250.

4. International Reflux Study in Children. International system of radiographic grading of vesicoureteric reflux. Pediatr Radiol 1985; 15: 105-109.

5. Gates GF. Split renal function testing using Tc-99m DTPA. A rapid technique for determining differential glomerular filtration. Clin Nucl Med 1983; 8: 400-407.

6. Christophe C, Cantraine F, Bogaert C, Coussement C, Hanquinet S, Spehl M, et al. Ultrasound: a method for kidney size monitoring in children. Eur J Pediatr 1986; 145: 532-538.

7. International Reflux Study Committee: Medical versus surgical treatment of primary vesicoureteral reflux: A prospective inter-national reflux study in children. J Urol 1981; 125: 277-283.

8. Schwab CW Jr, Wu HY, Selman H, Smith GH, Snyder HM 3rd, Canning DA. Spontaneous resolution of vesicoureteral reflux: a 15-year perspective. J Urol 2002; 168: 2594-2599.

9. Smellie JM, Jodal U, Lax H, Mobius TT, Hirche H, Olbing H. Outcome at 10 years of severe vesicoureteric reflux managed medically: Report of the International Reflux Study in Children. Pediatr 2001; 139: 656-663.

10. Polito C, Rambaldi PF, Mansi L, Di Toro R, La Manna A. Unilateral vesicoureteric reflux: Low prevalence of contralateral renal damage. J Pediatr 2001; 138: 875-879.

11. Smellie JM, Tamminen-Mobius T, Olbing H, Claesson I, Wikstad I, Jodal U, et al. Radiologic findings in the kidney of children with severe reflux. Five-year comparative study of conservative and surgical treatment. Urologe A 1993; 32: 22-29.

12. Nakai H, Kakizaki H, Konda R, Hayashi Y, Hosokawa S, Kawaguchi S, et al. Clinical characteristics of primary vesicoureteral reflux in infants: multicenter retrospective study in Japan. J Urol 2003; 169: 309-312.

13. Cardiff-Oxford Bacteriuria Study Group. Long-term effects of bacteriuria on the urinary tract in schoolgirls. Radiology 1979; 132: 343-350.

14. Herndon CD, DeCambre M, McKenna PH. Changing concepts concerning the manage-ment of vesicoureteric reflux. J Urol 2001; 166: 1439-1443.

15. Beetz R, Mannhardt W, Fisch M, Stein R, Thuroff JW. Long-term follow up of 158 young adults surgically treated for vesicoureteric reflux in childhood: The ongoing risk of urinary tract infections. J Urol 2002; 168: 704-707.

16. Polito C, Marte A, Zamparelli M, Papale MR, Rocco CE, La Manna A. Catch-up growth in children with vesico-ureteric reflux. Pediatr Nephrol 1997; 11:164-168.

17. Merrell RW, Mowad JJ. Increased physical growth after successful antireflux operation. J Urol 1979; 122: 523-527.

18. Pinter AB, Jaszai V, Dober I. Medical treatment of vesicoureteral reflux detected in infancy. J Urol 1988; 140:121-124.

 

Home

Past Issue

About IP

About IAP

Feedback

Links

 Author Info.

  Subscription