Home            Past Issues            About IP            About IAP           Author Information            Subscription            Advertisement              Search  

   
correspondence

Indian Pediatr 2012;49: 928-929

Reply


SN Singh

Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Chhatarpati Shahu Maharaj Medical University,
Lucknow 226 003, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Email: [email protected]
 


We thank the authors for their interest in our study [1]; 296 infants assessed for eligibility were cases having respiratory distress syndrome and requiring ventilation; of these, 150 infants were randomized. The remaining 146 infants could not be included because either they were excluded as per exclusion criteria, or the designated ventilator was not available, and thus, it does not reflect CPAP failure rate. The diagnosis of hyaline membrane disease was made as per working definition of NNPD of India, which includes clinical parameters, and chest radiology or negative gastric aspirate shake test.

Oxygen index (OI) was the primary outcome and it was measured at 1, 6 and 24 hours. Since significant drop-out was expected and we intended to look for longitudinal trend in OI over time on first day of ventilation, it was decided a priori to conduct analysis only on those infants who complete initial 24 hrs of ventilation. Moreover, the proportion of subjects who could not complete initial 24 hrs of ventilation after randomization were quite similar in both the groups (HFOV: 25.8%; SIMV: 27.3%).

As per our unit policy we administer surfactant to preterms with gestational maturity < 34 wks having respiratory distress due to HMD at earliest possible hours; however, it is used in only those who can afford it. We use Curosurf (porcine minced) for infants weighing <1000 g and Survanta (bovine minced) for those >1000 g. None of our patients in either group had received multiple doses of surfactant. Detailed analysis of patients receiving surfactant was not a stated objective; however, the major baseline characteristics were similar in both the groups. It was aimed to keep the tidal volumes lower by using lower PIP and optimal PEEP to maximally recruit lungs in synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) group; however, tidal volume was not measured.

References

1. Singh SN, Malik GK, Prashanth GP, Singh A, Kumar M. High frequency oscillatory ventilation versus synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in preterm neonates with hyaline membrane disease: A randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr. 2012;49:405-8.

 

Copyright 1999-2012 Indian Pediatrics