Psychosocial development during
adolescence is often accompanied by new stresses, behavioral
changes, and relationship problems. Parental involvement in the
lives of their adolescent children can help young people to
learn how to cope with stressors and maintain physical and
mental health. Indeed, high levels of parental involvement and a
strong bond between youth and their parents have been found to
be associated with a decreased risk of youth depression and
loneliness in high-income countries [1-3]. However, research
regarding the applicability of these results in different
cultural contexts is limited [4,5]. This study provides
information about the mental health of school-going adolescents
aged 13-15 years in India and the association between parental
involvement and child mental well-being.
Methods
The Global School-based Student Health Survey
(GSHS), which assesses the health behaviors of middle school
children, is conducted in participating low- and middle-income
countries by national governments in collaboration with the
World Health Organization (WHO) and the U.S. Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) [6].
The 2007 India GSHS used a two-stage cluster
sampling design to sample 75 nationally-representative Central
Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) schools (including
government schools, independent schools, Kendriya Vidyalayas,
and Jawahar Novodaya Vidyalayas), of which 74 (99%) agreed to
participate [7,8]. Within each of the participating schools,
several classrooms (usually grades 8, 9, or 10) were randomly
sampled, and all students in these classrooms were invited to
complete a self-report survey during one class session.
Participation was voluntary, and no identifiable information was
collected. A total of 8130 students completed the survey, for an
85% participation rate [7]. For this analysis, only data from
the 6721 students who were ages 13 to 15 and reported their sex
are included.
The mental well-being of students in the past
12 months was measured with key questions about loneliness ("How
often have you felt lonely?"), anxiety ("How often have you been
so worried about something that you could not sleep?"), and
symptoms of depression ("Did you ever feel so sad or hopeless
almost every day for two weeks or more in a row that you stopped
doing your usual activities?") [9]. The questions about
loneliness and anxiety used a five-point response scale with
possible answers of always, most of the time, sometimes, rarely,
and never. Responses of always or most of the time were coded as
markers of poor mental well-being. The question about symptoms
of depression had possible answers of yes and no, with yes
indicating poorer mental health status. A fourth question asked
about the number of close friends, and an answer of zero close
friends was considered a sign of low mental well-being.
Parental involvement was assessed with three
questions about the students’ perceptions of their parents’
involvement in their lives in the past 30 days: "How often did
your parents or guardians check to see if your homework was
done?", "How often did your parents or guardians understand your
problems and worries?", and "How often did your parents or
guardians really know what you were doing with your free time?"
[9]. These questions used a five-point response scale for
frequency, with possible answers of always, most of the time,
sometimes, rarely, and never.
Responses of always or most of the time were
considered to indicate a high level of parental involvement.
Chi-square tests were used to identify
differences in responses between age and sex groups. As several
differences were observed, age-and sex-adjusted multivariate
logistic regression models were used to examine the associations
between individual mental health variables and individual
parental involvement variables. Due to multicollinearity and
interaction between variables, no models included more than one
mental health variable or more than one parental involve-ment
variable. Any student missing a response for a particular
question was excluded from analysis involving that variable. All
statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS, version 19 (IBM,
New York, USA).
Results
About half of the students reported that
their parents checked their homework, understood their problems,
and knew how the student spent free time most of the time or
always (Table I). Less than 10% reported being
lonely or anxious, but nearly one in four reported symptoms of
depression. Older children reported lower levels of parental
involvement and higher levels of poor mental health than younger
students.
TABLE I Prevalence of Exposures and Outcomes in The Study Population
|
By age (y) |
By sex |
|
13 |
14 |
15 |
P value
|
Female |
Male |
P value
|
|
(n=2010) |
(n=2642) |
(n=2069) |
|
(n=2997) |
(n=3724)
|
|
Parental involvement factors |
Parents checked homework$ |
49.9% |
45.3% |
42.0% |
<0.001* |
45.2% |
46.0% |
0.839 |
Parents understood
problems |
59.1% |
58.7% |
55.8% |
0.006* |
59.1% |
57.0% |
0.023* |
Parents knew how the
student |
53.1% |
51.6% |
49.3% |
0.003* |
53.7% |
49.5% |
<0.001* |
Mental health factors |
Lonely# |
6.2% |
9.2% |
9.9% |
<0.001* |
9.9% |
7.4% |
<0.001* |
Insomnia due to anxiety#
|
6.1% |
7.3% |
8.8% |
0.005* |
8.4% |
6.6% |
0.005* |
Sad and hopeless ³w in
past year |
20.1% |
25.2% |
26.6% |
<0.001* |
23.1% |
24.9% |
0.120 |
No close friends |
10.6% |
11.9% |
9.6% |
0.038* |
10.6% |
11.0% |
0.724 |
$always or most of the time in
past 30 days; #always or most of the time in past year; |
More girls than boys reported high levels of
parental understanding and parental monitoring. Girls also
reported more symptoms of poor mental health, with the highest
rates of reported loneliness, anxiety, and depression occurring
among girls who reported low levels of parental involvement.
Age-adjusted logistic regression models showed that high levels
of parental involvement were consistently associated with a
decreased likelihood of poor mental health for both boys and
girls (Table II).
TABLE II Relation Between Parental Involvement (Always or Most of The Time Vs. Less Often) and Poor Child Mental Health.
|
Parents checked
homework |
Parents understood
problems |
Parents knew how
the
student spent free time |
|
Girls |
Boys |
Girls |
Boys |
Girls |
Boys |
Loneliness |
% with loneliness#
|
8.0 |
6.3 |
7.0 |
5.5 |
7.5 |
6.8 |
% with loneliness#
|
11.5 |
8.4 |
14.7 |
10.3 |
13.1 |
7.9 |
Adjusted odds ratio |
0.69 |
0.76 |
0.45 |
0.51 |
0.54 |
0.86 |
|
(0.54, 0.90)* |
(0.59, 0.98)* |
(0.35, 0.58)* |
(0.39, 0.66) |
(0.42, 0.70) |
(0.66, 1.11) |
Insomnia due toanxiety |
% with anxiety# |
7.5 |
6.2 |
7.1 |
5.4 |
7.2 |
6.6 |
% with anxiety#
|
9.0 |
7.3 |
10.5 |
8.7 |
10.2 |
6.8 |
Adjusted odds ratio |
0.84 |
0.85 |
0.66 |
0.60 |
*0.68 |
0.98 |
|
(0.64, 1.10) |
(0.66, 1.11) |
(0.50, 0.86) |
(0.46, 0.78) |
(0.52, 0.90) |
(0.75, 1.28) |
Sadness & hopelessness |
% sad & hopeless#
|
16.8 |
21.5 |
18.7 |
21.5 |
18.5 |
22.5 |
% sad & hopeless#
|
29.5 |
29.2 |
31.9 |
31.2 |
30.6 |
29.2 |
Adjusted odds ratio |
0.49 |
0.67 |
0.50 |
0.61 |
0.52 |
0.71 |
|
(0.41, 0.59)* |
(0.58, 0.78)* |
(0.42, 0.59) |
(0.52, 0.71) |
(0.43, 0.62) |
(0.61, 0.83) |
No close friends |
% with no close friends#
|
10.5 |
9.4 |
9.7 |
9.8 |
10.0 |
10.5 |
% with no close friends#
|
11.0 |
12.4 |
12.6 |
12.8 |
11.3 |
11.7 |
Adjusted odds ratio |
0.94 |
0.73 |
0.74 |
0.74 |
0.87 |
0.89 |
|
(0.74, 1.07) |
(0.59, 0.90)* |
(0.58, 0.94)* |
(0.60, 0.91)* |
(0.68, 1.11) |
(0.72, 1.11) |
# among those with high parental
involvement; $ among those with low parental
involvement. |
Discussion
This study shows that mental health concerns,
especially symptoms of depression, are common among Indian
adolescents and increase with age. These findings from
nationally-representative data are similar to previous, smaller
studies from several Indian states [10-12].
This study also showed that high levels of
parental involvement with both male and female adolescent
children are associated with reduced odds of poor mental health
among those children. A similar study of students aged 14-16
years in Finland found that parental knowledge of how children
spent their free time was a significant predictor of reduced
odds of depression and anxiety [1], but this finding cannot
necessarily be generalized to other parts of the world. Thus,
this study provides an important new perspective on adolescent
mental health in India. The differences in the strength of the
associations for boys and girls may be a function of sons and
daughters interacting differently with their parents and
perceiving parental support differently.
There were several potential limitations of
this study. The GSHS only includes data from children who attend
school, so the results cannot be generalized to all adolescents
in India, and parental involvement levels and mental health
symptoms were assessed based on students’ self-reports, which
were not validated with direct observation or parental reports.
Even so, this study suggests that parental
involvement is an important factor for positive child mental
health for both boys and girls. Healthcare providers should
encourage parents to be actively involved in their adolescent
children’s lives, since healthy mental well-being in adolescence
plays a key role in positive physical and psychological
development.
Contributors: TH, FA, CMC, JLA, and KHJ
all contributed to the conception of the study, the analysis and
interpretation of the data, and the writing and critical editing
of the manuscript, and all have approved its submission.
Funding: None; Competing interests:
None stated.
What This Study Adds?
• School-going Indian adolescents who
report high levels of parental involvement in their
lives tend to report lower levels of depression,
loneliness, and anxiety.
|
References
1. Fröjd S, Kaltiala-Heino R, Rimpela M. The
association of parental monitoring and family structure with
diverse maladjustment outcomes in middle adolescent boys and
girls. Nord J Psychiatry. 2007;61:296-303.
2. Kerr M, Sattin H. What parents know, how
they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment:
further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring. Dev
Pscyhol. 2000;36:366-80.
3. Masche JG, Barber BK. Connectedness and
separation in parent-adolescent relationships: indicators of a
successful identity development? Paper presented at: Biennial
Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development; Apr
19-22; Minneapolis, MN.2001.
4. Dwairy M, Achoui M. Adolescents –family
connectedness: A first cross-cultural research on parenting and
psychological adjustment of children. J Child Fam Stud.
2010;19:8-15.
5. Dwairy M, Achoui M. Parental control: A
second cross-cultural research on parenting and psychological
adjustment of children. J Child Fam Stud. 2010;19:16-22.
6. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention. Global School-Based Student Health Survey (GSHS)
Overview. Available from
http://www.cdc.gov/gshs/pdf/GSHSOVerview.pdf. Accessed March 28,
2012.
7. World Health Organization. Global
School-based Student Health Survey: India (CBSE) 2007 fact
sheet. Available from
http://www.who.int/chp/gshs/india/en/index.html. Accessed March
28, 2012.
8. Government of India, Ministry of Human
Resource Development, Department of School Education and
Literacy & Department of Higher Education. Annual Report
2007-08. New Delhi: MHRD; 2008.
9. World Health Organization. Global
School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS): 2006 India, central
board of secondary education (CBSE) GSHS questionnaire.
Available from http://www.who.int/chp/gshs/india/en/index.html.
Accessed March 28, 2012.
10. Muzammil K, Kishore S, Semwal J.
Prevalence of psychosocial problems among adolescents in
district Dehradun, Uttarakhand. Indian J Publ Health.
2009;53:18-21.
11. Pathak R, Sharma RC, Parvan UC, Gupta BP,
Ojha RK, Goel NK. Behavioral and emotional problems in school
going adolescents. Australasian Med J. 2011;4:15-21.
12. Mohanraj R, Subbaiah K. Prevalence of
depressive symptoms among urban adolescents in South India. J
Indian Assoc Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2010;6:33-43.
|