1.gif (1892 bytes)

Letters to the Editor

Indian Pediatrics 2004; 41:1183

Reply


The sample size was actually calculated using a beta error of 80% instead of 85%, this is a typographical error and needs correction. The power calculation we understand is more complex than how Dr. Dutta arrived at his values. Posthoc power calculation requires raw data and knowledge of delta values; it cannot be done on processed data. We agree that posthoc power calculation is meaningless. Overall, even if one was to look at our results as per the values of relative risks suggested by his calculation, one can see that our conclusions still hold good.

Regarding his observation on the study being unblinded we have no comments to make. We agree that this is a limitation of the study. The last paragraph of the article in fact mentions that there are limitations in this study and that we would like to see more data from well controlled and designed studies in the specific subgroup of patients of this particular ethnic origin.

We would like to point out that this was a prospective controlled trial of long enough duration and despite the limitations mentioned, we hope that the essential message that indomethacin is a potentially dangerous drug is not lost in the argument.

P. Arun K. Nair,
Senior Consultant and Neonatologist,
NICU, Division of Child Health,
Royal Hospital,
PO Box 1331, PC 111 Seeb,
Sultanate of Oman.

 

Home

Past Issue

About IP

About IAP

Feedback

Links

 Author Info.

  Subscription