Home            Past Issues            About IP            About IAP           Author Information            Subscription            Advertisement              Search  

   
Case Report

Indian Pediatr 2011;48: 235-237

Necrotizing Fasciitis Following BCG Vaccination

 

Rajoo Thapa, Debkrishna Mallick and Biswajit Biswas

From Department of Pediatrics, The Institute of Child Health 2, 11, Dr Biresh Guha Street, Kolkata 700 017, India.

Correspondence to: Rajoo Thapa, Department of Pediatrics, Upstate Medical University Hospitals, 750, E Adams Street, Syracuse, New York, 13210, USA.
Email: [email protected] 

Received: August 6, 2009;
Initial review: September 1, 2009;
Accepted: October 21, 2009.

 


We report a newborn with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus mediated necrotizing fasciitis after Bacilli-Calmette-Guerin vaccination. Radical debridement of the affected area coupled with twice daily surgical honey dressing and intravenous vancomycin and clindamycin resulted in satisfactory healing.

Key words: Bacille-Calmette-Guerin vaccine, Necrotizing fasciitis, Neonate, Staphylococcus aureus.


Necrotizing fasciitis is characterized by vascular thrombosis and necrosis following rapidly spreading bacterial infection of the skin, subcutaneous fat and fascia. Systemic dissemination and toxicity may at times be marked [1]. The most common organisms implicated include Streptococci of groups B, A and D, Staphylococci, Gram-negative Enterobacteriae and anaerobes. We described a neonate that developed Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) necrotizing fasciitis involving the left upper arm following BCG vaccination.

Case Report

A 7 day old previously healthy female neonate, born spontaneously to a non-consanguineous primipara was initially seen for fever associated with swelling and redness over the left upper arm. The baby had received BCG vaccine at our institute, about 18 hours prior to presentation. The inoculation using 26 G hypodermic needle was strictly intradermal, as evidenced by a satisfactory 4 mm bleb formation immediately after the procedure. Sterile saline with cotton was employed to swab clean the proposed site of vaccination. The mother’s antenatal period and delivery were uneventful. Examination revealed an excessively irritable febrile neonate (core temperature 103ºF), with a warm and tender erythematous swelling, involving the outer aspect of the middle third of the left arm (approximately 3 cm below the acromion process 2 cm above the elbow joint). The BCG vaccination site was inflamed. Laboratory investigations revealed a total leukocyte count of 3,800/mm3 (N30L62E4M4), hemoglobin: 19.5 g/dL, platelets: 71,000 /mm3, C-reactive protein: 109.4 mg/L and micro erythrocyte sedimentation rate: 24 mm (first hour). Considering the clinicolaboratory profile, intravenous cefuroxime and amikacin were started empirically. The next twelve hours was characterized by increased toxicity and rapid extension of the swelling to involve nearly the entire arm with deepening overlying erythema and areas of cutaneous sloughing and necrosis. The radiograph of the site showed extensive soft-tissue swelling with interposed air-bubbles (Fig 1). The differentials considered primarily included neonatal gas-gangrene and necrotizing fasciitis. Radical debridement of the lesion was done and empirical intravenous clindamycin was added pending blood cultures. Wound swab culture was sterile for anerobic organisms; however, positive cultures for methicillin resistant S. aureus were obtained. Intravenous vancomycin was started in place of earlier antibiotics; this was continued for 14 days along with intravenous clindamycin and twice daily surgical honey dressing. Blood cultures returned sterile after 3 days. Anti-tetanus prophylaxis was instituted promptly. Laboratory tests directed towards the immune functions of the baby revealed normal immunoglobulin levels and CD counts. The parents tested negative for HIV I and II by ELISA. HIV studies were not done on the neonate. The wound healed satisfactorily by secondary intention without a skin graft over the next three weeks. The baby was revaccinated with BCG on the right arm at one month of age and observed for 4 subsequent days. Spirit and cotton swab was used for the preparation of the proposed vaccination site on this occasion. Finally, she was discharged home on day 35 of life, feeding satisfactorily with steady weight gain. She was healthy on follow up.

 

Fig 1 Plain radiograph of the left arm demonstrating air within the soft tissues around the humerus.

Discussion

Necrotizing fasciitis is rare in newborns. Commonly recognized predisposing events include surgery, trauma, ruptured varicella blisters, and intra-muscular injection sites. The common predisposing factors in newborns include omphalitis, circumcision, bullous impetigo, rectal temperature measurement and electrode placement for vital sign monitoring [2-4]. In the present newborn, no obvious risk factor other than BCG vaccination in the same arm could be identified. BCG may be complicated by local edema and axillary adenitis, but necrotizing fasciitis is rarely reported [5]. This was possibly the result of bacterial infection and inflammation either by trauma induced by the procedure of vaccination or due to hypersensitivity to the vaccine itself. Hypersensitivity to the BCG vaccine could not be excluded in the present child. Isolation of the pathogenic organism from the lesion confirmed the etiology.

The IAPCOI, 2007-2008 recommended exclusive use of sterile saline without local antiseptics (such as spirit) for swabbing the proposed site of BCG vaccination in neonates [6]. The primary intention of the recommendation was to avoid instances of contact of the vaccine which contains live attenuated viable bacilli with antiseptics like spirit which would otherwise cause rapid inactivation of the same [7]. Certain other widely cited sources [8] state that if alcohol be used, it must be allowed to evaporate before the vaccine is given. Sterile saline causes removal of normal skin flora, including S. aureus by virtue of mechanical cleansing. It is known that spirit application on the skin kills the normal skin flora and vegetative organisms like S. aureus by protein denaturation; however, it does not render the skin surface absolutely sterile. Alcohol is a highly volatile substance and majority of it evaporates within few seconds of application on the skin surface. Some would argue that the application of spirit would lead to the absorption of the same and would therefore have deleterious effects on the vaccine containing the live-attenuated tubercle bacilli. Being of a volatile nature, majority of the spirit would vaporize quickly and whatever little that enters the deeper skin structures would prove more efficacious against pathogenic microorganisms that may have entered inadvertently, without undue inactivation of the vaccine bacilli.

Contributors: RT: critical literature review and manuscript preparation; DM: patient care and follow up; BB: patient care and manuscript drafting.

Funding: None.

Competing interests: None stated.

References

1. Legbo JN, Shehu BB. Necrotizing fasciitis: a comparative analysis of 56 cases. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005;97:1692-7.

2. Hsieh WS, Yang PH, Chao HC, Lai JY. Neonatal necrotizing fasciitis: a report of three cases and review of the literature. Pediatrics. 1999;103:e53.

3. Weber DM, Freeman NV, Elhag KM. Periumbilical necrotizing fasciitis in the newborn. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2001;11:86-1.

4. Nazir Z. Necrotizing fasciitis in neonates. Pediatr Surg Int. 2005;21:641-4.

5. Okeniyi JA, Adegbehingbe OO, Dedeke IMF, Olorunnisola OA, Ogunlesi TA, Oginni LM. Post-BCG Axillary necrotizing fasciitis. Internet J Pediatr Neonatol. 2006;6.

6. Singhal T, Amdekar YK, Agarwal RK. IAP Guide book on Immunization, IAP Committee on Immunization 2007-2008. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2009.

7. Tiwari M, John TJ. Skin preparation for BCG inoculation. Indian Pediatr. 1997;34:1135-6.

8. Park K. Park’s Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine. Jabalpur: Bhanot Publishers; 2009.
 

 

Copyright© 1999 by the Indian Pediatrics (Disclaimer)