Home            Past Issues            About IP            About IAP           Author Information            Subscription            Advertisement              Search  

   
research letter

Indian Pediatr 2018;55: 165-166

Feasibility of Helmet-delivered Continous Positive Airway Pressure in
Very Low Birthweight Infants


*Almudena Alonso-Ojembarrena, Antonio Segado-Arenas, Isabel Benavente-Fernández and
Simón Pedro Lubián-López

Department of Pediatrics, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Puerta del Mar University Hospital, Cádiz (Spain).
E-mail: [email protected]

 


We describe our experience with helmet-delivered continuous positive airway pressure in five preterm newborns. We analyzed oxygen requirement, arterial oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, medium arterial pressure, heart rate, apneic spells and patient’s comfort. The patients’ vital signs or pain scale were not different before and after treatment.

Keywords: CPAP, Noninvasive ventilation, Prematurity, Respiratory distress syndrome.


H
elmet-delivered continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is a different interface for the delivery of CPAP when nasal CPAP (nCPAP) is contraindicated as in cleft lip or palate, or in patients with nasal lesions. The Gregory box, developed in the late Sixties, is clearly the forerunner of this helmet [1].  The purpose of this paper is to describe our experience with helmet-delivered CPAP in five very low birth weight (VLBW) infants.

The Infant-Low helmet (CaStar; Starmed, Mirandola, Italy) is made of a clear latex-free flexible material. It is fastened by a harness called ‘baby-body’ that is connected to an elastic collar ensuring a good seal without compression of the patient’s body; in preterm infants, this collar surrounds the body next to the armpits. The input port is connected to an air-oxygen mixer that enables the determination of the desired flow and fraction of inspired oxygen and the output port is connected to a positive end-expiratory pressure valve that allows the regulation of the CPAP level. According to manufacturer’s recommen-dations, we used an input flow of >20 Lpm to avoid CO2 rebreathing [2,3]. We used a mean CPAP of 7 cmH2O (95% CI 5.5-8.5 cmH2O). We measured transcutaneous oxygen saturation, heart rate, non-invasive mean blood pressure, respiratory rate and the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) score [4], nine hours before helmet-delivered CPAP and nine hours after. All parents consented to inclusion of their children’s data in the study.

All patients were neonates born at 32 weeks of gestational age or less, and VLBW at birth; none of them showed signs of pain or discomfort. All responded well to treatment, which enabled CPAP discontinuation in 48-72 hours. The median age at initiation of Helmet device was 4.5 weeks. All patients survived till discharge; none of them developed intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) or white matter disease, and just one was diagnosed as grade II retinopathy of prematurity. Hearing tests were normal in all patients at discharge.

Helmet devices have been tested previously in preterm infants [5], but has not been used in VLBW infants. An earlier study in preterm infants suggested that use of Helmet CPAP reduces cerebral blood flow in the immature brain and could potentially increase the risk of IVH [6]: that is why we used it only after the acute phase of respiratory instability, when the risk for IVH is very low. High noise levels are also a concern in preterm patients, but as published earlier, noise levels are in an acceptable range using earmuffs and filters [7]. The principal limitations of the device are the difficulty to access infants for suction or manipulation, and that it lacks an alarm system when there is loss of pressure inside the chamber.

In conclusion, Helmet CPAP could be an option in newborns when nCPAP is contraindicated.

Contributors: AA-O, AS-A: provided medical treatment to patients described, and manuscript writing; IB-F: provided medical treatment to patients described in the manuscript, and manuscript reviewing; SPL-L: conceptualized the study and manuscript reviewing.

Funding: None; Competing interest: None stated.

References

1. Gregory GA, Kitterman JA, Phibbs RH, Tooley WH, Hamilton WK. Treatment of the idiopathic respiratory distress syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure. N Engl J Med. 1971~284:1333-40.

2. Taccone P, Hess D, Caironi P, Bigatello LM. Continuous positive airway pressure delivered with a "helmet": effects on carbon dioxide rebreathing. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:2090-6.

3. Racca F, Appendini L, Gregoretti C, Varese I, Berta G, Vittone F, et al. Helmet ventilation and carbon dioxide rebreathing: effects of adding a leak at the helmet ports. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:1461-8.

4. Lawrence J, Alcock D, McGrath P, Kay J, MacMurray SB, Dulberg C. The development of a tool to assess neonatal pain. Neonatal Netw. 1993;12:59-66.

5. Trevisanuto D, Grazzina N, Doglioni N, Ferrarese P, Marzari F, Zanardo V. A new device for administration of continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants: comparison with a standard nasal CPAP continuous positive airway pressure system. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31:859-64.

6. Zaramella P, Freato F, Grazzina N, Saraceni E, Vianello A, Chiandetti L. Does helmet CPAP reduce cerebral blood flow and volume by comparison with Infant Flow driver CPAP in preterm neonates? Int Care Med. 2006;32: 1613-9.

7. Hernández-Molina R, Fernández-Zacarías F, Benavente-Fernández I, Jiménez-Gómez G, Lubián-López S. Effect of filters on the noise generated by continuous positive airway pressure delivered via a helmet. Noise Health. 2017;19:20-3.


 

Copyright © 1999-2018 Indian Pediatrics