Home            Past Issues            About IP            About IAP           Author Information            Subscription            Advertisement              Search  

   
editorials

Indian Pediatr 2013;50: 194-195

Alleviating Pain in Neonates – What is The Best?


Ashok Deorari

Department of Pediatrics, WHO Collaborating Centre for Training and Research in Newborn Care,
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi – 110 029, India.
Email: [email protected]



Newborns are often exposed to minor invasive procedures such as venepuncture. Current evidence suggests that neonates are able to perceive pain. Studies have documented that babies born at less than 32 weeks of gestation are exposed to 10-15 painful procedures each day during the first few weeks of life, and in almost 80%, no treatment for pain relief is offered [1]. Pain in neonates is known to cause adverse short and long-term effects. Prolonged or repeated pain also increases the response elicited by future painful stimuli (hyperalgesia) and even by usually non-painful stimuli (allodynia). The consequences include altered pain sensitivity (which may last into adolescence) and permanent neuro-anatomical, behavioral, emotional and learning disabilities [2].

Healthcare providers are constantly on the lookout for a safe and effective pharmacological or non-pharmacological method to alleviate pain in neonates. Orally administered sweet solutions such as glucose and sucrose have been shown to be effective in reducing procedural pain in neonates. One Cochrane review examined 44 randomized trials enrolling 3496 infants for efficacy, effect of dose and safety of sucrose for relieving procedural pain in neonates [3]. Despite significant clinical heterogenicity in the dose of sucrose and tools used to measure effect of pain, there was significant reduction in total cry time and composite pain scores during heel lancing. Expressed breast milk (EBM) which contains 7% lactose is a good physiological alternative [4]. Studies have reported the analgesic effect of breastfeeding before, during and after venepuncture [5].

Despite convincing evidence, routine measurement of indicators of pain and use of pain-relieving measures is limited. Non-availability of sucrose in India and aversion of many neonatologists to administering anything other than breast milk to neonates may be contributing factors. In this issue, Sahoo, et al. [6] report reduced cry duration and pain score on using EBM or 25% dextrose before venepuncture. Their study shows 25% dextrose was more effective; EBM also significantly reduced the cry duration and pain score. Although, this is a well-conducted randomized controlled trial, exclusion of eligible subjects after obtaining consent and allocation of study group is undesirable. Probability of selection bias in such a scenario defeats the purpose of randomization. Administration of high concentration of dextrose can potentially cause hyperglycemia, rebound hypoglycemia and difficulty in subsequent breastfeeding. It is not clear whether investigators looked for these side effects.

There are inherent difficulties in conducting studies on neonatal pain. Standardization of dose of exposure (amount of pain) is difficult. Amount of pain inflicted is dependent on who conducted venepuncture, with what type/brand of needle and how the prick was given. Another concern with studies evaluating measures to reduce pain in neonates is about choice of a valid measure to detect and quantify pain. A recent study has suggested that although sucrose decreases clinical observation scores, there is no reduction in nociceptive brain activity and magnitude or latency of the spinal nociceptive reflex withdrawal response [7]. Whether the ability of sucrose to reduce the pain score or the duration of cry can be interpreted as reduced pain is not clear. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of sucrose, breast milk or other non-pharmacological measures in high-risk groups like extreme premature neonates exposed to repeated painful stimuli. Future studies should aim to report effect of these measures on long-term cognitive and behavioral outcomes.

Competing interests: None stated; Funding: Nil

References

1. Stevens B, McGrath P, Gibbins S, Beyene J, Breau L, Camfield C. Procedural pain in newborns at risk for neurology impairment. Pain. 2003;105:27-35.

2. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Fetus and Newborn, Section on Surgery and Section on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. Prevention and management of pain in the neonate: an update. Pediatrics. 2006;118;2231-41.

3. Stevens B, Yamada J, Ohlsson A. Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; 1. CD001069; CD001069.pub 3.

4. Upadhyay A, Aggarwal R, Narayan S, Joshi M, Paul VK, Deorari AK. Analgesic effect of expressed breast milk in procedural pain in term neonates: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Acta Paediatr. 2004; 93:1-5.

5. Shah PS, Aliwalas LL, Shah VS. Breastfeeding or breast milk for procedural pain in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006; 3:CD004950.

6. Sahoo JP, Rao S, Nesargi S, Ranjit T, Ashok C, Bhat S. Expressed breast milk vs 25% dextrose in procedural pain in neonates, a double blinded randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr. 2013;50:203-7.

7. Slater R, Cornelissen L, Fabrizi L, Patten D, Yoxen J, Worley A, et al. Oral sucrose as an analgesic drug for procedural pain in newborn infants: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2010; 376:1225-32.


 

Copyright © 1999-2012  Indian Pediatrics