|
Indian Pediatr 2013;50: 1085-1086 |
|
Tackling Inequities in Child Survival in
India: Let’s Meet at the Horizon of Pediatrics and Public Health
|
CP Bansal
National President, Indian Academy of Pediatrics,
2013
Correspondence to: Shabd Pratap Hospital, Lashkar, Gwalior, MP.
Email: [email protected]
|
I write this president’s page with great pride, honour and humility
towards all fellow IAPians for giving me opportunity to serve this
prestigious association in the golden jubilee year of Indian Academy of
Pediatrics. It has been a great honour and privilege indeed and I
profusely thank each and every one of you, not only for electing me
president of IAP but supporting the efforts, which I initiated during my
tenure, i.e. Mission Uday and Mission Kishore Uday, IAP TOUCH, BLS
Awareness Program, Child India (our new e-bulletin), Advisory Committee
on Vaccination and Immunization Practices (ACVIP), and Indian College of
Pediatrics.
This entire year has been mesmerising and enriching
for me. During the year, through personal interactions with many of you,
with national and international experts, policy makers and people who
strive to improve health scenario in India, I am convinced about one
major challenge in child survival i.e., ‘inequity in child survival’ in
India.
I was always disturbed by the high infant and child
morbidity and mortality in India and that’s one of the many reasons we
started IAP Mission Uday. As I got deeply engaged in these activities, I
learnt about the wide geographic variations in the morbidity and
mortality; Madhya Pradesh has nearly five times of infant mortality rate
than that of the best performing state of Goa [1]. Besides, there are
wide, disturbing and distressing rural-urban, male-female, rich-poor
differences. These differ-ences in survival exist amongst tribal and
under-served population and in some religious groups also [2,3].
The stark reality is that since independence, there
is only partial success in providing child healthcare to rural and
tribal areas of India, where child morbidities and mortalities are high.
There is no provision of pediatrician at primary health centre level and
nearly three-fourth of the positions of pediatricians at community
health centers are vacant [4]. Majority of pediatricians work in private
sector in the metropolitan and major cities. There are districts and
towns in India, where number of qualified pediatricians for a population
of upto 20,00,000 is in single digit; forcing children to be seen by
unqualified practitioners. Understandably, the progress in India in
reducing child morbidity and mortality is slower than one would expect.
On 17 th
Nov 2013, IAP hosted the Roundtable summit of Pediatric Association of
SAARC countries in New Delhi. I am appalled that infant and child
mortality in India is much higher than Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Nepal.
This is despite the fact that during the last 2 decades, economy of
India has grown faster than these countries. I as a Pediatricians and
IAP President was disappointed by these statistics and thought we need
to accept the shared responsibility and do something immediately. I did
more search and tried to understand why our neighboring countries could
make faster progress in child survival and reducing inequities and not
India. And my interpretation is that the other countries have better
public health interventions and approaches, well supported by
pediatricians. If India has to accelerate child survival and reduce
inequities, our interventions and efforts have to meet at the horizon of
pediatrics and public health.
I urge my fellow IAPians to make efforts to reduce
these inequities in their personal capacity. The importance of taking
care of a sick child and happiness on the face of parents when child
recovers cannot be underestimated. The clinical care is important but
there is need that every opportunity a pediatricians has with parents
and child is used for promoting approaches such as immunization,
breastfeeding, use of oral rehydration solution for diarrhea, and
counselling.
I believe that the pediatricians need to have better
understanding of the epidemiology (burden, differential and causes) of
child morbidity and mortality in the country [5]. Combined with this
understanding and the increasing participation and involvement of IAP
members in the government initiatives such as National Rural Health
Mission (NRHM), National Urban Health Mission (NUHM), Rashtriya Bal
Swasthya Karyakram (RSBY), etc. more actively. Moving from the
sphere of pediatrics to the horizon of public health, where personal
health services meet population health services is part of my vision to
pediatrics in India. I believe that if each one of us IAP member learn
little more about these inequities and pledge to do something to address
these, i.e. volunteering one or two day in a year to serve in rural
area, it would make a huge difference in accelerating child survival and
reducing these inequities.
I have highest respect and admiration for Padma
Bhushan Dr Maharaj K Bhan for his incomparable contribution to child
survival in India. Dr Bhan’s pioneering research in low osmolarity ORS
and rotavirus vaccine has benefitted children across the country. His
leadership and initiative as Secretary of Department of Biotechnology,
Govt. of India has paved the path for India taking lead in many health
research areas in the years to come. He has contributed to both
technical and operational research and is continuously involved in the
national policy decision making and drafting of the national programs
for child survival efforts in India. In true sense, he is amongst the
first Indian pediatricians who have really reached to the horizon where
pediatric care meet public health and made difference in the life of the
millions of children in the community and in most disadvantageous parts
of the country.
There are other leading names who have taken this
path and I specially want to name Dr Pukhraj Bafna for extensive and
exhaustive work on tribal child health and adolescent health; Dr Abhay
Bang has worked on home based newborn care and other efforts in most
disadvantage tribal children in Gadchiroli district of Maharashtra;
amongst contemporaries Dr Naveen Thacker, who has done a lot of work in
public health and his special efforts in NRP has helped in training
hundreds of people to serve at community level apart from his key role
in IDSurv, polio eradication and Mission Uday. These are only a few
examples and there are many more similar people working in this area.
On public health side, I am impressed with Dr
Chandrakant Lahariya for his work and vision to improve child survival
in India. Dr Lahariya is a young, immensely talented and highly
respected public health professional in India, who has significantly
contributed to many activities of IAP including vaccinology courses,
Mission Uday and has been a regular contributor to all major activities
of IAP for last few years.
This gives me hope and conviction that there is merit
in combining pediatrics and public health for mutual benefit. We need
many more people on both side of pediatrics and public health to meet at
this horizon to improve child survival in India. In Pedicon 2013 in
Kolkata, all participants had taken an ‘IAP pledge for child survival’
which aimed at increasing focus upon public health interventions by
pediatricians. To continue further on it, I call upon all fellow
pediatricians to take a pledge that they will do something in personal
capacity to address the existing inequities in India and adopt more of
public health approach in their daily life. If it happens, there is no
reason that inequities are not addressed and child survival is not
accelerated.
Personally for me, if there is any learning from
being IAP president, it is that there is much more can be done by all of
us in personal capacity to accelerate child survival in India. I call
upon you all to join in this momentum and get India free from inequities
in child survival. I see many of you joining on the horizon.
References
1. Sample registration system (SRS) Bulletin, Vol. 47
No.2, October 2012. Available from: http://censusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/SRS_Bulletins/SRS_Bulletin-October_2012.pdf.Accessed
on December 6, 2012.
2. National Family Health Survey-3 (NFHS-3), 2005-06.
Mumbai: ORC Macro and International Institute for Population Sciences;
2007.
3. District Level Household Survey -3 (DLHS-3)
2007-08. Mumbai: ORC Macro and International Institute for Population
Sciences; 2009.
4. Rural Health Statistics 2011. New Delhi: Ministry
of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2012.
5. Lahariya C, Paul VK. Burden, differential and causes of child
deaths in India. Indian J Pediatr. 2010;77:1312-21.
|
|
|
|