Home            Past Issues            About IP            About IAP           Author Information            Subscription            Advertisement              Search  

   
short communication

Indian Pediatr 2009;46: 1085-1087

Surface Area In Children: A Simple Formula


Muhammad Furqan and Anwarul Haque

From the Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

Correspondence to: Dr Anwarul Haque, Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University Hospital, Stadium Road, PO Box 3500, Karachi 74800, Pakistan.
Email: [email protected]

Received: May 23, 2008;
Initial review: June 10, 2008;
Accepted: September 15, 2008.

Published online 2009 April 1.

PII:S097475590800297-2
 

Abstract

We retrospectively compared body surface area (BSA) using the Mosteller formula and a simple weight-based BSA formula ([4Wkg+7]/ [90+Wkg]). The participants were 363 children who underwent cardiac surgery from 1991 to 2000. Their age ranged from 5 days to 18 years, weight ranged from 1.2 kg to 98 kg and height ranged from 38 cm to 178 cm. There was excellent correlation (r2=0.991) between Mosteller formula and the new formula (P <0.001). We propose that the weight-based formula is easy to use and accurate. It can safely replace Mosteller formula and dispense the need for time-consuming calculations.

Key Words: Body surface area, Bodyweight, Child, Mosteller formula.


Measurement of body surface area (BSA) is important in determining the basal metabolic rate, blood volume, cardiac output and renal clearance(1-5). It is also frequently used for calculating drug dosages and parenteral fluid requirements(6). While the direct measurement of BSA is cumbersome, a number of formulae have been developed for its estimation based on height and bodyweight(7-12). The bi-exponential nature of these formulae requires the need for a scientific calculator or computer, which might not be always possible. Of the formulae available, the Mosteller equation is commonly used because of its accuracy. Though, this equation is simpler than other height and weight based equations, it cannot be calculated by a standard calculator because of the requirement of square-root function. Besides mathematical complexity, all these equations require measurement of height. Pediatricians are aware of problems faced in measuring accurate height or supine length in children, and acknowledge the non-reproducible nature of this variable, especially when the situation is emergent. Bodyweight is conveniently measured even in less sophisticated health facilities. The purpose of this study was to calculate BSA from a formula based primarily on bodyweight(12) and compare it with that calculated using the Mosteller formula(10).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed records of children who underwent cardiac surgery during 1991-2000 at Children’s Hospital Illinois, University of Illinois, and College of Medicine at Peoria. This data was maintained by our perfusionist. We included children (newborn to 18 years) who required cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiovascular surgery. The following variables were recorded: age (months), weight (kg) and height (cm). The BSA (m2) values in patient records using Mosteller formula were listed as Group A. A second value of BSA (m2) for each patient was also calculated using a new weight based equation (Group B). The Institutional Review Board of University of Illinois, College of Medicine Peoria approved this study.The formulae for calculating BSA were as follows:

Group A BSA (m2) =

Group B BSA (m2) = (4 × W + 7) ÷ (90 + W)

Where height (H) is measured in cm and weight (W) is measured in kg.

We divided the study population in to four weight categories: (i) 0-9 kg; (ii) 10-19 kg; (iii) 20-29 kg and (iv) ³30 kg. Data were entered and analyzed in SPSS version 14.0. We calculated the mean BSA for each weight category in both groups along with standard error of means. We also computed the Pearson correlation coefficient for each weight category; significance between groups was determined by t-test. Pearson correlation was also applied to all BSA values in both groups regardless of weight. The Bland- Altman analysis was used to determine the mean difference and 95% limits of agreement between Mosteller and new formula for BSA(13).

Results

The study included 373 subjects. Their ages ranged from 5 days to 18 years, weight from 1.2 to 98 kg and height from 38 to 178 cm. Body surface areas of study subjects varied from 0.11 to 1.88 m2 by Mosteller formula and 0.13 to 1.90 m2 by the weight-based formula. Table I shows the number of children in each weight category and their estimated BSA values by both the formulae along with Pearson correlation. The mean±standard error BSA by the Mosteller formula was 0.58±0.23 m2. The mean± standard error BSA by the study formula 0.59±0.24 m2. There was excellent correlation between BSA values from both formulae (P<0.001) (Fig. 1). Bland-Altman plot of differences between the two formulae, versus their respective averages, showed that the mean bias was 0.01 m2 and limits of agreement were between -0.2 to 0.2, i.e. extremely narrow band (means excellent agreement) (Fig. 2).

TABLE I



Body Surface Area (Mean ± Standard Error) by Different Weight Categories Using the Two Formulae 
Wt  No     Group A Group B Pearson P
(kg)     correlation        
 0-9 199 0.28± 0.01 0.29 ± 0.01 0.99 <0.001
10-19 88 0.60 ±0.01 0.60± 0.01 0.89 <0.001
20-29 26 0.90± 0.01 0.87± 0.02 0.84 <0.001
30 + 59 1.42± 0.03 1.43± 0.03 0.93 <0.001
Group A: Mosteller formula; Group B: New formula.

Fig. 1 Correlation between body surface area (BSA) comparing Mosteller and new formula.

 

Fig. 2 Bland-Altman plot showing average of Mosteller formula (BS-A) and new formula (BSA-B) on X-axis and differences of Mosteller formula (BS-A) and new formula (BSA-B) on Y-axis.

Discussion

Measurement of BSA is still a cumbersome task. BSA nomogram and web-based BSA calculators are frequently used in clinical practices instead of measuring BSA directly.

Benefits of using the weight-based formula are manifold. Not only does it dispense with the hassle of exponential complexities, it also circumvents the difficulties of measuring accurate height in very small or sick children for incorporation in Mosteller formula. Our finding of an excellent correlation between these two formulae (r2=0.99) establishes the accuracy of the weight-based formula besides highlighting its user-friendliness. This easy formula with its impressive correlation and agreement, can potentially replace the Mosteller formula in pediatric population especially in emergent situations where ease of calculation is more important than accuracy. Further studies are needed to validate the clinical application of this formula.

There are several limitations in this study. The study is retrospective, and a single center based. The weight-based formula may have the same limitations as Mosteller formula since both give similar BSA values. We did not compare the study formula with the Mosteller formula in population other than pediatric nor did we account for variations in weight (normal versus underweight versus obese subjects) in the same age groups.

Acknowledgment

We appreciate the cooperation of Data Management Unit, Department of Pediatrics, and Aga Khan University for help in data analysis and Dr Fatima Mir for reviewing the manuscript.

Funding:  None.

Competing interest:  None stated.

References

1. Krovetz LJ. The physiologic significance of body surface area. J Pediatr 1965; 67: 841-862.

2. Wang Y, Moss J, Thisted R. Predictors of body surface area. J Clin Anesth 1992; 4: 4-10.

3. Bailey BJ, Brias GL, Estimating the surface area of the human body. Stat Med 1996; 15: 1325-1332.

4. Nwoye LO, Al-shehri M. A formula for the estimation of the body surface area of Saudi male adults. Saudi Med J 2003; 24: 1341-1346.

5. Gibson S, Nauma A. The importance of metabolic rate and the folly of body surface area calculations. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 50-83.

6. Lack JA, Stuart-Taylor ME. Calculation of drug dosage and body surface area of children. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78: 601-605.

7. DuBois D, DuBois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Int Med 1916; 17: 863-871.

8. Gehan EA, George SL. Estimation of human body surface area from height and weight. Cancer Chemother Rep 1970; 54: 225-235.

9. Haycock GB, Schwartz GJ, Wisotsky DH. Geometric method for measuring body surface area: A height-weight formula validated in infants, children and adults. J Pediatr 1978; 93: 62-66.

10. Mosteller RD. Simplified calculation of body surface area. N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 1098.

11. Lindahl S, Okmian L. Bedside calculation of body surface area for infants and children. Crit Care Med 1981; 9: 778-779.

12. Silverman BK. Practical Information. In: Fleisher GR, Ludwig S, eds. Textbook of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, 5th edn. Philadelphia, Lippincott William & Wilkins; 2005. p.2014.

13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical agreement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310.
 

 

Copyright© 1999 by the Indian Pediatrics (Disclaimer)