1.gif (1892 bytes)

Brief Report

Indian Pediatrics 1998; 35:765-767 

Acute Segmental Enteritis


Utpal Kant Singh
Purnendu Ojha
Ranjan Kumar Sinha
Sanjay Suman

 

From the Department of Pediatrics, Patna Medical College, Patna 800 004, India.

Reprint requests: Dr. Utpal Kant Singh, 8 Rajendra Nagar, Patna 800016, India.

Manuscript received: June 30,
1997; Initial review completed: August 12, 1997;
Revision accepted: March
2, 1998.

 

Acute segmental enteritis (ASE) is an inflammatory disorder of small bowel that may present as a surgical emergency in children(1-3). ASE is uncommon in most parts of the world, but a relatively high incidence of this disease has been reported

from some parts of India and China(1-6). The clinical features are vague and include acute abdominal pain, bilious vomiting, fever, abdominal distension, leukocytosis and radiological evidence of obstruction or peritonitis in a previously healthy child.

Early diagnosis and conservative management carries a good prognosis, without any long term sequelae(1-5). Surgical intervention is not required in most cases and carries a high mortality rate. We report our experience with diagnosis, management and the outcome of 220 children with ASE.

Subjects and Methods

Two hundred and twenty children with a provisional diagnosis of acute segmental enteritis were managed during the five year period from March, 1990 to December, 1995. The diagnostic criteria for ASE included acute generalized abdominal pain with or without bilious vomiting, constitutional features of inflammation (fever, leukocytosis, etc.), radiological evidence of intestinal obstruction with contrast X-ray showing segmental narrowing of intestine with proximal dilatation. Other acute abdominal conditions were differentiated from ASE on clinical and laboratory investigations like plain abdominal radiograph, contrast X-ray and ultrasonography.

Initially, 28 children underwent surgical treatment with resection and end to end anastomosis of affected segment of small intestine. After observing a high mortality rate (8/28, i.e. 28.5%), we shifted to conservative management. One hundred and ninety two children were managed with intravenous fluids, nasogastric suction and broad spectrum antibiotics. Laparotomy was reserved for cases developing complications or showing signs of deterioration during conservative management.

Results

There were 182 boys and 38 girls with ages varying from 3 to 12 years. About half were from lower socio-economic group and rice Was the staple food in a majority of cases. Past history and family history were non-contributory. Most presented during summer months with a peak incidence (63%) between May and July. Various presenting features included abdominal pain (100%), bilious vomiting (53.6%), abdominal distension and muscle guarding (30.4% and 27.2%, respectively). Absolute constipation, an important feature of mechanical intestinal obstruction was present in only 12.7% cases. Features of acute inflammation like fever and leukocytosis was present in 90% and 92% cases, respectively.

Out of 192 children managed conservatively, 16 required surgical intervention for various reasons like pneumoperitoneum (n = 2), frank peritonitis, (n = 1), deteriorating general condition during conservative
management (n = 7) and no signs of improvement for 5 or more days of conservative management (n = 6). Out of these 16 children, 5 died post-operatively, a mortality rate of 31.2%. A total of 176 children were managed conservatively and all but two (1.1 %) made uneventful recovery - (Table I).

Discussion

ASE is an uncommon inflammatory disorder of small intestine. Various synonyms have been used in literature to describe similar conditions like segmental jejunitis, segmental obstructing enteritis and segmental necrotizing enteritis. A similar condition reported from Yugoslavia in 1951, was called Pasini disease because it was first described by Joseper Pasini(7).

 

TABLE I

 Management and Outcome in 220 Cases of ASE.

Management No. Mortality (%)
A. Surgery as primary
    treatment modality
28 8 (28.5)
B. Conservative management    
    I. Required surgery for
       complication
16 5 (31.2)
    II. Improved by conservative
       management
176 2 (1.1)
Total 220 15 (6.8)



The pathology of this uncommon condition described in literature included edema and congestion of small bowel, hemorrhage with patchy areas of necrosis and ulceration. Gangrenous change without perforation are known to occur at times. All these pathological variations were observed in our series. Some children (13/28) had involvement of the jejunum only, whereas others (15/28) had involvement of jejunum and ileum. The accompanying enlarged lymph nodes showed non-specific reactive hyperplasia.
The etiology of ASE is uncertain. But the seasonal incidence, leukocytosis and good response to antibiotics favors an infective etiology(5). Kalani et al.(1) concluded that the disease is reversible in early stages with supportive management but once gangrenous changes occur, surgical intervention seems to be mandatory.

In our present series primary surgical treatment with resection of all the affected segment, resulted in poor outcome (mortality rate of 28.5%); whereas a conservative approach produced favorable outcome, with a mortality rate of 3.6% (7/192) only. In patients (16/192 i.e., 8.3%) requiring surgical intervention during course of conser
vative management, the mortality rate of 31.2% (5/16) was not much higher than 28.5% mortality in patients managed by surgery as the primary modality of treatment. It may be noted that surgery was done in the sickest children.

It appears from our observations that though the etiology of acute segmental enteritis is unknown, the disease appears to be basically a disorder that shows favorable outcome with conservative management. Surgery is required only in a small number of patients. Therefore, it may be suggested that once a diagnosis of ASE is made, the initial approach should be conservative. However, the criteria for diagnosis of ASE are still vague, so a cautious approach towards diagnosis is required.
 

 References


1. Kalani BP, Shekhawat NS, Sogani KC Acute segmental necrotizing enteritis in children. Am J Dis Child 1985; 139: 586- 588.

2. Narayanan R, Bhargava BN, Kabra SG, Sangal BC Segmental necrotising jejunitis. Lancet 1987; 2: 1517-1518.

3. Sharma AK, Shekhawat NS, Behari S, Chandra S, Sogani KC Nonspecific jejunitis: A challenging problem in children. Am
J gastroenterol 1986; 81: 428- 431.

4. Rai AN, Prasad PR, Prasad SN, Tiwari PK. Epidemic regional jejunitis: A new clinical entity? Lancet 1987; 2: 1020.


5. Lee HC, Huang FY, Hsu CH, Sheu JC, Shih SL. Acute segmental obstructing enteritis in children J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1994; 18: 82-86.

6. Welch TP, Sunitswan S. Acute segmental ischemic enteritis in Thailand. Br
J Surg 1975; 62: 716-710.

7. Pasini J. Acute segmental enteritis.
In: Proceeding of XIVth Congress of International Society of Surgery, Allergy and Abdominal Surgery, Paris, 1951; p 679.

Home

Past Issue

About IP

About IAP

Feedback

Links

 Author Info.

  Subscription