|
Indian Pediatr 2016;53:
311-313 |
|
Stress in Fathers of Premature Newborns
Admitted in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
|
Sourabh Dutta, Rama Mahajan, Sunil K Agrawal,
*Ritu Nehra and Anil
Narang
From Departments of Pediatrics and *Psychiatry,
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research,
Chandigarh, India
Correspondence to: Dr Sourabh Dutta, Professor,
Department of Pediatrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education
and Research, Chandigarh 160 012, India.
Email:
[email protected]
Received: July 25, 2015;
Initial review: September 26, 2015;
Accepted: January 14, 2016.
|
Objective:
To study stress in fathers of preterm infants admitted in a neonatal
intensive care unit.
Methods: Questionnaire-based study. Questionnaire
included domains on infant’s health, maternal illness, staff behavior,
parental role, home affairs and finances. Eligible fathers were
repeatedly interviewed on day 7 (n=80), day 17 (n=59) and
day 27 (n=28). Raw and standardized stress scores were
calculated.
Results: Financial burden was the main stressor
at all times. Stress related to staff behavior and altered parental role
reduced with time. Birthweight and father’s age, occupation and
education independently predicted stress.
Conclusions: Fathers of preterm infants admitted
in hospital are stressed, primarily due to financial burden.
Keywords: Neonate, Prematurity, Psychological, Stress.
|
T he care of a premature infant admitted into a
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) is stressful for the family.
Research has primarily focused on mothers and only recently has stress
among fathers been studied [1-7]. Reports on parental stress from
developing countries and from cultural minorities in Western countries
suggest that the causes of stress and responses thereof do not always
fit into the Western paradigm [8-10]. We planned this study with the
objective of quantifying the stress perceived by fathers of preterm
infants requiring NICU care in India.
Methods
We conducted this prospective cohort study in a level
III public sector neonatal unit of Northern India, that caters to a
middle-class and lower-middle class population. Very few families have a
health insurance or employee health cover. The Institute’s Ethics
Committee approved the study.
We developed a 67-item Paternal Stress Questionnaire
in Hindi language. First, we collated candidate items from a previous
questionnaire [11], from inputs by our staff, and from unstructured
interviews of parents, and rephrased the items in conversational Hindi
language. Secondly, items were removed for inadequate comprehensibility
and duplication. Items were rated as ‘applicable’ or ‘not applicable’,
and ‘applicable’ items were rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1: not
stressful, 2: mildly stressful, 3: moderately stressful and 4: extremely
stressful). Based on a pilot study, we excluded items that >75% fathers
considered inapplicable or ambiguous. The remaining 67 items were spread
across 6 domains: infant’s health, maternal illness, staff behavior,
parental role, home affairs and finances (Table I). Thirty
fathers of normal healthy term infants rated all 67 items as being
either ‘not applicable’ or ‘not stressful’. The raw scores of each
domain were expressed as Domain-specific Percent Stress Scores (DPSS) of
the maximum possible domain score. Mean Percent Stress Score (MPSS) was
the arithmetic mean of the six DPSS.
TABLE I Summary of 67-item Paternal Stress Questionnaire in Hindi
Domain name |
Description |
No of items |
Cronbach’s a |
Baby health |
Appearance and health of baby |
21 |
0.80 |
Maternal illness |
Maternal illness/ ability to care for baby |
9 |
0.63 |
Staff behavior |
Attitude of staff and hospital facilities |
16 |
0.71 |
Parental role |
Alteration of parental role |
9 |
0.80 |
Home affairs |
Neglect of home affairs & other children |
6 |
0.82 |
Finances |
Financial burden |
6 |
0.82 |
We included fathers of singleton neonates (gestation
<35 weeks and birth weight <1501 g) admitted in our NICU for
³5 days. We excluded
fathers of neonates with major malformations or terminal illnesses. We
conducted the first interview on day 7 and repeated twice at 10-day
intervals during hospital stay.
We recorded neonatal demographic data and the
following factors: father’s and mother’s occupation, education and age;
family income, duration of marriage, gravidity, number of previous
preterm babies, duration of antenatal stay in hospital, and family size.
The key outcome was the MPSS. We recruited a
convenient sample size of 80 subjects as there was no previous similar
study for sample size calculation. We compared differences between
scores by the appropriate tests for related groups. We assessed the
predictors of the MPSS of the first interview by univariate followed by
multivariate backward stepwise linear regression.
Results
We interviewed 80 fathers on day 7; subsequently 59
and 28 of them and of them were interviewed on day 17 and day 27,
respectively. The declining numbers were due to intervening discharges
or deaths. The median (IQR) of fathers’ age was 29 (27,34.5) years,
family income was Rs. 3000 (1800, 7000), duration of marriage was 3
(1,6) years, gravidity was 2 (1,3), and duration of antenatal hospital
stay was 2 (1,5) days. Forty-five (56.2%) fathers were educated beyond
10 th grade, 38.4% between
6-10th grade and 9.6% to
less than 6th grade. The mean (SD) gestational age of included neonates
was 31.0 (1.7) weeks and birth weight 1194.5 (203.4) grams. Within each
interview, there were significant differences in the DPSS between
domains (Web Table I). At each interview, the maximum
stress was caused by financial burden.
We compared the first and second interviews among
fathers who were available for both interviews (Web Table I).
Responses were highly correlated (P<0.001). The total stress
score showed a declining trend. Raw stress scores of staff behavior and
parental role decreased significantly, and of finances and home affairs
showed an increasing trend. When we compared results of all three
interviews, stress score of parental role showed significant decline,
but the total score were largely unchanged (Web Table I).
On univariate analysis, mother’s age, father’s age,
family income, birth weight, educational and occupational status of
father were either associated with or had a trend towards association
with the MPSS in the first interview (Web Table II). On
multivariate analysis, father’s age, birth weight, father educated to
11-12 grade and father employed as either daily wager or skilled
labourer were independent predictors of the MPSS (Table II).
As mother’s age was highly correlated with father’s age (r > 0.8) on
testing for multicollinearity, we dropped mother’s age from the model.
Table II Multivariate Linear Regression Models of Risk Factors for Predicting the Mean Percent Stress Scores
Risk factor |
Unstandardized coefficient |
95% confidence interval |
P value |
Father’s age (y) |
–0.009 |
–0.02, –0.002 |
0.02 |
Birth weight (g) |
–0.0002 |
–0.0004, –6.4 |
0.04 |
Father’s education <6 grade
|
0.09 |
–0.06, 2 |
0.2 |
Father’s education status 6-10 grade
|
–0.1 |
–0.2, 0.02 |
0.09 |
Father’s education 11-12 grade
|
–0.2 |
–0.3, –0.04 |
0.01 |
Father’s occupation daily wager
|
0.2 |
0.03, 0.3 |
0.02 |
Father’s occupation skilled labour
|
0.2 |
0.03, 0.3 |
0.02 |
Constant |
0.862 |
|
<0.001 |
Discussion
We found that fathers of very low birth weight
newborns admitted to the NICU are stressed due to financial burden,
alteration of parental role and concern about home affairs. There was a
decline in stress due to staff behavior and alteration of parental role
over time, and a trend toward increasing stress due to home affairs and
finances.
An earlier study among Chinese-American fathers
reported stress by the infant’s appearance, altered parental role and
the health care provider’s communication [12]. In another study from
Turkey, fathers were stressed by altered parental role [13]. In a
longitudinal study on 35 fathers of very preterm infants, the stress
scores did not change from day 7 to 35 of life [5]. An altered parental
role was a common cause of stress in all the above studies, as well as
in our study. However, financial burden, which was an important and
progressively increasing cause of stress in our study, was not studied
previously. In the absence of universal health insurance and inadequate
governmental spending on health, parents make huge out-of-pocket
expenditures [14,15]. The independent predictors of stress – occupation,
education and age – are also indirectly related to financial well-being.
Since stress perception may be influenced by one’s cultural background
and available social support, the results of this study may not be
generalizable to all parts of the world.
We conclude that fathers of premature newborns
requiring NICU care face a high degree of stress, the major stressors
being financial difficulties, altered parental role and concern about
home affairs. Healthcare personnel in NICUs must recognize that fathers
of preterm infants go through a lot of stress, and should undertake
appropriate measures to ease their stress.
Contributors: SD: planned the study, designed the
questionnaire, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; RM: helped to
design the questionnaire and collected the data; SA: wrote the 1st draft
of the manuscript and analyzed part of the data; RN: helped to design
the questionnaire; AN: helped to plan the study, supervised the study
and finalized the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of
manuscript.
Funding: None; Competing interests: None
stated.
What This Study Adds?
• Fathers of preterm infants admitted in neonatal intensive
care unit suffer from a great deal of stress: the major
stressors being financial difficulties, altered parental role
and concern about home affairs.
|
References
1. Jackson K, Ternestedt BM, Schollin J. From
alienation to familiarity: Experiences of mothers and fathers of preterm
infants. J Adv Nurs. 2003;43:120-9.
2. Lundqvist P , Jakobsson L. Swedish men’s
experiences of becoming fathers to their preterm infants. Neonatal
Netw.2003;22:25-31.
3. Arockiasamy V, Holsti L, Albersheim S. Fathers’
experiences in the neonatal intensive care unit: A search for control.
Pediatrics. 2008;121:e215-22.
4. Joseph RA, Mackley AB, Davis CG, Spear ML, Locke
RG. Stress in fathers of surgical neonatal intensive care unit babies.
Adv Neonatal Care. 2007;7:321-5.
5. Mackley AB, Locke RG, Spear ML, Joseph R.
Forgotten parent: NICU paternal emotional response. Adv Neonatal Care.
2010;10:200-3.
6. Matricardi S, Agostino R, Fedeli C, Montirosso R.
Mothers are not fathers: Differences between parents in the reduction of
stress levels after a parental intervention in a NICU. Acta Paediatr.
2013;102:8-14.
7. Lee TY, Wang MM, Lin KC, Kao CH. The effectiveness
of early intervention on paternal stress for fathers of premature
infants admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit. J Adv Nurs.
2013;69:1085-95.
8. Heidari H, Hasanpour M, Fooladi M. The Iranian
parents of premature infants in NICU experience stigma of shame. Med Arh.
2012;66:35-40.
9. Ichijima E, Kirk R, Hornblow A. Parental support
in neonatal intensive care units: A cross-cultural comparison between
New Zealand and Japan. J Pediatr Nurs. 2011;26:206-15.
10. Bracht M, Kandankery A, Nodwell S, Stade B.
Cultural differences and parental responses to the preterm infant at
risk: Strategies for supporting families. Neonatal Netw. 2002;21:31-8.
11. Miles MS, Funk SG, Carlson J. Parental Stressor
Scale: Neonatal intensive care unit. Nurs Res. 1993;42:148-52.
12. Lee SY, Lee KA, Rankin SH, Alkon A, Weiss SJ.
Acculturation and stress in Chinese-American parents of infants cared
for in the intensive care unit. Adv Neonatal Care. 2005;5:315-28.
13. Turan T, Basbakkal Z, Ozbek S. Effect of nursing
interventions on stressors of parents of premature infants in neonatal
intensive care unit. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17:2856-66.
14. Narang A, Kiran PS, Kumar P. Cost of neonatal
intensive care in a tertiary care center. Indian Pediatr.
2005;42:989-97.
15. Tripathi N, Saini SK, Prinja S. Impact of Janani
Shishu Sureksha Karyakram on out-of-pocket expenditure among urban slum
dwellers in Northern India. Indian Pediatr. 2014;51:475-7.
|
|
|
|